What is it? Why are you so mad at me, man?
How is disagreeing with your CRT being mad? Don't accuse people over trivial nonsense.
I know, but this is a crt about the gods of destruction being able to erase subspace and affect the world of the void that contains no concept of space and time
The world of the void very much does have space and time, based on the fact there's both space and time.
Idk what you want me to say to that, the only excuse one might have is GP gave it some, but if that's the case Toppo making slight changes to it doesn't mean a thing.
And if you know, don't derail your own CRT.
I've already proved it, the gods of destruction are capable of wiping out the entire Universe with their energy of destruction and subspace is accepted as part of the macrocosm, so it would be affected too with Beerus and his brother fighting
No it isn't. What both the blog and CRT said is not what you think it says. Hell the CRT itself even tries to rectify the very explicit fact that some of these don't actually exist in the same universe per Frieza.
I'm fine with agreeing to disagree
Not how this works, you need to actually prove your CRT.
Fine, you can do your thing, the subspace is said to have no absence of concepts like space or time, so it doesn't have a space
Actual showings > statements.
Statements > statements that contradict both said statements and showings.
We call that cherry picking lad.
But I've already proved it, the fight between the two gods of destruction would erase the Universes and we see their energies of destruction filling all the space in that room, and the subspace is between the dimensions of the Universe.
You simply saying it is, is not proof, I don't want your word I want actual evidence.
Prove that these things even exist in the frame he's going to destroy over time, that's what you need to prove, and you haven't.
Bro, it's said on the page itself that it's among the dimensions of the macrocosm and said in the crt that it is between the dimensions of the macrocosm,
That is literally not what it says, I don't wanna be mean here, but if you can't actually understand english that well, you need to run this shit by others first.
I'm not sabotaging anything, I think you're confused...
Both the CRT and the blog actively says the thing you're tying to say they would destroy, based on destroying the universe is, in fac, not actually apart of the universe.
Isn't it saying here that subspace is within the macrocosm?
On blog, explicitly noted to not be apart of any world.
Between, not in, not apart, it's between them and doesn't actually belong to them.
since this void is present between dimensions of macrocosm having time, it shows that they have their own parallel time axes thus they are separate Space-Times
Literally used as evidence to show the dimensions have their own space-time.
And furthermore
In essence, this details the fact that there’s a void without the concepts of time and space existing detached, but between from every dimension. Also, that despite this there exists dimensional boundaries that indicate the separation of space and time from these other dimensions.
Between and detached.
The thing is literally not part of the universe, it's detached, outside of it, and is even part of why they're accepted to have seperate space-times. If we want to say it's actually part of it, half the blog is going to be reworked because half the separate space-time arguments would need to be tossed.
