• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Could you evaluate this CRT when you get the chance please and thank you.
Heya! I witnessed one of your message on the official translation request thread and I wondered if I could get permission to quote you in a CRT in a near-future?
Heya! Sorry to bother you, but could you come here whenever you have a couple of minutes? Thank you in advance!

Could you please comment on this thread?
Could you please comment on this thread?
Could you please comment on this thread?
Could you please comment on this thread?
Could you please comment on this thread?

Hello Clover, I want to talk to you about something. My friend said I should put this cals on the Black Clover verse page right now. I understand that you want to change everything after Black Clover ends, but my friend said to prevent confusion for those who don't. Follow this verse (even if you already wrote notes lol) and you also checked my class. What do you think?
CloverDragon03
CloverDragon03
I don't think it's necessary at the moment. The calc is accepted, yes, but we're avoiding any updates until Black Clover ends
Hey, sorry to bother. This CRT really needs to be approved for revisions of the verse to continue, it doesn't change anything in the verse itself and primarily there so that there isn't massive walls of back and forth between me and another user which derail every revision. Another staff member has already looked over the frankly overblown back and forth on this one and approved of compositing the highly episodic verse.
Can you look into this?

I noticed that you are one of the Knowledgeable Members from the verse Parasyte. If you are interested, could you look at this:
Seeing you liked my old requests, I can tell that some of those may have already been covered in a Mazinger Z VS Getter Robo blog I'm part of. (though pilot feats are most important requests for now)
  • Like
Reactions: Omnificence
Omnificence
Omnificence
Thanks! Luckily, I already have you in my friends list there. I'm thinking of putting together a server so the 4 of us can work together on the CRT.
Omnificence
Omnificence
Btw, @Kaiser0079 was wondering if you had any of the scans from Cyborg 009 which contained the Tokyo sinking and volcano exploding feats.
Tonygameman
Tonygameman
Already shared all three scans (counting Apollo's heat from that screenshot) on your Discord message.
Hey, we are near the ending of this thread, we already got an admins vote so we would appreciate you checking the crt. Thanks
Unchanged for the past 4 years, and one of the most commonly rolled attacks in 40K, what is the Strength/AP/damage profile of an Astartes Chainsword?
Crabwhale
Crabwhale
Monomolecular cutting edge of teeth = dura neg and lol
DaReaperMan
DaReaperMan
I was talking about Gameplay on the tabletop lol

(And really thick enough armor ***** over Chainsword duraneg cause I real Lion El'jonson's book in 40K yesterday lol)
Crabwhale
Crabwhale
I don't give a flying **** about the tabletop.

And also, no it doesn't. If it does, that's a particular quirk of the book, not a legitimate consistent thing across the board.
Hiya, can I have your input on this CRT? Pretty please?
Hi, Ultima
Basically this from the Math page:
The Hierarchy of Large Cardinals is fairly extensive and contains many exotic-named numbers, but the most conventional and easily-understood entry point to it are the Inaccessible Cardinals: Infinite cardinal numbers that are uncountable, regular (cannot be defined as the union of quantities smaller than themselves) and strong limit (cannot be attained through repeated power set operations), which in layman's terms, means that they cannot be reached from lesser cardinals in any way, shape or form, standing beyond their scope entirely. The following is a good illustration of an Inaccessible Cardinal's relation to lesser numbers:
Shouldn't the part I bolded be removed since we now only treat qualitative superiority as that and treat even large cardinals as ultimately quantifiable?
Hi, could you evaulate this please?

Back
Top