oh that is different.
Because, it is unreasonable to think that nothing would change, not even the ownership is permanent, within about half a century later Dragon Ball will be in the public domain, this does not mean that the Toei verse, or what Toriyama created, will cease to exist, but it will mean that anyone will be allowed to use it without getting a copyright strike... if not even the copyright is eternal... even less will some guides be.
You have 0,
Null, zilch, utterly, absolutely, NO FREAKING CLUE about how intellectual property ownership works, what copyright means and what implications it has for the material a verse relies on. Stop embarrassing yourself. You are bad at this, horrible in fact. Stop.
also the information has been contradicted many times (again, the appearences of new characters, things that didn't exists and stuff that clearly were not mentioned in the past, are examples)and if they are not.
That's not a contradiction you stubborn mule that's called expanding upon the world! Show me where exactly the heck those statements got contradicted. Show me right now or shut it!
then why are the kaioshin (glinds)born from a tree?and not from the fruit of a tree, they are literraly born from one, they come out from one.
You donut that's literally one of the OLDEST IDEAS that Toriyama conjured up AGES AGO that was just now reaffirmed in the Daima series. That proves how you don't know jack shit about Dragon Ball or its lore. Stop making this worse for yourself no one here respects your crap.
why is the demon realm exists before the actual universe?why are there another creator of the multiverse, etc.
Because they wanted to show us how a guy named Alexander on VS Battles Wiki pretends to know shit but is talking completely out of his rear and he cannot read and boy did they end up showing and proving that.
What you're saying is that there's no way to be objectively correct about a character's tiering. What I said is that if constant changes were made, it's because certain things were wrong, or rather, many agreed they were wrong.
No it just means there were more improved, better ways of scaling. You continue parroting this nonsense "right-wrong" false dichotomy when I've told you already that the wiki is NOT that simple. Your inability and failure to grasp this is not mine or anyone's burden.
You can't change something like the entire system without, at least, questioning whether something is wrong. If everything were right, changes wouldn't be made, because you don't have to fix something that isn't broken.
None of this is relevant to what I said. The wiki doesn't operate on this false dichotomy
anyone could do it but me.
Yeah, I know. You can hardly read what's in front of you, no way can you type anything coherent sensible under anesthesia when you can't even do it while fully awake.
i have been told that many times and it was not dragon ball related,
Yeah because you suck at it, not just Dragon Ball, you suck at debating in general.
i even know i suck at debating,
But you don't know why. Let me tell you why.
that does not prevent me from debating or trying to get better at doing so.
Except you're NOT getting better. You suck at it as much as you sucked at it months ago. The fact that it doesn't prevent you and get you to stop, introspect, self-evaluate about what you're doing wrong or why you suck at it is PRECISELY why you suck at it to begin with. You come in head-first in this thread spouting utter garbage expecting to be taken seriously and every single time you fall flat on your face, but you don't realize why. Well that's exactly why, you never listen, you never learn, you never consider or even THINK about what you're doing wrong, whether some of the ideas or assumptions you have are wrong, you never think to challenge YOURSELF and your own garbage beliefs first before challenging us on it (which just leads to you being embarrassed a million times). So yeah, that's why you utterly suck at it and that's why you're not getting better at it.
they told me i suck at making profiles, so i just got better.
Not the same thing. Not sure I believe you either and I don't care to verify.
this is how low is the standard for me in this specific thread?
It's way lower. Way, way lower. No one here thinks you're a serious debater or worth taking seriously at all. Only reason I'm engaging with you instead of doing something better is because I have some free time to kill right now and honestly your opinions are just annoying to me.
"No one is attacking you personally, we just think your opinions belong in the garbage." i will ignore this has a personal attack, because i don't think it is one
There's no personal attack here, calling your opinions what they are is not an attack on you or your personhood or your identity. Anyone can make shitty arguments, some more than others, evidently.
saying another person opinion is garbage or crap is definitely not a personal attack (and i don't even know if counting that has a personal attack).
It's not, but I don't care to do the emotional labor for you here and help you understand why it isn't a personal attack.