• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Theglassman12
Reaction score
10,899

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Hi Glass, hope you are good, just need one more staff for my CRT, can you check it?
    Hello,can you evaluate this crt?
    excuse me, can you evaluate this crt??
    Hello! if you have time, can you please check this out?

    Hello! if you have time, can you please check this out?

    Excuse me for disturbing you I would like to have the opinion please
    Please, your input



    Hi. Sorry for bothering you but would you like to comment on this Thread? Only one more vote left.

    If you don't want to comment then i apologize for causing troubles.
    Hey, can you give your input on this thread and especially its counter arguments? We really need another staff input before it becomes a 11 page CRT like it once happened (most arguments were resumed on page 4 btw)
    Could you please look at this thread?
    One small CRT eval pls, thanks!


    HI! Would you mind answering this question (preferably both of them, but whichever one fits your repertoire of knowledge more closely).
    hey Glass can you check if this guy qualifies for acausality type 5? thanks
    Could you perhaps check this thread? Thanks! 🙏

    Theglassman12
    Theglassman12
    Not a tokyo ghoul expert, you're better off asking someone else, sorry.
    NikHelton
    NikHelton
    fairly simple scaling is described there; new calculations are simply made.
    Other moderators are just busy and don't respond
    NikHelton
    NikHelton
    Can you help, please?
    Hey, Glass, posted the last part of the FFVII CRTs for now. Can you take a look when you have a minute? Thanks in advance, dude.

    Sorry to interrupt, but could you help me with this question?

    Hey Glassman, since I've seen you have some knowledge on Super Dragon Ball Heroes I was wondering if you could give me your thoughts on a CRT I wish to do. It's not to add exotic abilities or anything, but some (hopefully) simple additions:

    Basically I wish to give CC Goku all the hax and resistances that he has in the Dragon Ball Super anime up until DBS Broly where it diverges from canon. This is because the anime of Super is considered the "official" version of Super that the CC timeline continues after as stated in a number of sources like the Dragon Ball Battle Hour, an event that Bandai Namco holds for the future of DB games, the production team of Heroes, and official guidebooks. Basically I just want to know if there's enough evidence from my part to give CC Goku all his Super counterpart's abilities and resistances.

    BTW if you're concerned that this might be used to upgrade canon Dragon Ball by me saying that Super is canon to Heroes then don't worry, the other half of my CRT will be to add a note to the game page for Dragon Ball which explains why Super is canon to Heroes but Heroes isn't canon to Super in return. So that's all I have to ask and I thank you in advance for whatever it is you say.
    Glass we need your help in this thread🙏
    Hello! if you have time, can you please check these out?

    Mind evaluating this (Sorry if discussion is a bit long😭)?
    Hello! if you have time, can you please check these out?

    Could you evaluate this? Need just 1 more vote

    Hello, glass, I was having a bit of a confusion at what rating to use for a certain thing, so the question :

    There is a thing called "Soul"[as a whole], which has 3 layers, "Ego", encompassed by "Core", and that than encompassed by "Soul"[the Layer that's actually called Soul], and all of this is made of information[type 2]

    • if you destroy the Soul[the actual soul layer], its stated that a being "ceases to exist" and "disappear" and "their existence collapses", "reduced to nonexistence" but they can still reincarnate, basically, they can resurrect after existence erasure of this level, because their core still remains, as long as that remains, they can reincarnate
    • yet if you destroy a "core", they won't be able to resurrect, its true death, no resurrection or reincarnation

    does that make a "Core" Nonexistent [Aspect type 4{information]?
    Theglassman12
    Theglassman12
    No since it’s not damaged, let alone erased whatsoever. It would only be nonexistent if it was already erased in the first place.
    Astral_Trinity439
    Astral_Trinity439
    I see, than how would we distinguish between the info type 2 of core and the info type 2 of soul? Like if a unique character could regen from even a core, would his HGR still be the same as characters that regened from soul only? [in this case both are info type 2 so would would be HGR]
    Do we just give it a "Layered" or "Enhanced" or something?
    Theglassman12
    Theglassman12
    That doesn’t really sound like enhanced regen since that doesn’t make any sense without it going the higher tier of regen. If there’s still information left then that just means all the information is still there, so they wouldn’t have high godly since they still have that remaining and it didn’t get destroyed only for them to regenerate it.
    Can you sign off on this?
    I don't believe it would be in anyone's best interest to rile up tensions on the thread further by addressing the comment there, so I will say this here.

    If you promise that when it’s done that this will be closed when it’s concluded or dormant then sure, I’ll drop this topic and leave it be.

    You will drop the topic and leave it be not because someone else will concede to your demand, but because you have been warned already earlier in the thread for continuing the topic and you have promptly ignored this warning.

    If how these threads have been handled and Deagonx's conduct therein is worthy of this vitriol, then take it up with me privately. You will be heard out and respected for your concerns. If it is not worthy of this vitriol, then separate yourself from the discussion until you no longer feel it. There is no excuse for perpetuating this drama at this stage. Every point you could have made has been made.
    Hi, could you please check out this thread? It's a pretty simple calc application
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top