• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts


Can you look at this when you get a chance?
Hi, could you evaluate this thread please? 🙏

Can you check this?
Hello. Sorry to bother you again but this really needs to be cleared up. I've posted pretty much the same message to Twilight-OP's profile but since you voted on both CRTs, you should be informed of this too.

Previous CRT made by a community member messed up a lot of justifications and skills for these profiles Acheron, IX, Nihility, Zephyro. In these profiles, a lot of skills and resistances were tied to the feat debated in that thread. The OP made a thread without knowing pretty much anything about these profiles and only debated Acausality when the feat was used to provide many more skills and resistances such as space-time EE and res, history EE and res, info and concept EE and res. Probably a few more.

Technically, if that member wanted to remove the Acausality, they needed to have removed those too and debate the entire validity of the feat. Here, I made my own thread 4 days ago to restore Acausality and fix this mess since all it would take would be to add Acausality back on and it would be fine. Despite this, yesterday, this community member in collaboration with another, 2 weeks since the thread concluded, opened yet another thread, the one you voted in, to remove history EE when at this point, there's not even a feat to debate for since in theory, that feat had already been debated in the original thread since Acausality was tied to those skills too and the feat was the justification for all those skills and resistances.
Mbpoops
Mbpoops
i like how you accuse me of not knowing anything about the profiles when the real issue was that i didnt know what the standard for history erasure was. now that i know it doesnt qualify im fine with removing it.

not gonna reply further but this is very weird to be doing and comes off as desperate.
Hi, could you evaluate this thread please? 🙏

Hello, iirc you are familiar with the Fire Emblem series. Would you like to give your input on this? We're missing one staff vote

Hello. I just uploaded this CRT, nobody replies yet as of now. If you have time please take a look. Tq.
Hello. I just uploaded this CRT, nobody replies yet as of now. If you have time please take a look. Tq.
Hello. I just uploaded this CRT, nobody replies yet as of now. If you have time please take a look. Tq.
MSahla
MSahla
We just need one more vote on this one. Your help would pretty much appreciated. 🙏

Can you check this when you get a chance?
Everything is on the last page
Could you evaluate this when you can?

Hello Data!, mind checking this out?, I want to add a new profile to the wiki, but because it involves tier 2 I have to create a CRT for it first, Hope you can comment on it, thank you!.
Drite77
Drite77
I don't really want to deal with Manwa things as everytime there is a calc about it, it comes with controversy within the comments
Pyro9278
Pyro9278
Well, sorry for the bother. I know you don't handle manhwa calculations, but could you give your opinion on this one? It's just about a crushed metal bat
Drite77
Drite77
Hm, I'll be busy for a few h ours, but that should be straight fowards enough. Still, ask the person who made the calc to link the source for the 0.83% as well as the source for the hollowness
Goodmorning/evening Planck

Thanks for coming to the 1C crt. Can you please evaluate this too?

We only need 1 more staff vote. The 2 threads opened after this already concluded before it so this one's an irregularity in the matrix 0_0
Thanks!
Hi, could you evaluate this thread please? 🙏


Edit: Link fixed, sry. I accidentally sent the link of the sandbox 😅
Hi, could you evaluate this thread please? 🙏

Hi, could you evaluate this thread please? 🙏

Hi, could you evaluate this thread please? 🙏


Can you check this when you get a chance?

Can you check this out when you get a chance?
Hellooo Qaws

Can you check this out when you get a chance?
Back
Top