• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Hello, Ultima,
I had some questions regarding Nonduality (current definitions), and was hoping you could answer them:

If a verse revolves around the duality of Yin Yang or Light and Darkness (on a Conceptual level), where said "Yin" and "Yang" are treated as qualities or fundamental truths governing all existence (not a single universe/space-time continuity), could they be treated as the General Duality with just that much context? (Inasmuch as that something Nondual to them would attain Nonduality type 2)

And what if, under the same premise as the first question, the verse also contextualizes that said Yin and Yang give birth to many other yin-yang type connections (some of which are also conceptual, yet still overall a "part" of that "bigger" Duality of Yin-yang), would that be enough to be treated as the General Duality if the context of the first question is not enough?

Note: The verse has introduced many stuff from Buddhism, as well as Chinese stuff in general (though its a japanese novel).
Hi Damage, if you have the time could you please look over this CRT?

Could you give your input regarding this question? Thanks!

Hello! Can you please give your input here? It's a very short CRT. Thank you in advance!
hey can you check this?
Chariot190
Chariot190
I do yeah, don't **** with it on wiki been playing that shit since the 90s.
was kinda feeling like rewatching the anime after it ended and compiling feats to calc, as well as doing a big calc blog for every feat-based dex entry, but i havent had much time.
Hi, mind giving your input here?
Hi, could you give your input here?
I'm asking users who have voted in previous Michael Myers threads if they have any interest in checking out the versus debate I am currently doing for the Halloween season.

Hello! Can you please give your input here? It's a very small CRT. Thank you in advance!
Checking with users who were in previous Thorn! Myers versus debates to see if they have any interest in the match I have of him against human Jason Voorhees right now.

Hi Wokistan, if you have the time could you please look over this CRT? I tried to make it as straight forward as possible so should be easy to look over.

Hello, can you review this please?
Felience1
Felience1
Awesome, thanks for such a good answer
  • Like
Reactions: Axscell
Felience1
Felience1
Oh also I remembered, they have causality manipulation as something they can do but not in abilities up in the powers section.
  • Like
Reactions: Axscell
Axscell
Axscell
Yep, there is that also.
Hello, can you take a look?

Just to be quick

Please lock this and unlock the 2 profiles, would need to add the match as grace passed long ago (Flowey won iirc).
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
Mr. Bambu
For future reference, I have since found the message you intended to link to. I think it reflects poorly on your character to have an instance where you specifically do not pursue action, only to reverse that when that party reports something you did. I will not humor that.
Back
Top