• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

Hmm. Which is their main account? Maybe we can permanently ban their two extra accounts, and ban their main account for a year, given that these are not serious offences, just a lot of them that turned tiresome to deal with? 🙏
 
Hmm. Which is their main account? Maybe we can permanently ban the two extra accounts, and ban their main account for a year, given that these are not serious offences, just a lot of them that turned tiresome to deal with? 🙏
I am fine with it (any ban is fine, I am just really tired of dealing with the consequences of their edits), but I also don't know their main account.
 
Okay. Would you be willing to ban the Punizher24 account for a year, and permanently ban their other two accounts as well, please? 🙏
 
Punizher20
Punizher24
JustAFanJan22
Masked has reason to believe these accounts may be related as well.

GreyIndigo
Gris2244

They have also given similar promises to the above accounts, as well
Gris2244·12/29/2024
Wait! I'm sorry for everything, I actually didn't notice this, but I'm only just modifying a few things here, I am not a troll, vandalizing or anything like that but if it has come to this then as a proof of apology, I'll now be inactive in this account from now on, you'll now have my word.
 
Masked has reason to believe these accounts may be related as well.

GreyIndigo
Gris2244

They have also given similar promises to the above accounts, as well
Yes, looking at those links and their contribution history, I am inclined to believe you as well.

@Antvasima, thoughts? Can we have these accounts checked too?
 
Dragopentling is making changes to many Pokémon pages without linking to an accepted CRT. I searched for a Pokémon CRT proposing the changes he applied to the profile, but I couldn’t find anything.
Those are cleanup work. Those tiers have been accepted for a long time but never fixed on various profiles.
 
Yes, looking at those links and their contribution history, I am inclined to believe you as well.

@Antvasima, thoughts? Can we have these accounts checked too?
Unfortunately, this appears to be a widespread issue.
After digging around in their contributions, as well as the history of certain pages (for example, Hades and Yammy),
There is significant overlap with these accounts, as well:
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:D'Sterrenacht22
D'Sterrenacht22
Anonymousrefiner

They also attempted to mislead Antvasima here:
D'Sterrenacht22·10/18/2024
I'm sorry but I did not change the image size I only reverted it back to the previous image as someone suddenly changed it into a diff. one.
These were their edits:
 
Unfortunately, this appears to be a widespread issue.
After digging around in their contributions, as well as the history of certain pages (for example, Hades and Yammy),
There is significant overlap with these accounts, as well:
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:D'Sterrenacht22
D'Sterrenacht22
Anonymousrefiner

They also attempted to mislead Antvasima here:

These were their edits:
Okay, I might be more open to a permanent ban for those accounts.

Potentially permanent ban for the original Punizher24 as well, if this is also confirmed to be the same user.

I'd like to hear what Ant has to say about it though.
 
Masked has reason to believe these accounts may be related as well.

GreyIndigo
Gris2244

They have also given similar promises to the above accounts, as well
Yes, looking at those links and their contribution history, I am inclined to believe you as well.

@Antvasima, thoughts? Can we have these accounts checked too?
Unfortunately, this appears to be a widespread issue.
After digging around in their contributions, as well as the history of certain pages (for example, Hades and Yammy),
There is significant overlap with these accounts, as well:
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:D'Sterrenacht22
D'Sterrenacht22
Anonymousrefiner

They also attempted to mislead Antvasima here:

These were their edits:
Okay, I might be more open to a permanent ban for those accounts.

Potentially permanent ban for the original Punizher24 as well, if this is also confirmed to be the same user.

I'd like to hear what Ant has to say about it though.
@Antvasima

I would like to hear your thoughts regarding these.
 
@Antvasima

I would like to hear your thoughts regarding these.
Apologies, but after reviewing the page history for Gigantomachia and Valter, Masked has found yet another user with significant overlap.

ZeReverter
 
I feel like a Rule Violations Report isn't a proper place to justify gthe removal of VS THreads, especially because the supporters of the JP verse weren't notified at all
I agree. I was just supplying you the information available in their edit summary.

As for the #3 and #4, either I am not trying hard enough, or I genuinely can't find where these were justified.
 
@AThe1412

Also, please make the requests here instead:
 
I agree. I was just supplying you the information available in their edit summary.

As for the #3 and #4, either I am not trying hard enough, or I genuinely can't find where these were justified.
AThe1412 used this justification on Cujo's page:
"Removing stomp match. Only argument is literally Steve with his bat staggers Kujo to death or outright oneshots and still wins even without it."

They should probably make the request in the appropriate thread, instead of here.
 
AThe1412 used this justification on Cujo's page:
"Removing stomp match. Only argument is literally Steve with his bat staggers Kujo to death or outright oneshots and still wins even without it."

They should probably make the request in the appropriate thread, instead of here.
I did see that justification, but I was trying to see if they made a case for it in the forums.

But yes, I agree, that the requests should be made on the appropriate thread.
 
I feel like a Rule Violations Report isn't a proper place to justify gthe removal of VS THreads, especially because the supporters of the JP verse weren't notified at all
Do they need to be notified if they're letting matches from 6-7 years ago remain on the profiles even after the verse had gone through numerous changes?
I did see that justification, but I was trying to see if they made a case for it in the forums.

But yes, I agree, that the requests should be made on the appropriate thread.
I thought that a request would only be necessary if the match is on a locked page or is particularly controversial.
 
Do they need to be notified if they're letting matches from 6-7 years ago remain on the profiles even after the verse had gone through numerous changes?

I thought that a request would only be necessary if the match is on a locked page or is particularly controversial.
I do somewhat agree, but I think the OP just has not been updated over time (while its use was slightly changing), similar to the Article Clean-Up thread.

People have been using it to submit various removal requests, or to notify others when they remove a match along with their reasons, since not all people will necessarily agree with just about anything.

That said, you are likely correct regarding your removals, so this can be disregarded.
 
The user Vapidhoe provided several grammar, scan fixes, and statistics values, which is good.
However, they also added "Fear Inducement" to the page, and changed the Tier rating of "higher" to "far higher".

As far as Masked is aware, there are no revisions to support these edits to the page.
The feats also seem to fit better with Social Influencing (Instigating Fear), not Fear Inducement.
 
woudl this be considered vandalisim. It was supposed to be added to his profile on release (his profile is relativley new and has no added mathes), but it wasnt due to the profile being contantly deleted and taken bake up due to it not meeting wiki standards for a period of time,

I was one of the main contributors to the profile, but if its vanadlisim ill revert all changes

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Alrasid_(Balanced_Craftwars_Overhaul)?diff=9453854&oldid=9432986
I think that I can retroactively accept your edit under these circumstances, since you seem to have created the page but forgot to add an important part of it. 🙏
 
The user Vapidhoe provided several grammar, scan fixes, and statistics values, which is good.
However, they also added "Fear Inducement" to the page, and changed the Tier rating of "higher" to "far higher".

As far as Masked is aware, there are no revisions to support these edits to the page.
The feats also seem to fit better with Social Influencing (Instigating Fear), not Fear Inducement.
I tried to fix that page:


@Vapidhoe

You are not supposed to make the kind of changes that were mentioned above without a minor content revision thread. 🙏
 
I tried looking but was there anything in the Versus Thread Removal Requests to justify the removal of these matches?, I couldn't find anything
there may be other matches removed but I haven't the time to check
To add to this

No notable changes were made to the dinosaurs to justify that removal; the OP clearly states that both were 9-A and in-character.


Cujo vs Steve is a more recent thread that was approved by eight users, including a Content Moderator, until Athe came in, decided it was a stomp, and removed it.


Recently, Athe has been doing this quite often in my threads, claiming they’re stomps even though other users say they aren’t.




He’s also been doing the same with threads from other users.






So, as you can see, it’s pretty common for him to label certain VS threads as ‘stomps’ when he doesn’t like them.
 
To add to this

No notable changes were made to the dinosaurs to justify that removal; the OP clearly states that both were 9-A and in-character.

Again, that was 7 years ago. They were downgraded to 9-B and then upgraded to 9-A again. And this is obviously not mentioning their intelligence sections.

I even linked specific revisions in their page history to show that I wasn't bullshitting.
Cujo vs Steve is a more recent thread that was approved by eight users, including a Content Moderator, until Athe came in, decided it was a stomp, and removed it.

Because it is a stomp. Are you aware of "FRA trains"? They're when people just take a glance at a match, see which character has more votes, then vote for that character without actually considering the arguments.

No reasonable wincons for Cujo was brought up. Instead, the only argument for Steve is "He easily beats the dog to death with his bat. Hell, he can still kill it even without the bat".
Recently, Athe has been doing this quite often in my threads, claiming they’re stomps even though other users say they aren’t.



Have you considered the possibility that other users can be wrong? Have you also actually considered why I was calling them stomps?

First, you put animals with recorded cases of having injured or even killed humans against a creature that is stated to be harmless to them and only has the strength of a child without even an age clarification. For all we know, that thing could be anywhere from infant to just under 18 year old level because that's how old children are legally. Of course, the harmless statement alone already puts it far below the dogs and anything below the age of 6 doesn't even stand a chance.

Next, you put a telepath with zero mind hax resistance and baseline feats against PROFESSOR X who's the greatest telepath in his verse who cooks other telepaths, has mind hax resistance, and can extend the range of his abilities across thousands of kilometers.
He’s also been doing the same with threads from other users.






So, as you can see, it’s pretty common for him to label certain VS threads as ‘stomps’ when he doesn’t like them.
Can you, like, actually read through those threads to get the context of why I claimed stomps instead of just going to the search bar, typing in my name, and looking for any posts with the word "stomp"?
 
Last edited:
Again, that was 7 years ago. They were downgraded to 9-B and then upgraded to 9-A again. And this is obviously not mentioning their intelligence sections.

I even linked specific revisions in their page history to show that I wasn't bullshitting.

Because it is a stomp. Are you aware of "FRA trains"? They're when people just take a glance at a match, see which character has more votes, then vote for that character without actually considering the arguments.

No reasonable wincons for Cujo was brought up. Instead, the only argument for Steve is "He easily beats the dog to death with his bat. Hell, he can still kill it even without the bat".

Have you considered the possibility that other users can be wrong? Have you also actually considered why I was calling them stomps?

First, you put animals with recorded cases of having injured or even killed humans against a creature that is stated to be harmless to them and only has the strength of a child without even an age clarification. For all we know, that thing could be anywhere from infant to just under 18 year old level because that's how old children are legally. Of course, the harmless statement alone already puts it far below the dogs and anything below the age of 6 doesn't even stand a chance.

Next, you put a telepath with zero mind hax resistance and baseline feats against PROFESSOR X who's the greatest telepath in his verse who cooks other telepaths, has mind hax resistance, and can extend the range of his abilities across thousands of kilometers.

Can you, like, actually read through those threads to get the context of why I claimed stomps instead of just going to the search bar, typing in my name, and looking for any posts with the word "stomp"?
I get your point, and I did read through the threads. I’m not just searching your name and picking comments out of context.

That said, I still think some of these cases are more debatable than outright stomps.

Even if some arguments were weak or influenced by FRA trains, that doesn’t automatically mean the match itself has no possible wincons or discussion value.

I do agree that in cases like Professor X vs Miki, the gap is very clear. But for others, I think they could’ve been handled through discussion rather than being labeled as stomps right away.

I’m not saying you’re wrong in every case, just that I think the approach can come across as a bit too quick or strict sometimes.
 
I get your point, and I did read through the threads. I’m not just searching your name and picking comments out of context.

That said, I still think some of these cases are more debatable than outright stomps.

Even if some arguments were weak or influenced by FRA trains, that doesn’t automatically mean the match itself has no possible wincons or discussion value.

I do agree that in cases like Professor X vs Miki, the gap is very clear. But for others, I think they could’ve been handled through discussion rather than being labeled as stomps right away.

I’m not saying you’re wrong in every case, just that I think the approach can come across as a bit too quick or strict sometimes.
Desperate times call for desperate measures. I've found that wiki folks are more likely to consider those who express their opinions with passion. There were times in the past when I attempted to point out unfairness in matches or make arguments for the losing side, which should've changed their results, only to be FRA-trained and ignored.
 
Back
Top