• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Page Deletion Requests Thread (New forum)

As recently discussed in the Pokemon discussion thread, I'd think a whole CRT should be done regarding how playable trainers should be indexed before doing this sort of pages, especially when it comes to how much content they should have (namely in regards to just which Pokemon they can have and so on). So for now they should be moved to a sandbox and removed until someone does a CRT on that matter and gets that settled.
 
The following page seems to be of very bad quality. Should we delete it, or is somebody willing to improve on it? 🙏

 
I agree with deleting the pages and moving them to sandboxes. Both of them (but especially Calem) have numerous formatting and scaling issues, and they lack references as was mentioned before.
As recently discussed in the Pokemon discussion thread, I'd think a whole CRT should be done regarding how playable trainers should be indexed before doing this sort of pages, especially when it comes to how much content they should have (namely in regards to just which Pokemon they can have and so on). So for now they should be moved to a sandbox and removed until someone does a CRT on that matter and gets that settled.
Sure, It seems he already have them in sandbox so, I'll just delete them.
 
Last edited:
The following page seems to be of very bad quality. Should we delete it, or is somebody willing to improve on it? 🙏

That profile is ver old. I think we should delete it
But we got some supporters of verse.
@HeadlessKramerGeoff777 @NikHelton @Theglassman12 @Newendigo @LordGriffin1000
anyone here willing to work on this?
 
What about the following new Pokémon pages? Are they acceptable? 🙏


 
What about the following new Pokémon pages? Are they acceptable? 🙏


They still have the masters keys so no. We've mentioned it before, we need to discuss how to approach the profiles properly before actually adding them.
 
What about the following new Pokémon pages? Are they acceptable? 🙏


I thought i deleted calem, but mistakenly delete the sandbox one, I recovered it. So my bad 🙏.

They still have the masters keys so no. We've mentioned it before, we need to discuss how to approach the profiles properly before actually adding them.
So I'll delete them.
 
Question, if i were to make a question about an profile that was deleted, do i ask here, or all purpose?
 
Okay. That may be unfortunate, but the community consensus from the members here who are knowledgeable about Pokémon should probably decide in this case. 🙏
 
Well, single members should not make decisions unilaterally regarding our wiki's views about canonicity and similar. 🙏
 
I suppose so, yes. 🙏
 
As the creator and single supporter of a verse or more, am I allowed to delete them without the need to mention here? There are a lot to say...circa 26 for a verse, and seversl for other verses that I have added in the past.

Rise of Humanity characters bar Zhong Yue which I will update, is the verse with the most deletion that I plan.

Reason: I find the profiles lacking and outdated plus I will never update them to the standards with references.
 
Bump.

Making a small correction, there are some scans there or here in some profiles. But it's still extremely little and I don't think it's even enough for most profiles.
try returning the verse so we can fix it into a better version.
 

2016 Page with no stat justifications, and the only page based around the verse
 

2016 Page with no stat justifications, and the only page based around the verse
wow, his only stat is Intelligence: Average.
 

2016 Page with no stat justifications, and the only page based around the verse
bump
 









Delete these profiles, please.
Without Stone Giant, I can't go on with this anymore.
So I suggest you delete those profiles now too.
I won't do it that verse again.
 









Delete these profiles, please.
Without Stone Giant, I can't go on with this anymore.
So I suggest you delete those profiles now too.
I won't do it that verse again.
What.
 
Ah, these yeah, I deleted a page yesterday because it lacked valid statistics and relied on guesswork. The user did reach out to me on my wiki message wall.
@Gyozu , I think you just need to request calculations in the calculation request thread. Once the feats are evaluated and accepted, you can use them.
 
Back
Top