- 10,901
- 12,335
Disagree with Tatsumi504's post. That is handing out powerful abilities for disproportionately weak evidence. Vague independence statements shouldn't be enough for an ability that makes immune to virtually everything. For something like that there should be evidence of being unable to be changed by any effect that relies on a system of causality.
I'm fine with Ultima's position, as it stands. If we don't want to rewrite due to it being a weird special case, then we should either keep the current definition or, if no relevant amount of characters qualifies, just delete Type 5.