• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Hey Imaginym, whenever you have a moment, could you please evaluate this when you have an opportunity to? I know you won't know the verse it's for, but more staff evaluation is required.

Drite77
Drite77
I get what is behind the calc, some explanation would be neat for the future in case someone tries to use this as a basis for another calc (Why did one took the 0.08 second perception speed for puck, more confirmation of where Zodd came from, etc). The angular size is also technically wrong, as the rules were updated, but it really won't make any difference, so alter it if you want it, otherwise

vP0Y2Ga.png
ElJoaki5
ElJoaki5
Oh im sorry yes, i shall add it
FragrantJaguar150
FragrantJaguar150
I have already told why they would. Also, do you even know what I am calculating?
Viott
Viott
This rule doesn't apply here. Thaddeus is already faster than the D-rank Brothers.
Viott
Viott
The other two calculations are invalid. I guess you didn't read the comment.
Hey Qawsedf, do you mind tagging some staff to evaluate this thread aswell as give your own opinion if that’s not a burden. It’s been sitting dry on 3 votes for some time now despite staff arriving in it and I would like to get this over the finish line for our next plans. Thanks

Could you evaluate these please?



We only need 1 more staff vote for these 2
Hi Ultima, I have a quick question regarding the current Tiering System. Mass is a quantity that is detached from the dimension of the object to which it is inherent, meaning that the difference in AP between dimensions is based on the span of space.

With that in mind, let's suppose Universe A and Universe B are both 4-Dimensional. However, the force/energy required to destroy Universe A is completely incapable of destroying even a 3D-object from Universe B. Does this mean a character who can destroy Universe B (4D-object) must wield a level of force/energy equivalent to a 5D-object? (Even if it is operating within a 4D-axis)
Greetings, Armorchompy. Can you evaluate this, please?
Drite77
Drite77
I don't like to evaluate famous Manwa's feat as they are always lead to some headaches, unless Viott is a supporter, knows about it, and go check the calc himself (Without pressuring him, as he has no obligation to the wiki, if he doesn't want to check, he doesn't need to check)
FragrantJaguar150
FragrantJaguar150
Viott agrees with the first calc.
Drite77
Drite77
There are some... weird mathemathical sintax mistakes '-'

To start, you said his leg is 0.9 meters, but you put 0.89 meters in the calc. However, the 0.89 meters is preferable, since, if you input his height in cm, that's what you would get, and you should always input it on cm to get a more accurate measurements of their body parts

But then I think you still used 0.9 meters despite putting 0.89? The first 45 degree kick, using the 0.89 meter would get 0.699, but then you rounded up to 0.71 meters, which would only really be decently acceptable if you used 0.9 meters, but you didn't there

Same with the 120 degree kick, using 0.89 meters you would get 1.864 meters, but using 0.9 you would get 1.8849, which makes more sense to round up to 1.88 meters like you did

You then put the wrong number (0.8 instead of 0.71) but the result was technically right (You did 0.71+1.88).

Fix those sintax errors, no need to let me know once you fix it, I'll approve the calc. If you want to keep 0.9 or 0.89 (And making the changes) is up to you, the vallue doesn't change too much, but for the future, make sure to use cm instead of the m vallue
Could you evaluate this when you can?
Hi sir, could you please give your input on this thread?
I've been waiting for weeks to get input from the staff, and I’ve only received one response from ActuallySpaceMan42 and Reiner04 (before he leaves vsbw). I would be grateful for any help. Thanks in advance.
  • Like
Reactions: Astral_Trinity439
Astral_Trinity439
Astral_Trinity439
You can't share sandboxes since only you can view them, not others. You'd either have to make it into a fandom sandbox instead of a forum one, or make an actual CRT, or send the contents in dms.
Theunidentifiedrakiel_54648
Theunidentifiedrakiel_54648
Ohh okay, thanks😅
Theunidentifiedrakiel_54648
Theunidentifiedrakiel_54648
Hi again astral, I finally figured out how to post crt's, I already tried in my other browser to see whether it's viewable and it is. Here's a new link

Could you evaluate these please?



We only need 1 more vote
Could you evaluate these please?



We only need 1 more vote
Hi, i'd appreciate if you can take a look at this please
Hello

Can you please help answer this question?

Hello

Can you please help answer this question?

Hello

Can you please help answer this question?

hello planck, if you have the time would you mind checking this crt?

Hello
Can you check this thread, please?

Hello
Can you check this thread?
NikHelton
NikHelton

Here we go again
Hello
Can you evaluate this thread, please?

NikHelton
NikHelton
Nierre has already reviewed it and we need more votes. Could you please rate it?
Hello
Can you evaluate this thread, please?

NikHelton
NikHelton
It would be a great help to us if you would take a look 🙏
Hi, i'd appreciate if you can take a look at this please
Hello. Could you please take a look at this calculation and this calculation?

It has been almost a month without a CGM evaluation, so I was wondering if you could review them instead.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Drite77
Drite77
  1. The ones he is familiar with
  2. It used to be something from old VSBW, perhaps I was a bit hasty on saying it. I'll try to check it whenever I can and I I remember
  3. Revisions are necessary, yes. Do you know how the new Angsize works or do you want me to send you an example? I also won't be able to review them very soon, and remember to always keep it a minimum of 1 calc per 1-2 days
Pxnd_013
Pxnd_013
1. What if it is a verse that he is not familiar with? In that case, can I just send it directly to you instead?

2. Okay, thanks.

3. Yes, I am familiar with the new Angle Size method. Would it be alright if I go ahead and edit the calculations first? You can review them whenever you have the time. Once I finish the revisions, I will let you know.
Drite77
Drite77
1. It depends on how popular they are or not. If they start bring me headaches, I'll probably not want to visit them
3. Yes, like I said, 1 calc per 1-2 days, and do remind me, as I'll likely forget if you don't
Hello, Would you mind evaluating this thread? It's a minor CRT and just needs one more vote.
Hello, can you give an input here please🙏🏻
Hello, can you give an input here please🙏🏻
Hello, can you give an input here please🙏🏻
Back
Top