• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

Antvasima said:
I have now asked the Fandom staff member I talked with about potential overlaps. 🙏
Click to expand...
Antvasima said:
I have asked about that one as well. 🙏
Click to expand...
I have received a reply from a Fandom staff member now.

"I am seeing strong links between these accounts:

ZeReverter
D'Sterrenacht22
Anonymousrefiner22
JustAFanJan22

Additionally, between these two:

Gris2244
Grayman424

I hope this helps!"

So should we permanently ban all of them as well as Punizher24? 🙏
 
Antvasima said:
I have received a reply from a Fandom staff member now.

"I am seeing strong links between these accounts:

ZeReverter
D'Sterrenacht22
Anonymousrefiner22
JustAFanJan22

Additionally, between these two:

Gris2244
Grayman424

I hope this helps!"

So should we permanently ban all of them as well as Punizher24? 🙏
Click to expand...
Is it enough to treat them as sock puppets?
 
Antvasima said:
I have received a reply from a Fandom staff member now.

"I am seeing strong links between these accounts:

ZeReverter
D'Sterrenacht22
Anonymousrefiner22
JustAFanJan22

Additionally, between these two:

Gris2244
Grayman424

I hope this helps!"

So should we permanently ban all of them as well as Punizher24? 🙏
Click to expand...
So are Gris2244 and Grayman424 a separate matter?

For the first list, the three accounts should be permanently banned (JustAFanJan22 has already received a permanent ban), and the original Punizher account should be changed from a one-year ban to a permanent one. Anonymousrefiner22 is also still recently active, so there's that.

I'm not sure what their intent is, but most, if not all, of these accounts have already been warned, notified that further violations could result in blocks, or were temporarily blocked at some point. The cumulative infractions across these accounts are significant, even if the actions mostly involve repeatedly changing images or reverting edits. Not to mention the sheer amount of sockpuppets just to repeat them.

I have applied the blocks for the first list.
 
Antvasima said:
I have received a reply from a Fandom staff member now.

"I am seeing strong links between these accounts:

ZeReverter
D'Sterrenacht22
Anonymousrefiner22
JustAFanJan22

Additionally, between these two:

Gris2244
Grayman424

I hope this helps!"

So should we permanently ban all of them as well as Punizher24? 🙏
Click to expand...
MaskedDragon908 said:
Is GreyIndigo a separate individual, then? Or have they not investigated that yet?
Click to expand...
Just a Random Butler said:
So are Gris2244 and Grayman424 a separate matter?

For the first list, the three accounts should be permanently banned (JustAFanJan22 has already received a permanent ban), and the original Punizher account should be changed from a one-year ban to a permanent one. Anonymousrefiner22 is also still recently active, so there's that.

I'm not sure what their intent is, but most, if not all, of these accounts have already been warned, notified that further violations could result in blocks, or were temporarily blocked at some point. The cumulative infractions across these accounts are significant, even if the actions mostly involve repeatedly changing images or reverting edits. Not to mention the sheer amount of sockpuppets just to repeat them.

I have applied the blocks for the first list.
Click to expand...
A new user named SkibidisSam may also be connected to one of the accounts. Their first four edits are looking like it. Just my suspicion though.

Also, @Antvasima, has GreyIndigo been checked yet?
 
Just a Random Butler said:
So are Gris2244 and Grayman424 a separate matter?
Click to expand...
I interpreted the answer that way at least.
Just a Random Butler said:
For the first list, the three accounts should be permanently banned (JustAFanJan22 has already received a permanent ban), and the original Punizher account should be changed from a one-year ban to a permanent one. Anonymousrefiner22 is also still recently active, so there's that.

I'm not sure what their intent is, but most, if not all, of these accounts have already been warned, notified that further violations could result in blocks, or were temporarily blocked at some point. The cumulative infractions across these accounts are significant, even if the actions mostly involve repeatedly changing images or reverting edits. Not to mention the sheer amount of sockpuppets just to repeat them.

I have applied the blocks for the first list.
Click to expand...
Thank you very much for helping out. 🙏❤️
 
Antvasima said:
I interpreted the answer that way at least.
Click to expand...
This one is surprising, considering that: Gris2244, Greyindigo, and JustAFanJan22 were doing the similar things to the same page since September 2025.

I genuinely wouldn't be surprised if this is some sort of coordinated move.

What should we do with these?
What should we do with GreyIndigo?

And what should we do with Grayman424 and Griss2244. The two accounts have been warned like 7 times already, by different staff and former staff member. Not to mention the sockpuppetry. I am fine with permanently banning with Gris2244, but I am unsure what duration we should give to Grayman424.

I am starting to think they have malicious intent given how many accounts are doing the same thing over and over again.

Antvasima said:
Thank you very much for helping out. 🙏❤️
Click to expand...
No problem. But some troubling pattern is starting to arise here, and it's a bit concerning, honestly.
 
MaskedDragon908 said:
Maikolpry added Power Mimicry and Analytical Prediction to Eddie Morra, and also added a semicolon to the tiering.
They also changed the image for Eddie Morra and Limitless.

Masked will attempt to fix the formatting, and remove the unaccepted abilities.
Click to expand...
Does adding images count as vandalism? then a lot of user must be banned.

And the abillities, I thought there would be no problem since they are implicit.
  • With Power Mimicry: the actual power justification whitout link is "Can copy and master actions that he sees" which is a consistent description with the Power Mimicry power.
  • Regarding Analytical Prediction: the justification for subsonic speed is literally "Was able to react to a sniper shot, while calculating every possible outcome and who fired it and delivering a speech at the same time" so...
 
Maikolpry said:
And the abillities, I thought there would be no problem since they are implicit.
  • With Power Mimicry: the actual power justification whitout link is "Can copy and master actions that he sees" which is a consistent description with the Power Mimicry power.
  • Regarding Analytical Prediction: the justification for subsonic speed is literally "Was able to react to a sniper shot, while calculating every possible outcome and who fired it and delivering a speech at the same time" so...
Click to expand...
Obvious abilities additions still need a crt, tho likely just 1 vote would be sufficient to add those
 
Maikolpry said:
Does adding images count as vandalism? then a lot of user must be banned.
Click to expand...
Nope. But if a user has been inappropriately resizing images over and over and was warned by a staff member repeatedly for continuously doing the same thing, then it's possible to be considered vandalism. Even then, it would only usually result in a block with a duration of months or so, (unless they make socks and do the same thing).
 
AThe1412 said:
Desperate times call for desperate measures. I've found that wiki folks are more likely to consider those who express their opinions with passion. There were times in the past when I attempted to point out unfairness in matches or make arguments for the losing side, which should've changed their results, only to be FRA-trained and ignored.
Click to expand...
I get what you mean, FRA trains can be really frustrating. I’ve seen that happen too.That said, I still think there’s a difference between pushing back and calling a match a stomp right away.

Even if some arguments are weak, it’s better to discuss them instead of shutting things down too quickly. Also, if a thread is going to be dismissed as a stomp, it should at least be discussed with the people who participated.

I’m not saying you’re wrong, some matches are stomps, but for more debatable ones, it’s better to let the discussion play out a bit.
 
Last edited:
Revisiting the situation, Ztesr....'s points are valid.

I recommend bringing up any potential future VS thread issues in the removal thread next time, so that any VS threads he plans to remove can be handled properly.

Since both of you are now arguing that some matches should not have been dismissed as stomps and removed, it further shows that these concerns should have been raised in that thread.

That is the purpose of that wiki management thread, to prevent situations like this. And yes, it is an appropriate thread to use, a lot of people have been using it that way now, even if the scope of the original post in the versus thread removal requests does not fully cover the situations mentioned, not to mention the original post itself is quite outdated and could use some revision, similar to what we recently did for the Article Clean-up Reports thread, as both threads have evolved over time.

Since FRA matches are still allowed by technicality, even if they are disliked, you should have requested their removal instead of invalidating the addition of a match that went through a legitimate process by removing it and labeling it a stomp, just my two cents.
 
Ztesrxgdfjcvgkbh said:
The rules seem a bit inconsistent. I’ve seen some users add obvious abilities without a CRT and face no issues, while others get called out for it.
Click to expand...
Self-evident minor revisions are in the borderzone between not allowed and considering it as productive wiki cleanup work, so it can depend on whether a staff member such as myself notices that an edit is beneficial to our wiki, or if it seems inaccurate or as questionable overreach. Basically, sometimes it seems more practical to allow a productive greyzone edit instead of a member potentislly having to wait for months for an evaluation of a minor content revision thread. 🙏
 
Vzearr said:
When I was a CM we were asked to change high ratings to unknown.
Click to expand...
Well, if there are self-evident explanations for a character's intelligence feats, an unknown rating is usually not necessary. Our intelligence statistics have deliberately been constructed in an easily determinable self-evident manner. 🙏
 
Maikolpry said:
Does adding images count as vandalism? then a lot of user must be banned.

And the abillities, I thought there would be no problem since they are implicit.
  • With Power Mimicry: the actual power justification whitout link is "Can copy and master actions that he sees" which is a consistent description with the Power Mimicry power.
  • Regarding Analytical Prediction: the justification for subsonic speed is literally "Was able to react to a sniper shot, while calculating every possible outcome and who fired it and delivering a speech at the same time" so...
Click to expand...
Masked wasn't sure about the images; they are sorry if they were not clear in their original report.
We have had a problem with image vandalization recently, and Masked wanted to check with the staff.

For the abilities, Mommyleona has already answered, but Masked would like to note that they are not against them.
However, Masked would prefer a revision thread, since it mentions "master actions that he sees", which would fall under Accelerated Development (Skill/Other), as well as Limited Power Mimicry, since he is simply replicating their actions.
"Calculating every possible outcome" is somewhat vague and could be an intelligence feat or Analytical Prediction.

Unfortunately, they will not be able to respond further in this thread, since this thread is reserved for reports.
Masked made this reply to acknowledge your questions, and to apologize for their lack of clarification.
 
Psychomaster35 said:
I'm not sure if this goes here, but this user has been taking down various matchups for a character over a CRT that had nothing to do with changing this character's abilities (It was only a speed downgrade and creation AP removal, but these matchups shouldn't be affected at all).

In addition, they put a link in the URL that read "azureserv", I have no idea if that site is malicious or not but I just want to bring this up.
Click to expand...
I checked that site with a few link checkers yesterday, and it seems to be harmless, but it is definitely not a valid justification for removing matchups either. 🙏
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Agnaa
Fanart Rule Revamp
Replies
7
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Antvasima
I will be mostly absent for a while
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
Antvasima
Antvasima
FinePoint
  • Locked
Clarifying Death Threat Rules
2
Replies
64
Views
6K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Agnaa
  • Locked
Controversial Powers on New Pages - Editing Rules Tweak
2
Replies
69
Views
8K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Just a Random Butler
  • Locked
Proposal to Disallow the Use of Google Docs/Drive and Similar Services for Scans and Evidence Hosting
Replies
30
Views
3K
Just a Random Butler
Just a Random Butler
Back
Top