Splash Star revisions 2

The_King_of_Prudence

10,787

1,635

• Jul 4, 2019

• #1

Continued from here, these are the current arguments for 3-A:

• Goyan all but stating that Spiral Heart Splash Star is on par with the big bang
• After Goyan destroyed the planet, there were no stars visible, implying that he destroyed the entire universe, or at least part of it
• As Goyan predates the universe, he presumably tanked the big bang.

There's also All Stars scaling to think about.

 

The_King_of_Prudence

10,787

1,635

• Jul 11, 2019

• Thread starter
• #2

Bump.

 

The_King_of_Prudence

10,787

1,635

• Jul 17, 2019

• Thread starter
• #3

 

Dino_Ranger_Black

VS Battles

Retired

2,031

989

• Jul 18, 2019

• #4

Sorry but this isn't enough. We only know Goyan existed since the creation of the universe. This doesn't confirm he tanked a big bang. Nor thus the final attack reminding him of the phenomenon means it has the same AP. It's best to stop bringing this up because it's too weak to consider for a 3-A.

 

The_King_of_Prudence

10,787

1,635

• Jul 18, 2019

• Thread starter
• #5

Would it be resistance to absolute zero, though?

 

Dino_Ranger_Black

VS Battles

Retired

2,031

989

• Jul 18, 2019

• #6

They were in space after the planet was blown up, so pretty much.

 

The_King_of_Prudence

10,787

1,635

• Jul 18, 2019

• Thread starter
• #7

Goyan in particular existed in what he described as a complete void. They also get resistance to radiation and self-sustenance for being OK in space.

 

Dino_Ranger_Black

VS Battles

Retired

2,031

989

• Jul 18, 2019

• #8

Doesn't make it 3-A.

 

The_King_of_Prudence

10,787

1,635

• Jul 18, 2019

• Thread starter
• #9

To be fair, it is one of the most reliable Big Bang statements possible. I agree, I was adding onto resistance to absolute zero. I'm guessing that "no stars" doesn't change your stance in the slightest.

 

Dino_Ranger_Black

VS Battles

Retired

2,031

989

• Jul 18, 2019

• #10

Sorry but no. There's still not enough context for it. We can't scale from assumption with insufficient proof and I know mutiple staff members will likely say the same thing. It's best to drop it all together since it's not happening.

 

Dino_Ranger_Black

VS Battles

Retired

2,031

989

• Jul 18, 2019

• #11

Btw, the other abilities are fine as well.

 

The_King_of_Prudence

10,787

1,635

• Jul 18, 2019

• Thread starter
• #12

I'll add abilities, and we can close this, then. I saw this one Ajimu thread where they were saying that her not being corporeal was the only justification for not having 3-A durability.