• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Alastor CRT (Part 1.9/2)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't see the point in adding the tier 7 calc onto AP when we rate him as tier 5?

Add Low 7-C calc to feats​

Specifically this (ancient) one. We already accept that he crushed it and scale it to his LS, so I see no reason to not mention it as AP feat in feats section.
Also, it acts as a supportive (casual Tier 7 feat is supportive to Tier 5 no matter what you say) and as a safe tier to scale to in case Tier 5 ever gets nuked.
 
Tllm, be honest with me, despite it being correct, do you HONESTLY believe that tier 5 AP will stay on Al and Co. forever?
In my heart it does.
Either way even if temporary, I'd rather not bloat the page just because we're scared there will be an eventual downgrade.
 
(Riddle me this, Orange, why would be slide acroes buildings and shit when he can fly?)

Mostly agree with the rest, though iffy on some things.
Okay, knowing it's been fun and all
But this is MY shit
vox-voxx.gif

I caught a frame where he was hanging in the air here (pic 5 & 6)


Because Shok.wav is a flying monster and ******* it around within its domain is just straight up suicide, like a jetpack vs a B52, so terrain reliance is needed to outmaneuver it
 
Last edited:
Okay, knowing it's been fun and all
But this is MY shit
vox-voxx.gif

I caught a frame where he was hanging in the air here (pic 5 & 6)


Because Shok.wav is a flying monster and ******* it around within its domain is just straight up suicide, like a jetpack vs a B52, so terrain reliance is needed to outmaneuver it

The only one you can even argue in your group here as flight is the first one.

Abaddon already shot the rest in the head with a bolter.
 
Stealth Mastery - was implied to be able to hide from Vox for some time before eventually being found.
The two scans are on the same time stamp. Also I don't really believe hiding from someone for a while before being found is Stealth Mastery on it's own.

Also why does Vox links to an entirely different Wiki?
These seems like shadows oozing up. They look more like black flames than actual smoke.

Tier 7 is not a supporting feat for Tier 5. And I do not think the prospect of a downgrade is enough justification to keep something like that indexed on a profile - I also don't think that the Tier 5 feat will be removed, but it might need a recalculation because there was a flaw that went largely unnoticed in how far the clouds were actually displaced.

Other than that everything seems fine at a glance.
 
The two scans are on the same time stamp.
Thanks for that, will fix it once I’m on PC.
Also I don't really believe hiding from someone for a while before being found is Stealth Mastery on it's own.
He literally hid from his opponent for extended period of time and likely deliberately let be found (his entire fight is a stage for Vox to believe he is weak). Pretty much Stealth Mastery.
Also why does Vox links to an entirely different Wiki?
Because my Alastor CRTs are typically copy-paste from what I have on my CSAP profile, so I occasionally forget to replace links.
I’m talking about the bottom. There’s a green smoke.
Tier 7 is not a supporting feat for Tier 5.
Casual Tier 7 is supportive for Tier 5 tho. Heck, extremely casual 9-C calcs would be supportive for even Tier 3, since a high tier character can obviously do lower tier feats.
And I do not think the prospect of a downgrade is enough justification to keep something like that indexed on a profile
Feats section currently has exact same feat except without calc linked lol. Heck, the section even currently has Tier 9 calcs linked. Idk why y’all are jumping me for this right now but not in the past thread.
 
He literally hid from his opponent for extended period of time and likely deliberately let be found (his entire fight is a stage for Vox to believe he is weak). Pretty much Stealth Mastery.
I feel Stealth Mastery is more nuanced than that. You don't have to be particularly resourceful or well versed on stealth to hide from somebody actively looking you from an extended period of time unless said person has something something that makes Hide and Seek unfairly easy.
I’m talking about the bottom. There’s a green smoke.
Fair enough ig.
Casual Tier 7 is supportive for Tier 5 tho. Heck, extremely casual 9-C calcs would be supportive for even Tier 3, since a high tier character can obviously do lower tier feats.
Supporting Feats exist to justify a rating. A Tier 5 character can indeed obviously perform a lower tier feat, hence including them in AP is redundant instead of adding up to the notion that these characters are, in fact, Tier 5.

I don't know, I just find it serves just to clutter a page instead of being actually helpful. But w/e. Feats sections are largely optional, so I feel discussing this is a waste of time.
 
Supporting Feats exist to justify a rating. A Tier 5 character can indeed obviously perform a lower tier feat, hence including them in AP is redundant instead of adding up to the notion that these characters are, in fact, Tier 5.

I don't know, I just find it serves just to clutter a page instead of being actually helpful. But w/e. Feats sections are largely optional, so I feel discussing this is a waste of time.
It's one calc, it won't bloat any.
If it were like 8 or 9 calcs, sure, but it's only one and it's great supportive
 
I don't know, I just find it serves just to clutter a page instead of being actually helpful. But w/e. Feats sections are largely optional, so I feel discussing this is a waste of time.
Brotatochip the Adam mountain split feat was added back in spite of it meaning nothing, Hell it even got a whole new recalc, Adding Alastors Tier 7 Feat is literally no different than that except its an already reviewed and accepted Calc
 
It's one calc, it won't bloat any.
If it were like 8 or 9 calcs, sure, but it's only one and it's great supportive
When I say:
I don't know, I just find it serves just to clutter a page instead of being actually helpful.
I mean that the practice of sourcing feats belong your hitting level doesn't really serves a helpful purpose. It's a general statement. And as I said before, I find it largerly redudant instead of a useful addition.
Brotatochip the Adam mountain split feat was added back in spite of it meaning nothing
Wasn't here, and if it means nothing, then I believe it's not worth to index.

But like, as I said, w/e. Not the worse I've seen.
 
I feel Stealth Mastery is more nuanced than that. You don't have to be particularly resourceful or well versed on stealth to hide from somebody actively looking you from an extended period of time unless said person has something something that makes Hide and Seek unfairly easy.
Vox currently has Stealth for less.

Besides, a character who can transform into shadows being able to utilize great strength is only natural consequence of the ability.
Supporting Feats exist to justify a rating. A Tier 5 character can indeed obviously perform a lower tier feat, hence including them in AP is redundant instead of adding up to the notion that these characters are, in fact, Tier 5.
That’s why I’m saying include it in feats section.
I don't know, I just find it serves just to clutter a page instead of being actually helpful. But w/e. Feats sections are largely optional, so I feel discussing this is a waste of time.
They still require CRT so.
 
Vox currently has Stealth for less.
Y'know, being an acomplished serial killer actually makes a better example.

Or I don't know, not like I've tried.
That’s why I’m saying include it in feats section.
They still require CRT so.
Yeah, I feel that arguing about this is largely pointless at the end of the day, so never mind me.
 

Introduction​

The remaining 0.1 will be downscaling to General of Excorcists, hence the funny title. Also, props to @DaReaperMan for better immortality type 2 stuff, and @Polastournecis for several abilities. They gave the ideas, so I felt that I have to credit them.
Anyways, to proposals themselves:

Skill Section​


Everything will be referenced of course.

Abilities & Hax​

Damn, neat work dude.
I was about to plan to add Body Control in the next CRT, but oh well, someone already covered it

I agree with this except one thing
This isn't a full Flight? He glided away rather than just floating
 
I do think that’s flight but staff told me Levitation suits better, so I compromised.
Idk maybe they have a point, but this seems to make thing more...confused than it is supposed to be
Like, what's the difference between Flight and Levitation here?

Also, i got the frame where him straight up flying to flee from Shok.wav
 
Current OP looks okay at a glance.

What has been agreed so far though?
Pretty much everything, Aside from whats been crossed out.

And i guess the L7-C Feat being re-added, but thats just some people arguing thats unnecessary due to the current T5 and that it might clutter the Page.
 
Current OP looks okay at a glance.

What has been agreed so far though?
@AbaddonTheDisappointment agreed with everything in the current OP, most issues people had are what current OP fixed. Some people had concerns about putting Tier 7 feat into feats section, but that section currently has even Tier 9 feats, so they kinda conceded on that point. So currently, pretty much everyone agrees.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top