• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Acheron's Acausality and Stuff (NEED STAFF VOTES PLEASE)

I am crying. You heard it here everyone. ANYBODY who has secrets follows the Path of Nihility.
So explain to me how a planet’s history can be erased but there are still scrolls that have information about the planet’s history?
Who says that History EE means that history books are destroyed 😭😭
Because it was abruptly destroyed. No one knows why except IX and parts of izumo’s past remains a mystery that can only be answered by IX yet he wont say anything because hes a bum. They cant place it down in a timeline because they only have bits and pieces of the history
You really gotta stop saying that. It's one of the worst arguments you have been presenting.
Plungin explained pretty well how this can be
Not really.
it obscured the history of izumo. It doesnt have to be history erasure for this to be true
Nihility does not obscure.
Ok and why does the power of nihility default to summoning IX shadows? Anyone who follows the path of nihility used the path’s powers so can random pathstriders summon IX shadows aswell? No. None of them can. Actually acheron explicitly has to travel to a shadow of IX at the horizon if existence
You're so crazily misinformed it's mind-numbing. There's no Pathstriders of Nihility broski. They are all Self-Annihilators.
Id like to ask you to reread the quote because thats not what it says at all. Is merely an assumption

And again it could be ANY black hole it doesnt have to be a shadow of IX
Except since it's coming from a Self-Annihilator, it most likely is.
This is explicitly only a enigmata and nihility thing.
No. The first thing Himeko and Welt tell us is that all Paths are quite mysterious and people aren't knowldgable on them.
he doesnt like IX so he creates the opposite of a black hole.

no one has seen the real IX so he'd make the opposite of IX's shadow because thats the closest thing to IX
?
so he creates a while hole...
Yes. Which is essentially a refined black hole coming from IX.
your quote implies that all black holes are shadows of IX. Of course no one can actually confirm whether or not a black hole is or isnt a shadow of IX but the fact that not all black holes are shadows of IX means that you need EXPLICIT proof of it being a shadow of IX such as the one at the horizon of existence
Lol. No you don't. And words such as the one you boldened have never been an issue before.
just a comparrison.
No. The word "shadow" almost always refers to IX's shadows.
2-A BAIHENG?!?!?!?!?!?!?!???? SELF ANNIHILIATOR???
Quite possibly yes! People have been theorising it was either a Stellaron or a Shadow. As you already saw, Shadows of IX can fit even inside Memory Bubbles!! So it's quite possibly that!!!
assumption. no one knows the real form of IX
XDXDXDXDXDXDXDXD ok guys time to nuke Black Hole Physiology from IX's profile. Open the threads yall! Start the count!!!
well we know this because its stated to be one. notice how it has proof that its a shadow of IX?
So... we have black holes coming from self-annihilators, shadows are stated to be black holes... self annihilators are the only ones we've seen use them... but we need an explicit statement saying "Hey, this black hole used in this fight, is actually a shadow". Please, go to bed.
no one is saying they arent, the problem is there also exists black holes that ARENT shadows of IX (dark zones, star of eden, normal ass black holes) you'd have to have proof that a black hole is a shadow of IX. zephyro's white hole falls under the same issue of not being confirmed to be one either.
Not if they come from self-annihilators that have NO other powers except Nihility.
also about that nihility passive powernull thing
Memories aren't always stored locally. The garden keeps them too. And again, Nihility doesn't conceal. If anything, memories are destroyed like I said in the OP.
 
I can't reply again......

@PlungingThroughTime
So... all black holes are shadows of IX? This is also a massive leap of logic with no scans supporting this.
Uhh... the black holes stemming from self-annihilators are NOT shadows of ix despite them only treading on that path and having no other powers? What else could they be? Do randoms possess the ability of black hole creation? Unlikely.
 
Sure I guess. March doesn't have Ice powers because she's a child of ansa-w/e. It's an innate ability. Ice isn't a power of Remembrance. Flame isn't a byproduct of destruction either I guess. Light manip doesn't belong to order/harmony either.
 
I am crying. You heard it here everyone. ANYBODY who has secrets follows the Path of Nihility.

THIS IS A MASSIVE LEAP IN LOGIC TO ASSUME EVERYONE WHO HAS SECRETS FOLLOWS NIHILITY

in almost EVERY description we see of people following nihility THEY LITERALLY DIE

However, as THEIR presence is shrouded in mist and mystery, there have been many a scholar who thought they have received revelations from the Aeon, causing them to leave all behind to seek Nihility's gloom without giving thought or concern to their own safety. In the end, none of them ever returned.

#2

Dan Heng (Chinese: 丹恒) is a playable character in Honkai: Star Rail.

The cold and reserved train guard and archivist of the Astral Express. Wielding a spear named Cloud-Piercer, he joined the Express crew to escape his secluded past.

Mythus's origins are predictably unknown

mythus follows nihility
Who says that History EE means that history books are destroyed 😭😭
so you cant explain how there are scrolls about a planet's history that has supposedly been erased from the timeline as you have claimed many times in this crt.

if it's history was really erased the information on the scrolls should have gone as well
You really gotta stop saying that. It's one of the worst arguments you have been presenting.
multiple people have argued this in this CRT so that might mean something
Not really.
shrug
Nihility does not obscure.

You're so crazily misinformed it's mind-numbing. There's no Pathstriders of Nihility broski. They are all Self-Annihilators.
dude. you've literally been arguing self annihilators are NOT nihility emanators

Please notice the quotation marks. It CLEARLY shows that these are the words of THOSE that believe Generals weren't Emanators. The wiki, had already categorized them as Emanators and a part of the community did as well because of the original, Chinese text that categorized both Emanators and some Self-Annihilators as Emanators.
From the HSR Wiki which is well-curated and trustworthy:

This is basically a repeat of the "Generals =/= Emanators" situation again and the last 2 patches have proven this to not be the case. There's no reason to think this situation is any different.
these are YOUR words. if self annihilators arent nihility emanators then they are just mere pathstriders.
Except since it's coming from a Self-Annihilator, it most likely is
actually there is no author. this would be an omniscient reader which you seemingly had a problem with in the OP
.

No. The first thing Himeko and Welt tell us is that all Paths are quite mysterious and people aren't knowldgable on them.
this is has been expanded upon the only aeons that are still considered mysterious are mythus and IX as mythus embodies the path of mystery like i mentioned before.
This is explicitly only a enigmata and nihility thing.
though i will admit i was a bit wrong because Fuli is also described as having Enigmatic origins
...There are plenty of mysterious Aeons in the universe, and Fuli is particularly enigmatic. Nobody in the entire Genius Society and the IPC and the Intelligentsia Guild knows when THEY were even born.
however this was before we ever saw Fuli in the story and we saw Fuli being born kindaish so take this as you will
?

Yes. Which is essentially a refined black hole coming from IX.
proof its from IX? proof its a shadow of IX?
Lol. No you don't. And words such as the one you boldened have never been an issue before.
so are you saying that all black holes are IX shadows or not? because the arguments youve presented seem like you're saying both
No. The word "shadow" almost always refers to IX's shadows.
yes and like i said before its just comparing their existence to that of a shadow of IX. nothing more
Quite possibly yes! People have been theorising it was either a Stellaron or a Shadow. As you already saw, Shadows of IX can fit even inside Memory Bubbles!! So it's quite possibly that!!!
IMG-8515.png

XDXDXDXDXDXDXDXD ok guys time to nuke Black Hole Physiology from IX's profile. Open the threads yall! Start the count!!!
no need because his shadows are still black holes.
So... we have black holes coming from self-annihilators, shadows are stated to be black holes... self annihilators are the only ones we've seen use them..

. but we need an explicit statement saying "Hey, this black hole used in this fight, is actually a shadow". Please, go to bed.
yes we do need this. because not every black hole is a shadow of IX. this is something YOU YOURSELF agreed with
yes that is true. not ALL black holes are shadows of ix. but zephyro's and the other self-annihilators' ARE. I literally linked you THIS that straight up says a LOT of black holes are IX's shadows.
Not if they come from self-annihilators that have NO other powers except Nihility.
dawg

we dont even accept zephyro as a nihility emanator which supports my previous argument about nihility pathstriders
Memories aren't always stored locally. The garden keeps them too. And again, Nihility doesn't conceal. If anything, memories are destroyed like I said in the OP.
Uhuh..

Uhuh..

Uhuh..
 
I can't reply again......

@PlungingThroughTime

Uhh... the black holes stemming from self-annihilators are NOT shadows of ix despite them only treading on that path and having no other powers? What else could they be? Do randoms possess the ability of black hole creation? Unlikely.
Sure I guess. March doesn't have Ice powers because she's a child of ansa-w/e. It's an innate ability. Ice isn't a power of Remembrance. Flame isn't a byproduct of destruction either I guess. Light manip doesn't belong to order/harmony either.
false equivelences.

Ice has been shown to be used by EVERY PCOA from march to evernight to cyrene. it is consistant

we see phantylia use fire or at least something akin to heat

we know zephyro can summon supernovas

of course we'd need more proof for the other lord ravangers but it seems pretty consistant

HOWEVER i will say irontomb, at least from my memory, doesnt use fire attacks so yea this can go as a universal ig

Light manip is such a broad ability any path can get this im not seeing why this has to be order or harmony

we've never seen a self annihilator summon a shadow of IX. the only time any self annihilator has been shown near one ingame was acheron at the horizon of existence which she has to travel to, she doesnt summon it
 
THIS IS A MASSIVE LEAP IN LOGIC TO ASSUME EVERYONE WHO HAS SECRETS FOLLOWS NIHILITY

in almost EVERY description we see of people following nihility THEY LITERALLY DIE
Girl thats irony. You yourself see the word "hide" and synonyms and make a run for it.
so you cant explain how there are scrolls about a planet's history that has supposedly been erased from the timeline as you have claimed many times in this crt.

if it's history was really erased the information on the scrolls should have gone as well
No it shouldn't. That's not how it works. History or Info manip does not need to destroy every record on a multiversal scale.
dude. you've literally been arguing self annihilators are NOT nihility emanators
You really are something. Not all self-annihilators are emanators but all pathstriders of nihility are self-annihilators. I can't help you if you don't try yourself.
actually there is no author. this would be an omniscient reader which you seemingly had a problem with in the OP
What are you even talkin about? I am talking about who's making the black holes. If it's coming from a self-annihilator its a shadow. Keep in mind, since you admitted that the black hole in the Horizon is both, what are you even arguing for? This means Acheron should automatically get it.
this is has been expanded upon the only aeons that are still considered mysterious are mythus and IX as mythus embodies the path of mystery like i mentioned before.
Himeko: A cloud of mystery shrouds the Aeons. I heard Madam Herta recruited a team to try and solve the mysteries about THEM.
Himeko: Aeons are the most mysterious beings in the galaxy.
Himeko: The birth of an Aeon gives rise to a Path. The nature of the Paths remains a mystery

Yes bro it's only mythus and ix.
proof its from IX? proof its a shadow of IX?
Yep. Zephyro is a self-annihilator. Black hole creation is part of nihility's arsenal. Black holes are shadows of ix.
so are you saying that all black holes are IX shadows or not? because the arguments youve presented seem like you're saying both
Those that are made by self-annihilators are.
we dont even accept zephyro as a nihility emanator which supports my previous argument about nihility pathstriders
Not my fault you haven't been indexing properly...
8dz8cjnkaj0c1.png

false equivelences.

Ice has been shown to be used by EVERY PCOA from march to evernight to cyrene. it is consistant
Lmfao dpmo. the equivalences are fine. Don't use those buzzwords randomly.

ice, as you can even see in remembrance's profile, is a power belonging to remembrance.
we see phantylia use fire or at least something akin to heat
and? she's a dual emanator.
we know zephyro can summon supernovas
yes cuz he's also an emanator of destruction.
of course we'd need more proof for the other lord ravangers but it seems pretty consistant
genuinely what are u saying? its been largerly already accepted that the ravagers are dual emanators/pathstriders.
 
There will be no end if both you @Nighting4l33yes and @Mbpoops keep arguing more and more.

Both of you should just post your complete summaries, make them as detailed as necessary, and then wait for staff input. If you keep responding to each other, this discussion will never end and the pages will just keep piling up.

I’m saying this for both of your own good and in a nice tone (trust). Come on, don't we all want a CRT to end quickly because there are other agendas besides this?
 
Last edited:
There will be no end if both you @Nighting4l33yes and @Mbpoops keep arguing more and more.

Both of you should just post your complete summaries, make them as detailed as necessary, and then wait for staff input. If you keep responding to each other, this discussion will never end and the pages will just keep piling up.

I’m saying this for both of your own good and in a nice tone (trust).
Frankly, I think my og post is already detailed. I don't mind editing in a few more things I and leaving it there
 
Girl thats irony. You yourself see the word "hide" and synonyms and make a run for it.
except you word it like everyone with a secret follows nihility
I am crying. You heard it here everyone. ANYBODY who has secrets follows the Path of Nihility.
No it shouldn't. That's not how it works. History or Info manip does not need to destroy every record on a multiversal scale.
"the history was erased but the historical records of the place still exist" is literally what you're saying

so how can there be scrolls containing information about the history of izumo if izumo's history was erased?

You really are something. Not all self-annihilators are emanators but all pathstriders of nihility are self-annihilators. I can't help you if you don't try yourself.
so... there are nihility pathstriders. we agree right?
What are you even talkin about? I am talking about who's making the black holes. If it's coming from a self-annihilator its a shadow
in the passage theres literally no confirmed reader so its likely an omniscient reader

Screenshot-2026-05-29-190113.png

. Keep in mind, since you admitted that the black hole in the Horizon is both, what are you even arguing for? This means Acheron should automatically get it.
was your argument not for them summoning one? im arguing against the summoning aspect for it. acheron already has this on her profile its just not summoning.
Himeko: A cloud of mystery shrouds the Aeons. I heard Madam Herta recruited a team to try and solve the mysteries about THEM.
Himeko: Aeons are the most mysterious beings in the galaxy.
Himeko: The birth of an Aeon gives rise to a Path. The nature of the Paths remains a mystery

Yes bro it's only mythus and ix.
yet we have databank entries explaining most aeon's lore. the only ones that are labeled mysterious are mythus Fuli and IX
Yep. Zephyro is a self-annihilator. Black hole creation is part of nihility's arsenal. Black holes are shadows of ix.
but not ALL black holes are shadows of IX. thats the problem. you need explicit proof that the one they are summoning is a shadow, they usually go out their way when they do this by calling it a shadow of IX.
Those that are made by self-annihilators are.
proof?
Not my fault you haven't been indexing properly...
its indexed correctly. you yourserlf even admit that not all self annihilators are emanators, is there any proof zephyro is a nihility emanator?
8dz8cjnkaj0c1.png


Lmfao dpmo. the equivalences are fine. Don't use those buzzwords randomly.

ice, as you can even see in remembrance's profile, is a power belonging to remembrance.
they arent fine because you're equating abilities that have actual showings rather than vague, flowery statements
and? she's a dual emanator.
shes not an emanator of abundance only pathstrider
yes cuz he's also an emanator of destruction.
hes ONLY an emenator of destruction.

also i thought self annihilators could only use nihility abilities?
Not if they come from self-annihilators that have NO other powers except Nihility.
genuinely what are u saying? its been largerly already accepted that the ravagers are dual emanators/pathstriders.
there literally hasnt been a double emanator in lore only an emanator that is also a pathstrider of another path

for example:

evanescia (Abundance emanator and elation pathstrider)
 
There will be no end if both you @Nighting4l33yes and @Mbpoops keep arguing more and more.

Both of you should just post your complete summaries, make them as detailed as necessary, and then wait for staff input. If you keep responding to each other, this discussion will never end and the pages will just keep piling up.

I’m saying this for both of your own good and in a nice tone (trust). Come on, don't we all want a CRT to end quickly because there are other agendas besides this?
its a hoyo crt. do these ever end "quickly"
 
Frankly, I think my og post is already detailed. I don't mind editing in a few more things I and leaving it there
That’s good then. Now you just need to wait for the staff to come. If some people disagree, then so be it. You can argue with them, just don’t drag it on for too long. If the staff asks about the opposing arguments, just present them along with your og post. There’s no need to keep dragging this out.

its a hoyo crt. do these ever end "quickly"
It'll be quick if people don't keep larping nonsense and stay on the topic.
 
yet we have databank entries explaining most aeon's lore. the only ones that are labeled mysterious are mythus Fuli and IX
Also, these are wrong btw and are constantly updated. We thought we knew about Fuli and yet she's not even born yet
is there any proof zephyro is a nihility emanator?
Lol.... Did you like not read the HSR wiki link?
"Dr. Primitive's quote at the end of the article discussing the nature of Self-Annihilators is highlighted, implying "-the few who can single-handedly withstand the encroachment of Nihility on their existences" to be Emanators of Nihility."
Essentially, the Self-Annihilators that can last long and not die and live many many years like Zephyro and Acheron, are Emanators.
also i thought self annihilators could only use nihility abilities?
...? Those that are only self annihilators... yes...?
 
Last edited:
all of this is just stuff i already said

You: We thought we knew about Fuli and yet she's not even born yet

ME: however this was before we ever saw Fuli in the story and we saw Fuli being born kindaish so take this as you will

and the rest isnt even substantial enough to respond to so ill leave it at this
 
And importantly, the issue is not merely "a planet exploded." A civilization with millennia of history and interstellar recognition should have left behind overwhelming external memory, records, cultural traces, communications, and acknowledgment throughout the wider cosmos. Yet the narrative repeatedly emphasizes uncertainty surrounding its very existence. That is not adequately explained by "scientists are confused" alone.

You act like this confusion wouldn't be normal. Several history revisionist groups exist within HSR. History Fictionologists and The Riddlers are two immediate examples. both of these are Enigmata factions and as we know:
Due to its sudden destruction, Izumo's history is all but lost in the modern day. A group of Armed Archaeologists once ventured to the remains but could only find the Enigmata there.
So, their confusion and Remembrance being destroyed could as easily be an effect of Enigmata rather than Nihility.

The language here sounds more like unrecoverable knowledge after a book burning rather than literal causality being changed and the effect of Izumo's history being erased. You think this is what happened, but Acheron's existence itself and simple scrolls defy this 'effect' from the 'cause' being changed.

(We don't even know for certain if IX destroyed the planet or Acheron, some places list Acheron, some places list IX)

Also, we don't actually know if Izumo reached out of its solar system, or how long it was around for. These are just presumptions and I haven't seen you provide a source. Izumo and Takamagahara Divine Realm were two planets orbitting a 'pitch-black great sun' which was the Shadow of IX.
It seemed like they were known about BY civilisation but hadn't been outreached to.
 
The language here sounds more like unrecoverable knowledge after a book burning rather than literal causality being changed and the effect of Izumo's history being erased. You think this is what happened, but Acheron's existence itself and simple scrolls defy this 'effect' from the 'cause' being changed.
No it doesn't... She's become an acausal existence and that's literally why she has resistance to causality manip, history manip and spacetime manip from surviving the slash she did to her own planet with nihility and her blade that severs causality as it affected her too. The existence of the scrolls prove nothing. We already know the civilization was built on magic and mystical powers. Them surviving hardly matters.
When the Cloud Knights' Vernalbolt Fleet arrived at the coordinates, the planet had been destroyed without any survivors remaining. It was categorized as a "deadworld," and deleted from the astral charts.
This here establishes the normal process by which planets disappear from astral charts. The world is first discovered, its destruction is confirmed, it is categorized as a deadworld, and only then is it removed from the charts through administrative action. Izumo was WIPED universally from ALL charts with no traces left behind likely even from already printed out charts since we know they come in this form too. Now, unless you're gonna tell me that any history-obscuring factions are capable of multiverse level deception that can go and wipe out every system, book, map, digital map, idk if you really believe that yourself.
Also, we don't actually know if Izumo reached out of its solar system, or how long it was around for. These are just presumptions and I haven't seen you provide a source. Izumo and Takamagahara Divine Realm were two planets orbitting a 'pitch-black great sun' which was the Shadow of IX.
The source is that it existed on astral charts and this means it was discovered and communicated with.
(We don't even know for certain if IX destroyed the planet or Acheron, some places list Acheron, some places list IX)
I literally explain this throughout the thread. Can yall start reading? The planets were lost to the Shadow but Acheron delivered the final strike.
 
No it doesn't... She's become an acausal existence and that's literally why she has resistance to causality manip, history manip and spacetime manip from surviving the slash she did to her own planet with nihility and her blade that severs causality as it affected her too. The existence of the scrolls prove nothing. We already know the civilization was built on magic and mystical powers. Them surviving hardly matters.
You know this has nothing to do with type 4 acausality right..?
This here establishes the normal process by which planets disappear from astral charts. The world is first discovered, its destruction is confirmed, it is categorized as a deadworld, and only then is it removed from the charts through administrative action. Izumo was WIPED universally from ALL charts with
no traces left behind likely even from already printed out charts since we know they come in this form too. Now, unless you're gonna tell me that any history-obscuring factions are capable of multiverse level deception that can go and wipe out every system, book, map, digital map, idk if you really believe that yourself.
“with no traces left behind”

1) A point that was raised in the previous thread was this: "There's remnants of Izumo such as scrolls, theories and observations

Your own OP debunks this claim of it being completely wiped from the charts. They have scrolls of it so there are some traces left behind
The source is that it existed on astral charts and this means it was discovered and communicated with.
He asked for a source. Can your provide it?
I literally explain this throughout the thread. Can yall start reading? The planets were lost to the Shadow but Acheron delivered the final strike.
So she destroyed the planets. Its just hoyo using flowery language
 
Well yes, that's what I mean. There's been a multi-page back-and-forth, I would assume you'd want to have your current arguments well presented.
So basically summarizing my arguments.

Acausality type 4 is irregular or how its more commonly applied "unconventional" causality is when you do something (cause) and something else happens that wasnt supposed to happen (effect)


for example:


I peel an orange (cause)


the orange falls (effect)


its unconvventional because thats not what normally happens.


normal causality example:


i peel an orange (cause)


orange is peeled (effect)


None of the scans on the OP have supported this type of causality it only supports type 1 acausality, which is impossible to achieve in a conventional way for the verse due to MWI.

Elio's script:


As clarified in my previous thread, Acheron not appearing in Firefly's could be for a number of reasons why she isnt there hell theres even implications and showings that acheron appears in scripts.


For starters, Elio never gives the full script. simple as that the OP has not provided enough evidence that elio gave her a full script.


secondly, as i found out later in this thread Acheron does show up in scripts. the entirety of 3.8 takes place in a random script the dahlia found. guess who the script writer is and guess who appeared in that script multiple times.


Thirdly, as brought up by @TheGreatJedi13 in the last thread Acheron is actually in Firefly's script. this is a bit inconsistant as in 2.2 firefly says she doesnt show up in the script but we can easily fix this.


3.8 is a retcon of events in penacony so things are 100% subject to change in the story. Firefly actually says Acheron looks familiar upon seeing her and then later says that her mission was to prevent Acheron from drawing her blade near the trailblazer. This information confirms that Acheron is within Elio's scripts. Firefly recognizes her as she saw her in the script before because her mission is to prevent Acheron from drawing her blade near the trailblazer.


The only part firefly was surprised about was her status as an emanator. this part can simply be Elio not sharing this information as we know he never gives the full script.


less important script stuff:

this is more of a minor part but i'd like to address it

For starters, there is no evidence that Firefly lacked the full script during that scene.
Theres more evidence of her not having a full script than her having one

The Stellaron Hunters are frequently shown receiving scripts that contain even extremely specific details and outcomes.
This isnt consistant. One instance of kafka having a specific script doesnt mean all scripts are this detailed.

Claiming that Firefly simply did not have the complete information at that moment is therefore speculative and undermines the narrative purpose of the scene itself. The entire sequence is structured around gradually unveiling Acheron’s true nature as a Self-Annihilator, especially since she had initially been framed as an ominous and enigmatic, threatening figure throughout Penacony’s story.
...? if Firefly had all the information here then why was acheron being an emanator of nihility even a surprise? This doesnt go against the narrative at all she literally just didnt have all the information

IX Shadows summoning for self annihilators:

So as ive talked about throughout the thread, the scans shown have not proven that self annihilators can freely summon IX shadows. Lets go through these scans one by one.

Many Self-Annihilators can summon them in quite a few ways.
The Doctors of Chaos believe that this tonic can work wonders when treating a patient's loneliness, but it also makes them grow increasingly hostile toward the doctors at the end of the process. Its side effects can commonly cause Self-Annihilators to behold the "Shadow of Nihility."
This scan doesnt say that at all? How can we infer what they mean by "Beholding a shadow of nihility" if the game itself doesnt give any details on what they mean by "beholding a shadow of the Nihility"?


Here's the definition of Beholding because all this implies is that they look at a shadow of IX



summon them
As we talked about before, this is just a comparison of their existence. this doesnt imply they summon them at all.

Perhaps, as the Self-Annihilators aimlessly traverse the cosmos, they are also casting the shadow of the Aeon around the universe.
this scan actually goes hand in hand with this scan as they both suggest that the self annihilator's existence is akin to a shadow of IX.

The Self-Annihilators' connections to Shadows of IX goes deeper than just a form of transformation. As theorized by Dr. Primitive, as Self-Annihilators aimlessly traverse the cosmos, they also cast the shadow of the Aeon around the universe. As for the few who can single-handedly withstand the encroachment of Nihility on their existences, their journey of self-annihilation is drawn out to infinity, and the road they walk is like a shadow of IX cast in the world. When the Doctors of Chaos created the Tonic of Efficacious Chaos, one of its side effects was causing Self-Annihilators to behold a Shadow of IX.
What that means we dont really know because the verse doesnt go in depth on it yet.

Acheron, through her power of Nihility and being a Self-Annihilator, can directly manifest the Shadow in a space.
There is no scan that says she manifested it.

This manifestation does not require displacement of targets into a separate domain or state within the Horizon of Existence, as the effect itself is an expression of Nihility's presence applied locally.
This is just blatantly wrong.


Aventurine was literally transported here by acheron


Acheron herself speaks of the horizon has if they went to another location


here it is again


So clearly this is a seperate "domain" from wherever Acheron and the target were prior

the wiki even describes it as a seperate space

It is depicted as an empty monochrome space with a walkable liquid surface, imitating the accretion disk of a black hole, and the black hole itself.
The BFR is not a necessary prerequisite for the Shadow of IX’s activation, since the phenomenon can be invoked directly as a manifestation of a Self-Annihilator's/IX's power. Of course, because she passively carries Nihility's effect, which becomes active and affects things after drawing her Blade, she can affect things around her with it and BFR them without needing to summon a Shadow. She can selectively control who gets BFR-ed as she did with Aventurine and the TB despite multiple people being around them. Even during her in-game abilities, it's not necessary for her to summon a Shadow to BFR. And because every other time a Shadow has appeared, there's no mention of the Horizon, it is safe to say that those two don't need to go hand in hand.
Yes and no. Lets go more in depth on this part.

The BFR is not a necessary prerequisite for the Shadow of IX’s activation, since the phenomenon can be invoked directly as a manifestation of a Self-Annihilator's/IX's power.
So, the shadow in the Horizon of existence wasnt created by acheron you'd need actual proof she created it because even the wiki seems to make it clear it existed prior to Acheron

Record Stamp: "Only Self-Annihilators can observe the Border." "None of those who were drawn by it have ever returned." ...These conclusions remain challenging to verify or falsify, potentially fabricated by History Fictionologists.
And shadows of IX dont really need to be activated since they're black holes, black holes dont really get activated.

Of course, because she passively carries Nihility's effect
This is true however this has nothing to do with a shadows of IX, its just nihility powernull

Which becomes active and affects things after drawing her Blade, she can affect things around her with it and BFR them without needing to summon a Shadow.
Eh? I mean yea i guess most of her emanator power comes after she draws her blade the problem is that the game describes space itself as a manifestation of IX so you're basically arguing she creates the horizon of existence

She can selectively control who gets BFR-ed as she did with Aventurine and the TB despite multiple people being around them. Even during her in-game abilities, it's not necessary for her to summon a Shadow to BFR. And because every other time a Shadow has appeared, there's no mention of the Horizon, it is safe to say that those two don't need to go hand in hand.
Whaaaaa??? The first half is true, she can control who goes there, the second half no no no. first of all you havent proven she can even summon a shadow of IX the BFR comes from drawing her blade

And because every other time a Shadow has appeared, there's no mention of the Horizon, it is safe to say that those two don't need to go hand in hand.
Not every shadow of IX exists at the horizon of existence so this part is kinda pointless.

tl;dr: She can summon the Shadow without needing to BFR and vice versa.
sigh... scan?

Shadows of IX are explicitly described as "great black suns," while IX, being a black hole,
why does this link to the gravity manip page? IX is just purple goop at least from what we've seen in the simulated universe

IX resembles a large purple blob with two white eyes, with a large collection of asteroids and planets being pulled towards THEM. What appears to be THEIR body is a swirling nebula of magenta and blue stars enveloped by a large purple gas.
itself is consistently referred to as the Black Sun, Dark Sun, Pitch-Black Great Sun, and similar titles. Scholars further believe that regions where space-time curvature reaches its greatest extremes are Shadows of IX, directly associating them with black hole-like phenomena.
Because shadows of IX are usually black holes

Self-Annihilators are also stated to cast the Shadow of the Aeon throughout the cosmos, and the black sun orbited by Izumo is itself identified as both a black hole and a Shadow of IX. Combined with descriptions of Nihility engulfing entropy, time, and existence itself,
This isnt a black hole... this is Zephyro's white hole. The exact opposite of a black hole.

the narrative repeatedly presents these black-hole-like manifestations as expressions of IX rather than ordinary astrophysical objects. Therefore, the argument is not that every black hole is a Shadow of IX, but that the setting consistently links Shadows of IX to black holes and treats them as manifestations of Nihility. "Shadow of the Aeon" = Shadow of IX = Black Hole.
Now heres the main issue ive been repeating this whole thread, not all black holes are shadows of IX. When a black hole is shown you will need explicit proof whether it is or isnt a shadow of IX. Baiheng used a "dark sun" to kill Shuhu, would we say she just had a shadow of IX in her pocket?

Sometime before the Sedition of Imbibitor Lunae, the Abundance Emanator Shuhu rallied a great army of the Denizens of Abundance to attack the Xianzhou Alliance. Baiheng, in her typical headstrong fashion, charged ahead and shattered the enemy's defenses, allowing the other Xianzhou soldiers to break through Shuhu's Sanguinary Abyss and awaken Dan Feng from his Dragon's Delirium. She sacrificed herself to save the lives of Jingliu, Dan Feng, and countless others on the battlefield, using a "sun" of absolute darkness that ground everything around it into the finest dust. She was dragged into a vortex of raw power, leaving only a tuft of her hair and a few drops of blood behind.
Some powers/elements belong to certain Paths. Black Hole creation belongs to Nihility and all Pathstriders of Nihility are Self-Annihilators. All Self-Annihilators can cast Shadows of IX so those two are the same thing. And just in case, I am not saying black holes can't be created through other means. However, those we've seen, other than Welt's, have all been Shadows of IX and came from Self-Annihilators.
So we actually only ever see one self annihilator create anything similar to a black hole and its zephyro... making a white hole.


So 1. you'd need proof this is a shadow of IX turned into a white hole


And 2. you still need explicit proof when a black hole is or isnt a shadow of IX because not all black holes are shadows of IX.

If you want more proof not all black holes are shadows of IX


I probably would have wrote something about the Izumo stuff but it was all addressed in @Zanesucksatlife 's Crt so go read that if you want

Darkness Manip im fine with. its not like she really uses it for anything special but light absorbsion from it seems fine
Conclusion:


i Highly disagree with


Acheron regains Acausality but Type 4 instead.


not enough evidence to suggest the type. all evidence provided is just causality manipulation or normal Existence erasure which she already has.


Being immune to Elio's Precognition = Precognition Resistance.


was debunked in the last thread and this message


Able to summon Shadows of IX = Summoning


same as the first reasoning.
 
Last edited:
Reading both sides, I think there's enough discussion for me to give the answer I was asked.


I'll begin with what Acausality Type 1 and 4 is, since they are the main things present in this discussion.
Type 1: Time Paradox Immunity: Characters with this type of Acausality are rendered immune to changes in the past and standard temporal paradoxes, but remain just as vulnerable in the present and can be affected by normal Causality Manipulation and similar abilities.

Note that only characters explicitly depicted as immune to time paradoxes in their past by feats and/or direct statements qualify for this power. Fiction commonly features time travel systems where time-travelers, for no explainable reason, retain their memories of previous timelines even after changing the past, and merely existing in a work with such mechanics doesn't mean the character inherently has such an immunity, especially given how they would still be affected if someone else was time-traveling instead.

Basically if I exist at Point Y (Present), it's because I was born at Point X in the past. If I ceased to exist at any point between Y and X, or at X itself, I would not exist at Y either. That's regular causality.
But if someone erases goes to point X and kills me, or through whatever method they erase my existence at point X, or any point between X and Y, and I still don't cease to exist in the present (Y), that's Acausality Type 1 as it follows that I can exist without any cause for my existence.

Moving on:
Type 4: Irregular Causality: Characters with this type of Acausality operate on a different and irregular system of cause and effect than regular causality. This has the potential to grant them resistances to abilities such as Causality Manipulation, Fate Manipulation, and Precognition, among others, depending on its shown capabilities which should be specified on the given page.

Basically, if an action X (like lighting up a fire) has an effect Y (Fire is produced), that's regular causality, because it follows a conclusion that is encompassed by our physical and natural laws. If I cut a tree (action) and it falls (effect), that's regular causality too. IK there are ways to get around this without acausality (like with magic) but I think ya'll get the point.
But if I light up a fire (action) and instead a blizzard occurs (effect), or if I cut a tree (action) and it remains standing but I die (Y), that's an irregular cause-and-effect relation, because it follows a system of causality that doesn't align with our natural and physical laws. Or if I flick my finger and it causes the ground to shatter or stops time, that's also an irregular causality-system. We cannot make up a formula within our system where said action leads to said effect.

Cause and effect still persist, X is still the reason for Y's existence, but the difference from regular causality is that the relations are twisted. Think of it like this. If I have a table with two rows where I have to link each row in column 1 to a correct row in column 2, that's regular causality. If I do that in a way that the links are incorrect according to some "standards", that's irregular causality. Like:
3e81535dd990.png



Important Notes
  • Type 1 and Type 4 by default have no relation to one another, and do not share any characteristics. However, in-fiction portrayals showing them to be related is not an anti-feat.
  • Likewise, just because the properties of Type 1 or Type 4 (only one) are shown doesn't mean the other type must exist as well.
  • Type 1 is essentially Causeless Existence/Effect.
  • Type 4 is essentially an Entangled Causal Mess.
  • Having resistance to things that Type 4 can grant resistance to does not mean one has Type 4 itself. Same as how being able to resist Time Stop does not mean you have Time Stop yourself by necessity.


Reading both sides, I think the main arguments are:
  • Acheron can exist even after her history has been erased, which does/does not include her reason of existence.
  • Acheron does/does not have any forseeable future.
I think this is simply Type 1 Acausality and Resistance to Precognition, and possibly some Fate manip resistance/immunity (in case there is a lack of a future to begin with). It's not about having an irregular entangled mess of a causal system (like @Mbpoops's room), but about not having a cause of your existence to begin with (Like @Hecky2222 being jobless).

Hope this helps :d
 
Last edited:
I think this is simply Type 1 Acausality and Resistance to Precognition, and possibly some Fate manip resistance/immunity (in case there is a lack of a future to begin with). It's not about having an irregular entangled mess of a causal system (like @Mbpoops's room), but about not having a cause of your existence to begin with (Like @Hecky2222 being jobless).

Hope this helps :d
Thank you for the explanation (seriously tysm)

resistance to precog prolly wont work because of stuff in my summary and last thread and the fate manip resistance was also debunked in my last crt unless she gets it as a biproduct of not having type 1 aca? but other than that everything seems great thank you
 
The core argument is not that Acheron merely survived the destruction of her homeworld. The argument is that Izumo underwent a fundamentally abnormal collapse under Nihility that severed its historical continuity, causal trace, informational existence, and place within the universe's remembered history, yet Acheron continued to exist despite originating entirely from that lost continuity.

Izumo was not an isolated or unknown civilization. It existed for at least two thousand years, was indexed within astral charts, participated in the wider interstellar framework of the setting (it being indexed in charts should imply that along with the fact that it was a brilliant, dazzling city), and should have left behind countless external records, institutional memories, communications, cultural references, and historical traces. Under normal circumstances, the sudden destruction of such a world would not result in uncertainty regarding whether it ever existed. Yet the narrative repeatedly emphasizes confusion, mythologization, fragmented records, and doubt regarding Izumo's very existence.

The Relics mentioned by those that disagree are meta-texts that help the player understand the lore. Relics are are made through the fragmentum that works on entirely different plane of plane of existence. It's not unlikely that information passes through an entire other network and is recorded there. It also doesn't mean that this phenomenon that we still cannot understand needs to be erased or affected for history EE to work. Especially since it likely works on a whole other dimension. The fragmentum is not an entity or energy. It's used as an informational, reconstruction framework and information or history erasure does not demand the destruction of every secondary derivative or backup. This whole use of it is a secondary effect. It's not a TRUE reconstructive framework like Remembrance. It's just being exploited to work like that. It's some kind of strange space-time warping effect.

Here, it is very specifically seen that the entire history of Izumo is being erased. It's moving backwards from the moment the planet and the Shadow are struck.

The setting explicitly asks whether Izumo ever existed at all, whether its history ever occurred, and whether it became stranded upon the shore of reverse causation. This is not the language used for an ordinary dead world. It is presented as a cosmological anomaly.

This distinction becomes even more apparent when compared to ordinary planetary destruction. The setting establishes that when a normal planet is destroyed, investigators confirm its destruction, categorize it as a deadworld, and only then remove it from the astral charts. Izumo is treated differently. Its disappearance is not presented as a routine administrative update but as a mystery that cannot be properly reconstructed despite the existence of systems specifically designed to preserve memory and history.

The existence of surviving scrolls does not refute this conclusion. Information erasure, historical erasure, or causal severance do not require every physical artifact, remnant, or fragment to be universally annihilated. It's entirely possible that there was a SINGLE fragment that survived. A torn piece of paper. It's likely that it's even fabricated by History Fictionologists since we are aware that they have managed to conceal the entire galaxy. The relevant question is whether the historical continuity remains intact, not whether isolated residues survive.

The surviving scrolls therefore function as disconnected remnants rather than proof that Izumo's history remains normally preserved. Researchers cannot reconstruct a coherent historical framework from them. Many do not even know whether the civilization described within them was real. Some regard it as a fairytale. The fragments remain, but the continuity that once contextualized them has been severed.

This interpretation is reinforced by the role of Remembrance. In HSR, Remembrance is not equivalent to ordinary historical documentation. It is a cosmic mechanism tied to memory preservation on a universal scale. Destroyed worlds, timelines, and universes ordinarily leave behind traces, memories, or residual structures that can still be accessed or reconstructed. Izumo is repeatedly portrayed as lacking even those normal remnants. Its disappearance is therefore treated as abnormal even by the standards of a setting where timelines and universes routinely perish.

The destruction of Izumo is also explicitly associated with Nihility and the Shadow of IX. Nihility is repeatedly portrayed as the negation of meaning, continuity, and existence itself. The Shadow of IX does not merely destroy planets physically; it consumes significance, history, and reality. During Acheron's final strike, the visual narrative depicts Izumo's history moving backwards toward its beginning while being consumed by the black sun. Simultaneously, her blade Naught is explicitly associated with severing cause and effect. The symbolism and narrative framing consistently point toward the destruction of continuity itself rather than ordinary planetary devastation.

This is where the acausality argument begins.

A causal chain is the sequence connecting causes to their effects across time. Acheron was born on Izumo, raised on Izumo, fought on Izumo, and derived her entire existence from Izumo's history. If that history was severed, erased, and rendered absent from the universe's normal historical framework, then the continuity supporting her existence should logically have been destroyed alongside it.

Yet Acheron remains.

She persists despite the collapse of the historical and causal structure from which she originated. This is important because it was HER blade combined with Nihility that ended the world entirely. And the issue is not merely that her world was destroyed, but that the continuity linking her existence to her past was consumed by Nihility. She survives the destruction of the very framework that should sustain her.

This interpretation is reinforced by Elio's scripts.

Elio's foresight operates through branching futures, deterministic progression, and the observation of possible outcomes. Yet Acheron repeatedly appears as an anomaly within that system. Firefly explicitly questions whether Acheron was ever mentioned in the script. This point is revisited later rather than being left as a one-time inconsistency. Dahlia likewise acts without any indication that Acheron was accounted for. The omission is notable because Acheron is one of the most dangerous entities present and a direct threat to the Trailblazer if exposed to Nihility prematurely.

The usual counterargument is that the Stellaron Hunters do not receive complete scripts. While this is true in some situations, it does not explain why one of the most significant actors in the entire scenario would repeatedly remain unaccounted for. Firefly's own statements demonstrate that her scripts often contain highly specific details and outcomes. The narrative repeatedly presents Acheron as an irregularity within predictive systems rather than merely an omitted detail.

This pattern becomes more meaningful when compared to other acausal entities. Terminus exists from the future and moves backward through time. Fuli's nature transcends ordinary temporal progression through memory and remembrance. Both are associated with abnormal relationships to causality and prediction. Acheron's inability to be properly mapped within deterministic foresight aligns more closely with those entities than with ordinary characters.

The same principle applies to Device IX and later future projections. Acheron repeatedly states her intention to find Device IX, yet future scenarios centered around Device IX fail to account for her presence. While this is not definitive proof by itself, it contributes to a larger pattern in which her future remains impossible to cleanly resolve within systems designed to predict it.

Finally, the argument regarding Shadows of IX is misunderstood.

The claim is not that every black hole in existence is a Shadow of IX. The claim is that the setting repeatedly identifies Shadows of IX through black-hole imagery and terminology. IX is called the Black Sun, Dark Sun, Pitch-Black Great Sun, and similar titles. Scholars associate regions of extreme space-time curvature with Shadows of IX meaning they are essentially black holes. Self-Annihilators are stated to cast the Shadow of the Aeon throughout the cosmos. Izumo's black sun is identified as both a black hole and a Shadow of IX (We know this because by entering Acheron became a Self-Annihilator). The narrative consistently links these phenomena together (here too we see the black hole being linked to Nihility again).

Thus, when any Self-Annihilator manifests a black hole, the argument is that they manifest a known expression of Nihility repeatedly associated with black-hole-like phenomena throughout the setting. We have Zephyro casting a white hole that bends space, time and entropy. It has almost the exact same properties as a black hole except because he is against IX, he refined it to be different to mock him with light. Zephyro, being a Self-Annihilator is essentially casting a Shadow of IX since that is a power of Nihility.

In conclusion, Acheron is consistently portrayed as an anomaly to ordinary causal continuity. Izumo's destruction was not simply planetary destruction but the collapse of a civilization's historical continuity, causal trace, and place within cosmic remembrance. The surviving fragments do not preserve that continuity. Instead they merely persist as disconnected remnants. Acheron herself survives despite originating entirely from that lost history. Combined with her connection to Nihility, her severance of cause and effect through Naught, the repeated inability of predictive systems to properly account for her,the evidence supports the interpretation that Acheron operates under an abnormal causal framework consistent with Type 4 Acausality.
 
Last edited:
Reading both sides, I think there's enough discussion for me to give the answer I was asked.


I'll begin with what Acausality Type 1 and 4 is, since they are the main things present in this discussion.


Basically if I exist at Point Y (Present), it's because I was born at Point X in the past. If I ceased to exist at any point between Y and X, or at X itself, I would not exist at Y either. That's regular causality.
But if someone erases goes to point X and kills me, or through whatever method they erase my existence at point X, or any point between X and Y, and I still don't cease to exist in the present (Y), that's Acausality Type 1 as it follows that I can exist without any cause for my existence.

Moving on:


Basically, if an action X (like lighting up a fire) has an effect Y (Fire is produced), that's regular causality, because it follows a conclusion that is encompassed by our physical and natural laws. If I cut a tree (action) and it falls (effect), that's regular causality too. IK there are ways to get around this without acausality (like with magic) but I think ya'll get the point.
But if I light up a fire (action) and instead a blizzard occurs (effect), or if I cut a tree (action) and it remains standing but I die (Y), that's an irregular cause-and-effect relation, because it follows a system of causality that doesn't align with our natural and physical laws. Or if I flick my finger and it causes the ground to shatter or stops time, that's also an irregular causality-system. We cannot make up a formula within our system where said action leads to said effect.

Cause and effect still persist, X is still the reason for Y's existence, but the difference from regular causality is that the relations are twisted. Think of it like this. If I have a table with two rows where I have to link each row in column 1 to a correct row in column 2, that's regular causality. If I do that in a way that the links are incorrect according to some "standards", that's irregular causality. Like:
3e81535dd990.png



Important Notes
  • Type 1 and Type 4 by default have no relation to one another, and do not share any characteristics. However, in-fiction portrayals showing them to be related is not an anti-feat.
  • Likewise, just because the properties of Type 1 or Type 4 (only one) are shown doesn't mean the other type must exist as well.
  • Type 1 is essentially Causeless Existence/Effect.
  • Type 4 is essentially an Entangled Causal Mess.
  • Having resistance to things that Type 4 can grant resistance to does not mean one has Type 4 itself. Same as how being able to resist Time Stop does not mean you have Time Stop yourself by necessity.


Reading both sides, I think the main arguments are:
  • Acheron can exist even after her history has been erased, which does/does not include her reason of existence.
  • Acheron does/does not have any forseeable future.
I think this is simply Type 1 Acausality and Resistance to Precognition, and possibly some Fate manip resistance/immunity (in case there is a lack of a future to begin with). It's not about having an irregular entangled mess of a causal system (like @Mbpoops's room), but about not having a cause of your existence to begin with (Like @Hecky2222 being jobless).

Hope this helps :d
I understand and thank you for taking the time to read it. I am fine with Type 1 instead. I supported Type 4 merely because of its wider range that also accounts for any future seeing resistances, fate and causality manip.
 
because in MWI changes in the past dont change your future it creates a branch in the timeline instead.

else we'd have to give everyone in the verse type 1 from Otto
I don't get why you think this is a rule in the verse. We have ONE instance of someone attempting it and creating a branch instead. It doesn't mean it has to work like that everytime btw.

As I said, Fuli has also been agreed to have Type 1. So there's precedent.
 
because in MWI changes in the past dont change your future it creates a branch in the timeline instead.

else we'd have to give everyone in the verse type 1 from Otto
pretty sure this would technically give the verse type 1 if all (assuming) past paradoxes are always shifted to another timeline.
Though I admit erasing the past (if that's actually what's happening) isn't necessarily the same as "changing" the past (same as diff between soul manip and soul destruction), thus not normally creating branches (unless that still happens in-verse with Acheron's erasure still causing timelines to shift paradoxes). So Acheron's potential type 1 would be able to still resist some cases of Aca1 negation. 🤔

Like if someone can make it so that past changes don't get shifted to other timelines through some special mechanic and negate that case of type 1, they would still not be able to effect Acheron through history manip

This is entirely an IF though, in case type 1 for Acheron via the erasure thingy gets accepted.
 
Back
Top