- 7,249
- 4,367
I already clarified that this is usually not acceptable for tier 1 but its also not far fitched to be considered as such, given my neutral stance
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
maou gakuin no futekigousha Upgrade from 2-A to low 1-C
- Thread starter ImmortalDread
- Start date
- Status
- 9,404
- 6,723
- 18,393
- 14,332
- 18,393
- 14,332
- Thread starter
- #244
Anyway, lets not derail, I am waiting for someone to comment, please. (I am saying please cmon..)
- 9,404
- 6,723
- 7,249
- 4,367
I don't even know what to say at this point
I already explained why
I don't agree because 2A can contain 2A
I don't disagree because the contained 2A is microscopic to the container
- 9,404
- 6,723
Not rejected, seems like everyone agrees with 5D… just the 6D stuff.
- 177,424
- 90,350
Well, maybe I misunderstood then, but a tier 0 Anos upgrade seems completely outrageous.
If somebody explains all sides of the arguments here in easy to understand but sufficiaåently thorough manners, I can ask our staff for evaluations though.
I would appreciate a much less extreme degree of spam posts here outside of that though.
- 18,393
- 14,332
- 7,249
- 4,367
Ant, it was a joke
- 2,644
- 882
That was a joke
- 7,249
- 4,367
Skull emoji
I already read that, and no, the wiki doesn't accept containing 4D as 5D
- 18,393
- 14,332
- 12,782
- 23,061
Currently it cannot be summed up, the OP explains what is fair and necessary, there have been no proper counterarguments and elaboration (Most for the disagreed part) necessary to take this as accepted or rejected, the only thing left is to wait for the evaluation of knowledgeable members and staff.
Naughty joke...
- 7,249
- 4,367
- 9,404
- 6,723
Ant Sir, we were kidding.
- 18,393
- 14,332
Mr._Undetected
He/Him- 459
- 145
Well.... I'm neutral
- 163
- 48
Agree for 5D, neutral 6D.
- 18,393
- 14,332
- Thread starter
- #261
Ya, nothing is impossible in this world, I make impossiblness to possibleness hehe
- 2,206
- 2,174
Alright, obviously the bubble is superior in nature to a 2-A realm, making it 5D, idk about 6D tho
- 7,249
- 4,367
Call me P
and sorry, i get dizzy looking at large texts i probably didn't notice it
- 18,393
- 14,332
- 177,424
- 90,350
Anyway, if there is any more derailment and spam here I will unfortunately likely be force to unfollow this thread, and then it will likely self-die. I just don't have sufficient available time and energy to spend much further time here.
- 697
- 333
5D It's already a big step forward.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,311
- 6,361
Not at allCorrection: That would be High 1-B/Low 1-A
It is essentially woodin cardinal, for each crystal would contain uncountable infinite of other crystals which would also contain uncountable infinite crystals which also do the same to no end.
1{2{3{4{5{5{6(1(2(3[1[2[3......... till infinity.
Uhhm the crystal is supposed to contain those other version, destroying it means destroying them
Then you should read the arguments again. That would make the crystal low 2C not the current 2-A
And yes "I don't find the proof sufficient for 6-D is valid in this case"
As you only provided something and it's not sufficient for a 6-D upgrade.
Anyway I will be waiting for a likely explanation to my post
- 18,393
- 14,332
- Thread starter
- #272
You want to downgrade the verse to low 2-C? You are joking right?
- 14,673
- 5,676
Infinite recursions are High 1-B (higher depending on the context). Plus, they cannot reach High 1-A either since it is beyond the reach of power sets already.
You cannot reach neither High 1-A nor 0 via stacking hierarchies of dimensions or whatever, even if they are uncountable infinite. Thats the point of those tiers. They are equated to inaccessible cardinals, which use those properties (as stated on the tiering system)
Last edited:
- 230
- 148
the timeline is Low 2-C, there are infinite of those tho
- 230
- 148
that barely reaches Aleph-omega, let alone inaccessible or even Woodin
Last edited:
- 1,856
- 1,392
Nah, you destroy the structures, not their versions, besides, we're just talking about the World of Nafta, when the world of Nafta is destroyed, Anos or any other version of you will go back to where they were before Nafta summoned the World.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,311
- 6,361
Never said that. Just explaining something
And that is 2-A
This is derailing so I may DM to continue but I want to put it out there that you can reach inaccessible cardinals by stacking up sets, only the size of the sets matter.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,311
- 6,361
You do know this is coming from your head and not what the author said?
- 230
- 148
exactly, realms are 2-A.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,311
- 6,361
Read the 2-A thread, the crystal is 2-A
- Status
