- 961
- 288
Why would you even assume the cosmology of Dragon Ball is larger than Cookie Runs.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Strongest 5-D Characters on the Wiki
- Thread starter Robo432343
- Start date
- 9,315
- 4,381
A universe timeline is already a 5-D structure, multiply that by the infinite ammounts of universe there are.
- 961
- 288
A dream in the world of dreams is 2-A in size and each dream stacks endlessly. And theres infinite dreams. So each dream should be 5D via infinite 2-A. so each dream should be at least 5-D.
- 9,315
- 4,381
That isn't how it works, that is still 2-A, just at a higher grade
- 961
- 288
Each dream is a hierarchy of infinite 2-A'S.
- 495
- 864
You’d need to prove an uncountable infinity to reach 5D territory
- 9,315
- 4,381
I think you are saying that cookie cosmology is like DBH, but in steroids, but you don't understand why DBH cosmology is 5-D to begin with
- 961
- 288
The World of Dreams is above time and space, as well as the infinite Multiverse. Also, its metaphysical and physical laws don't apply there. Its conceptually abstract as well.
- 1,146
- 897
And 2-A is...still smaller than infinite numbers of low 1-C structures by a kilometer.
As for the other points you mentioned here
And she bypass her passive fate manipulation by low 1-C Fate Manipulation, resistances to it and Plot Manipulation/Causality Manipulation.
And arale has better feats and usages of plot manipulation, she can just rewrite the entire narrative with a thought, leave it, erase it and just ignore it completely. And it doesn't matter much when arale also have insane levels of RE, so even if Swan has equal plot manipulation, arale would just surpass it or copy it.
- 961
- 288
I'm not gonna argue on the cosmology of DBZ for now since the world of dreams is a weird thing to discuss with its Nature, because one dream has a L1-C realms as well, nor is it the true conversation so i'm not gonna get too into this.
Sugar Swan resisted Plot Manip which affected Players as well as the Executive Producer of Cookie Run who exist in the Real World. I hardly doubt this would work on the Sugar Swan. She also has other passive hax abstract existence and concept manip type 1.
- 495
- 864
Cool, that’s one layer of plot manip. Too bad Arale can do the same and she gets more enhanced plot manip even after that.
- 961
- 288
Does Arale have Plot Manip which affects Toriyama or readers? If yes, then Sugar Swan resists it. If anything lower, then she obviously resists it.
- 495
- 864
This isn’t even acknowledging the wall of haxes she possesses that sugar swan has no resistance to or the passives of characters like Mechikabura and Demigra
- 495
- 864
I don’t think you understand. Nothing about this feat makes it more impressive than a conventional plot manip resistance. You’d have to argue that that level of plot manip is more impressive than the normal type through in verse showings (of which there don’t exist) meaning Arale just outlayers
- 961
- 288
I don't really understand the layers of plot manip, so I don't have much to comment. The same Plot Manip im talking about affected the real world players.
- 495
- 864
I’ll repeat what I’ll said before and that that doesn’t have any effect on the potency of the plot hax unless you’re arguing it’s 1a. At this point we should just make a thread
- 961
- 288
Cookie Runs R>F has been argued multiple times but so for its gotten nowhere. I'll make a thread to open a discussion about it.
- 9,315
- 4,381
Wut? Her data is not abstract
- 14,991
- 10,604
- Thread starter
- #1,579
No.
- 9,315
- 4,381
- 14,991
- 10,604
- Thread starter
- #1,581
- 15,359
- 22,724
What the hell guys
- 14,991
- 10,604
- Thread starter
- #1,583
see i made a thread about this plot problem and everyone agrees with me
- 3,313
- 1,836
The Overlord is equal with FSM, And weaker than Lloyd and Source Dragon
- 4,051
- 2,714
Quid pro quo on how layers work:
Example:
P1 has plot Hax (0 layer potency) and P2 has Plot resistance (0 layer resistance)
*P1 uses Plot Hax against P2. It fails because P2 resists.
*P3 uses Plot Hax against P2. It succeeds meaning P3’s Plot Hax operates at a higher potency than P1’s and was potent enough to bypass/overwhelm P2’s resistance = 1 Layer Potency for P3
*P3 uses Plot Hax against P4. It fails meaning P4’s plot resistance operates at resiliency higher than P2’s to be able to resist P3’s Hax = 1 Layer Resistance for P4
*P5 uses Plot Hax against P4. It succeeds meaning P5’s Plot Hax operates at a higher potency than P3’s and was potent to bypass/overwhelm P4’s Resistance = 2 Layer Potency for P5.
And so on and so forth. Layered Hax and Resistance basically adds addition “layers” of potency to Hax and resiliency to resistances. If your character has no layers to speak of and/or fewer than someone else’s then no amount of plot Hax used by them can affect the opposition and no amount of resistance they would have protect them plot Hax from the opposition as well.
Also Layers don’t matter when faced with a higher dimensional potency.
For Example:
P6 has 100 Layers of Plot Resistance (4-D)
P7 has 1000 layers of plot resistance (4-D)
P8 has
layers of Plot resistance (4-D)P9 has 1 layer of Plot Hax potency (5-D)
P9 can affect P6, P7 and P8 because while P9 has less layers his Hax operates at an infinitely higher level.
- 495
- 864
So now DBH has info manip 2 back I think they should at least be above Ss now
- 3,422
- 2,512
I doubt you can kill a being who cannot die as long as a certain concept exists (AE type 1) by… doing affecting something entirely different that said concept. Going by the AE type 1 page:
Arale cannot affect the abstraction, so she can't affect SS. Period
- 961
- 288
Period
- 495
- 864
Sugar swan just gets incapacitated by having their fundamental information changed or erased.
- 3,422
- 2,512
- 495
- 864
Assuming DBH characters can’t affect SS, wouldn’t they incon via defensive causality manipulation that just undoes anything she does or their other wall of haxes and resistances?
- 961
- 288
All her Pets and Invocation Cards are passive. Then we have her Curse that negates all powers and debuffs opponent.s
- 495
- 864
A lot of DBH character haxes are passive too, including power null and the aforementioned causality manip
- 961
- 288
Check the Sugar Swans page. Better and more Passive Hax and then we have her concept manip. Passive Coin Magic which turns anyone in Radius to Coins.
- 495
- 864
All of them save for law, concept and plot get resisted meanwhile Sugar Swan can’t negate their fate and causality manip, which are passive too.
- 961
- 288
Fate can be avoided in Cookie Run. (Check Sea Fairy's profile) She can also undo effects of causality. Keep in mind shes Large Size Type 10 so these attacks cover a HUGE distance
- 495
- 864
iirc all time power hax is layered, not to mention nothing on SF’s profile remotely mentions her being able to undo causality.
DBH characters also literally have the range to effect large size type 10 characters lol
- 961
- 288
She can undo it. She's been portrayed to undo cause and effect in the game. I also explained how it can be avoided. She has lots of thought based hax, and much more Passive Hax. They can't even win considering they can't affect her via Abstract Existence.
Similar threads
