- 1,489
- 1,131
I will continue this on your profile wall, mods, feel free to delete our messages.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 34,634
- 41,954
@Re5yh @Lycoris4812 Both of you cut it out! Stop spamming the RVR and give the staff time to analyze what is going one.
Edit: Now anyway, it is usually outside our jurisdiction to deal with offsite drama except in cases of harassment or extreme cruelty to their faces. But this mostly looks like both just being jerks to each other, and it's up to those other wikis to decide what to do regarding grievances there. And I'm kind of behind on what was between you two on Bambu's comment. But looking at his post, he seems to be having a good grasp on the situation here.
Edit: Now anyway, it is usually outside our jurisdiction to deal with offsite drama except in cases of harassment or extreme cruelty to their faces. But this mostly looks like both just being jerks to each other, and it's up to those other wikis to decide what to do regarding grievances there. And I'm kind of behind on what was between you two on Bambu's comment. But looking at his post, he seems to be having a good grasp on the situation here.
Re5yh
He/Him- 1,506
- 652
Ok, I see, I won't be a real jerk anymore. My fault
- 1,489
- 1,131
Btw, they're reported me after I debunked their characters scaling.
Last edited:
Re5yh
He/Him- 1,506
- 652
It's true, but it was a different subject
BoastJr
He/Him- 2,743
- 3,962
Re5yh, Sincerely from the bottom of my Teensy Heart
Stop reporting users over the most petty thing imaginable. Seriously, every week I come here, I see you abusing the rvr system over people mildly sassing you
You reported me for very little things here
Not to mention that you are a known troll that plagiarizes pages
Last edited:
- 6,235
- 5,716
This would normally be a Wiki Vandalism thread issue, but I can take a look here just because I'm here and it's my job. In my experience Jinx's edits are usually reasonable though.
Okay, if you can provide a scan for those statements, then that information should probably not be removed. Only if you can provide a scan for it though. Jinx might have thought the statements were inaccurate. Either way this isn't a rule violation so much as a referencing issue.
Disagreements over images is not a rule violation either, and Jinx might have thought the image could be construed as inappropriate. Maybe if it was renamed as beach outfit instead of swimsuit, I don't know. It also at very least doesn't seem necessary to show every outfit the character wears, given that it has no bearing on her combat abilities. This isn't a rule violation.
Okay, the thing about the Sync Stone could be an issue. I do however notice that a Sync Stone doesn't seem to be listed in her standard or optional equipment though. Hard to tell with how absurdly long the list is though. If she does have one then it should probably be added to her equipment via a CRT and the weakness details altered to include the Sync Stone and how it circumvents the weakness. This doesn't seem like a rule violation.
This seems to be about Masters again, so I don't even know how to go about that. Isn't Masters given its own profiles still? I'll bow out of this one.
The stamina change is fine. The intelligence stats shouldn't just be changed like that, so there should be a CRT on the matter. The only true evidence for the rating you provided was a statement calling her a genius though, and meanwhile all the actual feats described sound more like Gifted. Probably best to make a CRT about it, which you probably should have done before making the page with that rating. This doesn't seem like a rule violation. Jinx probably should have made a CRT instead of just changing it, but you also should have started with a more conservative rating, in fact the exact one Jinx changed it to, if not lower like Above Average, and then made a CRT before adding such a rating.
Actually, you can talk about it here. No need for a CRT.
Those images don't seem to really add any information to the profile, and disagreement over images is not a rule violation.
In short, I'd suggest making a CRT to add the Sync Stone and the Genius rating. The latter can be discussed here if you prefer. These are not rule violations.
Last edited:
- 5,228
- 1,606
Yeah, all of this is to do with Masters EX, which was agreed we discuss before adding (Sync Stones are related to Masters EX exclusively). Its all out of place things regardless to the flow of the profile, and like i've expressed countless times, It will get left if no one else does it.
Making entire CRTS (that in my experience, can take years unless you know the right people for the most uncontroversial changes ever) for little changes regarding something that has already been discussed in that infamous Masters EX CRT should not be necessary. We came to a conclusion in a CRT, and now Masters EX content (including mentions) should be fair game to remove if they have not been discussed.
The Genius stuff is whatever cause Intelligence on this wiki is tried to measure quantitively. A player insert like Gloria though, and most pokemon characters in general, wouldnt qualify for genius over gifted. Merely being called a 'genius' like in Maylenes case doesn't make her quanlify to this wiki's standards, and she would need genuine feats to put her there. Its iffy to try and put Gloria as the canon protagonist over Victor when theyre both interchangable in the first place.
Idk who Zyurtunder13 is other than a guy that also dislikes Sean
Making entire CRTS (that in my experience, can take years unless you know the right people for the most uncontroversial changes ever) for little changes regarding something that has already been discussed in that infamous Masters EX CRT should not be necessary. We came to a conclusion in a CRT, and now Masters EX content (including mentions) should be fair game to remove if they have not been discussed.
The Genius stuff is whatever cause Intelligence on this wiki is tried to measure quantitively. A player insert like Gloria though, and most pokemon characters in general, wouldnt qualify for genius over gifted. Merely being called a 'genius' like in Maylenes case doesn't make her quanlify to this wiki's standards, and she would need genuine feats to put her there. Its iffy to try and put Gloria as the canon protagonist over Victor when theyre both interchangable in the first place.
Idk who Zyurtunder13 is other than a guy that also dislikes Sean
Last edited:
- 6,235
- 5,716
More Masters stuff? At best shouldn't Masters need a separate key given it's at very least a different time or something? I have no idea how to approach this. I seem to recall you did warn that Masters would make working on the pages very confusing... Anyway, I'm bowing out of this too, it seems.
It should be discussed, in this thread or a CRT when you or Sean raises it. As I said, it'd be better if you'd discussed it rather than just editing it given that it is a statistics change, but it would also be better if Sean had discussed it before adding such a rating. Overall, it's just better if we make a discussion about it. Looking at the actual showings described though, I am inclined to agree with the rating you have applied.
Rest assured, nothing here looks like a rule violation to me. You're fine.
- 15,203
- 22,454
All of this isn't profile vandalism, let alone rule violation. The only thing that could be borderline profile vandalism is the edit over intelligent rating but this was already explained by Random Helper
So anyway, this could be solved with a discussion or CRT, no need for a report, also i advise you to not instantly report Jinx everytime you disagree with what he did, things could be solved with a discussion, or if you can't talk with him, make CRT to address them
Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera
He/Him- 5,382
- 1,149
Why am I the only one who has to make CRTs while he doesn't? I've made CRT after CRT undoing the damage he's done to the Pokemon verse and he's never answered for it and I'm the bad guy.
Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera
He/Him- 5,382
- 1,149
We just had a CRT about this, Masters has been deemed secondary canon and thus entirely usable, he just continues deleting Masters shit from my profiles.
Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera
He/Him- 5,382
- 1,149
How about you just stop touching profiles?
- 6,235
- 5,716
You both do. The issue is that the intelligence rating was added to a new page without approval and then removed without approval. Both of you should have discussed it first, and I'm against punishing anyone for what clearly seems like well-intentioned edits from both of you.
Being deemed canon usually still means things have to be discussed from it to be added on an individual basis. No different from any other canon material. We don't get to randomly add an ability based on a mainline game either, it needs to be discussed first.
- 6,235
- 5,716
Oh no... @Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera please calm down and stop shouting at Jinx, and no, Jinx doesn't have to stop editing pages. @Jinx666, as tempting as it must be, please don't react to that latest comment from Sean, I'm begging you.
- 16,258
- 24,924
We can't really prohibit people from editing profiles unless they're doing rule violations.
Noneless21
He/Him- 8,178
- 5,664
- 6,235
- 5,716
That latest comment might make it a necessity, and objectively, Sean was the one who added a Genius rating without approval, while Jinx just removed an unapproved rating. Looking at that alone I'd rather just leave it, and both edits seemed well-intentioned and didn't deserve any punishment, but if I absolutely had to name someone who'd done something wrong there, it'd be Sean, not Jinx.
Last edited:
BoastJr
He/Him- 2,743
- 3,962
I second this, he has a tendency to report people who disagree with him. We are not here to cuddle people and he keeps wasting staff's time.
If he doesn't want to interact with people I suggest some form of blocking
Re5yh
He/Him- 1,506
- 652
Maybe a warning should be fine for me, I guess. I'm smart enough to understand thingsI second this, he has a tendency to report people who disagree with him. We are not here to cuddle people and he keeps wasting staff's time.
If he doesn't want to interact with people I suggest some form of blocking
Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera
He/Him- 5,382
- 1,149
This was actually my first time ever reporting someone, I believe. All the other times were someone else reporting me for one reason or another before I explain my side of the story.
- 6,235
- 5,716
There seemed to be a misunderstanding, and overall both of you should have made threads over certain things, and neither of you seemed to have ill intent with your respective edits and neither deserved any warnings over it.
That latest comment telling Jinx not to touch the pages is very inappropriate though.
Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera
He/Him- 5,382
- 1,149
I didn’t even edit the profile, I MADE the Maylene profile and he changed it.
- 6,235
- 5,716
Yes, but the genius rating was questionable and should have been discussed first. You didn't have negative intentions when making the profile, but Jinx also didn't have negative intentions changing it. I'd have disagreed with any punishment for either of you over that.
The issue people are objecting to is your conduct here, not the pages. Telling Jinx not to touch the pages in regard to edits that are not rule violations is inappropriate. Please don't do that.
- 15,203
- 22,454
I don't feel like warning someone over this kind of thing, from what i saw he isn't intentonally being bad. However @Re5yh , you are overreacting and overthinking, so next time stop reporting people simply because you have a feeling they are insulting you. Next time however will be an official warningI second this, he has a tendency to report people who disagree with him. We are not here to cuddle people and he keeps wasting staff's time.
If he doesn't want to interact with people I suggest some form of blocking
@Jinx666 next time please make a CRT if you want to change thing in the profile, even though he brought you up first, since both of you always disagree with each other about the verse, a CRT to solves this is a must
Yeah, but you don't need to report him over this, discussion is a thing, and there is a verse discussion thread to address your issues
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 25,029
- 29,524
I came from the wiki vandalism thread to notify the thread of a report against @Jinx666, and I find the user embroiled in drama here, as well.
Regarding Sean's report, I do dislike a few of those edits; removing evidence from profiles with no oversight sucks. Butchering the content of a profile with no permission and possibly no knowledge, is against our purposes. The gallery removal stuff just seems petty, to me, and paints the removal of those bits of evidence in a further bad light.
What should have happened here is that Sean maybe posts a profile, and Jinx proposes revisions to it. I do think we would clinically classify this as vandalism, so although it should not be in this thread, it is a legitimate concern that this is happening.
However. The reason I came here was this. Jinx continued posting irrelevant and unhelpful posts to the Wiki Vandalism thread, dragging out an issue and starting conflict for no discernible reason. Random-Helper's original post strictly mentioned that it wasn't technically vandalism, just something that had to be logged; in response, Jinx defended himself and started a back and forth in which he refused to adhere to the staff statements that, yes, we know it wasn't vandalism, and that he wasn't in trouble, accusing them of "rage baiting" for nine posts. He was explicitly told to stop (first by Helper, then myself, then others) and so this constitutes a rule violation, going against the very rules laid out in the OP of that thread (and all wiki management threads). Strictly speaking the OP mentions a threadban for the subject, but I do not believe this is necessary. I believe this is the first time we will have "Unhelpful Wiki Vandalism Reports Thread Post" as a reason on the Warning Tracker, although we have many for the RVRT.
Regarding Sean's report, I do dislike a few of those edits; removing evidence from profiles with no oversight sucks. Butchering the content of a profile with no permission and possibly no knowledge, is against our purposes. The gallery removal stuff just seems petty, to me, and paints the removal of those bits of evidence in a further bad light.
What should have happened here is that Sean maybe posts a profile, and Jinx proposes revisions to it. I do think we would clinically classify this as vandalism, so although it should not be in this thread, it is a legitimate concern that this is happening.
However. The reason I came here was this. Jinx continued posting irrelevant and unhelpful posts to the Wiki Vandalism thread, dragging out an issue and starting conflict for no discernible reason. Random-Helper's original post strictly mentioned that it wasn't technically vandalism, just something that had to be logged; in response, Jinx defended himself and started a back and forth in which he refused to adhere to the staff statements that, yes, we know it wasn't vandalism, and that he wasn't in trouble, accusing them of "rage baiting" for nine posts. He was explicitly told to stop (first by Helper, then myself, then others) and so this constitutes a rule violation, going against the very rules laid out in the OP of that thread (and all wiki management threads). Strictly speaking the OP mentions a threadban for the subject, but I do not believe this is necessary. I believe this is the first time we will have "Unhelpful Wiki Vandalism Reports Thread Post" as a reason on the Warning Tracker, although we have many for the RVRT.
- 177,276
- 90,163
- Thread starter
- #31,709
@AKM sama @DontTalkDT @Mr. Bambu @DarkDragonMedeus @Just_a_Random_Butler @Agnaa @Qawsedf234 @Celestial_Pegasus @Ultima_Reality @Elizhaa @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @GrathOfLux @Dereck03 @Planck69 @LephyrTheRevanchist
It is extremely important that you continously help out here while I am away.
It is extremely important that you continously help out here while I am away.
- 5,228
- 1,606
There wasn't evidence removed. It all stemmed from Masters EX. Nothing was 'butchered' either
We agreed in a CRT that the inclusion of Masters EX content needs to be discussed second hand. Sean has already shown that he dismisses this outcome of the thread, and I was simpply cleaning up the mentions or any information that comes from it, even when its sketchy.
The gallery removal wasn't me, though I do agree that if galleries are simply just 'cool images' of the characters and don't add anything discernable to the actual powerscaling as they should, then they should be removed.
But I didnt remove any of that. Sean's pages are also often full of a lot of froth and editing mistakes, so outward editing tends to be needed after a profile of his has been posted anyway.
I'm not getting into any guaranteed agreements to that. I dont agree with A LOT of how Sean's profiles are scaled, let alone structured or whether they should be profiles to make in the first place (its fine for him to make them, but they're very odd). I'm actually thinking about bringing up how we deal with making 'Protagonist' pages for Pokemon, since as of right now, Sean is only deciding which one is the main character. The Verse as a whole is just unorganised
I can look it over and give it thoughts, however I dont think Sean will appreciate it, and i'd rather limit my interactions with him as much as possible. Otherwise editing a profile to remove things that have been CRT agreed to need permission in granting wouldnt (or shouldnt) be 'vandalism'. The intelligence rating fair enough, but i've seen people edit Intelligence countless times without CRT, and by all means theres nothing that puts the character in question at a Genius level. Its not a term we should be giving out lightly.
I wasn't dragging out this issue anymore than Random-Helper was. I made a post that put things from my perspective formally, and afterwards i was told to 'Calm down' and that i wasnt 'Reading the Post'. Thats an insitigating way to saying things, and expecting people to just shut up out of authority isnt right, especially when said mod is the one making those statements. Im sorry it went on for longer, but I'm not going to have things skewed. I'm an adult first and foremost, so I will speak up regarding things that concern me and what people think i am saying/doing. I know how to admit to my own mistakes or if i'm being out of line, at the end of the day it doesnt matter if i am on this site, but I shouldnt be letting these things be said about me if they're are purely wrong.
Even now, trying to claim that i was 'starting conflict for no discernable reason' is disingenuous, and just tells me that some mods seem to think blue names cannot call out blatant misinformation. I don't know Random Helper personally, but this isn't the first time i've found their lack of misreading the situation (and making it look bad in my instance) to be actively skewing interpretations, to the point I even reached out personally. (in context regarding my interactions with Sean)
I believe you yourself have had yourtone and informal use of language being used to instigate and upset others on multiple occasions, so I can understand why you don't think people should have a right to defend what someone is being wrongly made out to be. I don't believe in being flowery either, but if i feel things about me are being incorrectly said, then I will be speaking up. I believe its better to nip it in the bud in general, however as evident now, people will wait a while and try to report resolved issues publically that just...don't need to happen. I said my piece and i stopped, and now it feels like you're taking advantage of Sean's trigger-happy report making me the one in the hot seat for a brief moment to bring it back up again. It genuinely isnt that serious from my perspective
Last edited:
- 5,228
- 1,606
Overall you can warn me if you want, but I initially posted in that thread to explain my actions from my perspective (should be considered helpful).
I wasnt even IN the drama. I made one post to explain and i said nothing else after, even after Sean is trying to outwardly bait me. My actions were simply 'reported' (and we can all guess why) and even now theres not really anyone who fully agrees to Sean's claims so I'd rather we didn't try to act like I am 'embroiled' in this.
The rest wasn't me trying to contribute to anything, I don't want to even use that thread if I have to because i think the criteria for whats considered Vandalism is massively skewed, but instead is me defending myself. It wont look strong to give me warns based on this when all i ask is that people, let alone mods, dont try to use instigative phrases and then force their authority to silence me. Thats ragebait and goading someone into punishment. (I will clarify that im not accusing RandomHelper of this, it can easily not be intentional and they are in fact pretty fair to me for the most part. They just interpret things wrongly, such as once using my own reporting of someone over innappropriate comments as an example of me trying to escalate a situation)
I will be replying if someone (a mod) wants to reply or ask me something directly, otherwise discuss amongst yourselves.
I wasnt even IN the drama. I made one post to explain and i said nothing else after, even after Sean is trying to outwardly bait me. My actions were simply 'reported' (and we can all guess why) and even now theres not really anyone who fully agrees to Sean's claims so I'd rather we didn't try to act like I am 'embroiled' in this.
The rest wasn't me trying to contribute to anything, I don't want to even use that thread if I have to because i think the criteria for whats considered Vandalism is massively skewed, but instead is me defending myself. It wont look strong to give me warns based on this when all i ask is that people, let alone mods, dont try to use instigative phrases and then force their authority to silence me. Thats ragebait and goading someone into punishment. (I will clarify that im not accusing RandomHelper of this, it can easily not be intentional and they are in fact pretty fair to me for the most part. They just interpret things wrongly, such as once using my own reporting of someone over innappropriate comments as an example of me trying to escalate a situation)
I will be replying if someone (a mod) wants to reply or ask me something directly, otherwise discuss amongst yourselves.
Last edited:
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 25,029
- 29,524
I already logged it as a warning. It's a petty thing, you just need to understand that these threads aren't for discussion. You seem to have a very combative opinion of the staff, and are quick to take any action as being directly negative (e.g., "you're rage-baiting me", "you're taking advantage of me because I'm a blue name"), even when these allegations don't really match what is actually happening- in what way would we take advantage of you? The OP of all of these threads clearly states that you are not to post pointlessly. Your posts in the Wiki Vandalism thread were pointless- you weren't in trouble. That makes it a rule violation. You weren't handed one immediately, only after you carried on doing the thing over and over again.
If you break the rules, you receive a warning. Even now, splitting your post in two sort of sucks.
The matter is concluded. You don't need to defend yourself or restate your beliefs of what other people were doing. Just try to abide by the rules of the wiki management threads, they aren't there pointlessly.
If you break the rules, you receive a warning. Even now, splitting your post in two sort of sucks.
The matter is concluded. You don't need to defend yourself or restate your beliefs of what other people were doing. Just try to abide by the rules of the wiki management threads, they aren't there pointlessly.
- 493
- 597
@Dragopentling has repeatedly inserted material into the Blue Archive profiles/CRT discussions that directly contradicts the actual contents of the accepted CRTs.
He had edited like 10 profiles or more that doesnt correlate with his CRT at all.
1. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Takanashi_Hoshino
2. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Sunaookami_Shiroko
3. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Sorasaki_Hina
4. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Shiromi_Iori
5. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Mikamo_Neru
6. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Asuma_Toki
7. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Shirasu_Azusa
8. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Aomori_Mine
9. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Misono_Mika
10. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Shiromi_Iori
Based on the message shown in the screenshot, even other users are explicitly pointing out that the High 1-B justification applied only to Aris’ Ark of Atrahasis, and that students do not scale to High 1-B. Despite this, Dragopentling continued adding or implying High 1-B scaling for students ― something that was never approved in the CRT and in fact goes against the current evaluations.
This behavior directly violates the rules against:
Despite this clear outcome, Dragopentling still added information implying High 1-B scaling where it does not belong, which is exactly the type of unapproved editing that is grounds for moderation.
This shows a repeated pattern of:
Therefore, I request moderation action on the basis that Dragopentling is adding non-CRT-compliant content, violating site rules regarding profile accuracy, CRT adherence, and proper sourcing.
He had edited like 10 profiles or more that doesnt correlate with his CRT at all.
1. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Takanashi_Hoshino
2. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Sunaookami_Shiroko
3. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Sorasaki_Hina
4. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Shiromi_Iori
5. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Mikamo_Neru
6. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Asuma_Toki
7. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Shirasu_Azusa
8. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Aomori_Mine
9. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Misono_Mika
10. https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Shiromi_Iori
Based on the message shown in the screenshot, even other users are explicitly pointing out that the High 1-B justification applied only to Aris’ Ark of Atrahasis, and that students do not scale to High 1-B. Despite this, Dragopentling continued adding or implying High 1-B scaling for students ― something that was never approved in the CRT and in fact goes against the current evaluations.
This behavior directly violates the rules against:
- Adding unapproved content to profiles or scaling chains.
- Ignoring CRT outcomes and inserting interpretations that were explicitly rejected.
- Misrepresenting or altering accepted lore/evidence by including material outside what the CRT concluded.
Despite this clear outcome, Dragopentling still added information implying High 1-B scaling where it does not belong, which is exactly the type of unapproved editing that is grounds for moderation.
This shows a repeated pattern of:
- Inserting personal interpretations as if they were CRT-approved facts.
- Re-adding rejected scaling.
- Ignoring corrections from multiple users.
Therefore, I request moderation action on the basis that Dragopentling is adding non-CRT-compliant content, violating site rules regarding profile accuracy, CRT adherence, and proper sourcing.
Last edited:
- 40,896
- 16,337
Hold! Just hold....
Someone pointed out that @EinelRendezvous has using AI for attempting the downgrade and now reporting @Dragopentling by using it
I have checked the creditability of his posts up there and this is what I got:
His downgrade thread that I checked as well show the sign of using AI on it too, I only copy-paste the first two paragraphs of that thread but the result show that 79% of using AI
For the record l, this is the site I used justdone.com, but even then this issue need to be re-looked once again
If I proven to falsely attempting a sabotage then my deep apologies
Someone pointed out that @EinelRendezvous has using AI for attempting the downgrade and now reporting @Dragopentling by using it
I have checked the creditability of his posts up there and this is what I got:
His downgrade thread that I checked as well show the sign of using AI on it too, I only copy-paste the first two paragraphs of that thread but the result show that 79% of using AI
For the record l, this is the site I used justdone.com, but even then this issue need to be re-looked once again
If I proven to falsely attempting a sabotage then my deep apologies
- 2,896
- 3,341
i don't think it mattersHold! Just hold....
Someone pointed out that @EinelRendezvous has using AI for attempting the downgrade and now reporting @Dragopentling by using it
I have checked the creditability of his posts up there and this is what I got:
His downgrade thread that I checked as well show the sign of using AI on it too, I only copy-paste the first two paragraphs of that thread but the result show that 79% of using AI
For the record l, this is the site I used justdone.com, but even then this issue need to be re-looked once again
If I proven to falsely attempting a sabotage then my deep apologies
there was this thread that aimed to clarify where AI should be allowed on the forum and if it should be subject to any regulations or whatnot but it doesn't seem to have concluded anywhere given its last post was right around the start of august
but even outside of that, while i don't think you should be using it to write your arguments for you, you can just treat them like you would literally any other CRT someone posted. if it's bad logic or has bad scans then you can refute it the same way you would if someone wrote it by hand. it being written by AI changes nothing.
- 493
- 597
I would love to clarify this. My native languanges are not english. I do using AI, but only to help me. I have these raw text of my writing in my native language that I let AI helping it. And I am openly admit using AI as a tool for helping me.Hold! Just hold....
Someone pointed out that @EinelRendezvous has using AI for attempting the downgrade and now reporting @Dragopentling by using it
I have checked the creditability of his posts up there and this is what I got:
His downgrade thread that I checked as well show the sign of using AI on it too, I only copy-paste the first two paragraphs of that thread but the result show that 79% of using AI
For the record l, this is the site I used justdone.com, but even then this issue need to be re-looked once again
If I proven to falsely attempting a sabotage then my deep apologies
So your point? I am not a bot. I am not doing any violation at all.
Also for my downgrade thread, I am writing it since yesterday. Its not AI at all lol. The sources and arguments are mainly coming from me. It took me hours to collect feats (you can even see the timestamps here). Its not like I generated evidences from GPT, nope, using them only to help me translating stuff.
Last edited:
- 40,896
- 16,337
Ah then that's settled it
Tbh this issue about AI being allowed in the forum need to be looked once again, but then again it could be just me
But anyway I'll leave this one out now
- 998
- 1,268
Hmm… This isn't the first time he added stuff without a CRT. Was already reported for this before. I think an action is needed, but I will leave that to the higher ups.
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 25,029
- 29,524
For now, I will tag @Dragopentling and say that ideally, we would be linking to specific edits on these profiles; I do note that most of the ones performed by the accused user do not link to any CRT for justifying them, but I am curious which ones in particular are accused of being related to a CRT, and then adding things outside the bounds of said CRT.
