• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Some Random One Piece CRT

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, you explain it then. Why is it that Cracker completely failed when he tried to cut through Luffy's haki in both of his Bound Man and Tank Man's forms head-on, but the one time he succeeds is while Luffy is off-guard and is trying to pull his outstretched arm back in?
Because the second time Luffy was applying force back to Cracker's stab and the third time Tank Man is > Bounceman dura wise?
 
What about scaling Doffy to Armament Bound Man for blocking his Double Culverin with Off-White w/o using haki? Or Luffy admitting via flashback that Armament Bound Man couldn't beat Doflamingo with anything less than KKG? But if you and others disagree, meh, I'm completely fine with Doffy just scaling to Regular Bound Man.
This was also brought up in the Doffy thread, I really don't get why we're trying to make this thread bigger than it needs to when this was already covered very recently.

Doflamingo blocking the off-white is just a Durability feat and even then later in the fight Luffy breaks through it with a no named attack.
 
So when I tried to back scale Ace from WB for scarring him y’all said no, but y’all scaling Doffy to Luffy for dealing minimal damage…

My god
 
Because the second time Luffy was applying force back to Cracker's stab and the third time Tank Man is > Bounceman dura wise?
So basically my point about Cracker only being able to cut through Luffy's haki when he's off-guard remains correct.

But I do agree about Tank Man being more durable than Bound Man, and I admit I went a little overboard using that form of Luffy's to try and prove my point about Cracker lol.
 
So basically my point about Cracker only being able to cut through Luffy's haki when he's off-guard remains correct.

But I do agree about Tank Man being more durable than Bound Man, and I admit I went a little overboard using that form of Luffy's to try and prove my point about Cracker lol.
Not true. Being off guard doesn’t suddenly lower your durability for armament haki, it’s literally like an armor. It already got explained that luffy was using force back.
 
At what point does a person not scale with their durability when they're hit by an attack? What's the threshold? I understand some basic ones like if the attack completely pierces them without resistance like Big Mom's attack on Ulti, or if they're killed outright, but what about situations where they're hit by an attack and neither of those happens? Like if they get hit dead-on but they remain conscious and still able to move / talk?
 
Doesn't make a difference if he's in the biscuit soldier or not, that doesn't make it as strong as him.
Of course a Biscuit Soldier itself isn't as strong as Cracker himself, but while he was fighting inside it against Luffy, Cracker was clearly using his actual strength and haki. So yes he got overpowered by Bound Man, and twice at that.
 
Of course a Biscuit Soldier itself isn't as strong as Cracker himself, but while he was fighting inside it against Luffy, Cracker was clearly using his actual strength and haki. So yes he got overpowered by Bound Man, and twice at that.
Why would that be the case? Him being inside it wouldn't grant it his physical strength, it's still made our of biscuits and has several arms. Yes Cracker can clad the biscuit soldier with his haki but all that means is:

Real Cracker with the real Pretzel > Biscuit Soldier with the fake Pretzel.
 
Not true. Being off guard doesn’t suddenly lower your durability for armament haki, it’s literally like an armor. It already got explained that luffy was using force back.
1. First of all, let's get something straight. I never once actually outright said being off-guard suddenly lowered one's durability for Armament Haki. In fact, that was never even what I was trying to argue when I brought it up. Even when I asked Eminiteable to explain why Cracker couldn't do this and that, that wasn't what I meant.

2. Right, when Luffy used force (Kong Gun) as Cracker tried to cut him, he couldn't pierce through his haki with his own like we all saw when he cut through his arm after he came out of his armor while Luffy was trying to pull his arm back in. Yes, Cracker is capable of cutting through Luffy's haki, I never once denied that. All I'm arguing is that he can't do it through head-on engagements because BM Luffy is too physically superior for him to do so. Also, some of you seem to be forgetting that it was stated that as Bound Man even in his Armament Haki state his body is still rubber, and that's another reason why Cracker was able to cut him since Luffy's body has always been vulnerable to sharp objects like swords.

3. Furthermore, Cracker's only feat against Armament BM Luffy is just slightly cutting his arm, it wasn't like he was doing multiple damage to him like his brother did. I really don't see the big deal about him just getting a Possibly 6-C rating.
 
You
3. Furthermore, Cracker's only feat against Armament BM Luffy is just slightly cutting his arm, it wasn't like he was doing multiple damage to him like his brother did. I really don't see the big deal about him just getting a Possibly 6-C rating.
Oda
Cracker:

[Famed Sword Pretzel]

A long sword with excellent cutting ability. By cladding his sword with his Haki, he can harm and wound Luffy's arm which was strengthened further by Busoshoku Haki.


Oda says this is a feat.
We're not getting possibly for a non contested feat.
 
No, when he's not attacking he's fine. Big difference from off-guard and not attacking.
He may be fine when he's not attacking, but how exactly was he not caught off-guard trying to pull his arm back in AFTER attacking with Kong Gun when the Real Cracker suddenly sprung up from the Biscuit Solider Armor and sliced his arm?
 
Also, some of you seem to be forgetting that it was stated that as Bound Man even in his Armament Haki state his body is still rubber, and that's another reason why Cracker was able to cut him since Luffy's body has always been vulnerable to sharp objects like swords.
UEWI4vr.png
BlWEKoM.png


Hm?

He may be fine when he's not attacking, but how exactly was he not caught off-guard trying to pull his arm back in AFTER attacking with Kong Gun when the Real Cracker suddenly sprung up from the Biscuit Solider Armor and sliced his arm?
Because he stared at him and watched him get out of the Biscuit soldier.
 
You

Oda



Oda says this is a feat.
We're not getting possibly for a non contested feat.
So Cracker really gonna get a full 6-C rating for his slight cut to Armament Bound Man? Lol. Alright, fine. This is really not that serious to me like it is to some of you apparently.
 
Last edited:
UEWI4vr.png
BlWEKoM.png


Hm?


Because he stared at him and watched him get out of the Biscuit soldier.
Lol!


Also, even though Luffy's staring right at Cracker and watching him get outside the Biscuit Soldier, the fact that another person was inside the entire time clearly takes him off-guard. You actually trying to deny it makes this comment even more hilarious to me. Thanks for the laugh.
 
That's luffy not being able to maintain his armament haki...
Also, some of you seem to be forgetting that it was stated that as Bound Man even in his Armament Haki state his body is still rubber, and that's another reason why Cracker was able to cut him since Luffy's body has always been vulnerable to sharp objects like swords.
Luffy is rubber and hard at the same time... Here doffy uses athlete which is cutting and blunt force attack and says even in armament...he's still rubber?! And we have this as well (edit this one as well link)
 
Last edited:
So pretty much everyone here agrees with the multipliers (besides damage OF course...)

What do you guys think about hody scaling to 7-B above usopp, and usopp scaling to 7-B in durability off of trebol, or ap off of buffalo and durability off of caesar?
 
So Cracker really gonna get a full 6-C rating for his slight cut to Armament Bound Man? Lol. Alright, fine. This is really not that serious to me like it is to some of you apparently.
Much more affective than bruises doflamingo gave, which are also inconsistent.
 
If this is supposed to be shade, are my feelings supposed to hurt or something? :rolleyes:
Wtf? Not at all lmao. I apologize if I did but that was just meant to show that cracker has much better of a reason to scale, but you said Doflamingo should off of bruises, but cracker is literally cutting into haki
 
UEWI4vr.png
BlWEKoM.png


Hm?


Because he stared at him and watched him get out of the Biscuit soldier.
You know better than to use this example, I would hope... It's already been confirmed that Haki's effectiveness is reflected by the user's stamina (I also believe it's the case regarding DFs as well). Both Luffy and Doflamingo are at their worst here. All this would prove is C.790 Doflamingo is just a bit stronger than C.790 Luffy's Durability in terms of Haki.

Doflamingo vs BM Luffy being off-panel obviously means there's a lack of evidence for Doflamingo scaling since we don't see him actually hurt Luffy, but at the same time, he fought the dude for over 20 minutes and had him on the defense. It's strange to suggest any disparity between them when they were fighting seemingly on par until Luffy got the upper-hand.

Also, to be frank, Ace scarring WB is something I personally support, as I do think people relative to the Commanders/Admirals have the capability to harm a Yonko if they are giving it their all. The problem here is that we have scaling that puts people like Doffy <1/1000 Kaido or the same with Ace vs WB, when really, it's not anywhere near that massive.
 
Both Luffy and Doflamingo are at their worst here. All this would prove is C.790 Doflamingo is just a bit stronger than C.790 Luffy's Durability in terms of Haki.
Luffy became unconscious by using to much haki in gear 4th... Doffy didn't over use his haki like luffy at all.
 
The problem here is that we have scaling that puts people like Doffy <1/1000 Kaido or the same with Ace vs WB, when really, it's not anywhere near that massive.

Kind of the issue when we make every Yonkou to be Country level when Big Mom and Kaido don't have feats on that level.

Either a huge number of people in the verse need to be rated hundreds or thousands of times stronger than they are now (basically making tons of characters scale to Whitebeard) or we're over-estimating some feats, or we're scaling too loosely for the characters.

If we're looking at it objectively, Oda's intentions are pretty clearly not to make a Haki-less Whitebeard to be an unbelievably high tier character because he can be stabbed by Squardo, stabbed by numerous Marines lower than Admiral Tier, whereas Oda goes out of his way to point out that Big Mom has a special nigh-invulnerability that stops blades, and Kaido is so used to being unharmed that he only ever recieved a scar in his life from the likes of Oden.
 
Luffy became unconscious by using to much haki in gear 4th... Doffy didn't over use his haki like luffy at all.
Luffy burned himself out via Haki use. Doflamingo was heavily fatigued because of constantly sustaining grievous wounds up until Gear 4th ended. He then started using Haki, displaying reckless abandon as he angrily hunted down Luffy.

Whether Doflamingo burned out via Haki (no) or from injuries (yes), his abilities were going to be affected heavily regardless.
 
Kind of the issue when we make every Yonkou to be Country level when Big Mom and Kaido don't have feats on that level.

Either a huge number of people in the verse need to be rated hundreds or thousands of times stronger than they are now (basically making tons of characters scale to Whitebeard) or we're over-estimating some feats, or we're scaling too loosely for the characters.

If we're looking at it objectively, Oda's intentions are pretty clearly not to make a Haki-less Whitebeard to be an unbelievably high tier character because he can be stabbed by Squardo, stabbed by numerous Marines lower than Admiral Tier, whereas Oda goes out of his way to point out that Big Mom has a special nigh-invulnerability that stops blades, and Kaido is so used to being unharmed that he only ever recieved a scar in his life from the likes of Oden.
There’s reasons they all scale to WB, they’ve all been stated to be rivals off of the feats he’s pulled. You can’t be rivals and then be thousands of times weaker than the other person, do you really think making them thousands of times weaker makes any sense? It doesn’t matter if they don’t have feats at that level, the yonkos have been compared multiple times and have been stated to be rivals, they can’t be thousands of times weaker than each other, and Whitebeard has consistent country level feats with his Shima Yurashi and Kaishin, the same crack which he can apply on enemies such as akainu, and the same enemies that can evenly clash with the attack when punching back, and the yonkos have statements of being rivals so they scale to his country level feats, especially since we know it’s no longer than outlier because there is 3 country level feats, 2 with whitebeard, 1 with blackbeard. Btw just to mention, everyone knows Whitebeard getting stabbed by marines is literally just an outlier, you have to remember that this is a sick Whitebeard and it’s an outlier. You really can’t suggest the fact that a sick Whitebeard can potentially have wall level durability because oda suggested it and big mom and kaido have been shown to have better durability, despite not even looking at the factors behind it anyway. You’re also the only person I know that’s saying this, nobody else here agrees with that logic, despite the feats literally just speaking for themselves and it was specifically explained in the god tiers rev thread, and the high tiers rev thread. With all due respect man, this is literally why people get upset with your ideology because of how you tend to lowball things despite it already being explained.
 
Last edited:
You know better than to use this example, I would hope... It's already been confirmed that Haki's effectiveness is reflected by the user's stamina (I also believe it's the case regarding DFs as well). Both Luffy and Doflamingo are at their worst here. All this would prove is C.790 Doflamingo is just a bit stronger than C.790 Luffy's Durability in terms of Haki.

Doflamingo vs BM Luffy being off-panel obviously means there's a lack of evidence for Doflamingo scaling since we don't see him actually hurt Luffy, but at the same time, he fought the dude for over 20 minutes and had him on the defense. It's strange to suggest any disparity between them when they were fighting seemingly on par until Luffy got the upper-hand.

Also, to be frank, Ace scarring WB is something I personally support, as I do think people relative to the Commanders/Admirals have the capability to harm a Yonko if they are giving it their all. The problem here is that we have scaling that puts people like Doffy <1/1000 Kaido or the same with Ace vs WB, when really, it's not anywhere near that massive.
That’s literally all we can scale off of tbh. We literally used to have the yonkos at high 7-A because they had nothing else. I’m pretty sure the only person who enjoyed that was damage, even though everyone knows that the yonkos are not even near that low, but Doflamingo is most likely higher too, I also believe he scales to meteors, but nobody made a CRT on it.
 
Last edited:
Luffy burned himself out via Haki use. Doflamingo was heavily fatigued because of constantly sustaining grievous wounds up until Gear 4th ended. He then started using Haki, displaying reckless abandon as he angrily hunted down Luffy.

Whether Doflamingo burned out via Haki (no) or from injuries (yes), his abilities were going to be affected heavily regardless.
Not to mention all the damage he took prior to dealing with G4 as well.
 
You really can’t suggest the fact that a sick Whitebeard can potentially have wall level durability because oda suggested it

This is textbook Strawman Argument. Who the hell suggested Whitebeard has Wall level durability?

Please stop arguing like this. It makes it harder and harder to come back to threads like this when I have to see the stupidest Strawman Arguments.

With all due respect man, this is literally why people get upset with your ideology because of how you tend to lowball things despite it already being explained.

I don't care. If I didn't have this ideology, we'd have a Sun-sized One Piece planet and everyone would be Continent level by now.
 
This is textbook Strawman Argument. Who the hell suggested Whitebeard has Wall level durability?

Please stop arguing like this. It makes it harder and harder to come back to threads like this when I have to see the stupidest Strawman Arguments.



I don't care. If I didn't have this ideology, we'd have a Sun-sized One Piece planet and everyone would be Continent level by now.
I mean then what else are you suggesting with the sword wounds then? What point are you trying to make?

Who mentioned the sun size? It’s not even confirmed and it’s inconsistent, unlike whitebeards feats which are consistent, which is why the yonkos scale too due to being rivals. I’m literally just stating how I feel, and how multiple others must feel. It gets frustrating seeing this much lowball, despite all the feats being there.
 
I mean then what else are you suggesting with the sword wounds then? What point are you trying to make?

Do you think all sword wounds are Wall level by default?
 
Do you think all sword wounds are Wall level by default?
So then explain what you’re trying to say out of that point? What does that do for Whitebeard? Where do you think it is at? Do you logically think that Whitebeard scaling to sword wounds makes sense? Lmao. I’m not saying you are, I’m asking you btw, before you say I’m strawmanning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top