- 18,393
- 14,323
As the cosmology from any verse is not made by statements, what is your point? I would appreciate further clarification regarding the relevance of your point to the current request, as it did not invalidate the request I made.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just don't know what you want me to put in the Cosmology Page. And even if I made one, It wouldn't be linked to the profile at all since they don't scale off the Cosmology (And there hardly is one)As the cosmology from any verse is not made by statements, what is your point? I would appreciate further clarification regarding the relevance of your point to the current request, as it did not invalidate the request I made.
This Verse It's not very long, it can be said that it is the shortest one by this author.Did you really pay a translator to translate the whole novel?
The problem isn't that there is no hierarchy, the problem is that the hierarchy does not relate to the Cosmology. They discuss dimensions, but they never say if they exist in small worlds, main worlds, or origin worlds. They also never discuss if the small worlds' and origin worlds are the same as the main worlds.So there is absolutely no cosmology, no infinite ladder hierarchy (which is a requirement to go pass low 1-A), no structural framework and yet high 1-A? I disagree, don't mind me.
Well as I said it's a short novel, the author simply didn't have the time. That's literally why the 2nd Novel was created, to explain stuff better.In my opinion, the nonexistence of a cosmic framework is intricately intertwined with the nonexistence of a hierarchical structure within the realm of the physical coordinates.
?In my understanding, yintianshenyin'sVerseThere doesn't seem to be any correlation, if there is H1-A I think 永镇天渊There is no such power, but Monsters will die if they are killedI think it does exist.Well as I said it's a short novel, the author simply didn't have the time. That's literally why the 2nd Novel was created, to explain stuff better.
This Novel, Soul of Searing Steel and Monster Will Die If They Are Killed is all in the same universe, the author states so in his testimonial.?In my understanding, yintianshenyin'sVerseThere doesn't seem to be any correlation, if there is H1-A I think 永镇天渊There is no such power, but Monsters will die if they are killedI think it does exist.
True, which is why I had to collect a crap ton of scans to make sure everything is explained. And like I said, this is only temporary. Once I finish the 2nd Novel I'll be able to make the Cosmology Page and the MC can scale to that instead.However, my point is that in the absence of cosmology, the implementation of any higher tiers becomes quite ambitious, given the lack of physical existence to serve as a foundation.
can I see a scan of them encompassing 2-A structuresIt has been stated Gold Cores have Infinite, Incomparable & Immeasurable Gaps between them, and lower-ranked Cultivators. However, the gap between Gold Cores and even a fragment is a Creator's True Body is a gap that can't be described with concepts. This lines up with the fact they can encompass 2-A structures, they are simply bigger than a Gold Core's infinity.
okayScales from the above.
this is not 'tierable' in any formCreators can reverse their own personal entropy, however, reversing entropy, in general, is needed to reach true infinity.
so they are the same or one is stronger? and that brings the question if they are the same how can one be stronger?The MC splits in two, one becoming a Higher-Dimensional Will as seen above, and the other becoming the origin of the world. His will section was able to reach the origin, which formed the world of existence as it is known.
still will not get past baseline 1-ASure.
Even beings on the level of the origin of the world, can't reach this step, despite them infinitely increasing their ability. It's not just transcending one limit, it's transcending infinite limits which already lie beyond the limits of infinity.
Can I see a scan of them encompassing 2-A structures
It's in the AP Reasoning, you might have missed it. All worlds are 2-A due to Timeline Splitting, which is also in the AP Reasoning. And yes, they clarify that worlds refer to universes.He was an evil god that could cover an entire world, a monster that could destroy the world and shatter stars and galaxies with a single thought.
"Evil Demons are not creatures of this world."
In the huge information room below the observatory of the Abyss Zhenyuan Sect, the silver-haired old man, Gu Die, slowly said to the young man beside him. He seemed to be lamenting, but also seemed to be telling a story.
"This world does not refer to this planet, this galaxy, or the human civilization sphere. It refers to the largest physical sphere that encompasses all living beings, the universe."
I was just explaining why a God-Like being made the laws of thermodynamics a big deal since you wanted context.this is not 'tierable' in any form
It is because he's both a Cultivator & a Creator, so he's traveling down two paths at once.So they are the same or one is stronger? And that brings the question if they are the same how can one be stronger?
So his Will went down one path, while his consciousness became the Origin of the World. Cultivators mimic Creator's but in the end, Creator's are just superior.As a cultivator and a Creator, Gao Chuan's power had no upper limit. He was constantly growing stronger.
Why?Still will not get past baseline 1-A
If I remember correctly,RanGang multivariate in the pictographic domain,butGuaisha multivariate on the multivariate derivative axisThis Novel, Soul of Searing Steel and Monster Will Die If They Are Killed is all in the same universe, the author states so in his testimonial.
but universes involving timeline splitting does not automatically mean containing the physical aspect of it is 2-A especially if it is not explicitly stated to be soIt's in the AP Reasoning, you might have missed it. All worlds are 2-A due to Timeline Splitting, which is also in the AP Reasoning. And yes, they clarify that worlds refer to universes.
this is confusing but I do not know about the verse so I will leave that point aloneI was just explaining why a God-Like being made the laws of thermodynamics a big deal since you wanted context.
It is because he's both a Cultivator & a Creator, so he's traveling down two paths at once.
So his Will went down one path, while his consciousness became the Origin of the World. Cultivators mimic Creator's but in the end, Creator's are just superior.
transcending every extension of low 1-A is still 1-AWhy?
The Timelines, Possibilities, and Parallel Worlds all exist within a single universe, it's not a situation where they become a part of the multiverse or something like that.but universes involving timeline splitting does not automatically mean containing the physical aspect of it is 2-A especially if it is not explicitly stated to be so.
Well, the qualitative gap between Low 1-A and 1-A is the same gap between Low 1-C and 1-C (Alephs). So I'm just confused why surpassing not just a single limit, when it has already been explained infinity is a limit, but infinite limits beyond that is not more than a single level of transcendence.Transcending every extension of low 1-A is still 1-A
prove of this pleaseThe Timelines, Possibilities, and Parallel Worlds all exist within a single universe, it's not a situation where they become a part of the multiverse or something like that.
You are wrong, the gap between low 1-A and 1-A is not the same gap between 1-Cs.Well, the qualitative gap between Low 1-A and 1-A is the same gap between Low 1-C and 1-C (Alephs). So I'm just confused why surpassing not just a single limit, when it has already been explained infinity is a limit, but infinite limits beyond that is not more than a single level of transcendence.
Huh...? Low 1-A and 1-A fall under the same framework... Aleph-1 (low 1-A) and Aleph-2 (1-A).You are wrong, the gap between low 1-A and 1-A is not the same gap between 1-Cs.
1-A is beyond any extension of Low 1-A, High 1-B is infinite dimensions, low 1-A is beyond any extensions of that, low 1-A is uncountable infinite dimensions, 1-A is beyond any extension of that.
1-A transcends low 1-A the same way low 1-A transcends High 1-BHuh...? Low 1-A and 1-A fall under the same framework... Aleph-0 (low 1-A) and Aleph-1 (1-A).
If measured purely by quantity;You are wrong, the gap between low 1-A and 1-A is not the same gap between 1-Cs. 1-A is beyond any extension of Low 1-A, High 1-B is infinite dimensions, low 1-A is beyond any extensions of that, low 1-A is uncountable infinite dimensions, 1-A is beyond any extension of that.
If measured purely by quantity;
2-A is an Aleph-0 amount of Universes, Low 1-C is an Aleph-1 to Aleph-2 amount of Universes, and so on and so forth. Once you reach Aleph-Infinity (Not the official term) you're at High 1-B which we equate to an Aleph-0 amount of Spatial Dimensions. Aleph-1 Spatial Dimensions are Low 1-A, and Aleph-2 Spatial Dimensions are 1-A.
However, in the end, the gap is still that of Alephs, whether it be Low 1-C, or Low 1-A.
1-A transcends low 1-A the same way low 1-A transcends High 1-B
and a single transcendence over high 1-B is still High 1-B
so unless you transcend the entire extension of it, you do not get to low 1-A, same thing for low 1-A to 1-A
Low 1-A is not beyond any extension of High 1-B, and 1-A is not beyond any extension of 1-A. The gap between High 1-B and Low 1-A is (High 1-B^High 1-B).1-A transcends low 1-A the same way low 1-A transcends High 1-B. And a single transcendence over High 1-B is still High 1-B so unless you transcend the entire extension of it, you do not get to low 1-A, same thing for low 1-A to 1-A
???????? What are you even talking about? Ur confused sis, right?You are wrong, the gap between low 1-A and 1-A is not the same gap between 1-Cs.
1-A is beyond any extension of Low 1-A, High 1-B is infinite dimensions, low 1-A is beyond any extensions of that, low 1-A is uncountable infinite dimensions, 1-A is beyond any extension of that.
Further for low 1-ACharacters or objects that can affect structures with a number of dimensions equal to the cardinal aleph-2, which in practical terms also equals a level that completely exceeds Low 1-A structures to the same degree that they exceed High 1-B and below
Unless the gap between 2-A and low 1-C is an uncountable infinite amount of higher Dimensions and not a single one, I really do not know what anyone of you is talking about.Characters or objects that can affect structures with a number of dimensions greater than the set of natural numbers, meaning in simple terms that the number of dimensions is aleph-1 (An uncountably infinite number, assumed to be the cardinality of the real numbers themselves), and therefore that such objects fully exceed High 1-B structures, which have only a countably infinite number of dimensions.
We are talking quantity, not quality.Unless the gap between 2-A and low 1-C is an uncountable infinite amount of higher Dimensions and not a single one, I really do not know what anyone of you is talking about.
No we were not based on my post and reasons but anyway it is not importantWe are talking quantity, not quality.
Uncountably Infinite (Aleph-1) 2-A Structures is Low 1-C, and Uncountably Infinite High 1-B Structures is Low 1-A, it's not that complex.
I am aware of tiering system and this is still in discussion.Dread this is not your calling.
I feel like no one bothered to read the tiering system page
Further for low 1-A
????? This became trolling rn, who said that the gap between those two are in terms of spatial dimensions?Unless the gap between 2-A and low 1-C is an uncountable infinite amount of higher Dimensions and not a single one, I really do not know what anyone of you is talking about.
Yes we were.No we were not based on my post and reasons but anyway it is not important
Made my evaluations, unfollowing this now
read again, this is the part where you are trying to act knowledgeable in things you are notThis became trolling rn, who said that the gap between those two are in terms of spatial dimensions?
What are you even talking aboutAnd yes the fundamentally difference is in quantity.
You and who?Yes we were.
Should I remind you the part in MG against Sen/UMR or u ain't better?read again, this is the part where you are trying to act knowledgeable in things you are not
I evaluated the verse to “at least low 1-A, possibly 1-A”
I think you should call Qawsedf and some others to evaluate this has none other have a definite evaluationOkay. That is probably fine then. What do other staff and knowledgeable members here think?