• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

[Bleach] Shinigami, except Ichibei does NOT have EE buddy šŸ˜­šŸ’” (Thread accepted)

Status
Not open for further replies.
You need to prove that, the crux of your opposition is based on the statements being hyperbolic.

Prove that then, for we have statements of description that satisfy the definition of Existence Erasure along with visual depictions showing an effect of targets being "erased".

So prove it is hyperbolic by either the statements being wrong or the visuals being incorrect.
not my burden to prove, we don't take the most highballed interpretation as the default one, when two equal interpretations exist we go with the simpler, least assumptive one, that happens everywhere but happens more aggressively in this wiki

we have the destruction value of pulverization for when things have no visible remains and the rules spell it out for you that you are allowed the higher destructive interps like atomic/subatomic destruction ONLY if you have explicit statements

what makes you think you can qualify for something far beyond even subatomic destruction with evidence as weak as that of pulverization
 
it just says it blows anything it touches without a trace and we also have yamamato erasing yhwach's sword. I personally dont see why it faces this much scrutiny when tso has eraser despite it leaving behind fragments when it hits the ground and when it hits Edo tensei
I saw this late but still wanna to address this,

Blowing away without a trace / visual remains is just pulverisation, that’s what our pulv standards outright say so we can’t extrapolate it to being hyper literal EE because the evidence for that specifically is just not present in the equation.

Now with TSO while I’m personally fine with answering about it here it’s ideally best if you don’t pull the whataboutism card in CRTs as it’s quite looked down upon here, I personally think the descriptions for TSO are similarly not enough to qualify for an ability of this magnitude, naruto fans jumped me when I said thisšŸ’”, I think it’s an issue of the wiki as a whole for being overly lenient for these types of abilities and would probably benefit from being more stricter about it.
 
I agree with OP.

I'm not a big fan of trying to use Mayuri's statement to include Ichibe, as knowledge on Ichibe's abilities is not at all confirmed and Squad 0 makes it clear they don't get involved unless something comes up and bothers them. Squad 0 in their first appearance stresses they don't do anything with SS unless they themselves choose to come down. The matter of executing those locked in Muken doesn't seem to pass under Squad 0s purview, so they wouldn't be considered executioners much less Ichibe who considers himself head of everything.

I figured Aizen would still have Mid-Godly due to regening from Mugetsu. Unless we're no longer considering that as a valid feat for Mid-Godly regen.
 
I agree with OP.

I'm not a big fan of trying to use Mayuri's statement to include Ichibe, as knowledge on Ichibe's abilities is not at all confirmed and Squad 0 makes it clear they don't get involved unless something comes up and bothers them. Squad 0 in their first appearance stresses they don't do anything with SS unless they themselves choose to come down. The matter of executing those locked in Muken doesn't seem to pass under Squad 0s purview, so they wouldn't be considered executioners much less Ichibe who considers himself head of everything.
Makes sense. Thank you for your evaluation, and could you maybe tag some other staff to get this evaluated too so I can apply the changes?
I figured Aizen would still have Mid-Godly due to regening from Mugetsu. Unless we're no longer considering that as a valid feat for Mid-Godly regen.
That argument is no longer valid due to the previous EE thread nuking Quincy EE towards everyone other than Hollows.
 
Are you not going to suggest something else for Aizen’s regeneration level, if you’re removing it? Like Low-Godly or thereabouts?
I'm waiting for staff input, they may agree with keeping mid godly but I'll make a suggestion if not later
 
I agree with OP.

I'm not a big fan of trying to use Mayuri's statement to include Ichibe, as knowledge on Ichibe's abilities is not at all confirmed and Squad 0 makes it clear they don't get involved unless something comes up and bothers them. Squad 0 in their first appearance stresses they don't do anything with SS unless they themselves choose to come down. The matter of executing those locked in Muken doesn't seem to pass under Squad 0s purview, so they wouldn't be considered executioners much less Ichibe who considers himself head of everything.

I figured Aizen would still have Mid-Godly due to regening from Mugetsu. Unless we're no longer considering that as a valid feat for Mid-Godly regen.
Yeah my guy, sorry to break it to you but that's not how statements like that work, just coming out with "yeah but this guy is an exception" despite nothing of the sort ever being shown or stated is pulling at straws, in order to just give an agreement for the sake of doing so.

The statement is clear, no shinigami has EE, Ichibei is a shinigami and has EE, hence the statement is incorrect and is thus proven to be unreliable, that's it.
Y'all are essentially attempting to use the statement as authorial intent "outside of ichibei" bc he's apparently an exception for w/e reason to fit your arguments lol, it's kinda getting ridiculous atp

Considering you claimed that Mayuri lacks knowldge on Ichibei, prove to me that he has full knowledge off Yamamoto's bankai.
 
Last edited:
I don't know if Mayuri has full knowledge on Yamamoto's bankai. I also don't care. That's not important for this CRT.
 
Ok, so, uhhhh, this has been dead for a while, but I think we also need context for mayuri's statement.

In the instance op did show his statement(beggining of tybw), he doesn’t clearly express his full line of thought. However, when he explains to the other captains he includes 2 major clues that were skipped at first:



The large quantity of hollows and the location(World of The Living).

For refference, the only people that should be able of using Hado 54: Haien are: most captains(excluding zaraki and soi fon), some lieutenants and some kido corps top members, as well as Tessai, Hachi, Urahara, Aizen and Azashiro.

During the time of the invasion, the only characters in the World of the Living among them are Urahara, Tessai and Hachi, which obviously wouldn't do such a thing. Also, the large amount of hollows would make it extremely difficult even for them to achieve such a feat in such a small amount of time, thus the culprit being the Quincies.

Then, Haien also has a narrative role which I pointed out here - thanks to orihime restoring grimmjow's arm erased with haien, Aizen affirms it is "far more than mere spatial or temporal regression", it being straight up "a rejection of phenomena".

Edit: the japanese raws also say haien erased Grimmjow's arm

Thus, I think Haien should stay as Existence Erasure

I also think Soi Fon should keep her EE, same for Ichibē and Aizen and I agree with Yama's EE being removed.

For Mugetsu, this isn't translated officially or by one of our translators yet, but Safwy shows it is EE and much more.

With the expression of a child throwing a tantrum, Cien let out a soundless scream.

But unmoved by such words, the darkness continued to sing its song of destruction—

And the ā€œdeathā€ that enveloped Cien slowly began to dismantle his body.

To return the madness born of darkness back into darkness once more.
Roka was barely alive.

After activating that power, she didn’t know what had actually happened in concrete terms.

The only thing she could understand was that nothing remained around her anymore.

The rubble that should have been scattered about was gone without a trace, and all that echoed through the area was the sound of sand flowing across the ground.
 
Last edited:
Ok, so, uhhhh, this has been dead for a while, but I think we also need context for mayuri's statement.

In the instance op did show his statement(beggining of tybw), he doesn’t clearly express his full line of thought. However, when he explains to the other captains he includes 2 major clues that were skipped at first:



The large quantity of hollows and the location(World of The Living).

For refference, the only people that should be able of using Hado 54: Haien are: most captains(excluding zaraki and soi fon), some lieutenants and some kido corps top members, as well as Tessai, Hachi, Urahara, Aizen and Azashiro.

During the time of the invasion, the only characters in the World of the Living among them are Urahara, Tessai and Hachi, which obviously wouldn't do such a thing. Also, the large amount of hollows would make it extremely difficult even for them to achieve such a feat in such a small amount of time, thus the culprit being the Quincies.

Then, Haien also has a narrative role which I pointed out here - thanks to orihime restoring grimmjow's arm erased with haien, Aizen affirms it is "far more than mere spatial or temporal regression", it being straight up "a rejection of phenomena".

Thus, I think Haien should stay as Existence Erasure

I also think Soi Fon should keep her EE, same for Ichibē and Aizen and I agree with Yama's EE being removed.

For Mugetsu, this isn't translated officially or by one of our translators yet, but Safwy shows it is EE and much more.


U/it_s_me-t is that you?
 
Since it’s been a week and nobody has replied at all I guess I will.
In the instance op did show his statement(beggining of tybw), he doesn’t clearly express his full line of thought. However, when he explains to the other captains he includes 2 major clues that were skipped at first:



The large quantity of hollows and the location(World of The Living).

For refference, the only people that should be able of using Hado 54: Haien are: most captains(excluding zaraki and soi fon), some lieutenants and some kido corps top members, as well as Tessai, Hachi, Urahara, Aizen and Azashiro.

During the time of the invasion, the only characters in the World of the Living among them are Urahara, Tessai and Hachi, which obviously wouldn't do such a thing. Also, the large amount of hollows would make it extremely difficult even for them to achieve such a feat in such a small amount of time, thus the culprit being the Quincies.
This argument really doesn’t address the point about Mayuri in the OP. The argument never was ā€œhow did Mayuri come to the conclusion that quincies were the one erasing the hollows?ā€ It was about the specific statement that Mayuri said about quincies. Mayuri states that ONLY quincies can erase hollows from existence, that statement just does not make sense under the view that haien can, in-fact, erase hollows from existence. It doesn’t matter that quincies were the culprit or how Mayuri came to the conclusion that they were the culprit, but the fact that Mayuri pretty bluntly states that ONLY they can erase hollows from existence.
I also think Soi Fon should keep her EE
You provide no reasoning for this
same for Ichibē and Aizen
Nobody in this thread is proposing to remove their EE.
For Mugetsu, this isn't translated officially or by one of our translators yet, but Safwy shows it is EE and much more.
This thread is not covering mugetsu at all. Mugetsu is already accepted as having existence erasure towards hollows via Ichigos quincy physiology. Mugetsu is pretty irrelevant to everything proposed in this thread.
Depends who asks
You might be able to tell by now

This also serves as a bump too I guess.
 
Last edited:
Bump
I also notice these points haven’t been truly responded to
Because random Shinigamis with a normal Hado having the same potency as a Squad Zero leader is completely absurd and not equatable whatsoever. Ichibei's existence erasure needs a whole ritual literally taking 100 days from a Universe just to erase one person and said technique being hyped up as such, so this hype for Ichibei's EE would make zero narrative sense if all it did was do something that normal Shinigamis can do, especially given the fact that Ichibei, who is also a Shinigami, can also use Haien as a result
I agree with all of this. Especailly Hado 54: Haien has conflicting statemnts in the databooks. Databook 2 states it is EE while the later Databook 3 states it reduces to ashes. And there is this fact that Higher Level Kido are meant to be more powerful the higher the number is. This is conflicted by Hado #90. Kurohitsugi which is atomizes people through deconstruction on atomic scale and is not EE.
 
Last edited:
This argument really doesn’t address the point about Mayuri in the OP. The argument never was ā€œhow did Mayuri come to the conclusion that quincies were the one erasing the hollows?ā€ It was about the specific statement that Mayuri said about quincies. Mayuri states that ONLY quincies can erase hollows from existence, that statement just does not make sense under the view that haien can, in-fact, erase hollows from existence.
It literally does adress it? The one who doesn't really adress the things I said is you ngl. Disregarding canon author and character statements via one interpretation which ignores context of a character statement is very fallacious.
It doesn’t matter that quincies were the culprit or how Mayuri came to the conclusion that they were the culprit, but the fact that Mayuri pretty bluntly states that ONLY they can erase hollows from existence.
And he doesn’t say ONLY quincy can? He only asks who else could destroy their existence, without waiting for an answer. And the reason why he came to the conclusion it's quincy is the key so all the statements make sense. Under your interpretation, either mayuri’s statement is false(which you believe it's not without providing any reason, for it) or Kubo's statement and Luppi' statement, as well as Tokinada's and Kubk establishing Orihime's ability through a direct explanation from the second smartest character in the verse are all invalid(which you believe to be the case, again, without any reasoning at all, which is an action of bias)
You provide no reasoning for this
I already explained why mayuri’s words don't invalidate any other ee shinigami have.
Nobody in this thread is proposing to remove their EE.
P sure it's been discussed here as well
This thread is not covering mugetsu at all. Mugetsu is already accepted as having existence erasure towards hollows via Ichigos quincy physiology. Mugetsu is pretty irrelevant to everything proposed in this thread.
Actually some people discuss things related to it such as Aizen's regen here.
You might be able to tell by now
Yes, I can, lol. Also why did you reply to me here if you blocked me?? I tried like 5 times to post my reply to you and it failed although I made sure to split the text so it's not due to text size😭
Bump
I also notice these points haven’t been truly responded to
I will adress them now:

For ichibe, just as Deceived said, his ee should be conceptual in nature, it also removes you from cycle of rebirth, something other ees beside quincy aren't really stated to do. Btw, Ichibe is not a shinigami, they are just the closest thing to him.

For the second one, there was nothing left of grimmjow's arm and we clearly see ashes be left from things that we accept as ee anyway(you should recognise these scans)



Also, the point of kurohitsugi is gravity, not an attack that eradicates the very existence of the target. Gravity strong enough to warp space and time and atomise things as an after effect, but that's it. Also, hado of level 89 and lower can be blocked by bakudo 81, danku. We have yet to see any bakudo that somehow defends you from kurohitsugi. Thus, kurohitsugi is a far more broken attack to use against a skilled kido user than hado 54.

If you want to continue that debate, I still have the draft made for you, I will reply to myself or to you if you unblock me
 
It literally does adress it? The one who doesn't really adress the things I said is you ngl. Disregarding canon author and character statements via one interpretation which ignores context of a character statement is very fallacious.
The statements don’t really ignore context at all. It’s a pretty blatant statement.
And he doesn’t say ONLY quincy can? He only asks who else could destroy their existence,
Check the link in the op https://ibb.co/hJ0qKwgR
answer. And the reason why he came to the conclusion it's quincy is the key so all the statements make sense.
But the problem is that nobody is questioning the fact that he came to the conclusion that it was quincies. That really doesn’t matter here. It’s the statement that he says while coming to that conclusion that matters.
Under your interpretation, either mayuri’s statement is false(which you believe it's not without providing any reason, for it)
Wouldn’t that be true under your interpretation? Why would Mayuri’s statement be false?
or Kubo's statement and Luppi' statement, as well as Tokinada's and Kubk establishing Orihime's ability through a direct explanation from the second smartest character in the verse are all invalid(which you believe to be the case, again, without any reasoning at all, which is an action of bias)
If you are referring to the databook when you say Kubos’ statement, then the reason we are considering that hyperbole is because it contradicts with the main story itself. Also combined with the fact that in later databooks haien was just stated to only reduce to ash. Can you provide context for all the other statements you are referring to?
I already explained why mayuri’s words don't invalidate any other ee shinigami have.
That wasn’t the main reason why it was proposed to remove soi fon’s ee
P sure it's been discussed here as well
Their ee has been discussed, but nobody has proposed to remove them which kind of makes your statement meaningless.
Actually some people discuss things related to it such as Aizen's regen here.
Aizen’s current regen rating does not have anything to do with mugetsu. It was already determined that mugetsu only has ee towards hollows. This has already been told to you multiple times within this thread. Mugetsu is completely irrelevant
Yes, I can, lol. Also why did you reply to me here if you blocked me?? I tried like 5 times to post my reply to you and it failed although I made sure to split the text so it's not due to text size😭
I never blocked you? I can still see your posts and you should still be able to see mine. I was waiting for your response.
For ichibe, just as Deceived said, his ee should be conceptual in nature
Why is that? Futen Taisatsuryo isn’t currently accepted as conceptual ee as far as I know.
it also removes you from cycle of rebirth, something other ees beside quincy aren't really stated to do.
If it didn’t remove them from the cycle of rebirth it wouldn’t be ee. At least not on a soul level.
Btw, Ichibe is not a shinigami, they are just the closest thing to him.
I’m pretty sure he is, but either way that doesn’t matter to the arguments proposed.
For the second one, there was nothing left of grimmjow's arm
Was that ever shown?
Also, the point of kurohitsugi is gravity, not an attack that eradicates the very existence of the target. Gravity strong enough to warp space and time and atomise things as an after effect, but that's it.
Yeah, that’s kind of their point. A far lower level hado has a massively higher destruction level.
Also, hado of level 89 and lower can be blocked by bakudo 81, danku. We have yet to see any bakudo that somehow defends you from kurohitsugi. Thus, kurohitsugi is a far more broken attack to use against a skilled kido user than hado 54.
Then why wouldn’t haien still be higher then? It’s not like haien is hado number 89, it’s 54
If you want to continue that debate, I still have the draft made for you, I will reply to myself or to you if you unblock me
You can respond there or we can make a versus on here if you’d like. I also never blocked you.
 
Last edited:
The statements don’t really ignore context at all. It’s a pretty blatant statement.
The one who ignores context is you, not the statement…
Check the link in the op https://ibb.co/hJ0qKwgR
Check this.
But the problem is that nobody is questioning the fact that he came to the conclusion that it was quincies. That really doesn’t matter here. It’s the statement that he says while coming to that conclusion that matters.
That "statement" is his conclusion. And I am questioning HOW he came to that conclusion.
Wouldn’t that be true under your interpretation? Why would Mayuri’s statement be false?
Your interpretation of Mayuri’s words is that any other race than quincy can't erase hollows. My interpretation is that the only ones in the world of the living capable of erasing so much hollows in such a short time is the quincy. It contradicts no statement, no narrative implication and no feats. Moreover, when Mayuri(who could watch the large number of hollow disappearences live) explains his reasoning for the one who caused it to be the quincy to the other captains, he mentions the kwy aspects: "a large number of hollows" and "in the world of the living". He doesn’t even say erasure, he says disappearence, yet he also says it's enough for the captains to understand it's quincy.
If you are referring to the databook when you say Kubos’ statement, then the reason we are considering that hyperbole is because it contradicts with the main story itself.
How does it contradict the main story? And we don't consider it a hyperbole yet, nor will we do unless this crt and the hado 54 part pass. There's nothing hyperbolic about it.
Also combined with the fact that in later databooks haien was just stated to only reduce to ash.
Would you show the statement for it? And already adressed that part right above.
Can you provide context for all the other statements you are referring to?
What statements? I mean, I linked every statement I am reffering to(and the tokinada stetement is on soi fon's page). You should be able to recognise by yourself from the manga scans the context if you are able to make claims such as certain statements contradicting the story which would imply you are familiar with it.
That wasn’t the main reason why it was proposed to remove soi fon’s ee
I already adressed the "kubo intended ee to remove you from cycle of rebirth thing" in this thread if you're talking about that.
Their ee has been discussed, but nobody has proposed to remove them which kind of makes your statement meaningless.
P sure it was…
Aizen’s current regen rating does not have anything to do with mugetsu. It was already determined that mugetsu only has ee towards hollows. This has already been told to you multiple times within this thread. Mugetsu is completely irrelevant
Curious how you say you read the thread yet missed my comments… And on Aizen's profile, mugetsu is still linked as feat for mid godly.
I never blocked you? I can still see your posts and you should still be able to see mine. I was waiting for your response.
Then why doesn't it work to reply to you? Anyway, I will just reply to my message then.
Why is that? Futen Taisatsuryo isn’t currently accepted as conceptual ee as far as I know.
Yes, it isn't yet, but it ought to be due to ichibe's conceptual powers. For a fact, the mere activation of the technique, filled everything with his darkness and even the aspect of things was slightly altered and the background disappeared. Something less than that was already labeled as limited rw here merely due to artistic effects if you wanna argue that. Then, it's the fact he summons the everlasting darkness which in bleach is a type 2 concept and uses it to reduce to the targets to nothingness. This is considering the fact ichibe's darkness already deletes the name which is also a concept.
If it didn’t remove them from the cycle of rebirth it wouldn’t be ee. At least not on a soul level.
P sure I also explained the cycle of rebirth thing and the difference between konpaku and tamashi somewhere here.
I’m pretty sure he is, but either way that doesn’t matter to the arguments proposed.
He's a primordial entity different from the 5 Great Nobles's ancestors or Reio, who are the ancestors of soul reapers. And it serves to point the existence of mistakes in the arg.
Was that ever shown?
P sure in the anime at least. Also in the manga we see nothing where the arm should be. And then again, there are the statements I already mentioned. One from Kubo, one from Luppy and the whole narrative point of Orihime restoring Grimmjow's arm being proof of her ability being beyond spatial or temporal regression
Yeah, that’s kind of their point. A far lower level hado has a massively higher destruction level. Then why wouldn’t haien still be higher then? It’s not like haien is hako number 89, it’s 54
It warps space and time and it does that trough sheer force of gravity. It also can't be blocked with other kido as far as we know. All these are advantages of Kurohitsugi. Which also has the advantage of spawning directly on the target meanwhile haien is a blast attack meaning it can be dodged. So Kurohitsugi has the overwhelming advantage in terms of mechanics and is a kido that affects space and time which are forbidden in soul society. This also aligns with the fact the only other forbidden kido whose number we know is hado 96 Itto Kasso(another kido in the 90's). There are plenty of reasons for it to be higher.
You can respond there or we can make a versus on here if you’d like. I also never blocked you.
Yeah, it's basically the same. I think I will reply to our debate after we end this one if there's smth left undiscussed.
 
The one who ignores context is you, not the statement…
???
It implies the same thing. And the link in the op’s translation aligns with the original japanese
That "statement" is his conclusion. And I am questioning HOW he came to that conclusion.
His conclusion was that quincies were the ones erasing the hollows. But to be clear you are questioning how mayuri came to the conclusion that only quincies can erase hollows from existence?
My interpretation is that the only ones in the world of the living capable of erasing so much hollows in such a short time is the quincy. It contradicts no statement, no narrative implication and no feats.
Which is literally not at all what mayuri said. He said that the only ones capable of erasing hollows from existence are quincies. Never does he mention timeframe or the world of the living in his statement. Your interpretation of the statement quite literally contradicts what the statement itself says.
Moreover, when Mayuri(who could watch the large number of hollow disappearences live) explains his reasoning for the one who caused it to be the quincy to the other captains, he mentions the kwy aspects: "a large number of hollows" and "in the world of the living". He doesn’t even say erasure, he says disappearence, yet he also says it's enough for the captains to understand it's quincy.
Again, the point has nothing to do with how mayuri came to the conclusion that the quincies were the ones erasing the hollows. It’s about that specific statement he said
How does it contradict the main story?
Read the op. The section under ā€œShinigami's Existence Erasureā€
And we don't consider it a hyperbole yet, nor will we do unless this crt and the hado 54 part pass. There's nothing hyperbolic about it.
When I said ā€œweā€ I was referring to the people in favor of the crt.
Would you show the statement for it?
What statements? I mean, I linked every statement I am reffering to(and the tokinada stetement is on soi fon's page). You should be able to recognise by yourself from the manga scans the context if you are able to make claims such as certain statements contradicting the story which would imply you are familiar with it.
I’m pretty sure all of those statements have already been previously addressed in this thread. I also don’t need to instantly be familiar with whatever statement you are referring to just based off of the character to be able to claim another statement contradicts the story.
I already adressed the "kubo intended ee to remove you from cycle of rebirth thing" in this thread if you're talking about that.
I’m pretty sure that was already replied to. And that’s not the only reason soi fon’s ee is being proposed to be removed.
P sure it was…
Can you show where?
Curious how you say you read the thread yet missed my comments…
What does mugestu have to do with the thread?
And on Aizen's profile, mugetsu is still linked as feat for mid godly.
Must be a mistake then. Because in the previous thread mugetsu’s ee was downgraded to be only towards hollows
Then why doesn't it work to reply to you? Anyway, I will just reply to my message then.
I don’t know, but if I blocked you, you wouldn’t even be able to see it in the first place
Yes, it isn't yet, but it ought to be due to ichibe's conceptual powers….
But it ought to be isn’t enough. If you want to argue in this thread using the idea that ichibe’s existence erasure is conceptual, you would need to get that accepted first. Him controlling black is considered as conceptual manipulation, not conceptual erasure, and the name thing is considered conceptual sealing and modification.
P sure I also explained the cycle of rebirth thing and the difference between konpaku and tamashi somewhere here.
I’m pretty sure that was already replied to by saqphire
He's a primordial entity different from the 5 Great Nobles's ancestors or Reio, who are the ancestors of soul reapers. And it serves to point the existence of mistakes in the arg.
I don’t really think that’s a mistake in the argument tbh. Or even one that matters to this thread.
It could very easily be off-panel. We don’t know where his arm landed
And then again, there are the statements I already mentioned. One from Kubo, one from Luppy and the whole narrative point of Orihime restoring Grimmjow's arm being proof of her ability being beyond spatial or temporal regression
All of those have already been addressed
It warps space and time and it does that trough sheer force of gravity. It also can't be blocked with other kido as far as we know. All these are advantages of Kurohitsugi. Which also has the advantage of spawning directly on the target meanwhile haien is a blast attack meaning it can be dodged. So Kurohitsugi has the overwhelming advantage in terms of mechanics and is a kido that affects space and time which are forbidden in soul society. This also aligns with the fact the only other forbidden kido whose number we know is hado 96 Itto Kasso(another kido in the 90's). There are plenty of reasons for it to be higher.
Aren’t hado ranked on power? But still we see multiple other hado ranked above haien that do not have existence erasure at all, or have any real advantages, that are also just blast attacks that can be dodged.
 
Last edited:
Your interpretation of mayuri’s words ignores the contex, that's all.
It implies the same thing.
It's slightly different.
And the link in the op’s translation aligns with the original japanese

???
His conclusion was that quincies were the ones erasing the hollows. But to be clear you are questioning how mayuri came to the conclusion that only quincies can erase hollows from existence?
Bruh, we already had this discussion in our debate. I am simply explaining how he came to the conclusion that the quincy are the only possibility.
Which is literally not at all what mayuri said.
"Captain, could this be?"(The question Mayuri replies to.)
"To be capable of erasing the very existence of hollows…"(another clue he used, which greatly reduces the number of possibilities. Again, he already had the other clues he thought were necessary for someonw to deduce it's quincies: the large number and the location, WoTL. Heck, if only quincies were able to erase hollows then the moment someone saw a hollow was erased would have already realised it's the quincy, no need to ask the most irascible captainšŸ˜‘šŸ˜‘) "They are the only ones!"(His conclusion regarding who could be guilty of destroying all those huge numbers)
He said that the only ones capable of erasing hollows from existence are quincies. Never does he mention timeframe or the world of the living in his statement.
Again, he mentioned the large number and the fact it's in the wotl when explaining to the captains who’s at fault. He doesn’t even say erasure, he says destruction. The only clues he gives the captains are:
1. Destruction of hollows
2. It's a large number
3. It happened in World of The Living

This points out towards the importance of these clues which are actually what determines it's quincies.
Your interpretation of the statement quite literally contradicts what the statement itself says.
My interpretation aligns with every canon statement, narrative implication and feat as well as it does not ignore the context behind mayuri’s words. Thus I believe it is far better than your overly symplistic interpretation that ignores the context behind someone’s words in order to somehow attempt to discredit other 10 canon statements, feats and narrative tools, all of them having the same amount of canonicity as mayuri’s words. And yes, feats and facts contradict what mayuri says. We have tosen erasing grimmjow's arm, thing Luppi also states and which is supported by the guidebook. It's moreover supported by Aizen deducing the fact Orihime's powers go way beyond spatial and temporal regression, being able to restore a thing whose existence was erased. Would you say Grimmjow's not a hollow? Or would you say Ichibe or Aizen can't erase hollows?
Again, the point has nothing to do with how mayuri came to the conclusion that the quincies were the ones erasing the hollows. It’s about that specific statement he said
Which ignores context that I've named and adressed yet you continue to ignore.
Read the op. The section under ā€œShinigami's Existence Erasureā€
Ok, I will adress that asw. If there's any argument in this thread left unanswered and which my own args didn't already nullify, feel free to quote it. Idk when I will have the time for this, but I will. Now, then, I believe I already adressed the first part of it. Further, we have:

1. The Tosen thing. I believe this one already hard counters his other arg that randoms use it. Anyway, already adressed Mayuri’s words and it's not like Tosen didn't have one of the greatest kido users in the entire series to teach him cogh cough Aizen cough cough. In fact, Tosen likely learnt this from Aizen as he repeatedly asked Aizen not to kill him, but to erase his existence entirely, leaving nothing behind(not saying Aizen used haien on Tosen). And I already did show panels from the manga where there's nothing left to be seen from grimmjow's arm, not even ashes.

2. The randoms having access to it thing. As said, the randoms thing is already debunked by the fact so far we have only one confirmed usage of this kido when we get the kido's number and name. Also, even kidos in the 30's are considered powerfull by a lieutenant lvl character, far far above your average shinigami.

3. The shinigami/Quincy parallel. Shinigami explicitly purify hollows only when killing them with their zanpaktos(which are what actually purifies the hollow). It makes no sense to have a whole kido just to do what a regular zanpakto does. Moreover, we've never seen someone who actually follows soul society's law use that kido. And lastly, that's no proof kubo intended ee to explicitly remove people from the cycle of reincarnation. Showing certain ee does it is a feat for said ee and expresses its potency but this arg is merely just a hasty generalisation and that's no debunk to other ee's.

When I said ā€œweā€ I was referring to the people in favor of the crt.
Ok
Just say it's in the op. Not to mention I already adressed with your own scans about ee leaving something behind. Anyway, no, we haven't seen anything left behind whenever haien was used.
I’m pretty sure all of those statements have already been previously addressed in this thread. I also don’t need to instantly be familiar with whatever statement you are referring to just based off of the character to be able to claim another statement contradicts the story.
And I'm also pretty sure I too have adressed everything? You’re free to come with new things or new args to support what I've already refuted but insisting on the same things I've already answered does nothing.
I’m pretty sure that was already replied to. And that’s not the only reason soi fon’s ee is being proposed to be removed.
It's being proposed to be removed because:
1. It's argued that it has the same problem as the yamamoto statement. Which is however, wrong, there is no instance of anything remaining of the victim which is the reaosn yamamoto' ee is removed(which I agree with)
2. The ee=imm4 negation thing. Again, Kubo didn't intend ee in general to remove people from the cycle of reincarnation. This is just a hasty generalisation.
Can you show where?
Nah, I am too tired at this point, ima give you that, it's useless to discuss things outside the crt, guess we'll do those in our debate.
What does mugestu have to do with the thread?
Same for this.
Must be a mistake then. Because in the previous thread mugetsu’s ee was downgraded to be only towards hollows
🤷
I don’t know, but if I blocked you, you wouldn’t even be able to see it in the first place
Probably. Idk, I forgot how it's like to block someone. Anyway, I will reply to my own comment in case there's an error for whatever reason.
But it ought to be isn’t enough. If you want to argue in this thread using the idea that ichibe’s existence erasure is conceptual, you would need to get that accepted first.
Again, I am just explaining why it's special, thus comparing other ee to it is wrong, it has nothing to do with anything else here, I don't really care about it being accepted as such.
Him controlling black is considered as conceptual manipulation, not conceptual erasure,
Yes, never said otherwise. However, this very darkness itself is associated with nothingness and by applying this darkness to Yhwach's being, he is reduced to nothingness. Or you may call this ee via cm, point stays the same, the conceptual nature of the attack makes it incomparably superior to other ees in the verse.
and the name thing is considered conceptual sealing and modification.
The names are straight up deleted, but whatever, already explained right above the reasoning for his ee.
I’m pretty sure that was already replied to by saqphire
He just called it an interesting point as far as I remember.
I don’t really think that’s a mistake in the argument tbh. Or even one that matters to this thread.
It's still an informal mistake.
It could very easily be off-panel. We don’t know where his arm landed
That's just an appeal to possibility. Anyway, for your peace of mind, the anime does fully show it disappearing and there's no ash or anything left.
All of those have already been addressed
Where?
Aren’t hado ranked on power?
That's part of it. They are also ranked based on their nature. For example, fire type hados are in the 30's(which implies haien's far higher placement is especially due to its ee properties unlike normal fire hado).
But still we see multiple other hado ranked above haien that do not have existence erasure at all, or have any real advantages, that are also just blast attacks that can be dodged.
Yes, because, once again, it's not that hard to counter, especially for characters that use techniques that incredibly boost their speed for short distances(shunpo, hirenkyaku, sonido, bringer light) or to block it with literally anything, ranging from rocks to countless barriers. As far as we know, it has no actual ap unlike kidos which can thus bypass barriers and other forms of protection one may use to block haien.

And once again, even kidos in the 30 are considered powerful bylieutenant lvl characters. You really overstimate the number of people who can actually use that hado
 
Your interpretation of mayuri’s words ignores the contex, that's all.
My interpretation of mayuri’s words is quite literally just what he says. Your interpretation of mayuri’s statement adds things that he didn’t say. Does Mayuri not say that the only ones capable of erasing hollows from existence are quincies? For haien to be ee, that would make it so Mayuri was either lying, or that for whatever reason Mayuri does not know of the existence of haien, which wouldn’t make sense. As haien is something that numerous soul reapers should have.
It's slightly different.
Not different enough to matter
What are the question marks for?
Bruh, we already had this discussion in our debate. I am simply explaining how he came to the conclusion that the quincy are the only possibility.
Nobody was questioning how he came to the conclusion that it was quincies. That really has nothing to do witn the argument.
"Captain, could this be?"(The question Mayuri replies to.)
"To be capable of erasing the very existence of hollows…"(another clue he used, which greatly reduces the number of possibilities. Again, he already had the other clues he thought were necessary for someonw to deduce it's quincies: the large number and the location, WoTL. Heck, if only quincies were able to erase hollows then the moment someone saw a hollow was erased would have already realised it's the quincy, no need to ask the most irascible captainšŸ˜‘šŸ˜‘) "They are the only ones!"(His conclusion regarding who could be guilty of destroying all those huge numbers)
Again, nobody is questioning how he came to that conclusion. But that statement Mayuri made would make absolutely zero sense under your interpretation. Why would Mayuri say ā€œThey are the only ones!ā€ In reference to the capability to erase hollows from existence, if he knew well that they weren’t. He doesn’t say ā€œto be capable of erasing the very existence of that many hollows, and in the world of the living… They are the only ones!ā€ He strictly mentions and is only referring to the capability to erase hollows from existence. I feel like this is something pretty self explanatory just by reading the statement. The only thing he emphasizes is the ability to erase hollows from existence as being something only capable by quincies.
Again, he mentioned the large number and the fact it's in the wotl when explaining to the captains who’s at fault. He doesn’t even say erasure, he says destruction. The only clues he gives the captains are:
1. Destruction of hollows
2. It's a large number
3. It happened in World of The Living

This points out towards the importance of these clues which are actually what determines it's quincies.
Did you miss the part where he says
My interpretation aligns with every canon statement, narrative implication and feat as well as it does not ignore the context behind mayuri’s words.
Your interpretation just blatantly ignored what Mayuri says. Does Mayuri not state that quincies are the only ones capable of erasing hollows from existence?
Thus I believe it is far better than your overly symplistic interpretation that ignores the context behind someone’s words
My interpretation of Mayuri’s words, are just quite literally what Mayuri says. I don’t understand what you mean. My interpretation is that Mayuri states that quincies are the only ones capable of erasing hollows from existence, which he does, does he not?
in order to somehow attempt to discredit other 10 canon statements, feats and narrative tools,
And what are these 10 other canon statements you speak of?
And yes, feats and facts contradict what mayuri says. We have tosen erasing grimmjow's arm, thing Luppi also states and which is supported by the guidebook.
A later guidebook says that haien instead reduces to ash. So far it’s one guidebook statement that is later not corroborated by a later guidebook and contradictory to narrative vs a canon, and pretty blunt, in series statement.
It's moreover supported by Aizen deducing the fact Orihime's powers go way beyond spatial and temporal regression, being able to restore a thing whose existence was erased.
Aizen never mentions existence erasure. This would be presupposing that it is existence erasure in the first place, which is what you are supposed to be arguing for using this.
Would you say Grimmjow's not a hollow?
Would you? Because under your interpretation that would be a scenario of a somewhat well known technique outside of quincies that is able to erase hollows from existence, which blatantly goes against the narrative.
Or would you say Ichibe or Aizen can't erase hollows?
It is very reasonable that Mayuri does not know of either the existence or capabilities of Futen Taisatsuryo. Aizens passive ee is only accepted as a possibility and it is only stated to be able to erase humans. So where are these ā€œ10 other canon statements, feats, and narrative toolsā€ that Mayuri’s statement contradicts? So far it’s only one questionable and contradicted databook statement.
Which ignores context that I've named and adressed yet you continue to ignore.
It doesn’t, but go on.
. The Tosen thing. I believe this one already hard counters his other arg that randoms use it. Anyway, already adressed Mayuri’s words and it's not like Tosen didn't have one of the greatest kido users in the entire series to teach him cogh cough Aizen cough cough.
There are a good amount soul reapers that should have the ability to use haien. Haien is not ranked super high.
In fact, Tosen likely learnt this from Aizen as he repeatedly asked Aizen not to kill him, but to erase his existence entirely, leaving nothing behind(not saying Aizen used haien on Tosen).
This example seems like figurative language, with him later clarifying he just wants his konpaku destroyed.
And I already did show panels from the manga where there's nothing left to be seen from grimmjow's arm, not even ashes.
You actually did not, as I clarified earlier that we don’t know whether anything was left behind from grimmjows arm in the manga as we don’t see where it lands.
The randoms having access to it thing. As said, the randoms thing is already debunked by the fact so far we have only one confirmed usage of this kido when we get the kido's number and name.
Though it is extremely likely that others have that hado. There are a good amount of characters we know capable of using higher ranked kido.
3. The shinigami/Quincy parallel. Shinigami explicitly purify hollows only when killing them with their zanpaktos(which are what actually purifies the hollow). It makes no sense to have a whole kido just to do what a regular zanpakto does
What? I have no clue what your point is here. And what kido are you talking about?
And lastly, that's no proof kubo intended ee to explicitly remove people from the cycle of reincarnation. Showing certain ee does it is a feat for said ee and expresses its potency but this arg is merely just a hasty generalisation and that's no debunk to other ee's.
It does seem like that is the case. He associates someone being erased from existence with them being removed from the soul cycle. And I don’t think we’ve ever seen an example of someone being erased from existence and not being removed from the soul cycle.
And I'm also pretty sure I too have adressed everything? You’re free to come with new things or new args to support what I've already refuted.
Is that not what I’m currently doing?
It's being proposed to be removed because:
1. It's argued that it has the same problem as the yamamoto statement. Which is however, wrong, there is no instance of anything remaining of the victim which is the reaosn yamamoto' ee is removed(which I agree with)
That’s not the only problem it shares with the yamamoto statement. The language used is not necessarily indicative of ee. That is gone over in the op.
Nah, I am too tired at this point, ima give you that, it's useless to discuss things outside the crt, guess we'll do those in our debate.
What? You’re the one who said that people in this thread were attempting to remove aizen and ichibe’s ee. Then I ask where, and then you say it’s useless to discuss things outside of the crt? You were the one who claimed it was inside of the crt in the first place.
Again, I am just explaining why it's special, thus comparing other ee to it is wrong,
But your explanation for that was that it was conceptual ee, which it isn’t accepted as. So that explanation no longer stands.
Yes, never said otherwise. However, this very darkness itself is associated with nothingness and by applying this darkness to Yhwach's being, he is reduced to nothingness. Or you may call this ee via cm, point stays the same, the conceptual nature of the attack makes it incomparably superior to other ees in the verse.
That is kind of the point that is being made here. It wouldn’t make sense for the move to be treated so special for its ability to erase someone from existence, if there is just a random hado that is capable of doing the same thing. The conceptual nature you speak of is just how ichibe performs the attack in the first place. But it’s effect on the opponent in the end is still the same.
The names are straight up deleted, but whatever, already explained right above the reasoning for his ee.
That is conceptual sealing. He changes and seals away their name.
He just called it an interesting point as far as I remember.
They did make a response to it if i’m not mistaken.
That's just an appeal to possibility. Anyway, for your peace of mind, the anime does fully show it disappearing and there's no ash or anything left.
You were the one who claimed there was nothing left of his arm in the manga, so you would have to provide sufficient proof for that claim. The anime would not be a canon source in this scenario.
Go back to when you first said it
That's part of it. They are also ranked based on their nature. For example, fire type hados are in the 30's
That’s not true. Take for example hado #73
Yes, because, once again, it's not that hard to counter, especially for characters that use techniques that incredibly boost their speed for short distances(shunpo, hirenkyaku, sonido, bringer light) or to block it with literally anything, ranging from rocks to countless barriers.
You could say that same thing about multiple hado ranked above haien.
As far as we know, it has no actual ap
Wouldn’t that make it even more powerful, since it wouldn’t rely on ap or durability to erase it’s target?
And once again, even kidos in the 30 are considered powerful bylieutenant lvl characters. You really overstimate the number of people who can actually use that hado
Still a good amount of people that should be able to use that hado.

And can we get any mods or anyone elses input on this? Otherwise this thread will just be forever turned into a back and forth 1v1 debate.
 
Last edited:
My interpretation of mayuri’s words is quite literally just what he says.
No? I already explained the countless things you are ignoring
Your interpretation of mayuri’s statement adds things that he didn’t say.
Does an extraordinary genius have to explain his entire line of thinking when the clues are all right infront of him?
Does Mayuri not say that the only ones capable of erasing hollows from existence are quincies?
Yes, he doesn't, that's what I've been explaining for quite a while.
For haien to be ee, that would make it so Mayuri was either lying, or that for whatever reason Mayuri does not know of the existence of haien, which wouldn’t make sense.
Only under your interpretation of his words, which I already adressed
As haien is something that numerous soul reapers should have.
Show me anyone who is a member of Gotei 13 use it.
Not different enough to matter
Every difference matters.
What are the question marks for?
Your claim about aligning with the original raws
Nobody was questioning how he came to the conclusion that it was quincies.
Ok, this is straight up fallacious. I did already say a few times I am the one questioning that.
That really has nothing to do witn the argument.
Yes, it does? Because you are trying to mix his answer about the identity of the culprit with one of the clues he used, saying they are the only ones for whom this clue applies. If that were the case, one hollow being erased would've been enough to tell everyone it's the quincy. Moreover, if that were the case, he could have just said erasure when explaining the situation to the captains, but no, he considered that "destruction", "large number of hollows" and "in the World of The Living" are the clues required for anyone to guess it's the quincy.
Again, nobody is questioning how he came to that conclusion.
I do.
But that statement Mayuri made would make absolutely zero sense under your interpretation.
How so?
Why would Mayuri say ā€œThey are the only ones!ā€ In reference to the capability to erase hollows from existence, if he knew well that they weren’t.
He doesn’t continue his phrase or whatever? He literally answers Akon's question.
He doesn’t say ā€œto be capable of erasing the very existence of that many hollows, and in the world of the living… They are the only ones!ā€
He says "The destruction of a large number of hollows in the world of the living" and considers these enough clues for anyone to know it's the quincy.
He strictly mentions and is only referring to the capability to erase hollows from existence.
No, he is reffering to akon's question after naming one of the clues we weren't explicitly told yet(the alarms and people were already screaming about mass disappearences of hollows in wotl)
I feel like this is something pretty self explanatory just by reading the statement.
Call it statement if you want, but the statement is the quincy are the culprit, not that only they can erase hollows. That's your mere interpretation based on ignoring context and the question he replies to with "They are the only ones!", as well as the clues he already had: destruction, large number of hollows and in The World of The Living automatically meaning it's quincies as he considers these clues enough even for people who don't match his intellect to understand who the cluprit is.
Also, by this "just by reading the statement" you prove you decide to ignore the rest of the context in order to draw a wrong conclusion and act as if that's a debunk to all other statements about shinigami having ee.
The only thing he emphasizes is the ability to erase hollows from existence as being something only capable by quincies.
No? Already explained why your interpretation is wrong. Now all you're doing is just repeating the same wrong idea without actually adressing what I say.
Did you miss the part where he says
?
Your interpretation just blatantly ignored what Mayuri says.
No? Just because it contradicts your wrong interpretation, doesn’t mean mine ignores anything? I already explained what he's actually reffering to with "they’re the only ones!" and what are the actual clues for determining it's the quincy, things you didn't actually adress. And my interpretation aligns with every canon statement, narrative implication and all the rest. No contradiction under my interpretation which also keeps everything in mind. So yes, objectively speaking, I'd say that's a way better interpretation than yours which ignores context to try and discredit other statements with just as much canonicity as this line.
Does Mayuri not state that quincies are the only ones capable of erasing hollows from existence?
Yes, that's what I've been saying for quite a while.
My interpretation of Mayuri’s words, are just quite literally what Mayuri says.
Taken out of context, ignoring he had the actual clues that lead to the conclusion it's the quincy right on that huge screen, ignoring the question he' replying to and used to attempt a discreditation directed at multiple other ee statements and implications just as canon as this.
I don’t understand what you mean.
Well, hope this comment made everything clear, I've been as explicit as possible.
My interpretation is that Mayuri states that quincies are the only ones capable of erasing hollows from existence, which he does, does he not?
He doesn’t and I already explained why.
And what are these 10 other canon statements you speak of?
I just linked 3 of them from cfyow, further we have the soi fon one, the guidebook haien statement, the luppi statement, another shinigami Aizen ee statement here. Then, there comes the narrative tool of Aizen establishing Orihime's powers due to her being able to restore grimmjow's arm whose existence itself was erased which is pointed out in the same scene by luppi saying it's impossible to restore that arm which was completely erased.
A later guidebook says that haien instead reduces to ash.
Already adressed this, thing that you ignored.
So far it’s one guidebook statement that is later not corroborated by a later guidebook and contradictory to narrative vs a canon, and pretty blunt, in series statement.
No? So far it's a guidebook statement supported by the original raws of the manga, by the fact we literally see the arm fully disappear, with no ashes left or anything, supported by the narrrative value of aizen deducing orihime's powers based on their ability to restore the arm vs a guidebook statement that doesn't fully contradict it and that is directly contradicted by both manga and anime.
Aizen never mentions existence erasure. This would be presupposing that it is existence erasure in the first place, which is what you are supposed to be arguing for using this.
You need to read the scans again then.
Would you?
No? Why would I? It creates no contradiction with any canon statement whatsoever.
Because under your interpretation that would be a scenario of a somewhat well known technique outside of quincies that is able to erase hollows from existence,
It's clearly not that well known considering we only ever see one individual explicitly using it. And yes, that's what I'm saying. Under my interpretation there's no contradiction.
which blatantly goes against the narrative.
Again, there's no narrative supporting the idea that only quincies can erase hollows.
It is very reasonable that Mayuri does not know of either the existence or capabilities of Futen Taisatsuryo.
That's just a possibility
Aizens passive ee is only accepted as a possibility and it is only stated to be able to erase humans.
Read the bottom of Aizen's page.
So where are these ā€œ10 other canon statements, feats, and narrative toolsā€ that Mayuri’s statement contradicts? So far it’s only one questionable and contradicted databook statement.
Literally listed them above. And mayuri’s words don't contradict them in the slightest, only your interpretation of them does
It doesn’t, but go on.
Ummmm, yes, it does??
There are a good amount soul reapers that should have the ability to use haien. Haien is not ranked super high.
Yet we don't see them use it for various reasons.
This example seems like figurative language, with him later clarifying he just wants his konpaku destroyed.
He wants it destroyed to the point of Aizen "wiping his existence out of this world", "leaving no trace" of him. And if you watch the anime scene of Aizen killing him, you see the impact of his attack only leaves a mass of blood from tosen's body and that blood also completely disappears with no trace whatsoever right after that. Heck, you can even see the blood drops that were thrown everywhere slowly disappear while they were still moving in slow motion.
You actually did not, as I clarified earlier that we don’t know whether anything was left behind from grimmjows arm in the manga as we don’t see where it lands.
That's why I brought the anime scan, for this arg which is just an argument from silence, with no actual value, btw
Though it is extremely likely that others have that hado. There are a good amount of characters we know capable of using higher ranked kido.
Yeah, so? Those characters don't really have ee via haien on their profile. And "a good amount" is an overstimation, troughout the entire series, we've only ever seen like 15 people who should be capable of using haien and all of them are high-top tiers(aizen is a god tier). None of them except urahara, tessai and hachi were in WoTL and none of them would ever do that. Moreover, even for them, erasing such great numbers of hollows in such a short time would kinda be impossible.
What? I have no clue what your point is here.
I genuinely don't see what you don’t understand, tbh. The point is simple: Killing hollows with zanpaktos is what actually purifies them. It's repeatedly stated throughout the manga, in the novels and even in the guidebooks. Killing them trough other means would have different effects, that's all. Thus, shinigami don't only purify hollows which is what you and the op try to picture as the narrative intent.
And what kido are you talking about?
About haien, obviouslyšŸ˜‘.
It does seem like that is the case. He associates someone being erased from existence with them being removed from the soul cycle.
Would you please stop ignoring the context? The guy asking the question associates them and he only does it because quincy ee explicitly removes you from cycle of reincarnation and the question is regarding quincy ee working on yamamoto.
And I don’t think we’ve ever seen an example of someone being erased from existence and not being removed from the soul cycle.
The guy erased by Aizen's passive reiatsu for example.
Is that not what I’m currently doing?
It is partially, although you're still ignoring some of my points.
That’s not the only problem it shares with the yamamoto statement. The language used is not necessarily indicative of ee. That is gone over in the op.
The wording used does imply ee if there's nothing left behind, that's why it was accepted in the first place. And unlike yamamoto's statement, this one has no antifeat like something remaining.
What? You’re the one who said that people in this thread were attempting to remove aizen and ichibe’s ee. Then I ask where, and then you say it’s useless to discuss things outside of the crt? You were the one who claimed it was inside of the crt in the first place.
I claimed people here discussed those ee's and they did, but it’s unrelated to the proposals of the crt so ima just ignore anything that isn’t proposed.
But your explanation for that was that it was conceptual ee, which it isn’t accepted as. So that explanation no longer stands.
It's not accepted that someone who can do a kido in the 70's can also do a kido in the 50's either, so, by this logic, the argument with higher numbers of kido being less dangerous is invalid by default. It is invalid anyway and I gave plenty of reasons for it, but you get the idea(or so I hope).
That is kind of the point that is being made here. It wouldn’t make sense for the move to be treated so special for its ability to erase someone from existence, if there is just a random hado that is capable of doing the same thing.
"A random hado". Buddy, kidos in the 30 are already considered impressively powerful even for lieutenants, and those are barely middle lvl kidos.
The conceptual nature you speak of is just how ichibe performs the attack in the first place. But it’s effect on the opponent in the end is still the same.
Wrong. The effect also removes them from the cycle of reincarnation which is quite special even among ee and so far only quincy ee is confirmed to do the same. Moreover, it's still ee via conceptual manipulation, far more op than your regular ee.
That is conceptual sealing. He changes and seals away their name.
It is currently treated as such. But he doesn't just "change" their name. He deletes it and then he creates a new one for them from 0 with his "bankai", shirafude ichimonji.
They did make a response to it if i’m not mistaken.
I don't remember, but you're free to link.
You were the one who claimed there was nothing left of his arm in the manga, so you would have to provide sufficient proof for that claim.
You were the one who claimed his arm was outside the panel so you'd have to provide sufficient proof for that first.
The anime would not be a canon source in this scenario.
Why? Because you don’t like it? Anime events are canon and they fully follow the manga, up to tybw when kubo decided to introduce new things.
Go back to when you first said it
Go read page 3 again, I've adressed anything that was replied to my points.
That’s not true.
Take for example hado #73
It actually is 100% true(go to q&a 830). And hado 73 is an evolved form of a fire type hado in the 30's, that's why it's placed higher.
You could say that same thing about multiple hado ranked above haien
Like?
Wouldn’t that make it even more powerful, since it wouldn’t rely on ap or durability to erase it’s target?
It means it can't get past a piece paper if it's placed between the attack and the target.
Still a good amount of people that should be able to use that hado.
And all of them in the Soul Society during the mass destruction of hollows in the WoTL.
And can we get any mods or anyone elses input on this?
Multiple people already asked multiple mods, we just have to wait
Otherwise this thread will just be forever turned into a back and forth 1v1 debate.
I believe this is probably one of the last replies or maybe even the last one as I answered absolutely everything so far and made things clear enough that even those unfamiliar with bleach would understand everything
 
Last edited:
No? I already explained the countless things you are ignoring
None of the things you brought up suddenly change the statement that Mayuri said
Does an extraordinary genius have to explain his entire line of thinking when the clues are all right infront of him?
Again, I am not referring to the fact that Mayuri came to the conclusion that it was quinces, but that specific statement he says. I have told you this countless times already.
Yes, he doesn't, that's what I've been explaining for quite a while.
ā€œTo be capable of erasing the very existence of hollows. They are the only ones!ā€ And it should go without saying that ā€œtheyā€ is referring to quincies. So he says quincies are the only ones in reference to be capable of erasing the existence of hollows. There is quite literally no arguing against that.
Only under your interpretation of his words, which I already adressed
So do you think Mayuri was lying?
Show me anyone who is a member of Gotei 13 use it.
Technically the only use of it we see in the series is of a captain of the gotei 13. But are you claiming it is unreasonable to assume that any other soul reaper has the ability to use haien? Or that Mayuri does not know of the existence of haien?
Every difference matters.
Then explain how that one matters.
Your claim about aligning with the original raws
Yes?
Ok, this is straight up fallacious. I did already say a few times I am the one questioning that.
Then how is that relevant to the current arguments at all? How Mayuri came to the conclusion that it was quincies does not matter to the op or to any of my current arguments, so then what’s the point of bringing it up again and again? And explain how that is fallacious.
Yes, it does? Because you are trying to mix his answer about the identity of the culprit with one of the clues he used,
Except I’m not at all. I’m simply taking him by his statement. He says that to be capable of erasing the very existence of hollows, quincies are the only ones.
If that were the case, one hollow being erased would've been enough to tell everyone it's the quincy.
Who says it wasn’t?
Moreover, if that were the case, he could have just said erasure when explaining the situation to the captains, but no, he considered that "destruction"
And by destruction, he obviously meant erasure. Because they were talking about, you know, the hollows that were erased. He even mentions the extinguishing of the souls. I don’t see your point on this.
"large number of hollows" and "in the World of The Living" are the clues required for anyone to guess it's the quincy.
Never does he state that those are the clues required.
Then you can do that on your own time then I guess. But that has nothing to do with the points being made in the OP and the points I am making.
Because why would he say ONLY quincies when referring to the ability to erase hollows from existence?
He doesn’t continue his phrase or whatever? He literally answers Akon's question.
What do you mean? Right before he says ā€œthey are the only onesā€ he says ā€œto be capable of erasing the very existence of hollowsā€. And using your scan, he says ā€œwho else could eradicate the very existence of hollows but themā€ which wouldn’t make sense if he knew good and well the answer to that. And then in the scan in the op he says ā€œThe only ones capable of removing hollows from existence itself are them and them aloneā€. In all of these he says ā€œTheyā€ are the only ones in reference to the ability to erase hollows from existence.
He says "The destruction of a large number of hollows in the world of the living" and considers these enough clues for anyone to know it's the quincy.
What’s your point here?
No, he is reffering to akon's question after naming one of the clues we weren't explicitly told yet(the alarms and people were already screaming about mass disappearences of hollows in wotl)
See above
Call it statement if you want, but the statement is the quincy are the culprit,
Not true. The statement he makes is that quincies are the only ones capable of erasing hollows from existence, and uses that to imply that they are the culprit.
That's your mere interpretation based on ignoring context and the question he replies to with "They are the only ones!"
You are ignoring what he says right before he says ā€œThey are the only onesā€ he says ā€œto be capable of erasing the very existence of hollowsā€.
as well as the clues he already had: destruction, large number of hollows and in The World of The Living automatically meaning it's quincies as he considers these clues enough even for people who don't match his intellect to understand who the cluprit is.
Mayuri never even mentions any of those in his statement. He only ever mentions the ability to erase hollows from existence and then says they are the only ones.
Also, by this "just by reading the statement" you prove you decide to ignore the rest of the context in order to draw a wrong conclusion and act as if that's a debunk to all other statements about shinigami having ee.
There is no context I am ignoring. It is you that is ignoring the very statement that Mayuri makes.
No? Already explained why your interpretation is wrong. Now all you're doing is just repeating the same wrong idea without actually adressing what I say.
I have been addressing everything you have been saying.
For some reason what I typed was cut off. I meant to say did you ignore the part where he says ā€œto extinguish souls. I'm sure you astute captains have already figured it out by now this rebel army is none other than quinciesā€
No? Just because it contradicts your wrong interpretation, doesn’t mean mine ignores anything? I already explained what he's actually reffering to with "they’re the only ones!" and what are the actual clues for determining it's the quincy, things you didn't actually adress.
I did. I gave literal quotes of what Mayuri was referring to within that scene. You conveniently ignore what he says right before that.
And my interpretation aligns with every canon statement, narrative implication and all the rest.
No it doesn’t as outlined throughout the OP and my arguments,
Yes, that's what I've been saying for quite a while.
And that is blatantly incorrect as I outline above by going over all of the quotes.
Taken out of context, ignoring he had the actual clues that lead to the conclusion it's the quincy right on that huge screen, ignoring the question he' replying to and used to attempt a discreditation directed at multiple other ee statements and implications just as canon as this.
The only clue he mentions in reference to ā€œThey are the only onesā€ is the ability to erase hollows from existence.
Well, hope this comment made everything clear, I've been as explicit as possible.
It really doesn’t
I just linked 3 of them from cfyow,
Already responded to those
further we have the soi fon one,
Was already addressed in the OP and you have yet to even acknowledge all of the arguments against it.
the guidebook haien statement, the luppi statement
Both already addressed
This one is pretty meaningless to this thread. That statement is in reference to the creation of oken
Then, there comes the narrative tool of Aizen establishing Orihime's powers due to her being able to restore grimmjow's arm whose existence itself was erased which is pointed out in the same scene by luppi saying it's impossible to restore that arm which was completely erased.
This presupposes that the arm was erased from existence in the first place
Already adressed this, thing that you ignored.
When did I ignore this?
No? So far it's a guidebook statement supported by the original raws of the manga,
Not true. That guidebook statement is contradicted by Mayuri’s and by a later guidebook statement.
supported by the narrrative value of aizen deducing orihime's powers based on their ability to restore the arm
This was already responded to by saqphire if I’m not mistaken
You need to read the scans again then.
Can you show me where in those scans Aizen mentions existence erasure?
It's clearly not that well known considering we only ever see one individual explicitly using it.
Logically it should be considering we know multiple kido proficient characters and characters capable of using higher level kido.
Again, there's no narrative supporting the idea that only quincies can erase hollows.
Mayuri’s statement
That's just a possibility
I never said it wasn’t?
Read the bottom of Aizen's page.
Disregard the possibility thing then
And mayuri’s words don't contradict them in the slightest, only your interpretation of them does
This is a pretty meaningless statement. I could say the same thing.
Yet we don't see them use it for various reasons.
Okay?
He wants it destroyed to the point of Aizen "wiping his existence out of this world", "leaving no trace" of him. And if you watch the anime scene of Aizen killing him, you see the impact of his attack only leaves a mass of blood from tosen's body and that blood also completely disappears with no trace whatsoever right after that. Heck, you can even see the blood drops that were thrown everywhere slowly disappear while they were still moving in slow motion.
The blood drops do not seem to disappear, and none of that would even matter since that’s anime only
That's why I brought the anime scan, for this arg which is just an argument from silence, with no actual value, btw
That would not be an argument from silence. Because I never claimed that anything was left behind from grimmjows arm. You were the one claiming that nothing was left behind and you failed to provide sufficient proof.
And "a good amount" is an overstimation, troughout the entire series, we've only ever seen like 15 people who should be capable of using haien and all of them are high-top tiers(aizen is a god tier).
It should be slightly more than that but that is still a good amount of people.
None of them except urahara, tessai and hachi were in WoTL and none of them would ever do that. Moreover, even for them, erasing such great numbers of hollows in such a short time would kinda be impossible.
This is completely irrelevant. I’m not questioning how Mayuri came to the conclusion that it was quincies.
I genuinely don't see what you don’t understand, tbh. The point is simple: Killing hollows with zanpaktos is what actually purifies them. It's repeatedly stated throughout the manga, in the novels and even in the guidebooks. Killing them trough other means would have different effects, that's all. Thus, shinigami don't only purify hollows which is what you and the op try to picture as the narrative intent.
Nobody said shinigami can only purify hollows.
About haien, obviouslyšŸ˜‘.
You said it makes no sense to have a whole kido to do what a regular zanpakuto does. Do you mean purify hollows? Because nobody is claiming that’s what haien does. Do you mean to just defeat hollows in general? Because like all hado can do that.
The guy erased by Aizen's passive reiatsu for example.
Were we shown that he was still in the soul cycle?
Would you please stop ignoring the context? The guy asking the question associates them and he only does it because quincy ee explicitly removes you from cycle of reincarnation and the question is regarding quincy ee working on yamamoto.
But he says quincy arrows can only erase hollows from existence when referring to a question about being removed from the soul cycle. He interchanges removing from the soul cycle with being erased from existence.
It's not accepted that someone who can do a kido in the 70's can also do a kido in the 50's either, so, by this logic, the argument with higher numbers of kido being less dangerous is invalid by default. It is invalid anyway and I gave plenty of reasons for it, but you get the idea(or so I hope).
Okay, so would you be under the logic that tosen was the only one capable of using it?
"A random hado". Buddy, kidos in the 30 are already considered impressively powerful even for lieutenants, and those are barely middle lvl kidos.
That is kind of besides the point
Wrong. The effect also removes them from the cycle of reincarnation which is quite special even among ee
Can you even prove that? That no other ee besides quincy removes from the soul cycle?
Moreover, it's still ee via conceptual manipulation, far more op than your regular ee.
That wouldn’t make the ee more powerful, that is just how he performs the ee.
It is currently treated as such. But he doesn't just "change" their name. He deletes it and then he creates a new one for them from 0 with his "bankai", shirafude ichimonji.
Then you can make your own crt on that
I don't remember, but you're free to link.
You were the one who claimed his arm was outside the panel so you'd have to provide sufficient proof for that first.
I never claimed his arm was outside the panel. You are asking me to provide proof for a strawman
Why? Because you don’t like it? Anime events are canon and they fully follow the manga, up to tybw when kubo decided to introduce new things.
It actually is 100% true(go to q&a 830). And hado 73 is an evolved form of a fire type hado in the 30's, that's why it's placed higher.
I see, but what I also see is that danku’s ability to block lower level hado is still dependent on the user. So it is not a total counter to haien.
58, 63, 73, 78, 88, 91
It means it can't get past a piece paper if it's placed between the attack and the target.
But that would still mean it would erase its target regardless of the users proficiency in it or the receivers durability. That would still make it overall way more powerful than if it did rely on ap. And by your logic haien either wouldn’t have erased the sleeve on grimmjows arm or grimmjows arm itself because the sleeve was in the way. You claim nothing was left behind.
And all of them in the Soul Society during the mass destruction of hollows in the WoTL.
Not all of them, as even you yourself note, but either way that wouldn’t matter due to the fact that the argument is not based on how Mayuri came to the conclusion that it was quincies, but that he claims only quincies can erase hollows from existence which wouldn’t make sense under the assumption that haien is ee in the first place.
I believe this is probably one of the last replies or maybe even the last one
I’m ngl I doubt that. Whenever somebody says this in a debate they usually continue to reply after. Hell, I’m even guilty of this in the past.
 
Last edited:
Ghostimus does have a point

None of the things you brought up suddenly change the statement that Mayuri said
Ofc they don’t change his words, they were never meant to say what you believe they say, that's all.
Again, I am not referring to the fact that Mayuri came to the conclusion that it was quinces, but that specific statement he says. I have told you this countless times already.
And I have told you already you're mixing 2 different things? Heck, I explained all these.
ā€œTo be capable of erasing the very existence of hollows. They are the only ones!ā€ And it should go without saying that ā€œtheyā€ is referring to quincies. So he says quincies are the only ones in reference to be capable of erasing the existence of hollows. There is quite literally no arguing against that.
I love how once again, you are ignoring the context and the lines right above that:
Akon asks about the identity of the culprit and mayuri says "Isn't it obvious?" Short pause "To be able to erase the very existence of hollows…" Short Pause "They are the only ones!". Mayuri is clearly replying to Akon's question.
So do you think Mayuri was lying?
No? I simply believe you conveniently ignore context in order to draw wrong conclusions out of Mayuri's words and then act as if that's a debunk to all other shinigami ee in the verse simply because your interpretation of his words contradicts the other canon statements, feats and narrative implications which should already ring some bells and tell you to think again, but it seems it doesn't, for whatever reason.
Technically the only use of it we see in the series is of a captain of the gotei 13.
Tosen is no longer a member of Gotei13 by that time.
But are you claiming it is unreasonable to assume that any other soul reaper has the ability to use haien? Or that Mayuri does not know of the existence of haien?
Or perhaps that they purposely not use that on hollows whatsoever due to them knowing the dangers of erasing hollows?
Then explain how that one matters.
Nah, it's not important how it matters since anyway I decided to quote the anime whose canonicity>the manga when it comes to tybw
Explain it.
Then how is that relevant to the current arguments at all?
It is relevant to the op and these are all arguments that haven't been refuted.
How Mayuri came to the conclusion that it was quincies does not matter to the op or to any of my current arguments, so then what’s the point of bringing it up again and again?
It is relevant to the op(heck, it's one of the most relevant args so far, as it nullifues the main arg of the op) and it's my arg. I appreciate the fact you admit your args(which only try to refute mine, that's how this discussion between you and me started) have no relevance to my arg though.
And explain how that is fallacious.
Because I swear it sometimes feels like you’re playing dumb on purpose. And purposely ignoring the numerous times when I said it, per your own claim that "Nobody's questioning how he came to the conclusion that it was quincies", meanwhile I already did that.
Except I’m not at all. I’m simply taking him by his statement.
Yes, you are. You do it again right now:
He says that to be capable of erasing the very existence of hollows, quincies are the only ones.
Once again, you are ignoring several contextual aspects:
1. Akon's question about the identity, which is what mayuri replies to with "They are the only ones!"
2. The fact that this "To erase the very existence of hollows…" is merely a clue.
Who says it wasn’t?
They were still not sure about the identity of the culprit despite 28k souls being erased. It took the equivalent of 28k souls for someone to even take action(which wasn't authorised yet, btw). I swear some people argue without knowing what they argue for and what they argue against😭. Btw, speaking of mayuri mobilising squad 12 in order to eliminate those souls, the original kanji do, once again, translate as erasure( I knew i forgot something when listing those statements and narrative implications) and the only thing left from those guys were the footprints from where they were gathered. That's basically how he did combat the erasure of 28k souls in wotl, fixing the balance via erasing 28k souls in soul soviety. Would you still say shinigami don't have ee? Also, if you read the scans, you'll see it took the whole squad 12 multiple days to erase so much souls, time that the 3 people in WoTL who should be able to use Haien didn't have. The large number of hollows is another indicative of the culprit being the quincy.
And by destruction, he obviously meant erasure.
It happened in the context, but would you say a hollow being blown up with hado 33, for example, isn't destroyed? The other captains didn't know what he meant trough destruction.
Because they were talking about, you know, the hollows that were erased.
Again, the others didn't know about the hollows being erased when he informed them.
He even mentions the extinguishing of the souls.
1. To extinguish≠to erase.
2. Unlike the other sentences where he does take short breaks to let the captains process the information, he doesn't let them time to process this and directly continues saying they must have already realised it's quincy.
I don’t see your point on this.
The point is the form of destruction(erasure or whatever) isn't that much of a relevant clue as the large numbers and the fact it happened in WoTL.
Never does he state that those are the clues required.
But he implies it when he says those and then proceeds to say the captains must have understood that the culprit is the quincy.
Then you can do that on your own time then I guess. But that has nothing to do with the points being made in the OP and the points I am making.
Yes, it has? The op presents an interpretation of Mayuri’s statement, I present another one and explain why it's way, way better. And I've been answering all your points so far, the one ignoring my points is you.
Because why would he say ONLY quincies when referring to the ability to erase hollows from existence?
Once again, he doesn’t say only quincy can do that. He says only quincy can be the culprit. The ability to erase hollows is a different story.
What do you mean? Right before he says ā€œthey are the only onesā€ he says ā€œto be capable of erasing the very existence of hollowsā€.
And right before that, he is asked about the culprit's identity. And even before that, he received all the necessary clues: mass destruction of hollows in WoTL.
And using your scan, he says ā€œwho else could eradicate the very existence of hollows but themā€ which wouldn’t make sense if he knew good and well the answer to that. And then in the scan in the op he says ā€œThe only ones capable of removing hollows from existence itself are them and them aloneā€. In all of these he says ā€œTheyā€ are the only ones in reference to the ability to erase hollows from existence.
Due to the many versions of the manga, I decided to quote the anime, which is more canon. The image in the op is the first instance I ever saw mayuri’s words translated like this. Which I think is a very bad translation(possibly done on purpose by the translator) considering the word only is part of the last sentence in that scene, in both various manga translations and in the anime.
What’s your point here?
That erasure isn't a clue leading only to quincy. However, the 3 clues he gave the captains, "destruction of Hollows", "large numbers" and "in the Worlt of The Living" do mean it's the quincy. The form of destruction alone isn't enough clue to tell it's the quincy.
See above
You 2
Not true. The statement he makes is that quincies are the only ones capable of erasing hollows from existence, and uses that to imply that they are the culprit.
Already adressed this. You want the anime scans?
You are ignoring what he says right before he says ā€œThey are the only onesā€ he says ā€œto be capable of erasing the very existence of hollowsā€
And you are ignoring what he says before those separate lines.
Mayuri never even mentions any of those in his statement.
Why would he mention what he had right infront of his eyes?
He only ever mentions the ability to erase hollows from existence
Wrong. Again, for God's sake, when explaining to the other captains, who knew nothing, he gives them 3 clues and none of them is erasure, although he mentions destruction.
and then says they are the only ones.
Yes, the only ones for whom all the clues he had apply. The only ones who could be the cluprit.
There is no context I am ignoring. It is you that is ignoring the very statement that Mayuri makes.
Buddy, I literally named the context you ignore and you keep ignoring. And I don’t ignore mayuri’s words, I just give a better interpretation
I have been addressing everything you have been saying.
The wiki accepting as ee attacks that leave things behind as long as they eradicate the existence is an example and I literally presented the same scans you did in our debate.
For some reason what I typed was cut off. I meant to say did you ignore the part where he says ā€œto extinguish souls. I'm sure you astute captains have already figured it out by now this rebel army is none other than quinciesā€
Look above
I did. I gave literal quotes of what Mayuri was referring to within that scene. You conveniently ignore what he says right before that.
No??? Buddy, I did that and you ignore what's said right before what you want to argue for
No it doesn’t as outlined throughout the OP and my arguments,
Which I repeatedly refuted, meanwhile now you are just stating the same things you already did, essentially ignoring what I say
And that is blatantly incorrect as I outline above by going over all of the quotes.
It's far better than your interpretation at the very least. Also, I refuted everything you said so far, so…
The only clue he mentions in reference to ā€œThey are the only onesā€ is the ability to erase hollows from existence.
The only clue he mentions in refference to the culprit is indeed the erasure of hollows. But that's because he had every clue needed right infront of him. Why would he repeat everything the screens already told him? And they are the only ones reffers to Akon's question, ot to the erasure thing. Already explained this.
It really doesn’t
Then, tell me what you didn't understand
Already responded to those
And I already responded to your "answer" in the same comment you replied to in your reply I quote right now. It' not the first time you do this, but you really have to stop pretending that if you answer to something that answer is absolute or anything or that your opponent didn't refute your answer. Would you, please, read everything before you start replying?
Was already addressed in the OP
And I adressed all that
and you have yet to even acknowledge all of the arguments against it.
Tell me one argument against soi fon's from the op that I ignored.
Both already addressed
And I already adressed your "answer" to them(which was mainly just stating the same wrong interpretation of mayuri’s words)
This one is pretty meaningless to this thread.
It still is a clear statement about a shinigami(although an absurdly powerfull one repeatedly stated to have transcended the shinigami race and have unparalleled powers even back in the soul society)erasing the existence of 100k souls
That statement is in reference to the creation of oken
So? It's still ee. One that both Aizen and Yamamoto(who also knows how to create the oken) have. Would you say they don’t have ee?
This presupposes that the arm was erased from existence in the first place
It's literally stated to have happened so and your only arg against it that isn’t based on the misinterpretation of mayuri’s words is that we don't see it, which literally supports the erasure thing btw.
When did I ignore this?
When did you reply to the hakai parallel?
Not true. That guidebook statement is contradicted by Mayuri’s and by a later guidebook statement.
Already explained several times both these "args".
First, I explained why Mayuri’s words don't actually contradict shinigami having ee, they only do it under your one specific interpretation of them. And under that interpretation, they are contradicted by other 10 canon statements, feats and narrative implications, including Mayuri himself erasing rukongai citizens.
Second, I already adressed the Unmasked statement and explained how it is contradicted by both narrative and Luppi's statement.
This was already responded to by saqphire if I’m not mistaken
And I literally told you to read the 3rd page of this thread again… I refuted all thatšŸ˜‘
Can you show me where in those scans Aizen mentions existence erasure?
Now I wonder if you actually read those scansšŸ˜”. Last line before we return to the current situation in Muken.
Logically it should be considering we know multiple kido proficient characters and characters capable of using higher level kido.
The wiki doesn't really treat things this way and I did just link such an example
Mayuri’s statement
I adressed this several times already
I never said it wasn’t?
Then, if you argue that's the case just because that's a possibility, congrats, that's your average appeal to possibility.
Disregard the possibility thing then
I'm a bit confused by what you mean here… Disregard the "possible" part from Aizen's passive ee that you mentioned earlier? Yeah, I do that.
This is a pretty meaningless statement.
No, it’s very meaningful. It points out how your interpretation of mayuri’s words contradicts several things just as canon as the words themselves, let alone the mere interpretation.
I could say the same thing.
No, you actually couldn't, because none of the things I named is contradicted under my interpretation of mayuri’s words. In fact, tell me one contradiction generated by my interpretation of his words.
Good, so you agree with the point. That’s a start.
The blood drops do not seem to disappear,
You literally see them slowly shrinking although everything is shown far slower than in reality, let alone far far slower than those characters would perceive
and none of that would even matter since that’s anime only
Anime which is made strictly after the manga and with kubo's indications. In the manga we don't see the full erasure process, but the anime does show it, implying this is what Kubo wanted to share. After all, Luppi's statement about grimmjow's arm being actually erased came 6 months after tosen erasing it and the arrancar arc is famous for the large amount of fillers the anime had in order to give kubo time to draw and write more manga chapters which points towards the fact kubo simply told them the arm was erased rather than them learning it from the manga. Either way, we do see the flames engulf the arm instantly in both anime and manga and we see nothing left from it.
That would not be an argument from silence. Because I never claimed that anything was left behind from grimmjows arm.
Ok, so if you're not arguing for it that's fine.
You were the one claiming that nothing was left behind and you failed to provide sufficient proof.
This is called Burden Shifting, the BoP always lies on the person making the affirmative claim that there’s something left behind. My claim is the negation of that claim.
To put it simply for you:
1. You argue his arm was not erased because we don't see it
2. Or you don’t make a point at all here.
It should be slightly more than that but that is still a good amount of people.
Still far from enough to erase all those hollows in such a short time. And again, only 3 of them were in WoTL at that time
This is completely irrelevant. I’m not questioning how Mayuri came to the conclusion that it was quincies.
No, you're not. I am. And you are the one who started this discusiion by replying to me when I brought this up.
Nobody said shinigami can only purify hollows.
The scans from the op used for "narrative intent that only quincy erase hollows" arg do use the parallel between the way shinigami deal with hollows(purrifying them with their zanpaktos) and the way quincy do(erasing them with their arrows) as a reasoning for shinigami somehow being unable to erase hollows. I simply break that parallel.
You said it makes no sense to have a whole kido to do what a regular zanpakuto does. Do you mean purify hollows? Because nobody is claiming that’s what haien does. Do you mean to just defeat hollows in general? Because like all hado can do that.
Read right above.
Were we shown that he was still in the soul cycle?
It's up to you to prove he is if you want to argue he is. If not, you don't argue against him not being removed from the cycle of rebirth and I have no BoP.
But he says quincy arrows can only erase hollows from existence when referring to a question about being removed from the soul cycle. He interchanges removing from the soul cycle with being erased from existence.
Once again, please, read everything before you start typing a reply. The question clearly says: "Yamamoto was erased by Yhwach" which Kubo debunks. It's a known fact that quincy erasure remove you from cycle of rebirth. Kubo just says yama wasn't removed from cycle of rebirth because he wasn't erased by Yhwach's quincy ee in the first place.
Okay, so would you be under the logic that tosen was the only one capable of using it?
No. I do believe Aizen(whom he likely learnt it from and who also has several ee statements beside his passive aura) and the very few kido users on par with Aizen should be able to use it too.
That is kind of besides the point
No, it isn't, it shows the extremely limited amount of people who would even be able to use a kido in the 50. Lieutenat lvl people are considered to be way beyond any other members of gotei 13 except captains. Then, once again, number of possible haien users doesn't really matter here.
Can you even prove that? That no other ee besides quincy removes from the soul cycle?
You're asking me to prove something I didn't claim. All I said is that the only ee stated to remove you from vycle of rebirth are quincy and ichibe's. If you want to argue other ees also remove you from cycle of rebirth, be my guest.
That wouldn’t make the ee more powerful, that is just how he performs the ee.
Yes, it would make it way more powerfull. Even if someone can resist transmutation, it doesn't mean they can also resist transmutation via reality warping, or cm, for example unless they have feats or statements implying it.
Then you can make your own crt on that
I don't see enough reasons to do so. You can also make your own crt for people being able to use any kido with a number lower than what they've been shown to use.
Why do you think I told you to read page 3 again? Saqphire replied with what you just linked, then I answered with this, to which he answered with this, to which I replied with this, which he didn't refute. This is basically the same situation here only that you keep ignoring what I say and keep insisting on your interpretation without providing any proof for why it's valid. Instead, you keep asking me to prove negativesšŸ˜‘
I never claimed his arm was outside the panel. You are asking me to provide proof for a strawman
You said it could be this case and kept arguing for it and asking me to prove a negative.
Good, would you be kind enough to read a bit above that? I swear, you give me the impression you hate reading.
I see, but what I also see is that danku’s ability to block lower level hado is still dependent on the user. So it is not a total counter to haien.
Where is this stated?
58, 63, 73, 78, 88, 91
Neither of those is a fire type kido except 73 which I already explained why it's placed higher.
But that would still mean it would erase its target regardless of the users proficiency in it or the receivers durability. That would still make it overall way more powerful than if it did rely on ap.
Again, it can be blocked extremely easy. And any relevant(in terms of power) bleach character can use techniques to greatly boost speed on short distances meaning they can easily dodge haien.
And by your logic haien either wouldn’t have erased the sleeve on grimmjows arm or grimmjows arm itself because the sleeve was in the way. You claim nothing was left behind.
And grimmjow's sleeve was directly touching his arm? Don't you know how fire burns? Heck, Grimmjow's sleeve was tight on his arm. Now try placing a piece of paper 10 cm in front of grimmjow's arm, between it and tosen and the arm'd have been unscatched
Not all of them, as even you yourself note
Yeah, all of them except 3 people at the absolute highest estimation of their number
but either way that wouldn’t matter due to the fact that the argument is not based on how Mayuri came to the conclusion that it was quincies, but that he claims only quincies can erase hollows from existence which wouldn’t make sense under the assumption that haien is ee in the first place.
Once again, I am the one questioning the validity of the interpretation in the op and giving a far better interpretation which doesn't contradict anything.
I’m ngl I doubt that. Whenever somebody says this in a debate they usually continue to reply after. Hell, I’m even guilty of this in the past.
Yes, I can see what you mean.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top