Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,223
- 2,742
The current Nonduality page says the following about nature type 2, that is Transduality.
That's why, I propose an edit to the Transduality page to make the explanation of "qualitative superiority" clearer in context and not to be confused with a term like "uncountable infinite difference" just used in dimensional layering.
If you say that "qualitative superiority" in every context corresponds to an "uncountable infinite difference" (which it does not), then it should be removed from Transduality page, Because the uncountable infinite difference will only give you directly transcend the dimensional plane you are in and cannot be proven for Td in any way.
It is not that the definition of QS is wrong, but that it does not fit in the Transduality standards if we equate it to its use in this one, since they are 2 completely different things and therefore incompatible.
But my first proposal is to explain the qualitative superiority here in context and make it clearer.
For example ;
TL;DR
- Yes, to reiterate for the last time, the phrase "qualitative superiority" that I put in the draft will mean being inherently superior and transcendent to the nature of dual system/systems rather than meaning a dimensional superiority and mathemathical term such as "uncountable infinite difference" for Transduality.
- And yes, if this "qualitative superiority" always means uncountable infinite difference (only used in dimensional layering) then qualitative superiority should be removed from the Transduality page.
The description of "qualitative superiority" required on the page is confusing... Yeah that's true because some users and mods on the wiki may interpret the requirement for "qualitative superiority" to mean "uncountable infinite superiority" over dualities such as here and here (and more), but mathematical terms such as "uncountable infinite superiority" used in dimensional layering and physical scales cannot be used to describe superiority over dualities, which are abstract concepts, nor can such a thing be proven.
- Transduality: Characters with this type of nonduality exist outside and independently of the logical systems they're nondual regarding while also possessing qualitative superiority to them. Besides immunizing them against the dualities in question, this power also immunizes them against attempts to apply those dualities to them, as they would transcend the scope of the haxes that could do so.
That's why, I propose an edit to the Transduality page to make the explanation of "qualitative superiority" clearer in context and not to be confused with a term like "uncountable infinite difference" just used in dimensional layering.
If you say that "qualitative superiority" in every context corresponds to an "uncountable infinite difference" (which it does not), then it should be removed from Transduality page, Because the uncountable infinite difference will only give you directly transcend the dimensional plane you are in and cannot be proven for Td in any way.
It is not that the definition of QS is wrong, but that it does not fit in the Transduality standards if we equate it to its use in this one, since they are 2 completely different things and therefore incompatible.
But my first proposal is to explain the qualitative superiority here in context and make it clearer.
For example ;
Or a draft in which qualitative superiority is removed and there is only transcendence by nature againts dual system/systemsTransduality: Characters with this kind of non-duality exist outside and independent of the logical systems in which they are non-dual, they also have superiority againts the all natures of the dualities in that system and completely transcends them, that is a qualitative superiority for Transduality. Besides immunizing them against the dualities in question, this power also immunizes them against attempts to apply those dualities to them, as they would transcend the scope of the haxes that could do so.
Transduality: Characters with this kind of non-duality exist outside and independent of the logical systems in which they are non-dual, they also have superiority againts the all natures of the dualities in that system and transcends them. Besides immunizing them against the dualities in question, this power also immunizes them against attempts to apply those dualities to them, as they would transcend the scope of the haxes that could do so.
TL;DR
- Yes, to reiterate for the last time, the phrase "qualitative superiority" that I put in the draft will mean being inherently superior and transcendent to the nature of dual system/systems rather than meaning a dimensional superiority and mathemathical term such as "uncountable infinite difference" for Transduality.
- And yes, if this "qualitative superiority" always means uncountable infinite difference (only used in dimensional layering) then qualitative superiority should be removed from the Transduality page.
Last edited: