Mbpoops
He/Him- 8,362
- 7,510
type 6 or 8 immortality could work tho if they have seperate bodies they can swap toExample: 2B from nier. Robots should just be default longevity ngl
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
type 6 or 8 immortality could work tho if they have seperate bodies they can swap toExample: 2B from nier. Robots should just be default longevity ngl
Just saying, this is the scans used for her "narrative" and "reality"differentiate between narrative and destiny, because Istaroth writes narrative, not destiny.
re read what i said, then re read what you said. slimes and shades are fundamentally different beings.What do you mean? They come from the same source, they are all primordial shadows, which means they have the same physiology and existence. It's quite simple and easy to understand. That's what I'm saying to you, you seem to be differentiating between hydro slime and pyro slime
said "concept" of time is also predated by time as well lol. how do you logically conclude time didnt exist if we already have moon gods rule over time before heavenly principles, or did we just forget that laws and foundations of the world were changed completely which made existence of erosion too.I have actually given the scan which clearly states that it is a concept of time, stop diverting the conversation, erosion is a law caused by time, so no erosion = no time
I mean what we are talking about is what happens when your memories get erased, can you really expect someone to be same person if every piece of memory they have is erased, arlecchino explicitly talks how the ones person indetity is gone once memories get erased, literally what happened with scaramouche too.Didn't you read the explanation there? Irminsul completely erased the existence of the wanderer. What caused the wanderer to survive was fate, fate that Irminsul couldn't change.
Scaramouce was completely erased from reality. What we see now is only the wanderer who inherited Scaramouce's memories, nothing more.
Clervie was also stated to have emerged from those flames, meaning what we saw is the remaining memories of herself, you have arlechino stating that losing large protion of memories can alter your sense of self, Clervie we saw was stuck in past because all 10 years before her death were erased and we only saw a child her.The Clervie case is the clearest case to prove this. If it's just a memory, then only the memory is lost, not a part of her.
Okay now prove AE1 for Xiuhcoatl simply bcs he coated himself with Phlogiston.I have already provided evidence that phlogyston is information, you cannot refute that with more relevant evidence.
Just saying, this is the scans used for her "narrative" and "reality"
yeah of course because all the events in teyvat are the result of what they have determined, that's why I gave everything about furina, simulanka etc.With the first scan literally talking about istaroth writing the story of "world", but literal next sentence is how she engraved everything in her memory, basically what venti is talking about is istaroth experiencing the world herself and engraving every event in her memories.
What Columbina said was clearly true, because what is happening now is just a story determined by the heavenly gods, a story that has been engineered.Second scan i honestly cant believe how dishonest you sound, theres literally not a single world that this was Istaroth doing, not a single mention of narratives being rewritten and when columbina talks about reality being rewritten we literally dont know what she meant there with this one picture. do you at least have a context behind that specific scan?
The cycle of seven must be removed, because the secret narrative will be blocked.
Fear and grief must be torn down, and so the barrier between life and death must be removed.
Remove the sun, the moons, and weight, for there should be no barriers between time and space
bro, shades come from the same source, they are on the same level, and have the same physiology because they are all projection of heavenly principles, do you think slimes have different physiology just because of the difference in their elements?? obviously not, so do shades, even though they have different authorities, they still have the same physiology, because they themselves have trancendent all human boundaries.re read what i said, then re read what you said. slimes and shades are fundamentally different beings.
hmm i dont understand what are you talking about? i didn't even say the concept of time existed before time itself, but they are the definitions of those concepts, erosion itself is a law caused by time, it's even explained in the wiki you showed, where erosion is a wear and tear that goes on over time, anyway why did you read it until this point when i already gave a different scan to classify the concept??said "concept" of time is also predated by time as well lol. how do you logically conclude time didnt exist if we already have moon gods rule over time before heavenly principles, or did we just forget that laws and foundations of the world were changed completely which made existence of erosion too.
Bro, those two things are related, when their memories are completely erased, then a part of themselves will also be lost.I mean what we are talking about is what happens when your memories get erased, can you really expect someone to be same person if every piece of memory they have is erased, arlecchino explicitly talks how the ones person indetity is gone once memories get erased, literally what happened with scaramouche too.
not just perception, but she really lost herself in her teenage years, because that part was already burned by the fire of arlecchino, if only the memory was burned, her form should not have appeared when she was still a child, but already when she was a teenager. so this is not just a memory but also a soul.Clervie was also stated to have emerged from those flames, meaning what we saw is the remaining memories of herself, you have arlechino stating that losing large protion of memories can alter your sense of self, Clervie we saw was stuck in past because all 10 years before her death were erased and we only saw a child her.
Bro, all sovereign dragons are pure elemental creatures. Phlogiston is information, so phlogyston lifeform is information lifeformOkay now prove AE1 for Xiuhcoatl simply bcs he coated himself with Phlogiston.
Counterpoint in hereChanging plot hax to fate hax and immortality to longevity looks okay at a glance, although I'd be interested to hear the counterpoints. The rest I'm not sure about.
"When the Doves Held Branches"
When the eternal throne of the heavens came, the world was made anew. Then the true lord, the Primordial One, came forth and did battle against the seven terrifying sovereigns, dragon-lords of the old world. The Primordial One created shining shades of itself, and the number of these shades was four.
Doesn’t Naberius’s case also prove this? The shades are divisible by parts and therefore can not be abstract.the fact the Shades were divisible by 4 when they were created by Phanes debunks AE1.
aeons of hsr are also representatives of their path, so we must destroy that too.Plus the whole deal with Ronova claiming that she’s merely a delegate/representative of Death rather than Death itself as well.
For the staff who evaluated this CRT, this is a counter argument that refutes all the claims made in the CRT.Counterpoint in here
![]()
Genshin hax (sahl propaganda) removal 2
Higher-Dimensional Existence [4-D] (The Ruler of Time Istaroth is the embodiment of time, encompassing the entire temporal dimension, governing and embodying the entire timeline of the microcosm across past, present and future. This is just Temporal Omnipresence, something she literally has on...vsbattles.com
The aeons are not abstract either, mainly because they have physical presence in the universe and aeons like Terminus are divisible by parts. Your analogy doesn’t work.aeons of hsr are also representatives of their path, so we must destroy that too.
Your basis for the Shades being abstract in the first place involves assuming that the Shades are the concepts themselves. Ronova being a representative of Death in the sense that she simply speaks for it in the place of Death itself implies she is not Death itself. Which means that your basis falls apart.representative does not always refer to something tangible, abstract entities can also be representatives of something
Yeah, just nuke their AE1 and NEP1. With same reasonThe aeons are not abstract either, mainly because they have physical presence in the universe and aeons like Terminus are divisible by parts. Your analogy doesn’t work.
they are often said to be the abstractions they represent, so they are not only representatives, but they also exist purely as that thingYour basis for the Shades being abstract in the first place involves assuming that the Shades are the concepts themselves. Ronova being a representative of Death in the sense that she simply speaks for it in the place of Death itself implies she is not Death itself. Which means that your basis falls apart.
Sure, why not. HoYo has made it clear that the Aeons are not literal embodiments of concepts, nor are they abstractions. You’re using a flawed argument to support another flawed argument. It’s a textbook non-sequitur.Yeah, just nuke their AE1 and NEP1. With same reason
They’re never called as abstractions. You can never prove that because it simply does not exist.yeah they are often said to be the abstractions they represent, so they are not only representatives, but they also exist purely as that thing
Yeah, if you think like that I don't mind, I just have to destroy it later on another crtSure, why not. HoYo has made it clear that the Aeons are not literal embodiments of concepts, nor are they abstractions. You’re using a flawed argument to support another flawed argument. It’s a textbook non-sequitur.
you don't even show a single piece of evidence that refers to what you explainedThey’re never called as abstractions. You can never prove that because it simply does not exist.
Bro, do you really think death, life, space, and time are physical?Furthermore, those are mutually exclusive. You cannot be the abstraction that you are a representative of, because representation requires a different identity, and if it requires a different identity, your argument falls apart.
The same way that people with actually relevant knowledge say that the Shades simply control a concept, not that they actually are them/embody them.
Feel free.Yeah, if you think like that I don't mind, I just have to destroy it later on another crt
I am not burdened to prove a negative. Why do you keep asking others to prove a negative? I keep seeing this pattern from you with every message you type here. Next.you don't even show a single piece of evidence that refers to what you explained
I don’t know how someone reads my point and comes to this conclusion. No, these concepts are not physical. But that does not matter—because to be abstract, the shades need to be the concept itself or be an embodiment of the concept. They’re neither. They simply obtain power from the respective concept, that is all. They fail to qualify for the simplest part about Abstract existence. Ronova saying that she merely obtains power from Death does not make sense if she’s Death itself:Bro, do you really think death, life, space, and time are physical?
That’s tantamount to saying that any Time manipulator or any Death manipulator is abstract. They’re not, because they do not embody the concept. They’re same way, the Paths are abstract, but not the Aeons themselves.Death is intangible, which is why they can be categorized as abstractions.
You haven’t. None of them actually address the issue at hand.Furthermore, I've explained several times in previous comments that time isn't just time, but rather the concept of time.
Traveler further explains that it refers to the four boundaries of humanity, which refer to the four shades. So, the shades themselves are the four fundamental concepts that underpin reality.
The concepts had been defined. What wasn’t defined is the boundary between them. This is precisely why Dottore wants the power of the Trilune—it works in a way that it does not shackle the fate of humanity. A sick person may not die, a person may not be born again and go through suffering, and they may not be bound by the space of this world. That is all. The power of Time, Death, Life and Space were defined far before the existence of the four shades, they simply had no boundary between them.Because during the reign of the three moon goddesses, these concepts had not yet been defined and laws had not yet been enforced.
Tbf, an Abstract being can creates lesser abstract beings, being created is hardly an anti-feat against AE1Bump. I want to give inputs regarding HDE and AE1; The Shades were never stated to be higher-dimensional nor that they have to descend to the world below them, the entire justification is only that Istaroth is the entire timeline but we know this is false since Istaroth is only an aspect of Time elaborated here, especially as the Law.
![]()
Genshin Impact — Conceptual Moons (Accepted, but still require further clarifications)
Conceptual Manipulation (Type 2) The thread was originally accepted here, honestly I don't see anything that states the Shades are concepts other than the concept of time one which wouldn't work since it talks about the concept of time as something that only exists in the mind. This is refering...vsbattles.com
Istaroth is also never the temporal dimension itself, there's a clear distinction between Istaroth which is only the Aspect (Law) of Time and the temporal dimension itself in the verse, the fact the Shades were divisible by 4 when they were created by Phanes debunks AE1.
This should be fine, but like i said previously:Tbf, an Abstract being can creates lesser abstract beings, being created is hardly an anti-feat against AE1
those are just their avatars though aeons true forms are abstract in IMSThe aeons are not abstract either, mainly because they have physical presence in the universe and aeons like Terminus are divisible by parts. Your analogy doesn’t work.
I wouldn't call Phanes abstract ngl when it could just be an artificial intelligence but interestingTbf, an Abstract being can creates lesser abstract beings, being created is hardly an anti-feat against AE1
But anyway, from what i could see in the OP, i think the revision is oke
The issue is that this is inconsistent because their full power being divisible into physical avatars is not something that’s coherent.those are just their avatars though aeons true forms are abstract in IMS
Aeons have their respective True Form and their Avatar self, IX has thousands of manifestations spread across reality the same way Terminus has thousands of its manifestations spread across reality as black cats. Not really "divisible" when the entire thing is just Terminus sharing some of their authority to said black cats (it's like Pure Children of Anasrava manifesting from Fuli and there are hundreds of them too) as this would mean Aeons sharing their authority to their Emanators is an antifeat like Aha with the Noblesse Worm (entirety of their Path's power too) so yeah nahThe aeons are not abstract either, mainly because they have physical presence in the universe and aeons like Terminus are divisible by parts. Your analogy doesn’t work.
The issue is not about creating physical avatars with “some” of their power. The issue is that all their divine power was divided into these cats. The PCOA and the cats aren’t the same thing.Not really "divisible" when the entire thing is just Terminus sharing some of their authority to said black cats (it's like Pure Children of Anasrava manifesting from Fuli and there are hundreds of them too)
Aeons Authority ≠ Themselves, if this were actually the case then Aha giving away the entirety of Elation's authority to a literal Noblesse Worm is a disqualifier, Aeons Authority is just a powersource and the Aeons, well they're the Paths themselves anywayThe issue is not about creating physical avatars with “some” of their power. The issue is that all their divine power was divided into these cats. The PCOA and the cats aren’t the same thing.
It’s not just the Authority of Finality that was divided into the cats. It was all THEIR divine power. That is the Path of Finality itself being divided into physical avatars.Aeons Authority ≠ Themselves,
It can be.if this were actually the case then Aha giving away the entirety of Elation's authority to a literal Noblesse Worm is a disqualifier,
Aeons being the path itself also is incoherent. HSR has never been consistent with it, in fact, Aeons are also called Pathstriders, and a Path’s existence is independent of an Aeon’s existence.Aeons Authority is just a powersource and the Aeons, well they're the Paths themselves anyway
The cats are just physical avatars of Terminus. That we already know. Terminus divided all their path into these physical cats, which means that they are divisible by parts because physical entities are holding all their power.that Terminus interpretation cannot just be taken 1:1 when you know, this is revealed to only be Terminus manifestations anyway
Well, Aeons are never called as Pathstriders as far as I'm concerned and pretty sure Paths still existing after the Fall of an Aeon is because the Aeon simply is just inactive instead of them dying entirely. If you differentiated Aeons and Paths, then unironically nothing about this is related to Path of Finality being divided but rather Terminus themselves. So like you have to concede on one thing and say which one is which.It’s not just the Authority of Finality that was divided into the cats. It was all THEIR divine power. That is the Path of Finality itself being divided into physical avatars.
It can be.
Aeons being the path itself also is incoherent. HSR has never been consistent with it, in fact, Aeons are also called Pathstriders, and a Path’s existence is independent of an Aeon’s existence.
Well, Aeons are never called as Pathstriders as far as I'm concerned
Ena was assimilated into Xipe. Order should’ve become Harmony entirely but the Path of Order still exists. Tayzzyronth was separated from the Path of Propagation as well. Akivili fell into finality or became Finality itself, etc.and pretty sure Paths still existing after the Fall of an Aeon is because the Aeon simply is just inactive instead of them dying entirely.
No, i agree that the Paths themselves are conceptual. But my point is that the Aeons aren’t, and they should be differentiated.If you differentiated Aeons and Paths, then unironically nothing about this is related to Path of Finality being divided but rather Terminus themselves. So like you have to concede on one thing and say which one is which.
Ena did not fall into slumber. That was metaphorical for them essentially facing death. Ena was assimilated into Xipe, that is Ena’s second face (people theorise that Akivili/Idrila could be Xipe’s third face).HSR in itself isn't as blatant as Genshin when the game never confirms about the death of the Aeons directly but rather that they just fell and their Paths influence weakened to the point they're in slumber (Ena, for example)
Tayzzy was imprisoned, after their path was separated from them on a conceptual level. This already shows that Aeons and the Paths are independent of each other.or Tayzzyronth which was imprisoned.
A new path would’ve emerged if he actually achieved dimensional transcendence. He’s referred to as Ena because the way he received the status of an Aeon was through recreating the Swarm Disaster in the Dreamscape. He is in fact, referred to as a newborn god:Cause even the context of Sunday being the Second Ena is just Sunday merging with Ena instead of him actually becoming a new Aeon even though he failed to make a new Path later on![]()
Right, but there’s also plenty of other examples supporting my point. It isn’t only limited to Terminus. It’s for all aeons bar HooH.if PCoA is a different case than this then at best, it only applies to Terminus
There are 3 things I have a problem though;“Constrained by their limited cognition, intelligent lifeforms can only slightly perceive the Paths that Aeons tread upon, and rely on mere concepts and theories to vaguely comprehend the vastness of their powers. Eventually, through spoken legends, these Aeons became the embodiments of abstract concepts.”
Pretty sure CN even uses the same words as a pathstrider. Source.
Ena was assimilated into Xipe. Order should’ve become Harmony entirely but the Path of Order still exists. Tayzzyronth was separated from the Path of Propagation as well. Akivili fell into finality or became Finality itself, etc.
No, i agree that the Paths themselves are conceptual. But my point is that the Aeons aren’t, and they should be differentiated.
Terminus is the one who turned into the pack of black cats, which means they became a pack of physical beings, Dahlia says that because of this, by extension, every ounce of their power went into these cats.
Ena did not fall into slumber. That was metaphorical for them essentially facing death. Ena was assimilated into Xipe, that is Ena’s second face (people theorise that Akivili/Idrila could be Xipe’s third face).
Furthermore, Ena brushed past Terminus during the swarm disaster, which means that their Finality was nearing.
The entire point of 3.8 was that Gopher wood though Tayzzy was the third face, but was inevitably wrong.
Tayzzy was imprisoned, after their path was separated from them on a conceptual level. This already shows that Aeons and the Paths are independent of each other.
A new path would’ve emerged if he actually achieved dimensional transcendence. He’s referred to as Ena because the way he received the status of an Aeon was through recreating the Swarm Disaster in the Dreamscape. He is in fact, referred to as a newborn god:
“Using the Harmonious Choir as a foundation, the power of Order and Harmony intertwine to form the shell of an egg, within which the newborn god slumbers. The metaphysical embryo mumbles the olden dreams of childhood as the fetal movement of Paths throbs in the long night, futilely resisting the rising dawn.”
It’s just that people yearned for the Order to protect them, inevitably fueling Sunday’s power of Order and Harmony, and they intertwined to create a new path. He would’ve become the aeon of Conquest or Domination, which is a more selfish form of trailblaze. He and Ena weren’t just “merging”.
Right, but there’s also plenty of other examples supporting my point. It isn’t only limited to Terminus. It’s for all aeons bar HooH.
Terminus has already verbatim statements putting them above other paths, like Destruction, Hunt, Nihility, etc etc.
I don’t think it’s referring to people walking on the path created by an Aeon. The context was that an individual’s range of movement exists inside a larger design.1. But at the same time, the definition of a Pathstrider is that they walked on the Path that was already created by an Aeon
No, it just requires the Paths to be atemporal and aspatial, which is true, because the Paths are abstracts. Because of this, Aeons can be pathstriders despite their ascension triggering the birth of a path. This isn’t a weird casuality error. The moment a path is born, it becomes eternal throughout time, so it wouldn’t be bound by Time. For example, even though Lan was not born in the Swarm Disaster, traces of the path of Hunt still existed back then.Aeons being Pathstriders themselves would require all of them to function the same as Remembrance where it's possible for Fuli to be a Pathstrider and an Aeon at the same time due to its paradoxical nature where Future Fuli would be the Aeon and Present Fuli would be a Pathstrider (or special Emanators like Cyrene instead that was the closest to becoming Fuli).
This is as verbatim as it gets without actually calling them pathstriders. They are treading on their path, which by definition makes them pathstriders.if it doesn't verbatim state Pathstriders directly but rather indirectly for some reason who knows why.
The entire plot of HSR is that an Aeon can die. That’s how we’re gonna stop Nanook, especially with Elio’s third method of killing an Aeon that is yet to be revealed. But even then, Ena is in fact, dead. They were assimilated and their path is masterless. The same way, Trailblaze is also called a masterless path, and so is the Propagation.As much as it being metaphorical and whatnot, unless there's actual confirmation that they confirmed an Aeon is able to die, I don't think this is possible to rule out considering even after 3 years and so, this has to be the most vague thing about the Aeons.
What i’m saying is that Finality is said to be a path which other paths are bound by, which wouldn’t really make sense if the Aeon of that Path is physical and the others are somehow not. It’s not just applicable to Terminus.3. I don't think Paths superiority matter the most, it's just that Finality functions as the end of civilizations in HI3 and the end of the universe in HSR as confirmed with the Theory of the 4 Apocalypses where one of the Paths could become Finality (i.e how the universe ends).
Well, it'd be the case where instead Aeons have some form of CM (with them being able to create said Paths and manipulate said Paths albeit I don't know what the alteration/destruction here would be) but functionally they would be AE (Type 2) with like atleast CM2 at the very least cause they created it unlike the Shades which are just representatives (given Space, Time, Life and Death already existed before the Shades) and this is the case where things such as Destruction, Erudition, Remembrance, etc didn't exist yet before their own Aeons created itI don’t think it’s referring to people walking on the path created by an Aeon. The context was that an individual’s range of movement exists inside a larger design.
But even if we say that that’s what the statement is referring to, worth noting that a Path is born as an Aeon ascends. Those two factors are interdependent, but that doesn’t require the Aeon to be the path itself. Take the Speed force and Barry Allen for instance. It doesn’t contradict what i said. You simply have to interpret it in a way that makes sense.
No, it just requires the Paths to be atemporal and aspatial, which is true, because the Paths are abstracts. Because of this, Aeons can be pathstriders despite their ascension triggering the birth of a path. This isn’t a weird casuality error. The moment a path is born, it becomes eternal throughout time, so it wouldn’t be bound by Time. For example, even though Lan was not born in the Swarm Disaster, traces of the path of Hunt still existed back then.
The weird casuality with Fuli is that they simply have a husk throughout time, i.e, the Aeon’s body is spread across time to anchor events when they ascend.
This is as verbatim as it gets without actually calling them pathstriders. They are treading on their path, which by definition makes them pathstriders.
The entire plot of HSR is that an Aeon can die. That’s how we’re gonna stop Nanook, especially with Elio’s third method of killing an Aeon that is yet to be revealed. But even then, Ena is in fact, dead. They were assimilated and their path is masterless. The same way, Trailblaze is also called a masterless path, and so is the Propagation.
Now, because of Qlipoth hammering Tayzzy, their path was removed out of them:
“Simulated Universe: At that moment, an odd feeling strikes you, and you perceive a subtle sensation! The Propagation is being diluted... THEIR death is similar to a blot of light-colored ink that spreads out in the ocean. The Preservation is stripping the Aeon of THEIR broken shell, body, and heart... Next, the second concept is extracted... The Aeon is being further diluted, and the collective power is escaping from the disintegration. More forces, whether violent or calm, are disintegrating THEM...”
Swarm Diaster - Preservation II.
They and their path were separated, and that is their current state in the Amber prison right now.
What i’m saying is that Finality is said to be a path which other paths are bound by, which wouldn’t really make sense if the Aeon of that Path is physical and the others are somehow not. It’s not just applicable to Terminus.
Anyway, i disagree with the idea that the Aeons are conceptual, but it doesn’t really matter to the topic at hand, because we can easily refute the idea that the Aeons are treated as representatives in the same way that Shades are, so it shouldn’t matter largely.