Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don’t even know who deleted it but what was so bad about it, wank getting exposed part? I can say it again. Calling out someone for rage baiting shouldn’t be equivalent to someone ragebaiting.
Sorry Damage, but their behavior should be called out. Crashing out is the issue not calling it out, or as you said, “complaining” about it. They need to chill, stop the ironic comments and take this seriously.It wasn't asking for the unproductive comments to be deleted that was the issue. It was complaining about Bleach fans crashing out.
Regardless, I think we should move on from that and focus on the thread.
"We don't need bleach fans crashing out just because their wank is getting exposed"Sorry Damage, but their behavior should be called out. Crashing out is the issue not calling it out, or as you said, “complaining” about it. They need to chill, stop the ironic comments and take this seriously.
IMade just argues that Ulq is on a different pillar but that's not really a good argument because as shown here the pillars can only exist in the center area of the dome which would include said fatter ones to be in that concentration tooNot that i don't like the verse being questioned but this stuff was already addressed in a past thread which you can look at right here
https://vsbattles.com/threads/bleach-las-noches-size-2-0.54745/
“We don’t need bleach fans crashing out” is literally referring to the people who ARE crashing out in this thread, like you, not the entire bleach community, if you read it as a generalization that’s a you problem. The fact that some members made legitimate threads with staff votes doesn’t contradict anything I said, nobody is dismissing those, the issue is specifically the behavior happening here. Calling that ragebait is just deflection from the actual point."We don't need bleach fans crashing out just because their wank is getting exposed"
The entirety of this part is ragebait, it's not "calling out" you generalized the entirety of the bleach community and associated them with crashing out and wanking, the same members made dozens of threads about this, and got them accepted, with staff votes, calculations, you could not be more disingenuous.
why is there a random AI image in the blog lol
Then downgrade those tiers for being a massive outlier igI will agree exclusively because i want to eventually see this affect the ratings so the gap between the god tiers and everyone else gets even more comically large specifically because it 9-A Askin makes his entire encounter with Ichigo Hilarious.
If the current possibly 4-A chars also remain fine it will also be funny to think about gift ball deluxe turning a 4-A into someone that is now clashing with a 9-A depending on how that fight is adapted.
This can be deleted if it's considered derailing in some way,but i don't think it would be a downfall if Askin got downgraded all the way to 10-C or something in a somewhat nice forum and wiki of the already somewhat niche topic of powerscaling.Askin’s own PR Team praying on his downfall is diabolical & hilarious
******* baseddd, i respect thatHe'll still be the Askin that is my favourite Bleach character no matter the numbers on the page,at the end of day ya know?
thank you scar, there are some issues here and there but we'll have it corrected in discord, I'll put this on hold till we reach grace period for the size changeAs per request from Ghost, I made a blog detailing how the downscaling for each feat involved would apply once the old size gets discarded for Ghost's new one. This doesn't apply to the speed one because the formula made the speed of the Lanza go at 5 metres per second.
Yeah ofcthank you scar, there are some issues here and there but we'll have it corrected in discord, I'll put this on hold till we reach grace period for the size change
If there's a big inconsistency that's already a good reason to discard feats based on this place's size (or at least not rely on them for important ratings) since it makes their validity uncertain, but honestly the travel time statement is pretty flimsy reasoning to begin with. If you're arguing they're superhumans who can fly or run super-fast then the distance would actually be dozens of times greater, if you don't accept that logic then you should use actual IRL travel time which depending on how the ground is laid out could be much lower than what's gotten used. Either way the current math doesn't hold to scrutiny, and when visuals contradict it I see no reason not to prioritize them.
All in all I agree with the downgrade.
Adding on to what you said, it's not even that she's wrong that it would take three days to walk the distance. The problem is assuming she's talking about Ichigo specifically AND that he'd be walking that distance 24/7. There are sooo many factors that play along as to how someone who can walk for a long time doesn't need to walk the equal distance here such as pace reduction, breaks involved, terrain involved and so on and so forth.we dont have multiple people dropping statements for Las Noches
we have just 1 statement from a child who isn't word of god that's fighting against several visual contradictions who are all strongly consistent with each other
Not just word of God people who live in these places take days to walk itwe dont have multiple people dropping statements for Las Noches
we have just 1 statement from a child who isn't word of god that's fighting against several visual contradictions who are all strongly consistent with each other
not to mention it's not a flat plane either, more of the time gets consumed when going up and down the sand dunes in contrast, this is why timeframe statements suck and you need to assume so many factors, statements woulda had better weight if it was a size statement like the one Kubo wrote for the pillarsAdding on to what you said, it's not even that she's wrong that it would take three days to walk the distance. The problem is assuming she's talking about Ichigo specifically AND that he'd be walking that distance 24/7. There are sooo many factors that play along as to how someone who can walk for a long time doesn't need to walk the equal distance here such as pace reduction, breaks involved, terrain involved and so on and so forth.
Ichigo stated he can run for a week on a device made to drain reiatsu. He wouldn't need to take breaks for simply walking. The terrain is a none factor they were already at the building which is on a flat area of sand they would just to walk straight down for 3 daysAdding on to what you said, it's not even that she's wrong that it would take three days to walk the distance. The problem is assuming she's talking about Ichigo specifically AND that he'd be walking that distance 24/7. There are sooo many factors that play along as to how someone who can walk for a long time doesn't need to walk the equal distance here such as pace reduction, breaks involved, terrain involved and so on and so forth.
Then don't use his art to calculate feats.
Then don't use his art to calculate feats related to these locations.
M3X and Damage are correct. Unless there's extremely good explanation, you can't simultaneously use visuals to upgrade characters them dismiss them as inconsistent when they downgrade them, the same with statements as well.
I disagree with this reasoning. I view it like video game graphics. Just because a character is shown as being 1/10th the size of a city, doesn't mean that destruction of half of that city should be put at only High 8-C. Especially if there are statements indicating that the city is actually large.If there's a big inconsistency that's already a good reason to discard feats based on this place's size (or at least not rely on them for important ratings) since it makes their validity uncertain
Is it really true that all of Candice/Askin/Gremmy's feats above Building level are based on pure visuals, with no statements ever indicating that they could/have destroyed anything larger than a building? I'm not familiar with Bleach, but this certainly wouldn't be my default assumption.This is inflating values based on one statement. But you wouldn't downgrade Candice/Askin/Gremmy to Building level based on this one statement, would you?
Yeah it seems pretty absurd to believe that the columns would have a diameter of 1,668m, which is what we'd get from the 235km diameter.Columns are stated to be over 30 meters in diameter.
These sorts of niche physics considerations are, imo, the lowest tier of evidence for something like this. So I disagree with that reasoning.Atmospheric physics & hypoxia
If the same visuals show a rock to be the size of a city where as a timeframe statement makes it appear similar to a continent and we see visually a city sized rock being split it would be pretty weird to just pretend it's a continental feat because of an outlier statement & we'd be ignoring for the sake of big numbers, so I personally don't think ignoring the practical values to favour theoretical ones is justifiedI don't think doing so is "using visuals to upgrade, and dismissing them when used to downgrade". Unless there are other cases here I'm missing. It's using statements to get some important raw values in a calculation, then using visuals to derive the rest, rather than starting from visuals alone.
They don't have feats above building level, the sternritters mostly are featless people that are given stats based on argued chainscaling, among the three in particular only gremmy has power that is visually and literally above building level but that's through an ability that does not scale to his physicals, Askin has 0 DC feats, Candice mayy have surpassed building level (visually speaking) with her strongest charged attacks iirc, statements definitely do not indicate they could destroy anything building sized or greater with Gremmy being the exception due to his haxIs it really true that all of Candice/Askin/Gremmy's feats above Building level are based on pure visuals, with no statements ever indicating that they could/have destroyed anything larger than a building? I'm not familiar with Bleach, but this certainly wouldn't be my default assumption.
I definitely understand where you're coming from as they get a bit technical and deep rather than be one of the in-your-face contradictions but hypoxia and atmospheric pressure are genuine issues bleach characters have and are emphasized by the writer to be very explicit wincons in beating these people so I think we should take such weaknesses into consideration, not to mention the whole calculating a theoretical distance and then saying it technically is supposed to be this big is equally niche compared to the visuals so I'd say if those are fair game this one should be tooThese sorts of niche physics considerations are, imo, the lowest tier of evidence for something like this. So I disagree with that reasoning.
Fully Agreed on this thoYeah it seems pretty absurd to believe that the columns would have a diameter of 1,668m, which is what we'd get from the 235km diameter.
I disagree with most reasoning, but the "columns are >30m" statement convinces me to agree with a size downgrade.
The column statement is only for the one inside los noches. These columns come in different sizes all around los noches. Tho he kinda contradicts himself using that statement while dismissing other statementsI disagree with this reasoning. I view it like video game graphics. Just because a character is shown as being 1/10th the size of a city, doesn't mean that destruction of half of that city should be put at only High 8-C. Especially if there are statements indicating that the city is actually large.
I don't think doing so is "using visuals to upgrade, and dismissing them when used to downgrade". Unless there are other cases here I'm missing. It's using statements to get some important raw values in a calculation, then using visuals to derive the rest, rather than starting from visuals alone.
Is it really true that all of Candice/Askin/Gremmy's feats above Building level are based on pure visuals, with no statements ever indicating that they could/have destroyed anything larger than a building? I'm not familiar with Bleach, but this certainly wouldn't be my default assumption.
Yeah it seems pretty absurd to believe that the columns would have a diameter of 1,668m, which is what we'd get from the 235km diameter.
These sorts of niche physics considerations are, imo, the lowest tier of evidence for something like this. So I disagree with that reasoning.
tl;dr
I disagree with most reasoning, but the "columns are >30m" statement convinces me to agree with a size downgrade.
Can you provide some more information establishing this?The column statement is only for the one inside los noches. These columns come in different sizes all around los noches. Tho he kinda contradicts himself using that statement while dismissing other statements
First and third image from #74?Yeah I'm not really seeing diameters differing, just heights. Although I could be missing something.
If we do say Las Noches is as big as Nel stated, I feel it is very silly to say Kubo not accounting for accurate vapor dispersal patterns in his Shonen Manga's big explosions, instead of just what looks coolest is a real anti-feat for that.If it’s moving as a thick coherent plume up into the 80–100 km region, then it’s not behaving like normal vaporized rock should at that altitude.
At 40–80-100 km, pressure is extremely low. So vapor/gas released from a heated surface should mostly do this:
expand outward → spread → thin out fast
Not:
stay as a fluffy dense smoke cloud → rise upward like a chimney plume
These panels conflict due to the vertical flame columns implying buoyancy-driven rise which requires dense air that is not present at 40–80-100 km. So the gas should spread and thin quickly while this stays tight and structured.
timeframe statements get wanked by charitably assumed speed and stamina