Hello, if someone gives me permission to post their sandbox for a CRT, will I be allowed to or does it have to be mine?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

The main purpose of this forum is to discuss how to properly index the statistics of characters from a wide variety of different fictional franchises.
You can't force people to interact with a thread. It doesn't really seem like other communities would avoid the problem, though some may be more predisposed to some things than others (like SpaceBattles being less interested in some weebshit but more interested in things like Star Wars). There is also the consideration of what your end goal actually is; if it is just to interact with people over a certain verse, moving to a community that likes that verse more might help. If it is to present the information as VS Battles does it (that is, to a large audience with the level of peer review we have), then you're sort of stuck for options, I think. Most non-VSBW places get by on the argument of freedom, as opposed to critical inspection. If your goal is just to make the profiles, and you don't especially care about peer review, there are definitely places that use VSBW's structure without our need to verify and inspect everything; this would seem like a better fit, imo.
If you did want to stay on VS Battles with these projects, I don't really have much advice beyond keep at it, many mods (including myself) try to give extra attention to verses that specifically receive less attention. Without knowing your CRT work that well, I'd also suggest, abstractly, to try and keep CRTs concise, while also making them impactful and not too frequent. There are shitloads of CRTs in the ocean of VSBW, and it seems to me, from the review side of things, that many users sort of like to engage in what I will refer to as "CRT Feng Shui", in which they will constantly generate more and more to micro-adjust a verse, rather than trying to get it down the first time. If there's nothing much to add, we will relitigate some past issue, ad infinitum. Review fatigue comes in, for me, when I am asked to look at a CRT that is the third iteration of the exact same topic in the past year. CRTs with clearly acceptable content (not vague extrapolations) that are meaningful are more likely to be handled than the usual dross, because they don't require the same workload, even if they have the same amount of content.
On a personal note: I have many, many verses that I have added to the wiki, most of which have no other supporters around. I have been in the shoes of a user who makes CRTs for something rather niche, only to have it receive no real traction or attention. It is what it is. I wish you godspeed, no matter your choice.

Reactions: AthelChan