• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Page Deletion Requests Thread (New forum)

Ah, these yeah, I deleted a page yesterday because it lacked valid statistics and relied on guesswork. The user did reach out to me on my wiki message wall.
@Gyozu , I think you just need to request calculations in the calculation request thread. Once the feats are evaluated and accepted, you can use them.
I gave up on the Naxeex Games verse.
Then just delete the characters from that.
I won't work with this verse anymore.
 
As the sole supporter of this verse, I'd like these pages to be deleted.
 
As the sole supporter of this verse, I'd like these pages to be deleted.
Why?
 
This verse was originally allowed on here because Bambu found no connection with how the word Outerversal is used here. But then this.
This certainly is more on the nose than what I ran into before (not that my checkup was all-inclusive or extremely deep, more like a random sampling of the word as it appeared).

I mean he is the creator & only supporter of the verse.

@Mr. Bambu , is it fine if the verse gets deleted?
I have no issue with its deletion. Lycoris is a reliable enough source regarding the verse, and indeed was the one who pushed for its addition in the first place. If they feel it ought to be deleted, then it ought to be.
 
As the sole supporter of this verse, I'd like these pages to be deleted.
I've deleted all the profiles you mentioned. Let me know if there's anything else you need.
 
The game judging by it's reception on YouTube and articles by Forbes means that the verse has a very sizable fan base. Which can very well reach the millions. Simply saying "I don't think" alone isn't a valid reason unless you supplement that with "cuz it breaks X rule" or something of a similar level.
For me, while I did index the verse for it stroking my funny bone, the Toddler technically is above average since it's small (we have small size as an ability for even toddlers for some reason) and able to solve things unlike normal babies. And that's not mentioning we already have notable characters as mundane as Johnny from the Room and non combatants like Barney the Dino

If you have an actual, reasonable excuse for excluding the verse, go ahead and say it if the verse you think is bad precedent
 
The game judging by it's reception on YouTube and articles by Forbes means that the verse has a very sizable fan base. Which can very well reach the millions. Simply saying "I don't think" alone isn't a valid reason unless you supplement that with "cuz it breaks X rule" or something of a similar level.
For me, while I did index the verse for it stroking my funny bone, the Toddler technically is above average since it's small (we have small size as an ability for even toddlers for some reason) and able to solve things unlike normal babies. And that's not mentioning we already have notable characters as mundane as Johnny from the Room and non combatants like Barney the Dino

If you have an actual, reasonable excuse for excluding the verse, go ahead and say it if the verse you think is bad precedent
Fair then
 
The game judging by it's reception on YouTube and articles by Forbes means that the verse has a very sizable fan base. Which can very well reach the millions. Simply saying "I don't think" alone isn't a valid reason unless you supplement that with "cuz it breaks X rule" or something of a similar level.
For me, while I did index the verse for it stroking my funny bone, the Toddler technically is above average since it's small (we have small size as an ability for even toddlers for some reason) and able to solve things unlike normal babies. And that's not mentioning we already have notable characters as mundane as Johnny from the Room and non combatants like Barney the Dino

If you have an actual, reasonable excuse for excluding the verse, go ahead and say it if the verse you think is bad precedent
I think the reason for it to not be around is because it's not a combat-oriented verse, and doesn't have any superhuman combat abilities. From our Editing Rules:
Low-powered characters are allowed to be featured here as long as the characters come from popular/notable verses that are overall worthy of indexing, they are important to their stories, and the profiles are reliable and well-made, although sitcom characters, ones from more realistic romantic comedies, and similar should be avoided. This wiki's main purpose is to index characters, not to feature fights between them.
In this case, "overall worthy of indexing" means that other characters in the series are notable from an indexing perspective.
 
I think the reason for it to not be around is because it's not a combat-oriented verse, and doesn't have any superhuman combat abilities. From our Editing Rules:

In this case, "overall worthy of indexing" means that other characters in the series are notable from an indexing perspective.
I cited Barney the dinosaur as an example of a noncombatant and Johnny from The Room as a character with near-mundane yet above average abilities. And there's technically above average benefits to having below average abilities. even if you have something like below average human biting strength, the teeth could be different and gradually bite through hard stuff. Being smaller means you're harder to hit and you can fit into smaller spaces. And depending on your definition of superhuman, that may mean peak human physical characteristics shouldn't be an ability since you need to exceed any human

In the first place, the guy reporting the verse just said "I don't think so," but from you, this should be interesting.
 
I cited Barney the dinosaur as an example of a noncombatant
There are two qualifiers which both need to not be false. Barney has superhuman features.
and Johnny from The Room as a character with near-mundane yet above average abilities
He should definitely be deleted, too. We've deleted many pages like his in the past.

It's just a dude with a handgun, from a piece of media which has nothing to do with combat.
And there's technically above average benefits to having below average abilities. even if you have something like below average human biting strength, the teeth could be different and gradually bite through hard stuff.
In that case, while they'd be below-average in some ways, they'd be above-average in other ways. A character who punches at 0.00001 m/s, yet through some physics-violation, punches with the force of a nuke, would be allowed.
And depending on your definition of superhuman, that may mean peak human physical characteristics shouldn't be an ability since you need to exceed any human
We have a broader definition of "superhuman" which can include any quality, such as being able to read minds, which have no bearing on physical strength.
 
Last edited:
There are two qualifiers which both need to not be false. Barney has superhuman features.

He should definitely be deleted, too. We've deleted many pages like his in the past.

It's just a dude with a handgun, from a piece of media which has nothing to do with combat.

In that case, while they'd be below-average in some ways, they'd be above-average in other ways. A character who punches at 0.00001 m/s, yet through some physics-violation, punches with the force of a nuke, would be allowed.

We have a broader definition of "superhuman" which can include any quality, such as being able to read minds, which have no bearing on physical strength.
Let me get this striaght, we have an unwritten rule of only allowing verses that are combat/superpowers.

I have no know idea about his until now. Like I know we're a battleboarding site, but if we're indexing first and foremost, then why are we disallowing fictional, mundane characters that technically have average combat exp/a form of combat? Having a gun and basic combat exp of regular people already puts you at a great advantage. These written rules seems pretty vague since we have peak human strength as an ability or "superpower", and yet anyone with enough effort could achieve it. And not everyone can fit in smaller spaces of type 0 small size

Do we have at least good precedents, baselines or goals of what verses see want and don't want? Cuz I don't want to accidentally step on too muddy, bad waters here.
 
Let me get this striaght, we have an unwritten rule of only allowing verses that are combat/superpowers.

I have no know idea about his until now. Like I know we're a battleboarding site, but if we're indexing first and foremost, then why are we disallowing fictional, mundane characters that technically have average combat exp/a form of combat? Having a gun and basic combat exp of regular people already puts you at a great advantage. These written rules seems pretty vague since we have peak human strength as an ability, and yet anyone with enough effort could achieve it. And not everyone can fit in smaller spaces of type 0 small size

Do we have at least good precedents, baselines or goals of what verses see want and don't want? Cuz I don't want to accidentally step on too muddy, bad waters here.
It's a written rule; I posted it above. But admittedly, the "overall worthy of indexing" part isn't very clear, but I think this reading makes sense in context.

The general precedent is:
  • Does it have anything significantly noteworthy compared to an ordinary real-world entity of the same kind? If so, it's allowed. This includes if the thing doesn't have direct combat applicability (i.e. a human who has memorised all chess moves).
  • Does anything in its verse meet the first criteria, or is the verse conflict-oriented (not sure about the best wording here; a series following a character trying to be the world MMA champion would count, a series about competitive gamblers would count, a TV drama wouldn't)? If so, and if the character is important to the story, it's allowed.
I believe that covers all the bases.
 
It's a written rule; I posted it above. But admittedly, the "overall worthy of indexing" part isn't very clear, but I think this reading makes sense in context.

The general precedent is:
  • Does it have anything significantly noteworthy compared to an ordinary real-world entity of the same kind? If so, it's allowed. This includes if the thing doesn't have direct combat applicability (i.e. a human who has memorised all chess moves).
  • Does anything in its verse meet the first criteria, or is the verse conflict-oriented (not sure about the best wording here; a series following a character trying to be the world MMA champion would count, a series about competitive gamblers would count, a TV drama wouldn't)? If so, and if the character is important to the story, it's allowed.
I believe that covers all the bases.
Thanks, this makes stuff less vague.

The only things notable about the verse I could think of us that it's a unique horror game with the baby/toddler as the protag. And it has 1 mil copies sold

The Toddler also has a slight intelligence advantage compared to normal toddlers. And that's it. Is this a good precedent to allow? I'm fine with the potential outcome either way
 
Yeah I don't think that'd make the cut, unless later updates give The Toddler more noteworthy feats.

I would like at least one more person to weigh in; what do others think about deleting this page and this page?
 
This Verse should seriously be deleted, because it's outdated, only has one character, and it has over a lot of characters that weren't made yet:
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/666_Satan
 
None of those things are reasons to delete the verse. Unless by "outdated" you mean "doesn't line up with current standards".
 
None of those things are reasons to delete the verse. Unless by "outdated" you mean "doesn't line up with current standards".
Well, it's painful to see a lot of characters that are just blank where only one character exists and only 3 users are supporting the verse without doing anything.
 
Yeah I don't think that'd make the cut, unless later updates give The Toddler more noteworthy feats.

I would like at least one more person to weigh in; what do others think about deleting this page and this page?
The first one, I'm more lax on it being banished too the shadow realm. If it meant the feats of being able to access the risk of falling isn't a feat more distinct than IRL Toddlers or if the verse sets a terrible precedent.

The room? I know basic stuff on Johnny's verse. The movie is a classic it's so bad it's good movie. The filter is pretty much most of the movie and between that and the main plot, it shows rare cases of action only. Whether it's with IRL like people or crime. But it doesn't focus on that mainly. The verse only gets close to being on site with crime side characters, but that is pretty much it

Edit: AFAIK, I could try to vouch for Johnny due to the movie having it's strange cult following from it's bad writing, but that's the least of my concern. I could try to see who made Johnny's profile since not everyone knows how to do that
 
Last edited:
Back
Top