• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Mr. Bambu
Reaction score
22,312

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Silence after one message means I missed it; silence after two means "no".
    Hello Mr. Bambu, it's me again (sorry for bothering you so much). I'm about to make an important development for a universe I love, and I opened a Q/A for this. Your feedback is very important to me, thank you in advance!
    Bambu, mind later checking a CRT that would be relevant to the leading author questions? Because to know if it's count as leading or no. Since I do have talked with other admins that something like Q&As or interviews are allowed
    Hi, can you check out this thread.

    If you, perhaps, could check this thread whenever you have some time, it would be appreciated! Thank you in advance!

    Quick question, Bambu, a character strangling someone until passing out counts as AP, LS or both?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    LS, I believe. Breaking bones, which might be involved, is AP.
    Tomfer
    Tomfer
    Hey Bambu,

    I was hoping you could look at this CRT?

    Btw as for the LMK characters resistance to spatial and time manip, you dont need to remove the ones that tanked the Samadhi fire as it was already approved that you gain such resists from it. You can just change the references

    You can however remove the resists from characters that haven't resisted the Samadhi Fire like Azure
    Sdjlakjh
    Sdjlakjh
    Also I would like for you to join in a LMK crt addressing the author stating that LMK characters are beyond physical laws
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I don't know what LMK is, nor anything about what you're talking about. Without some context, I can't be of any help. I will state plainly that author statements gained via request is unusable- that clarification you asked for can't be used.
    Internet access is pretty much in the toilet at the moment, and it seems it will be for a few days. Do not expect assistance here.
    ey,can i ask you a question?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I was not expecting that to be the question.

    It has many of the same issues as the other one. For example, rather than list his P&A as a tabber, you have "in his true form he gets:", which isn't strictly outside the policy but is weird. There's tons of places where spaces should be where they are not. Your Tier section is in "quotation marks", as if the page itself doubts whether the character is actually that tier. There's other minor grammatical things (using "an" where it should be "a" and vice versa, names not being capitalized, etc) as well.

    On a more strict set of issues, your evidence for Wall level does not link to a character destroying the door or the calculation for that feat- it should link to both. By a similar measure, it cites the ability to "run into walls without dying" as wall level, when this is verifiably not the case.

    It needs a great deal of cleanup, basically. Manageable, but absolutely necessary.
    Homie890
    hmm,i see,thanks for the explaination chief
    (kinda wacky on how,even this being the sixth or fifth sandbox i make for faith characters,it still has the same mistakes as the first one)
    Homie890
    added the 9-b dura justificatives,changed the quotation marks into {}},and fixed a few of the grammar mistakes.
    Hello could you help evaluate this CRT?
    Am wondering since my CRT recently finished just debunking these arguments? Also isn't their a rule that prevents the same arguments and scans for being used within 3 months of getting debunked?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Am wondering since my CRT recently finished just debunking these arguments?
    I don't know what you mean by this.

    Also isn't their a rule that prevents the same arguments and scans for being used within 3 months of getting debunked?
    Per our Discussion Rules:

    "When creating content revisions, it is essential to ensure that the topic has not been addressed previously. Rejected content revisions cannot be resubmitted within a short period of time (typically defined as within 3 to 4 months), except in cases where a staff member has a good reason to do so (e.g. important unconsidered information, violation of site standards, or flaws in a calculation). This only applies to threads that have received extensive debate or have been rejected due to a clear conflict with the wiki's rules or standards. If a thread passes or is rejected without significant opposition, then opposition should not be restricted from making a point."
    Could you please check out this P&A revision?
    Just a quick question.

    If Character A's ability is removed, and Character B's ability is solely reliant on that ability, do we need a new CRT to remove Character's B ability/resistance?
    Dark_Soul20189
    Dark_Soul20189
    We have been removing lots of abilities in CRTs related to instant death verse, for example, their NEP.
    But we have missed that some profiles have gained nonexistence erasure, for "erasing" that person that now has lost their NEP.

    This is just one of many such examples I could find.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    If it is a missed ability like that, then it should be removed. Bear in mind that if it exists on a page for different reasons, you obviously need a CRT to remove it. So, be careful.
    Dark_Soul20189
    Dark_Soul20189
    Yeah, Will only focus on does, the rest will be removed with CRT's like I have been doing so far.
    Really minor CRT, easy to look over

    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    So is your proposal to consider the feat "At least 5-C, possibly 5-C+", now?

    I don't think it's perfect, because it takes into account things like the formation of tectonic plates, it seems like, but at this point my care has diminished to a nub.
    Flashlight237
    Flashlight237
    If that's what you want to roll with, then yes, that's my proposal.


    ^Just requesting for both these threads to be closed, please and thanks.
    Mahek_The_Assassin_Silent_Killer
    ^As usual, just using this extra message to make sure welp (again, "Silence after one message means I missed it; silence after two means "no""), sorry in advance for the notifs 😅
    If you have some free time, I would love it if you could check this out, should be short and simple.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    You must be a newer user

    I don't help with the HST, as well as a selection of other verses, due to the toxicity inherent in them. Even accepting a calc leads to lengthy processes by some other sub faction of that fandom making an opposing calc and arguing contextual information about x or y or z. It's a waste of man hours, and as I already don't like the given media... no, I will not check it out. I wish you luck in getting it evaluated.
    Faa_Tzy
    Faa_Tzy
    Fair enough, sorry for the inconvenience.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    No inconvenience caused. I do mean it- good luck.
    Would love to have your input here, should be pretty self-evident.
    I know you're not really into anime that much, but could you take a look at this calc (it's literally just 2 lines of text)

    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Man.

    If any of the HST ******** are hesitantly permissible despite my HST embargo, it probably is One Piece, but I really don't want to encourage people to drop these calcs on my doorstep like a cat delivering dead mice.

    So, tell you what- if nobody else responds in two days, I'll do it. I'd rather not, though.
    Kachon123
    Kachon123
    I appreciate it and don't blame you, haha
    Check this out

    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    me-who-has-literally-purchased-every-single-warhammer-dlc-v0-e1sidibcbxgb1.jpg
    Ar1216789
    Trying to get this CRT to finish, would it be possible for you to ping more staff, or the neutral ones?
    Hi Bambu, can you check out this thread.
    Robo432343
    Robo432343
    goku
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I have no idea what staff would be chill with Bleach, to be honest I get the impression that many have joined in my disdain for the verse due to the toxicity that tends to come along with it. If the Usual Suspects of anime have not replied, I don't know who would do so happily.
    ReaperAndBlues
    ReaperAndBlues
    I messaged Lephyr and DDM (They usually fw Bleach), but they haven't responded yet. I might shoot over another tomorrow morning. Thanks anyways Bambu

    May need staff opinions for this cause it's a forum-system-related question (even if a relatively innocent small one), would like your help in both providing your opinion and notifying other staff members for their input and opinions as well.
    Mahek_The_Assassin_Silent_Killer
    ^Sorry, but just leaving this here to ensure you did not miss it and also so that I know for sure that an absence of a reply means you're disinterested (as according to your profile bio/status, as in "Silence after one message means I missed it; silence after two means "no".")
    vote here
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    no lol
    Ar1216789
    Ar1216789
    yes lol
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I think Ninjago is a pretty stupid verse and I dislike Cookie Run from the get-go for being mobile game slop. Sorry man, I'll stick to the CRT side of things- I get no entertainment value out of either end, but at least CRTs have like. A mechanical purpose.
    Please check this and tell me if u approve it or not

    Hello bambu, sorry to come here again, but I hope you are well, I just wanted to ask you to look at this brief calculation, It is simple and straightforward and was based on one you already reviewed, When you can, could you please rate it?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    haven't even gotten to the last one yet, but maybe, yeah.
    Xaropadob3ta
    Xaropadob3ta
    Okay, thanks, this calculation will serve as support 🙏🏻, Have a great day 🙏🏻
    Hi, could you give your input on this small CRT? Thanks in advance
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top