- 5,386
- 4,827
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
One Punch Man: Replacing the Baseline Crater Calc
- Thread starter LegendariumOfLies
- Start date
- 4,555
- 3,437
...why?
- 5,386
- 4,827
- Thread starter
- #3
Why what?
- 5,386
- 4,827
- Thread starter
- #4
bump
- 5,030
- 4,047
Soooo, where was this even accepted?
- 4,239
- 4,084
How dudes feel after making a calc group thread 100 percent certain their calculation is gonna be accepted only for it to be debunked in 2 comments.
The pixel scaling is wrong, his foot is toward's the pov, his head is facing down, and he's sitting down, all these accounted for the calc is so wrong it makes almost no sense.
- 5,030
- 4,047
Also,thedamnoldblog hasalinktoanarabiccasino?
Lilybitdun
She/Her- 2,403
- 1,415
Why do you think they made a CGM thread for it in the first place
- 5,030
- 4,047
...
It was originally posted in "content Revision" section, a staff member must have moved it.
Lilybitdun
She/Her- 2,403
- 1,415
You know you can just give constructive feedback for them to adjust the calc right
I agree that measuring the young saitama's entire height doesn't work. It would make more sense to use just the torso as that's the clearest point of comparison and is leaning against the wall. The og calc using a soda can doesn't make sense considering it's some distance away from the crater plus using largest reference frames in a scene is general better for pixel scaling
- 4,239
- 4,084
You’re right, but I was in a trolling mood, apologies legandarium.
- 23,369
- 21,103
You seriously need to fix that because this happens in almost every thread I see you in. Its getting a bit much.
That being said, I'm pretty neutral. The current calc uses a soda can which is far closer to the POV than Saitama's foot. I'd just say to fix the pixel scaling and instead use the height of Saitama's torso using this website as a basis. I appreciate the attempt Legendarium, nice calc.
- 4,239
- 4,084
It's really not a big deal. In fact, your friend @KingTempest has much more troll posts than me, so maybe don't show clear bias when saying stuff like this, as I've never seen you call out one of his many troll posts.
In fact this is so funny, how contradictory you are as you even reinforce his behaviour, seen here. Let's tighten that up before calling others out.
- 4,239
- 4,084
No it's just funny how biased people can be towards me.
We can stop here as it is indeed derailment, but I'm pointing out the truth. I accept I was wrong.
Anyways, apologies.
Last edited:
- 24,280
- 37,682
Why am I catching strays
- 4,239
- 4,084
What he say **** me for.
- 35,060
- 41,649
Pipe it down, both of you.
Anyway @LegendariumOfLies, try Saitama's torso height (Shoulder-to-crotch), if you can't find a full-body render of 12-year-old Saitama, the HPC calculator should help.
Anyway @LegendariumOfLies, try Saitama's torso height (Shoulder-to-crotch), if you can't find a full-body render of 12-year-old Saitama, the HPC calculator should help.
- 5,386
- 4,827
- Thread starter
- #20
Sounds reasonable enough. I'll make the changes
- 4,239
- 4,084
No that doesn't work either. He's slouched down.
Second22
They/Them- 1,553
- 875
I don’t think just random wall feat needs over-the-top math. Yeah, details can make it look nicer, but not every tiny bit matters. His back wasn’t even slouched that much.
Second22
They/Them- 1,553
- 875
I see your point, but it’s really not that deep. I could also say his arm wasn’t even straight down since his hand was like right next to his knee. But honestly, I don’t think we need to go that far.
- 35,060
- 41,649
Not slouched enough to make a difference.
Plus it's more visible than the arms (Which are obscured by the clothing).
@DMUA @Mr. Bambu @Therefir @Dalesean027 @TheRustyOne @Psychomaster35 @Damage3245 @Dark-Carioca @Flashlight237 @SeijiSetto @Armorchompy @DemiiPowa @SunDaGamer @Migue79 Thoughts?
Last edited:
Lilybitdun
She/Her- 2,403
- 1,415
Tbf that's why he suggested the elbow to shoulder and not the whole arm, tho I personally think using the torso is better
- 35,060
- 41,649
The shoulder is obscured by the drooping torn cloth bits at the arm. The torso is objectively the better way to go here.
- 35,060
- 41,649
- 5,386
- 4,827
- Thread starter
- #29
I could just use shoulder length. Its pretty clear.
- 10,201
- 9,955
These pixel-scaling lines don't even make sense; they go from Saitama's shoe to his groin and then make a strange curve to a random point on his head, because he's looking down and you can't see where his head actually ends.
We don't even know 12-years old Saitama's true height, that's why I used the soda can instead, it's much simpler and doesn't require strange and complicated pixel lines or estimated heights to measure.
Not to mention the 12-ounce can is the industry standard all around the world and the one in the floor certainly looks like one.
So I disagree with the changes, the old calc is still good and it was checked by more than 3 calc group members back then.
We don't even know 12-years old Saitama's true height, that's why I used the soda can instead, it's much simpler and doesn't require strange and complicated pixel lines or estimated heights to measure.
Not to mention the 12-ounce can is the industry standard all around the world and the one in the floor certainly looks like one.
So I disagree with the changes, the old calc is still good and it was checked by more than 3 calc group members back then.
- 20,526
- 15,198
Wouldn't it be much better using the can for the width of the tile block on the floor and use that to know the width of the wall? And then possibly use that to pixel scale the minimum depth of the crater by using the outer part of the crater that's caving in
Here's also a very high quality image of the panel
Here's what I mean:
Can = 140 px (0.1227 m)
Tile block = 2345 px (2.055225 m)
Wall width = 2.055225 m
Last edited:
- 35,060
- 41,649
No, you'd have to draw the line right alongside the can, where the scan cuts off.
I am personally indifferent on choosing between Saitama's torso or the coke can for the radius.
I don't see an issue with using chest depth for the crater depth, especially considering how deep it looks, the 12-year-old-child chest depth is plenty good enough as is. Depth isn't a problem. It's the radius people seem to throw hissy fits about on some of the most asinine nitpicks imaginable because "muh accuracy". This is a hobby, not a science class.
- 20,526
- 15,198
I meant like that (if we are using the can, that is basically the only way it can actually work)Here's what I mean:
Can = 140 px (0.1227 m)
Tile block = 2345 px (2.055225 m)
Wall width = 2.055225 m
Yee that method isn't an issue, just if we know the minimum depth by using pixel scaling it can kinda support other values (like chest depth) (tho I don't think in this situation it would help much)
Last edited:
- 35,060
- 41,649
Ah. This. It could work.
- 20,526
- 15,198
Young Saitama's Durability (Small Adjustment)
vsbattles.fandom.com
Made the adjustment here, if someone wanna evaluate it
Lilybitdun
She/Her- 2,403
- 1,415
this is related to the scaling not the calc itself but why are we scaling a 12 year old saitama's durability completely to the value when it instantly knocked him out for an entire hour?
- 20,526
- 15,198
His body was still fine, being knocked out isn't an outer durability feat but the brain shutting down from damage, moving around too much from within
Last edited:
- 5,386
- 4,827
- Thread starter
- #39
Yeah this is far better than mine. I would recommend calling in @Kachon123 and @MrTayman616 for questions about OPM scaling as that is not my forte.Young Saitama's Durability (Small Adjustment)
Made the adjustment here, if someone wanna evaluate it
- 5,386
- 4,827
- Thread starter
- #40
From 4 to 5 Megajoule, truly the OPM Wank is unstoppable
Similar threads
