- 5,232
- 708
Sure no problem
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Antvasima said:@Basilisk1995 I hope so. Thank you for the help.
Kuzan is roughly equal/slightly weaker than Sakazuki after the time-skip, not at MarineFord. Borsalino is the weakest of the original Admirals, and should not be Small Continent Level. BB is more of a hax-man than an ap-man, so he should most likely not be Small Continent Level. We don't know if Shank's & Dragons power come from hax or ap, so we can't rank them at Small Continent Level. Only though direct statements or events should we scale characters to WB.Basilisk1995 said:@UncleSpaceman Akainu & Aokiji faught for 10 days.Akainu directly scales to Aokiji.Your suggesstion is WB,Roger Garp,Akainu,Aokiji all Small continent level???What about Kizaru,Shanks,Dragon,Kaido,Blackbeard and Shiki??
oh, I agree with that also don't worry.Antvasima said:Thank you. Feel free to start then. You can tell me on my personal message page if some pages need to be unlocked.
Btw: I technically agree with that the Bleach pages are quite a mess in terms of power structure, but that is a separate problem, and several wrongs do not make a right.
The Living Tribunal1 said:so are we keeping him with the tetraton answer?
the thing i got was the minimum energy to do that stuff, but yeah, i havent heard of aoe limitation in one piece, so that rift and building feat was not impressiveAntvasima said:No, if DontTalk says that the premise is invalid, and your calculation gives a much lower value for a full force attack, we have to powerscale Whitebeard from Chinjao and the Admirals instead.
Sabertoothunter said:If I'm not mistaken quakes are caused due to hypocentre point right under the epicentre? And the cause at epicentre is one that of devastation. One seen with every quake he had made.
The Tsunami wave's height caused by WB was roughly 3 to 4 times that of highest Tsunami ever recorded. His quakes no matter what were still felt on Long Ring Island. It possessed that much energy that thousands of kms far it's impact as light quake is still felt.
In simpler words he treated WB's quake as epicentre and the total distance it covered as total distance. Unless the formula he used is wrong then what's the actual problem here? Or what's wrong with it? I have never seen a quake pulverize complete MASSIVE area of impact at it's epicentre. Here I say "massive" because pulverizing/violently fragmentizing or even fragmentizing area at epicentre was completely visible.
You brought up nothing new to table with "Earthquake are created by bla bla" chit chat. Hypocenter point, search it up and then talk please. Epicenter =/= Hypocentre (focus) where what you said happens.Kambetal1 said:Earthuakes are created by tectonic plates converging, and subducting. The epicentre is the point on the SURFACE vertically above the focus/hypocentre. Hypocentre in this case is the same as epicentre.Sabertoothunter said:If I'm not mistaken quakes are caused due to hypocentre point right under the epicentre? And the cause at epicentre is one that of devastation. One seen with every quake he had made.
The Tsunami wave's height caused by WB was roughly 3 to 4 times that of highest Tsunami ever recorded. His quakes no matter what were still felt on Long Ring Island. It possessed that much energy that thousands of kms far it's impact as light quake is still felt.
In simpler words he treated WB's quake as epicentre and the total distance it covered as total distance. Unless the formula he used is wrong then what's the actual problem here? Or what's wrong with it? I have never seen a quake pulverize complete MASSIVE area of impact at it's epicentre. Here I say "massive" because pulverizing/violently fragmentizing or even fragmentizing area at epicentre was completely visible.
What's wrong with the calc? Using an incredibly quick boat speed (a method flawed as it is) to calculate distance. + It's a mega outlier.
Oh my bad. Well even if Space is correct, we then have to figure out about the durability issue (unless y'all have that figured out, that is).Antvasima said:That is what I am considering, but I would prefer if DontTalk and TLT1 can confirm if UncleSpaceman is correct.
Hmm, yes....Antvasima said:Also, we don't see him launch any attacks here. The environment is simply responding to his mood.
You seem to forget that Whitebeard's queakes don't fanction the same way earthquakes do ,he just produce seismic energy without all the other effects because he causes them with his punches and not the "traditional" way.UncleSpaceman said:@Kkapoios
The occurrence of an earthquake is a complex energy conversion process. When an earthquake occurs, much of the available local energy is used to power the earthquake fracture growth, producing heat rather than generating seismic waves which radiate outward and are detected by seismographs.
The seismic moment is a measure of the total amount of energy that is transformed during an earthquake. Usually only 1-10 percent or less of an earthquake's total energy is released in the form of radiated seismic waves.
- Source
Hence, you need to calculate the seismic moment, the maximum value for the seismic moment calculatoris a 10.5 magnitude. Our value is 10.9, so using 10.5 would only yield a lower value.
Plugging a 10.5 magnitude into the calculator, we get 6.934258e+24 joules or 1.65732743786 petatons of TNT. A 10.9 magnitude would be even higher.