-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Yog-Sothtoth is tier 0?
- Thread starter Adarpani
- Start date
- Status
- 61,134
- 14,530
If Azathoth werent a thing, Yog would be tier 0
- 2,650
- 467
Omnipotence is arbitrary, meaning "all-powerful" at its base. From one point of view, he is, and is even referred to such. On the other hand, he has a being which underpins him (Azathoth) and thus cannot be tier 0, as these tiers are not about omnipotence, but composite hierarchy.
- 15,332
- 7,559
If he is below someone, he is automatically not omnipotent.
Omnipotence is a peer of the concept of infinite worlds and Absolute Infinity, where removing something, no matter how small or irrelevant it is, invalidates it altogether.
Omnipotence is a peer of the concept of infinite worlds and Absolute Infinity, where removing something, no matter how small or irrelevant it is, invalidates it altogether.
- 16,917
- 11,946
Yes.
- 15,332
- 7,559
Omnipotence isn't remotely arbitrary.
The version we use, aka illogical omnipotence, isn't at least.
The version we use, aka illogical omnipotence, isn't at least.
- 2,650
- 467
Maybe that's not the right wording. What I mean though is: for Omnipresence and Omniscience, if you occupy all spots in a domain or know everything within the context of that verse, you qualify, even if you exist at a far more limited level than say, a High 1-B or 1-A character. But yet, Omnipotence is usually categorized as being beyond everything, no matter what.
- 15,332
- 7,559
Yes, because omniscience and omnipresence are both sub-abilities of omnipotence. They don't hold a candle to it.
- 1,096
- 94
Well. Yog-soth is still technically omnipotent, since Azathoth is not a actual "thing".
But we still use questionable omnipotence, before all else.
But, to put it simple. Omnipotence is not meant to proven, whether possibly or impossibly. Since being proven only subjects this whole metaphor and idea to a "limiting".
Also, nobody is questioning nobody here.
But we still use questionable omnipotence, before all else.
But, to put it simple. Omnipotence is not meant to proven, whether possibly or impossibly. Since being proven only subjects this whole metaphor and idea to a "limiting".
Also, nobody is questioning nobody here.
- 2,650
- 467
@Ant
My apologies; I didn't see the second part of Kep's comment about "our version". I am definitely not questioning the tiering system, I was mostly discussing the nature of omnipotence, which if I remember correctly, you have said before we do not really use to gauge characters. That's all. Either way, I'd prefer not to get too deep into that kind of discussion.
My apologies; I didn't see the second part of Kep's comment about "our version". I am definitely not questioning the tiering system, I was mostly discussing the nature of omnipotence, which if I remember correctly, you have said before we do not really use to gauge characters. That's all. Either way, I'd prefer not to get too deep into that kind of discussion.
- 15,332
- 7,559
Yog-Sothoth is not omnipotent. Our system makes it High 1-A at best.
- 15,332
- 7,559
Yog isn't omnipotent
- 15,332
- 7,559
Azathoth is above him, there's the proof.
- 15,332
- 7,559
It's 100% impossible for two omnipotent beings to exist
- 15,332
- 7,559
He isn't omnipotent in the sense no fictional character is omnipotent
But he is omnipotent in-verse.
But he is omnipotent in-verse.
- 15,332
- 7,559
No offense, but I don't think you actually know what omnipotence is.
It isn't a metaphor. You can do literally anything you want.
It isn't a metaphor. You can do literally anything you want.
- 1,096
- 94
No, only metaphors, can literally represent the idea of something which is always more powerful regardless of hierarchy. Omnipotence is simply not meant to be proven in-verse, otherwise it's meaningless.
And again, I don't need to make "sense" when talking about a "boundless". Because that's literally impossible, within context.
Boundless does not describe power, or more specifically it's not realizable at all. It's a huge understatement, to think it's just "beyond" omnipotence.
And again, I don't need to make "sense" when talking about a "boundless". Because that's literally impossible, within context.
Boundless does not describe power, or more specifically it's not realizable at all. It's a huge understatement, to think it's just "beyond" omnipotence.
- 15,332
- 7,559
I kinda think you have no idea of what you are talking about right now.
No offense.
No offense.
- 18,690
- 5,873
What is this nonsense going on here? You can't be omnipotent if there is someone stronger than you, that makes no sense, and why is this thread still open? Question has already been answered.
- Status
