A new Vs. Thread Rule: The continuation

Bobsican

He/Him

21,625

6,271

• Apr 19, 2019

• #1

As the past thread is a month old, this new thread had to be made.

"After the outcome of this, I think a new rule isn´t a bad idea, so long it´s actually needed.

I don´t know how to phase it, as it technically isn´t a stomp.

Thoughts?"

 

Bobsican

He/Him

21,625

6,271

• Apr 20, 2019

• Thread starter
• #2

Bump.

 

Torlikoff

7,889

1,324

• Apr 20, 2019

• #3

What are you actually proposing?

 

Paul_Frank

VS Battles

Retired

9,527

1,811

• Apr 20, 2019

• #4

That match was a stomp though

Casper had a wincon Goku gad no wincon

 

Bobsican

He/Him

21,625

6,271

• Apr 20, 2019

• Thread starter
• #5

Casper wouldn´t use it in character, however, as pointed in it.

But still, something has to be done.

 

Paul_Frank

VS Battles

Retired

9,527

1,811

• Apr 20, 2019

• #6

Not using your wincon in character doesn't mean you don't have a wincon

Matches that can only end as an incon are just closed.

If one character has a wincon then the match is fine

 

Bobsican

He/Him

21,625

6,271

• Apr 20, 2019

• Thread starter
• #7

Well, to my knowledge that part is kinda left ambiguous to my knowledge.

 

The_King_of_Prudence

10,785

1,635

• Apr 21, 2019

• #8

"A rule against matches where neither character has a win condition."

Something else that was brought up:

"Son Goku still stomps Thunder McQueen, as the latter has no win condition."

 

Bobsican

He/Him

21,625

6,271

• Apr 21, 2019

• Thread starter
• #9

Okay, how the rule should be worded/Added to another existing rule?