So instead of providing substance in your contentions, you elect to not address multiple parts of the greater argument. This will be my last response and I'll just wait for the consensus, unless your next response actually addresses stuff.
"..." is not a response, we are trying to ascertain where characters would tier, which requires thoughtful analysis, not dismissal. Anyways I'm pretty sure you find such a notion absurd, but to dismiss it on the basis of absurdity is fallacious. Star wars can have differing rules than the real world you know.
It means random individual Celestials can’t do it under their own power which already invalidates your scale of The Ones > Celestials = therefore they scale to everything.
Plurality is not used to denote that more than one celestial achieved that feat, but rather it is among the race's accomplishments. Engineering also doesn't imply that there is more than one celestial which preformed said task. Not sure where you got that from.
I also didn't claim the celestials created the universes singularly but whatever.
Also quit being bad faith.
Not sure why i'm being bad faith here, but i'm open to constructive criticism.
The current support for Mortis being 7D rests entirely on a Canon source.
The two sources which directly hold it above hyperspace/otherspace/realspace are:
1. Skywalker Family at War, which is canon (the "rules of time and space")
2. Nexus of Power, which doesn't defer to either continuity ("normal notions of time and space are meaningless")
Even without that, we have statements of Mortis being metaphysical, spiritual and "beyond/outside realspace", which should at least place it above Realspace, but both Hyperspace and Otherspace are physical constructs, so possibly them as well.
I think you need to lookup what the word concession means.
I'm well aware of what the word means. Respond to the argument.
As I have repeated multiple times, the description of the entire landmass degenerating into ‘moldy flesh’ like herself with the symbolism of the face is indicative of possession, it has nothing to do with some random attempt to derive an AP value from the scale of it. It is the quantity of avatars.
Controlling plants is not the same as making them an avatar.
That's nice and all but you still haven't addressed what I said at all, islands of flesh are not landmasses, nor does it say that the entire landmass degenerated into flesh, you made that up, also not sure how you correlated her face and possession, nothing indicates that, it can also equally be non-symbolic, but if it was symbolic of something then she was likely never that big in the first place. It's quite a leap to call her face hanging in the sky (even symbolically) indicative of possession. ATP you're going off of theory and not what the text says.
I already addressed the quantity of avatars argument, albeit indirectly, but both the murals and her planet depict the same amount of "plant/animal avatars" (assuming she was possessing the biosphere)
Yea, so you basically admit to being disingenuous, because if we pull up the quote:
After hurrying through two more archways, Thuruht finally stopped before a set of panels depicting three devastated worlds. In the first, an entire city lay in ruins. There were fungi rising from the rubble, and a drove of three-eyed bipeds could be seen fleeing a horde of tentacled felines. The second relief showed scores of dazed woodland creatures struggling through a blast-flattened forest, many fighting in vain to escape the fangvines wrapped around their legs. The third scene was the most gruesome of all. It was an ocean world with flocks of seabirds hovering over floating islands of moldy flesh. Hanging in the sky of each world was a female face with a gaping, fang-filled smile that stretched from one ear to another.
-Fate of the Jedi: Apocalypse
"It was a ocean world with flocks of seabirds hovering over floating islands of moldy flesh" not "it was a ocean world with flocks of seabirds hovering over what appeared to be landmasses degenerating into moldy flesh, due to the presence of the smiling face in the sky"
"In the first, a entire city lay in ruins. There were fungi rising from the rubble, and a drove of three-eyed bipeds could be seen fleeing a horde of tentacled felines"
"The second relief showed scores of dazed woodland creatures struggling through a blast-flattened forest, many fighting in vain to escape the fangvines wrapped around their legs."
NOWHERE DOES THIS SAY THAT THESE ARE AVATARS, THIS IS JUST HER CONTROLING THE ANIMAL LIFE, EVEN IF IT WAS ABELOTH'S PLANET HAS THE SAME EFFECT:
"The world is very hostile, completely unnatural. The animals thrive by photosynthesis, and the plants prey upon them." She gave Ben and Luke a half-smile. "Keeps you on your toes." "And Abeloth controls everything," Luke surmised. "She does."
-FOTJ: Allies
Why do the plants prey on animals? doesn't seem to be normal, and Abeloth is directly mentioned afterwards, saying she controls everything. I don't see a difference in the scans, nor do both of the scans directly say these are avatars.
I’m trying to split Pre-Imprisonment Abeloth and FOTJ Abeloth. Saying as I’m implying the actual weakening of her imprisonment went from 1-C to 4-A is disingenuous.
So you don't even understand what you claimed in the thread, this is precisely what you wrote:
FOTJ Scaling
Abeloth (Post-Release Physical Avatars), Luke Skywalker (FOTJ):
- Attack Potency: Solar System level
- Durability: Solar System level with Force Amplification
- Striking Strength: Solar System level with Force Amplification
She went from a Outerversal ED (pre-imprisonment) to solar system level (post-imprisonment). Please track.
So because there is a possibility of a difference in speed of weakening while Taalon was drastically reduced in a weak while Abeloth suffered the same effect for thousands of years, we should just pretend like she wouldn't be weakened at all?
To call this a stretch is an understatement.
Pretty ironic, considering most of your arguments for her being significantly weakened hinge on stretches and extrapolations of the text, but anyways:
The point of the contention was to establish neutrality, we can't ascertain if it would be exactly the same process or not per the delineation, I wasn't claiming that she wouldn't per say be weakened, although it's likely given that the font of power probably did give her some boost; it's just a huge "maybe".
????
Sinkhole was literally maintaining the Maw. It was right in the middle of it.
Not to mention the fact The Shelter was an entirely different station also in the middle of the Maw. That was the entire reason it was used as a hideout - navigating through the Maw was very difficult, making it very hard to find.
Send the Quotes. The galactic coordinate placement of both suggests otherwise.
@Xavis10 probably has this.
Why would a leg injury nerf his Force amplification and thus his ability to react appropriately? Not to mention this is Legends where passive barriers exist.
Force amplification takes time, you can't just passively conjure force barriers with significant potency. Also, you omitted the details of Taalon's death, he was only killed by Vestara when Luke created a distraction by sending down a roof, which, due to his crippled leg, he would have to focus on escaping, which allowed her to strike him down in surprise, acting if this was a legitimate feat for vestara and hence being indicative of how much he has weakened is pretty disingenuous. Luke also played a role in attacking Taalon, it wasn't solely Ben and Vestara.
Dangers? Dread and discomfort was the only thing stated explicitly.
Maybe dangers wasn't the best choice, but you get the point anyways. It doesn't have to be explicitly said that it weakened them, we can infer that through what was said in the text.