- 1,322
- 614
- Thread starter
- #41
Bump
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s not that. I’m saying it’s an assumption to have the size of it when we are just throwing around ideas of how big it ish There are other instances in series that had the same idea of what’s going on here but were rejectedI'm not sure if people can see it or not but did I not literally just provide evidence? Is there an error or something?
It's literally just stated to be perfect recreations of stars in our galaxy, what more is there to prove?It’s not that. I’m saying it’s an assumption to have the size of it when we are just throwing around ideas of how big it ish There are other instances in series that had the same idea of what’s going on here but were rejected
…..my friend is has nothing to do with that stars. I’m talking about the size of the dimension for the rating game.It's literally just stated to be perfect recreations of stars in our galaxy, what more is there to prove?
They state that everything there is an exact replication of a real place.…..my friend is has nothing to do with that stars. I’m talking about the size of the dimension for the rating game.
EDIT: i have shit memory but where was it said that they recreation of stars?
EDIT 2: ok nvm I found it….where in the world did u get that even the stars are the same as IRL? it only says earthly material locations/things….
No they only said the school was an exact replica. U have to prove that even the sky is a recreation itself, for all we know only the area they take them is the small area of the recreated space but everything around them is still irl….and again for the umpteenth time….im talking more towards the size of the dimensionThey state that everything there is an exact replication of a real place.
We see stars in them, stars exist in the real world a well.
Having a starry sky is indicative of size.
And you still haven't shown any indication or justifiable reasoning as to why they aren't real.
OKAY SO LET's GO THROUGH THIS AGAIN…..my friend is has nothing to do with that stars. I’m talking about the size of the dimension for the rating game.
EDIT: i have shit memory but where was it said that they recreation of stars?
EDIT 2: ok nvm I found it….where in the world did u get that even the stars are the same as IRL? it only says earthly material locations/things….
There are different fields created each time a rating game was held, the first example i showed didn't have any stars, the point was showing that objects created there are replicas of things in the human world, use common sense, if the ground is real, why wouldn't the sky be? As am I.No they only said the school was an exact replica. U have to prove that even the sky is a recreation itself, for all we know only the area they take them is the small area of the recreated space but everything around them is still irl….and again for the umpteenth time….im talking more towards the size of the dimension
EDIT: if the sky was actually created they would had said “everything” but they didn’t
EDIT 2: why in the world would they even recreate space if the battle is the ground???
Cool let it be known that there are a few series that literally went to the same thing (there’s a star in the dimension) that was created yet it was rejected because they don’t know the SIZE of itOKAY SO LET's GO THROUGH THIS AGAIN
If I create a pocket dimension, and the pocket dimension has stars in it alongside various other things, then I have created the stars, because the stars did not COME with the pocket dimension already I CREATED THEM.
In order for a pocket dimension to CONTAIN stars like that, it needs to be AT LEAST 4-A in size.
If the text says everything created in the Rating Game world is like it's real life version, then one can assume that the stars, that showed up when the rating game was created are also real, and were created as well.
How many times must we do this
No it was said the school was created. If it was said that everything was created then Grayfia would had included it in what she saidIf the text says everything created in the Rating Game world is like it's real life version, then one can assume that the stars, that showed up when the rating game was created are also real, and were created as well.
If it wasn't an exact representation of the stars in our galaxies, then it wouldn't perfect to begin, wouldn't it?…..my friend is has nothing to do with that stars. I’m talking about the size of the dimension for the rating game.
EDIT: i have shit memory but where was it said that they recreation of stars?
EDIT 2: ok nvm I found it….where in the world did u get that even the stars are the same as IRL? it only says earthly material locations/things….
Thank you a ton, does this mean that it can be applied or is there a wait period?Sorry it took so long, but I agree with Curry.
I forgot FC Staff don't count as a vote. But, Tier 2 or higher needs 1 Admin at minimum.Isn't 2-A need at least 3 staffs?? or at least 2 admins??
Not to be doubtful, but where is that rule stated exactly?Isn't 2-A need at least 3 staffs?? or at least 2 admins??
And one Admin did agreeI forgot FC Staff don't count as a vote. But, Tier 2 or higher needs 1 Admin at minimum.
Not to be doubtful, but where is that rule stated exactly?
Idek, some threads about 2-A peoples said that, so.......Not to be doubtful, but where is that rule stated exactly?
So its fine, 1 Admin agree, and 1 TM agree, I can make the changes now right?
Can you point me to that standard? I never heard that before. We have to prove stars in the sky are real now?I said multiple times that you nees to prove those are actual stars bruhh, it is standard
Just wanted to cover everything, it was my second blog on the site, I apologize for its lack of depth.For the blog, I can't lie it is pretty hard to go through. Some of these scans kinda suck/feel unnecessary. And the organization is pretty outdated.
I agree with the tiers of Hell and Heaven.
I don't think I agree with High 3-A Human Realm. I don't see anything about infinite size. The Touki doesn't seem to possess infinite volume.
2-A Dimensional Void doesn't really work since it's just a void between dimensions. As far as I know, it'd just be unquantifiable, even if it is infinite. Though it is possible you could scale people who affect the entire void to the amount of separate planes (space-times) it encompasses.
You also can't just assume it contains infinite-space times inside.
Infinite density =/= infinite volume. There seems to be people who have infinite energy but that doesn't mean the Realm is infinite.If there is density, there is volume.
The scans on the blog do not show any qualitative superiority.It isn't just a void between dimensions, it is what contains DxD. I proved qualitative superiority within the blog, and if it's infinite and possesses qualitative superiority to a 3D Realm, it would be Infinite on a 4D scale thus being 2-A.
The density or volume wasn't the point, it's infinite mass which is a requirement for High 3-AInfinite density =/= infinite volume. There seems to be people who have infinite energy but that doesn't mean the Realm is infinite.
I don't mind saying that the Human Realm is its own space-time/universe though. I just don't think this is solid evidence for infinite size.
The scans on the blog do not show any qualitative superiority.
It's pretty clear judging by how it is described this is just your typical void between dimensions, which is outside of time and space. It is described as being boundless nothingness that connects all the planes. It is also verifiably timeless since time stop doesn't work there.
By the way, I don't know where you got this idea, but being "infinite on a 4D scale" is not 2-A—by itself, that would only be Low 2-C. Space-time continuums themselves are already infinitely large 4D constructs. 2-A would be a structure that hosts an infinite amount of said constructs.
The most you can scale the Dimensional Gap to is the amount of space-times it is holding, hence why I suggested 2-C above.
Already applied, I'd just like the thread to be closed.Masque still seems to make sense, and besides we have 2 staff agreements, one being an admin and one being thread mod so we can apply this to the cosmology now.
Edit: Does great red even have a profile?
I'm gonna drop this point since I don't think it matters in the grand scheme of things. I think the Human Realm is Low 2-C.The density or volume wasn't the point, it's infinite mass which is a requirement for High 3-A
"Several days" can just be in reference to that person's perception of time.Check the Dimensional Gap section again
Contains the rest of DxD as I proved and it isn't timeless, just beyond the different space times. Not verifiably timeless,
"[After you defeated Shalba Beelzebub, you used up all your strength in the artificial dimension which was crumbling. After that, the artificial dimension collapsed completely. Great Red passed by coincidentally. Then, Ophis rode on Great Red while taking you with her. This is the Dimensional Gap. By the way, several days have passed since then.]
So, now it’s like this, huh. To meet Great Red by chance…I am really lucky. So, this is the Dimensional Gap. It’s a mysterious place…"
Finite 3D with the addition of a Temporal Dimension is Low 2-C. Very Different from an already 4D realm spatially that is then stated to be Infinite.
Even of we talking about literal stars, it is Multi-Solar at most??, having time doesn't mean it is an entire universe on it own, like, pocket space-time is a thing. Beside Ultima still not really change Low 2-C standard yetBut like... Forget stars, there is even a scan that confirms Hell even runs on its own time. That's enough for me to say these are probably their own entire universes.
There is a LN profileDoes great red even have a profile?
???, i don't remember such a thing in novel, also infinite timeline isn't matter, cause timeline contain dimensional gap, mythology realms, Earth, etc.....so you can scale anything to it, no one ever affect these amount of timelineinfinite timeline statements
The person who was in control of the Dimensional Gap for the longest known period of time, who is also the most knowledgeable of it making the statement begs to differ."Several days" can just be in reference to that person's perception of time.
Being "beyond" space-time doesn't necessarily mean it transcends space-time, especially when you pair it with the context that it is:
1. Between/Outside of dimensions (Space-times)
2. An infinite Void/Emptiness
3. Timeless
It makes more sense to me that this is just an infinite unquantifiable realm between/encompassing the dimensions in the multiverse.
So it would just scale to the amount of space-times it holds.
I would urge staff to recheck this.