• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Why arent these considered natural light or light speed in Fairy Tail

649
199
Something i have been wondering for quite a while is why aren't these attacks considered light speed or natural light.

The celestial spirit King Galaxia blade is stated to be starlight and are light from the 88 constellations And once again called starlight here so i was wondering shouldn't these attack be considered light speed or natural light. There is also lucy using urano metria which is also sated to have light that is from the constellations She even adds the words shine which should confirm the attack is light based or produces light.

we also have fairy glitter which is also stated to be a light based attack here And once again here. And it is stated to gather light from the sun moon and stars. In the ice shell calc moon drip beam had multiple reasons it could be considered natural light. add this with the fact that the light fairy glitter uses also comes from the sun and stars both produce light this attack should also be considered light speed and natural light.

these are multiple examples of natural light in these attack. and i think these should be counted as natural light as well. There is no reason for it to not be considered as such.
 
Being made of light =/= Light Speed here
Not to be that guy, but an attack being made of light is literally one the standards listed on our rules.

"Standards for laser
determination
Most lasers in fiction are not real or provable
as real. Often they are supernatural in nature
and do not function anywhere close to how
real light should. Therefore, lasers/light beams
are only accepted as real if they meet, at a
minimum, a few of these criteria:
• The beam refracts in a new material, such
as a liquid or...
• The beam diffuses in a reasonably realistic
way or reflects off a material that it can be
expected to, such as a non-magical
mirror.
• The beam is called lightspeed by reliable
sources.
It is stated to be composed/consisting of
photons or light itself, again by a reliable

source.
• It has its origin at a realistic source of
light, such as a camera."

I know virtually nothing about Fairy Tail and even less about feats I haven't seen scans of, but contradicting rules isn't right.
 
You don’t just need 1 qualification… you need more than 1 usually 2-3 and then it’ll get accepted as Light speed
 
Not to be that guy, but an attack being made of light is literally one the standards listed on our rules.
Yes and the attack needs to meet several of those to be valid, not just one.

DemonGodMitchAubin was just saying that an attack being called light or said to be made of it doesn't mean it's lightspeed by default, and he's right.

However, if it's true that they're "natural light", then you shouldn't need to prove any of this afaik.
 
No, he literally just said, "Being made of light =/= Light Speed here". He didn't further elaborate. That statement would include natural light.

That said I'm not the one proposing the CRT at all, and I'm neutral about it because the scans don't show for me. It already violates at least one, but I can't give a vote where I don't have evidence.
 
No, he literally just said, "Being made of light =/= Light Speed here". He didn't further elaborate. That statement would include natural light.

That said I'm not the one proposing the CRT at all, and I'm neutral about it because the scans don't show for me. It already violates at least one, but I can't give a vote where I don't have evidence.
Nah Purgy pretty much nailed my thought process
 
Back
Top