• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Xshia vs The One Above all

Status
Not open for further replies.
My weakness to The-One-Above-All can be subverted by just realising that he's just a guy who is really high up.
 
He's a massive weakling when it comes to "Tier 0" as he is only above ONE 1-A. Lovecraftian folks would step on him like a bug.
 
How does being above only one 1-A make him weaker than a guy who is above several 1-A's, just because one character is above 13 planet busters doesn't automatically mean a guy who only above one planet buster is weaker
 
Oblivion is nearly baseline 1-A and TOAA is above him, meanwhile guys like Hypnos is layers and layers of infinitely superior to baseline 1-A and he's a fodder in Mythos.
 
Seol404 said:
How does being above only one 1-A make him weaker than a guy who is above several 1-A's, just because one character is above 13 planet busters doesn't automatically mean a guy who only above one planet buster is weaker
I should point out that The Beyonder can be seen as 1-A as well.

That being said, these characters are quite low on the 1-A food chain; Oblivion embodies an outerversal void (which I don't remember if that puts him above baseline 1-A or not), and The Beyonder can be seen as being superior to him.

Xshia could be above 1-A characters that make these two look insignificant in comparison.

As I see it, TOAA is merely above 2-3 levels of 1-A.

EDIT: Damn it Alex, you ninja'd me.
 
But how does that equate to TOAA being weaker than the Cthulhu Mythos? TOAA is supposed to be omnipotent, so wouldn't it be impossible for him to lose?
 
Omnipotence is a fancy title given to those at the top of the food chain. In fact. VSBW has been thinking about deleting both Tier 0 and Tier High 1-A due to the requeriments of being those two tiers being unquantifiable and useless in the long term.
 
I would agree if it wasn't for the fact that TOAA meets all the requirements for being omnipotent
 
Seol404 said:
But how does that equate to TOAA being weaker than the Cthulhu Mythos? TOAA is supposed to be omnipotent, so wouldn't it be impossible for him to lose?
Not at all. The guy who made VS Battles' tiering system has stated himself that tier 0 (and by extension, High 1-A) are relative to the verse.

EDIT: ****, ninja'd agai.
 
KingPin0422 said:
Seol404 said:
But how does that equate to TOAA being weaker than the Cthulhu Mythos? TOAA is supposed to be omnipotent, so wouldn't it be impossible for him to lose?
Not at all. The guy who made VS Battles' tiering system has stated himself that tier 0 (and by extension, High 1-A) are relative to the verse.
EDIT: ****, ninja'd agai.
If your omnipotent in one verse your omnipotent in all verses, being above TLT and Oblivion isn't what makes him omnipotent
 
Seol404 said:
KingPin0422 said:
Seol404 said:
But how does that equate to TOAA being weaker than the Cthulhu Mythos? TOAA is supposed to be omnipotent, so wouldn't it be impossible for him to lose?
Not at all. The guy who made VS Battles' tiering system has stated himself that tier 0 (and by extension, High 1-A) are relative to the verse.
EDIT: ****, ninja'd agai.
If your omnipotent in one verse your omnipotent in all verses, being above TLT and Oblivion isn't what makes him omnipotent
The mere fact that multiple Tier 0 characters exist debunks your argument.
 
If you put someone who is Low 2-C in a verse filled with 10-Bs, they would be Omnipotent because they can do virtually anything. TOAA can do virtually anything for low-level 1-A's. Which isn't saying much when you compare it to, say, Umineko or I/O. Omnipotence cannot be proven logically. The "ability to do everything" depends on the "amount of things" inside a verse. In fact, a paradox similar to "make a rock so heavy one can't lift" in the "ability to do anything" would include the "ability to NOT be Omnipotent", which is a logical contradiction. This is what paraconsistent logic talks about. Omnipotent beings, in order to be Omnipotent, must be able to NOT be Omnipotent, otherwise they can't do everything, and thus, are not Omnipotent.
 
KingPin0422 said:
Seol404 said:
KingPin0422 said:
Seol404 said:
But how does that equate to TOAA being weaker than the Cthulhu Mythos? TOAA is supposed to be omnipotent, so wouldn't it be impossible for him to lose?
Not at all. The guy who made VS Battles' tiering system has stated himself that tier 0 (and by extension, High 1-A) are relative to the verse.
EDIT: ****, ninja'd agai.
If your omnipotent in one verse your omnipotent in all verses, being above TLT and Oblivion isn't what makes him omnipotent
The mere fact that multiple Tier 0 characters exist debunks your argument.
They exist in completely seperate works of fiction, so my point still stands
 
Seol404 said:
KingPin0422 said:
Seol404 said:
KingPin0422 said:
Seol404 said:
But how does that equate to TOAA being weaker than the Cthulhu Mythos? TOAA is supposed to be omnipotent, so wouldn't it be impossible for him to lose?
Not at all. The guy who made VS Battles' tiering system has stated himself that tier 0 (and by extension, High 1-A) are relative to the verse.
EDIT: ****, ninja'd agai.
If your omnipotent in one verse your omnipotent in all verses, being above TLT and Oblivion isn't what makes him omnipotent
The mere fact that multiple Tier 0 characters exist debunks your argument.
They exist in completely seperate works of fiction, so my point still stands
That's the reason Tier 0/High 1-A is probably going to be dropped. There isn't a clear way to define what's a 0 or 1-A as it changes depending on the verse, one can be "Omnipotent" by being superior to one 1-A or an endless amount of it.
 
If VS Battles Wiki drops Tier 0 TOAA wont get any weaker
 
I don't, and it's because power is subjective, such as TOAA's level, or the definition of "Omnipotence" itself, as it got changed many times already; From the "ability to do anything" to the "ability to do anything logically possible" to "anything that doesn't contradict one's own nature" and so on.
 
Well I'm just going to stick to the dictionary definition
 
I have read that
 
Omnipotence is a concept that is in constant change, always being questioned.
 
Thats because its a power that is impossible to understand
 
Quite the opposite, Omnipotence was made because we didn't understand and we just said "Oh, it's absolutely everything and anything ever of course!" and now we do, and see that it just doesn't work.
 
I don't know if it does or doesn't work, I'm not omnipotent
 
riiiiiiight.....
 
You can't prove I am not. The evidence that I can, could be literally anything. I can send you text. I am Omnipotent.
 
Actually I can prove that your not omnipotent, because an omnipotent being wouldn't waste their time on Joke Battles Wiki
 
Omnipotent beings can waste their time on Joke Battles Wiki as they can do anything, whether they do, or not, doesn't mean they can't. In fact, that's one of the arguments for a definition of Omnipotence, as "It's within my nature" to waste time on JBW.
 
Anyway, Xshia by "just realising that he's just a guy who is really high up."
 
Alexcar3000 said:
Anyway, Xshia by "just realising that he's just a guy who is really high up."
I also agree that Xshia wins, he almost out shitposted Crabwhale
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top