• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

but I may misremember something, so I asked for input from people who participated in one of the Dark Tower revision threads. 🙏
That's reasonable. I still don't think calling you a liar is being particularly reasonable or cooperative, but I digress.
 
Last edited:
He explicitly posted in his wiki profile page that he had killed himself on a specific date. 🙏
Okay. That is pretty hard to defend as just a joke unless you're an extremely edgy and insensitive person.

I would support a ban just for that. We're pretty strict on the suicide stuff.
And if they have sockpuppets that's a violation too.

Otherwise, I didn't get the impression that they genuinely were trying to sabotage the wiki or anything.
It's pretty normal for a CRT to not include the opposition, and instead have it come out in the thread itself. It took longer here because the verse didn't have many supporters.
 
It seems like Jason posted that information in his personal infobox though, and I did not take a screencapture of it at the time, but I did link to it in Jason's last Dark Tower revision thread several months ago, and other people presumably saw it that way. 🙏

 
It seems like Jason posted that information in his personal infobox though, and I did not take a screencapture of it at the time, but I did link to it in Jason's last Dark Tower revision thread several months ago, and other people presumably saw it that way. 🙏

I mean, it was still public.

We really don't want people lying about that kind of thing, even if they do think they're joking. It creates messes like this one.
 
Here is another likely sockpuppet account btw. 🙏

Maybe we should check the IP of that new account. I get home frustrating it is to keep checking IP, but if it has yet more overlap that makes it clearer.
I have asked Fandom about it now. It applied the exact same type of edits as the other two accounts within a very close timeframe though. 🙏
Already plenty suspicious. If the IP also overlap I'd say that's enough for a ban.
I received a reply from Fandom which said that the Jason_Voorhees1986 and Yeah_boy382 accounts have IP overlaps, but not with GrandMarshalAzure, so I will unblock the last account and give a warning instead for the moment, unless other staff members think that we should ban them all. 🙏
 
Also, Jason apologised here:


🙏
I'm gonna be straight up as someone who wasn't involved in this when it happened... Apologies don't cut it. He sockpuppeted, suggested suicide, joke or not, and was a repeat vandal. It is by the grace of several deities that he's even gonna have the chance to appeal this later; The man did two perma-worthy things and one thing that gets most sub-1K message members banned for months.

Give it six months to a year for an appeal, maybe by mid-2026 or early 2027 he'll have shaped up.
 
Well, due to the combination of a somewhat bad memory and lots of tasks to keep track of, I am not sure about to what degree he has vandalised/performed edits that went beyond what was agreed in content revision threads. 🙏
 
Well, due to the combination of a somewhat bad memory and lots of tasks to keep track of, I am not sure about to what degree he has vandalised/performed edits that went beyond what was agreed in content revision threads. 🙏
Even if he only did it once or twice he's still got two permas under his belt.

I'm not saying there never will be mercy, I'm saying that right now, the guy has gotten up to enough trouble that we should be merciless now and lower hackles much later.
 
I think I’ve gotta agree with Reaper here. A permanent ban with the possibility of appeal after a while sounds about right for what he did.
Okay. So what should we write as the ban reason for the two accounts? "Faked their own suicide, sockpuppetting, and vandalism"? 🙏
 
Okay. So what should we write as the ban reason for the two accounts? "Faked their own suicide, sockpuppetting, and vandalism"? 🙏
If we want to be as absolute fair as possible and give the benefit of the doubt (specially if we don't have any way to show they did write an apparent suicide date on their bio), we can just note the sockpuppeting and vandalism alone, as the first is already a permaban offense regardless if they did or did not make suicide "joke".
 
Well, how we punish using multiple accounts depends on the circumstances. In our forum we have recurrently simply asked well-behaved members which account they want to use and banned the other one, if neither of them have been used maliciously, so I think that we need to mention the faked suicide for context and ban length validation. That said, in this case the sockpuppet was used to apply unaccepted revisions in our wiki, if I remember correctly. 🙏
 
@FinePoint @Xearesay

Do you or Jockey remember better what happened during the Dark Tower revisions, including the manner they were applied in our wiki? If so, your input would be very appreciated here. 🙏
I remember the tier 0 upgrade got shot down, I thought there was some settling on 1-A or High 1-A but I don’t remember what exactly was decided on there.
 
Okay. Thank you for your reply. 🙏
 
It is due to an old misunderstanding from several members, including myself.

I am talking with Shattas about it. No punishment is necessary, but I have locked the linked wiki page. 🙏
 
Could change it to something like 'falsified self-harm' if we feel 'faked their own suicide' is too personal.

Otherwise, I think those reasoning are fine.
So "Falsified self-harm, sockpuppetting, and vandalism" then? Should the ban be permanent or not? 🙏
 
Last edited:
From the given reason of that edit, it seems like imgs weren't upto standard.
Also,
@DbzDB2, There’s no rule preventing supporters from updating character profile images when different variants exist.

And if a rendered image isn’t up to standard, it’s reasonable to have it removed.
If so, then I'll leave it be

A shame though, the renders were nice

Thanks for explaining
 
To be honest, I'm sick of people cluttering up profiles by adding a million unnecessary images and quotes. We don't need a picture for every outfit he wears throughout the series. This website is for character stats, not character quotes or appearances. And honestly, the renders were trash. They were blurry and badly cropped. The only acceptable render was the one that I made, and even that wasn't very good so I just swapped it with a non-render. If they're not up to standards, we should just use non-renders imo.

Look at this. What is even going on with the strange artifacts on his chest? Did you use AI to do the rendering? I'm sorry but it looks terrible.
Amai_Mask_Monster_form_render.png
 
Last edited:
I think that Sweet Mask used different appearances throughout the One Punch Man series, so featuring all of them seems fine to me.

Also, you should post in the following thread before you change any wiki profile page header images in a drastic manner. 🙏

 
Last edited:
To be honest, I'm sick of people cluttering up profiles by adding a million unnecessary images and quotes. We don't need a picture for every outfit he wears throughout the series. This website is for character stats, not character quotes or appearances. And honestly, the renders were trash. They were blurry and badly cropped. The only acceptable render was the one that I made, and even that wasn't very good so I just swapped it with a non-render. If they're not up to standards, we should just use non-renders imo.

Look at this. What is even going on with the strange artifacts on his chest? Did you use AI to do the rendering? I'm sorry but it looks terrible.
Amai_Mask_Monster_form_render.png
Removing a render and replacing it with just a plain image doesn’t justify this. If you feel they were too much (which I don’t agree with), the best course of action would have been to delete the renders you find “excessive,” not outright delete the whole thing.

Sweet Tooth has two keys; one for his human form and the other for his beast like form. You didn’t even leave the render that represented his monster key. quite absurd, isn’t it?

Well just like Ant said, if you need to change or delete a render next time, just go through the proper route.
 
Back
Top