-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
What Is Calc Stacking
- Thread starter Matthew_Schroeder
- Start date
- 10,508
- 11,596
I think the calc stacking page modification is easily done.
I would suggest something like the following:
Hiding Calculations
Hiding calculations is the practice of trying to avoid calculating a feat in order to be able to use the result in another calculation. In other words it is the practice of trying to fool people into not noticing that calc stacking is being used.
This usually occurs if a feat is quantified per a rule of thumb instead of precisely calculated. A typical example would be a character dodging a bullet from a short distance being ranked as "Supersonic" and then using that ranking to calculate the speed of another character, whichs speed one can compare to the former in some feat.
While it is acceptable to rank a character by such a self-evident feat without a calculation, one should keep in mind that the unwritten calculation is only skipped due to being trivial, but still the justification for the ranking. Hence calc stacking will still be an issue for such feats.
Creating a new multiplier page is a more difficult for me. What are our current standards regarding statements like "His new form is 6 times stonger than his old one" or "he can move 100 times faster than before now" again?
I would suggest something like the following:
Hiding Calculations
Hiding calculations is the practice of trying to avoid calculating a feat in order to be able to use the result in another calculation. In other words it is the practice of trying to fool people into not noticing that calc stacking is being used.
This usually occurs if a feat is quantified per a rule of thumb instead of precisely calculated. A typical example would be a character dodging a bullet from a short distance being ranked as "Supersonic" and then using that ranking to calculate the speed of another character, whichs speed one can compare to the former in some feat.
While it is acceptable to rank a character by such a self-evident feat without a calculation, one should keep in mind that the unwritten calculation is only skipped due to being trivial, but still the justification for the ranking. Hence calc stacking will still be an issue for such feats.
Creating a new multiplier page is a more difficult for me. What are our current standards regarding statements like "His new form is 6 times stonger than his old one" or "he can move 100 times faster than before now" again?
- 119
- 10
Or for calc stacking it become mandatory that low ends are assumed.
- 461
- 38
Isn't war arc Naruto, a trwiates Frankenstein of calc stacking, then? Sage makes moon, sage was 10 tails jin, anyone whom got 10 jin power or related, becomes super strong, end result madara's B.S. and Naruto and sasuke are moon level.
(And that's ignoring plotholes related to kaguya.)
(And that's ignoring plotholes related to kaguya.)
- 30,175
- 31,587
Has the page been updated? And if so, could we close the thread?
- 15,731
- 7,724
7th Ki'oo, these were properly calculated feats. It on Naruto (The Universe)'s page if you want to check.
- 8,136
- 2,156
Why do you think any of the calcs involved calc stacking,multipler stacking, or feat stacking?7th Ki'oon said:
- 32,327
- 20,215
- Thread starter
- #50
I think his suggestions are fine.
- 144
- 16
Haven't read the comments yet but this just seems like power scaling. Can you explain the difference if it isn't? There's nothing wrong with power scaling but your example of using FTL bullets just seems like either a bad example or if anybody actually said that they should just be called out on their bull****.
- 165,333
- 72,561
I have asked DontTalk to revise the Calc Stacking page.
- 165,333
- 72,561
- 32,327
- 20,215
- Thread starter
- #57
This seems good.
- 32,327
- 20,215
- Thread starter
- #59
I think some better examples / more examples.
