Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay, but we need to decide some rules for this. Should the respect thread blogs be in-depth evaluated by staff members who are written as knowledgeable members for a series before they are accepted and linked to in character profile pages?Just as we do with calculations, the comment section remains open, but the blog post, once accepted, can then just be linked accordingly to the respective page.
@Starter_Pack @Abstractions @Colonel_Krukov @Shadowbokunohero @Mindovin @Jvando @SamanPatou @Just_a_Random_ButlerThe Standard Format for Character Profiles and the Standard Format for Verse pages also requires a minor rewrite to have a proper section to feature them consistently. The former can specify that this stuff can be featured in the Feats section, rather than just arbitrarily at the end of the profile, and the latter probably below the calculations section.
Preferably, non-staff knowledgeable members can also evaluate accordingly, but like most verses in here, we can't expect the staff (or even other regular members) to be knowledgeable of the series in question, so in such cases some scrutinity over the featured content may be applied to avoid counterproductive content from being brought up on pages.Okay, but we need to decide some rules for this. Should the respect thread blogs be in-depth evaluated by staff members who are written as knowledgeable members for a series before they are accepted and linked to in character profile pages?
Yes, that's a good summary, regardless of the procedure all of the ones currently featured are to be removed, then eventually evaluated, and the ones that are allowed afterwards are readded.Okay, so we should initially remove all respect threads that are currently featured in our character profile pages, and back them up to archive.vn, and post the resulting links in blog posts, and after that these threads can be individually evaluated in content revision threads by our knowledgeable members, to see if they are acceptable to reinsert into the profile pages, and in the cases where they are accepted, references to the relevant content revision threads should be inserted into the pages? Is that a good summary of our plan of approach here? It seems like a rather complicated procedure though.
FanOfRPGs said:Spacebattles technical threads tend to be vast repositories of information with dozens of pages of tests without actual interpretation. At the very least, allow it for science fiction verses due to the latent different standards in analyzing them.
It seems he's quoting FanOfRPGs. Anyways, that would have to be evaluated regardless in a case-by-case basis, as even if a verse in general has no feats beyond tier 9 to speak of, that doesn't prevent off-site users from exaggerating their rating for our purposes, so I would say that this isn't a good idea as it unecessarily risks what's featured just to get the process done faster with no one even evaluating the content beyond than the one adding it, which goes back to the sort of issues we've been trying to fix across the entire thread.Firestorm808 makes a good point. Perhaps we should make exceptions for more rational and internally consistent verses?
Well, I already said my piece.What do you think @AKM sama ?
Adding to that, it will also be a lot of effort for something useless. People wouldn't want to redo something that is already available just for the sake of adding it to the Feats section. It's not something important that needs so much effort. For RTs that are not completely approved, a blog with only accepted feats can be made. But for accepted RTs, I really don't see the need to copy it all to a blog.I think it's dishonest to just copy them ourselves into a blog, even with credit. Besides, it's the same information, we're just retyping it in our wiki without permission.
On-site respect threads like this should be fine, although some evaluation even in those cases probably wouldn't hurt, as even on-site profiles can be unreliable at times as we all know.I don’t entirely agree with the premise of this CRT, but I’m relatively fine with it. Most of the verses I’m into have most of the highest feats on the pages, anyway.
As an alternative to creating entirely new CRTs or respect threads, would it also be ok if we continue to use small collapsible bracket with feats, like the Exelion’s page (keep in mind there’s more visible expanding brackets and tags)? Although, the Exelion’s feats are directly copy-pasted from a reddit RT that employs a lot of speculation, which is why I partially agree with the OP.
Are the rest of you fine with if we add this?I tried to make Bobsican's text easier to understand:
"Do not directly add any respect thread links from external sites to our pages, as they can't be properly monitored to keep their content of sufficiently high reliability for our purposes, and they recurrently do not meet our standards. Feel free to remove any such existing links that you come across. The same applies to calculations hosted in external sites, although exceptions are made for the ones that were hosted in the NarutoForums if they were previously accepted. If one desires to feature them, they must be backed up to archive.vn, after which the backed up pages are linked to in blog posts in the wiki (only link to one respect thread or calculation per blog post), with credit given to the original creator(s). It should then be requested that our staff and knowledgeable members evaluate which of the feats that seem reliable or not in the blog post comment sections, and uncertain cases may be handled in a content revision threads as well."