Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also that comment + the current vote count is suggesting he's just gonna not count the vote?On this thread
@BlackDarkness679 is being quite rude to Glassman for disagreeing with something he posted. Including calling people "Clowns." And a specific post removed by Lephyr was especially uncalled for. And ignoring warnings isn't really helping his case either.
This user is still around, and furthermore have not only lingered for awhile but have been kinda escalating (And like, blatantly seem to think staff are against them, at least on the FC/OC side of things but we can't really ban them only from that forum). They did also break a rule overtly in the form of spamming a bunch of different threads here.All I did was say something that conflicted with their view that VSBW's system is perfect and they retaliated by attacking me and making bad faith arguments. No system is perfect. Even the simple mathematical system of multiplying fractions is flawed. Why am I not allowed to mention those flaws? https://vsbattles.com/threads/a-teaser-for-the-power-level-of-a-manga-i-plan-to-make.177053
- Shugunou
- content moderators thread moderators
- Replies: 202
- Forum: Questions and Answers
Not sure if any explicit rule breaking has happened but this thread cant possibly lead to any good and just tonight has gotten to 5 almost 6 pages and is just going to lead to issues.
I'm honestly not sure, I just hit the "report" button and got brought hereWait really? This thread's meant to handle misbehaviour in threads on those other parts of the forum too?
Yeah, I kinda assumed that FC/OC and JBW staff would've been able to apply independent bans to their own subsections, based on their own rules. But I could easily see that not being true.I don't know why this thread wouldn't be shared, since all wikis are based in this same forum, which exists under whatever the vsbw forum rules are. And punishments seemingly transfer across each forum division. Like bans, warnings, etc.
Probably more efficient this way, anyways.
This comment seems to be arguing that this conduct doesn't violate this portion of our Site RulesI would not consider this a WOG statement or whatever like asking if Dante can fart away 190213213 universes after snorting 1 line of crack, this is simply asking how a game mechanic works.
I get how this can seem a bit of a blurred line, but I think we should put asking a game's creator for a list of velocities characters' abilities launch objects at, and whether certain factors change these velocities, as something we should not pester a creator about.Do not pester or harass the authors of various works on social media about versus debating or character statistics. They are often bombarded by numerous questions from fans, and thus are rarely interested in giving a serious response. In addition, the statements they give to appease users are often contradictory to the feats in the stories of the works they have written. Thus, it is frowned upon to bother them over these topics.
Yes, this thread is for misbehaviour in our forum as a whole. It would be too difficult for the much more limited resources of the staff members of our partner wikis to handle it by themselves otherwise.Wait really? This thread's meant to handle misbehaviour in threads on those other parts of the forum too?
Only people with more general admin rights can apply bans from our forum as a whole. I think that without that option available, only discussion thread bans can be applied, not sub-forum bans. Or at least those were the XenForo settings we have had to work with as well as possible.Yeah, I kinda assumed that FC/OC and JBW staff would've been able to apply independent bans to their own subsections, based on their own rules. But I could easily see that not being true.
Anyway, should we apply a temporary ban and final warning to the member in question? It is mostly up to the FC/OC staff to decide mind you.This user is still around, and furthermore have not only lingered for awhile but have been kinda escalating (And like, blatantly seem to think staff are against them, at least on the FC/OC side of things but we can't really ban them only from that forum). They did also break a rule overtly in the form of spamming a bunch of different threads here.
I think that seems reasonable.Minor thing here, @EmbalmerMaster9000 recently made this calc blog which includes a screenshot of a person asking for WoG, and that person seems to be Embalmer.
This comment seems to be arguing that this conduct doesn't violate this portion of our Site Rules
I get how this can seem a bit of a blurred line, but I think we should put asking a game's creator for a list of velocities characters' abilities launch objects at, and whether certain factors change these velocities, as something we should not pester a creator about.
In line with this, I think Embalmer should be warned.
I'm hesitant but I'll sign off on a warning. I think it treads too close to the rule for comfort, although as you say, I think he was within justifiable range of it. It's not equivalent to asking more direct questions.Minor thing here, @EmbalmerMaster9000 recently made this calc blog which includes a screenshot of a person asking for WoG, and that person seems to be Embalmer.
This comment seems to be arguing that this conduct doesn't violate this portion of our Site Rules
I get how this can seem a bit of a blurred line, but I think we should put asking a game's creator for a list of velocities characters' abilities launch objects at, and whether certain factors change these velocities, as something we should not pester a creator about.
In line with this, I think Embalmer should be warned.
I think what they're doing is pretty egregiously pushy and runs in violation of our rules, at least, although FC/OC has their own. Given FC/OC's staff ostensible agreement that action should be taken, I'd lean in favor of a short ban to cool off over a warning, as they were in communication with many people (staff included) telling them to take it easy, which they obviously didn't do. If a short ban doesn't work, then. Unfortunate, I suppose. One to two weeks seems appropriate.Anyway, should we apply a temporary ban and final warning to the member in question? It is mostly up to the FC/OC staff to decide mind you.![]()
Yes that's me, not going to sugarcoat it. I was asking how a game mechanic worked so I didn't have to bother with manually grinding out money in-game to get scans of the player getting launched around by different attacks. I literally linked a video shortly after demonstrating this very thing in-game (how poop hammer doesn't influence the knockback of attacks). I only thought that WoG specifically applied to asking about feats like "can they move at the speed of light" or "can they destroy a planet". I can remove that from the blog and just trudge through getting the scans and nothing would really change. Thank you for pointing that out though, I will avoid directly contacting coders to get specific values.Minor thing here, @EmbalmerMaster9000 recently made this calc blog which includes a screenshot of a person asking for WoG, and that person seems to be Embalmer.
This comment seems to be arguing that this conduct doesn't violate this portion of our Site Rules
I get how this can seem a bit of a blurred line, but I think we should put asking a game's creator for a list of velocities characters' abilities launch objects at, and whether certain factors change these velocities, as something we should not pester a creator about.
In line with this, I think Embalmer should be warned.
I don't think what you did was morally wrong, to be clear. But I do think it should probably be avoided, so a warning is sufficient to establish that as the case. As Ant said, one appreciates you being reasonable.Yes that's me, not going to sugarcoat it. I was asking how a game mechanic worked so I didn't have to bother with manually grinding out money in-game to get scans of the player getting launched around by different attacks. I literally linked a video shortly after demonstrating this very thing in-game (how poop hammer doesn't influence the knockback of attacks). I only thought that WoG specifically applied to asking about feats like "can they move at the speed of light" or "can they destroy a planet". I can remove that from the blog and just trudge through getting the scans and nothing would really change. Thank you for pointing that out though, I will avoid directly contacting coders to get specific values.
It seems intentional.Idk if this is enought for a remport but i don't like trolls in a tier 0 crt.
Is possible to have his comments removed?It seems intentional.
I guess a warning is warranted in this case.
I cannot but Thread mods can.Is possible to have his comments removed?
ThanksI'll delete those and thread ban for a day.
EDIT: Done.
Fully mentally skipped the word "thread" lol. Alright, rescind prior statement, that seems fine.Just from that particular thread.