• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Sorry to bother you again, but could you provide some input here?

Hello. When you are not busy, could you give your opinion on this CRT? Thanks in advance. 🙏
Hey, could you please provide some input here?

Hello,can you look at this if u have some free time?
Hello,can you look at this if you have some free time?
Can you check this CRT for a minor verse if you have the time?

Priority: 2

Fiction: The Amazing World of Gumball

Description: Various revisions to several characters, including correcting some oversights.

Gumball Revisions (August 2024)
There has been some discussion in the thread, and things are looking good. Now all I need is staff members who have evaluation power to accept the thread. Are there any such staff members seeing this thread who are willing and able to do it?
Reinvigoration post. This thread was posted on August 1st, and now it is September 1st.

Some progress has been made, thankfully. One staff member who has evaluation power finally wrote that the thread seems fine at a glance. I think one more evaluator's agreement would make the thread be considered as accepted.
Now October is here. I still require one more evaluator's agreement to get the thread accepted.
Please let me proceed by accepting the thread. All I'm doing is waiting for an evaluator's input at this point.
Could you check out this ability addition?
Could you take a look at this ability addition?
actual problems with Tier 2, such as how we made up the whole "needing to be of significant size" thing

The first problem isn’t necessarily a big problem as without that requirement, we might as well argue we can affect a small portion of the space time in the entire universe while becoming Tier 2.

And it would kinda affect how we treat Tier 3 in that case given the situation we have.

Not to mention this kinda does apply to Tier 3A as fiction has display statements/feats of affecting a universe or destroying a universe on screen.
CloverDragon03
CloverDragon03
we might as well argue we can affect a small portion of the space time in the entire universe while becoming Tier 2

That's kinda how it works considering it's adding an entirely new dimension
HammerStrikes219
HammerStrikes219
I know how it works. The other issue will been how we treated this as we have snapshots of the universe and so on. The issue is whatever it is affecting the spatial and temporal (time) portions as spatial dimensions is what one considered affected for the most part.


Also, you are just equally aware of the space time hax being used here as well, yes?


Either way, we still have to deal with Tier 1 as well as it also have the “affecting a significant portion of x-dimensional cosmological construct” and all that.


I rather not make this too overly complicated for the first problem. I think the second problem seems to been a reasonable issue though
CloverDragon03
CloverDragon03
We can agree on the second problem at least, then. The 1000 universes border is super arbitrary, and it's been proposed that 2-C be the new Low 2-C (one space-time continuum), 2-B become the tier for any finite number of space-time continua, and 2-A remain as is. Low 2-C would be removed as a result. However, this was shut down
Hello Rusty, just wondering why 80% Hollowness was used for this calc, instead of 90%.
Hello Lephyr, can you provide your input here?
SwordLegendz01
SwordLegendz01
Can I ask you for help in closing the thread?
Mind checking out this CRT
Mind checking out this CRT
Mind checking out this CRT

Can I get permission for at least a one or two posts on this thread?

I deleted the two post you already or will noticed due to my forgetfulness that was a staff discussion as I have some rather important information relating to the topic of Absolute Zero and how it doesn’t necessarily involve infinite energy per se.
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
I'm not in that thread, preferably ask someone who is.
HammerStrikes219
HammerStrikes219
Hmmm, that is fair. I will do so
Back
Top