• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

World of Darkness, an Unasked for Sequel

Status
Not open for further replies.
For very high tier revision somebody knowledgeable in our staff needs to agree as well. 🙏
 
If only Ultima can do somethin...
I understand they are very knowledgeable and basically created the standards for this very high tiers stuff but there are atleast a dozens crts held hostage waiting for input that likely will never happen.
 
Well, I suppose that this revision can probably be applied in lack of better options, as it is evidently an improvement from rating lots of characters in the same verse as Tier 0, but it would be appreciated if Ultima eventually responds here for safety reasons. 🙏
 
Well, I suppose that this revision can probably be applied in lack of better options, as it is evidently an improvement from rating lots of characters in the same verse as Tier 0, but it would be appreciated if Ultima eventually responds here for safety reasons. 🙏
He said he's not likely to respond plus we've already waited for him for a while. He’ll have to do his input afterward unless we can guarantee he will come.
 
Well, I suppose that this revision can probably be applied in lack of better options, as it is evidently an improvement from rating lots of characters in the same verse as Tier 0, but it would be appreciated if Ultima eventually responds here for safety reasons. 🙏
We've been bullying him on Discord to try and appear, he said he'd "read it" in Jan and we're in March now so unless it's like 1 word a day we're not gonna see him
 
Tertiary-canon... so still canon...
It's also an inferior statement to what the Void already is.

It being less than Nothing is inferior to beyond all symbol and division, the end of human comprehension and intellection.
 
What currently needs to be done here? 🙏
 
No problem, and I will do so then.

Thank you to everybody who helped out here, and if Ultima has complaints about the scaling, he can reopen this discussion later. 🙏
 
Firstly, as shown in that thread I linked, we do not list descriptors like that in the notes for tier 1 characters. People can discuss them in CRTs and cosmology blogs, or infer them from descriptions in the AP sections, but we don't place them in notes.

Secondly, "infinite supra-qualitative superiority" is nonsense jargon that we don't have an official definition of, so it shouldn't be used, even if the verse uses it itself.
 
I can't really comment if the High 1-A+ ratings are accurate or not, but I believe the main goal was the reminder that we can't have any more than one Tier 0 character. Which was the part dealt with, but Agnaa does make good points. Though would it be better handled in a refreshed thread?
 
Firstly, as shown in that thread I linked, we do not list descriptors like that in the notes for tier 1 characters. People can discuss them in CRTs and cosmology blogs, or infer them from descriptions in the AP sections, but we don't place them in notes.

Secondly, "infinite supra-qualitative superiority" is nonsense jargon that we don't have an official definition of, so it shouldn't be used, even if the verse uses it itself.
@Apotheosis69 @Udlmaster
 
Firstly, as shown in that thread I linked, we do not list descriptors like that in the notes for tier 1 characters. People can discuss them in CRTs and cosmology blogs, or infer them from descriptions in the AP sections, but we don't place them in notes.

Secondly, "infinite supra-qualitative superiority" is nonsense jargon that we don't have an official definition of, so it shouldn't be used, even if the verse uses it itself.
@Udlmaster @Apotheosis69
 
Honestly, because all of that is already described in the Cosmology Page. There's not really any point in putting it in the Profiles, I can agree on that front.
 
You think a scaling chain of the High 1-A(+) in the World of Darkness page itself would substitute the Statistics Values in the profiles of the Godheads?
 
Last edited:
Welp, Apotheosis and Udl both seem fine with its removal.

Should I just delete that note, or do y'all want to handle it yourselves (potentially to replace it with something more suitable)?
 
Welp, Apotheosis and Udl both seem fine with its removal.

Should I just delete that note, or do y'all want to handle it yourselves (potentially to replace it with something more suitable)?
"Take it out back and "deal" with it boys."

If you unlock the profile, I'll handle it.
 
Beginning the unlock spree, going alphabetically.

EDIT: Done, these are now unlocked: Bondye, Gaia, Jehovah, Safin, The Wyld

EDIT 2: Going through these pages, I did also notice some weirdness in P&A sections; particularly Cappadocius' first tabber with unlinked mentions of Dark Thaumaturgy, Oblivion, and Mortis. That seems more suited for the NA&T section.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top