• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

A new Vs. Thread Rule: The continuation

That match was a stomp though

Casper had a wincon Goku gad no wincon
 
Casper wouldn´t use it in character, however, as pointed in it.

But still, something has to be done.
 
Not using your wincon in character doesn't mean you don't have a wincon

Matches that can only end as an incon are just closed.

If one character has a wincon then the match is fine
 
Well, to my knowledge that part is kinda left ambiguous to my knowledge.
 
"A rule against matches where neither character has a win condition."

Something else that was brought up:

"Son Goku still stomps Thunder McQueen, as the latter has no win condition."
 
Okay, how the rule should be worded/Added to another existing rule?
 
Back
Top