- 13,170
- 20,894
I don’t see what the issue in punishing genuine bigotry is, personally
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no issue. Just playing devils advocate.I don’t see what the issue in punishing genuine bigotry is, personally
It does hurt the safety of the site. Many people have exclaimed discomfort with such beliefs being present on the sire and if someone hates your existence and the group you're from I think you'd feel unsafe interacting with them lol. Plus it's not a good look for visitorsThere is no issue. Just playing devils advocate.
Is it staffs place to punish something that in no way hurts them or the safety of this site ?
It is when the severity of it is such that it’s in-conducive to the safety or general well-being of our users, such as harshly bigoted sentiments or - even worse - calls for genocide. We’re not the morality police, no, but a line does need to be drawn somewhere - and I feel right now the site benefits from the line we recently decided to draw.There is no issue. Just playing devils advocate.
Is it staffs place to punish something that in no way hurts them or the safety of this site ?
Essentially, yeah. I’d say it’s very harmful when, say, a number of our users (those that are LGBTQ+) are sharing the site with someone that wants them dead, for instance.It does hurt the safety of the site. Many people have exclaimed discomfort with such beliefs being present on the sire and if someone hates your existence and the group you're from I think you'd feel unsafe interacting with them lol. Plus it's not a good look for visitors
These private messages (a lot of the time) shouldn't even be leaked to the public rvr in the first place.It does hurt the safety of the site. Many people have exclaimed discomfort with such beliefs being present on the sire and if someone hates your existence and the group you're from I think you'd feel unsafe interacting with them lol.
How does it effect the wellbeing of other users if the user (who is racist or homophobic ect) is generally kind to other users and problem free. It wouldn't actually effect anyone, unless its leaked. Posting it to the rvr would actually cause more harm then good.It is when the severity of it is such that it’s in-conducive to the safety or general well-being of our users, such as harshly bigoted sentiments or - even worse - calls for genocide. We’re not the morality police, no, but a line does need to be drawn somewhere - and I feel right now the site benefits from the line we recently decided to draw.
"Well you see guys it was all actually just an ironic joke guys come on guys don't permaban me guys wanting to kill gay people is actually really funny and quirky guys come on"Depends on the severity of it tbh. Take my recent report of Reio35 for example. Quite frankly, the fact that he was unable to defend himself is of no consequence to me because I’m not interested in seeing how someone defends bigotry or even calls for genocide
Just because someone is quiet about their bigotry doesn't mean it's not a problem. More often than not it leaks out anyways. Doing stuff behind closed doors is still overall contributing to the bad stuff lol.How does it effect the wellbeing of other users if the user (who is racist or homophobic ect) is generally kind to other users and problem free. It wouldn't actually effect anyone, unless its leaked. Posting it to the rvr would actually cause more harm then good.
Contributing to the bad stuff that doesn't effect the on-site wellbeing of users.Just because someone is quiet about their bigotry doesn't mean it's not a problem. More often than not it leaks out anyways. Doing stuff behind closed doors is still overall contributing to the bad stuff lol.
Cool.Actually there are a few groups with humour like that. Although it is disgusting there are a people like that who actually think its a funny joke.
How did you respond that quick...Cool.
I think overall I can say I’m satisfied with our current stance on off-site conduct. This could potentially change if it’s taken advantage of in one way or another, but I believe this adequately punishes actively harmful behavior while not shifting into thought police territory.I'm a proponent for freedom of speech as far as where it isn't actively harming someone. I don't like inching towards thought-policing people in our sphere of entirely unrelated shit. Yeah, I think they're probably bad people (or, being very generous, extremely flawed) but I don't see that as being grounds to ban people. I don't think it's a "safety issue" or whatever.
Reio was a valid boot to the arse because he was actively pining to hurt people because the dude's a ******' lunatic. Lesser cases aren't covered by our rules, and I still don't think they should be.
How does someone actively wanting other users dead not hurt the site's safety?There is no issue. Just playing devils advocate.
Is it staffs place to punish something that in no way hurts them or the safety of this site ?
I was not talking about Reio. I did not know of his existence and what he did when I said that.How does someone actively wanting other users dead not hurt the site's safety?
Just because it doesn't effect you doesn't mean you shouldn't care lol and I think it does affect the on-site users because I'm gonna feel very uncomfortable if I, as a trans person, am engaging with someone who is severely transphobic, off-site or on-site behaviorContributing to the bad stuff that doesn't effect the on-site wellbeing of users.
Why the discomfort you feel?Just because it doesn't effect you doesn't mean you shouldn't care lol and I think it does affect the on-site users because I'm gonna feel very uncomfortable if I, as a trans person, am engaging with someone who is severely transphobic, off-site or on-site behavior
I don't quite understand your question but it's not exactly fun interacting with someone who hates you for a part of yourself that you is harmless, makes up a lot of your identity and wants you dead because of it.Why the discomfort you feel?
Problem is sometimes i dont have the energy to compile person A, a part of B and and counter arguement to person C to vote.I feel like their should be a rule added that says you have to comment more then [Insert character] FRA.
It’s honestly pretty silly how the bulk of a comments on a battle discussion will literally just be people typing two words and that somehow is a commonly accepted voting criteria.
Yeah, this is one of the reasons I always feel the need to list every advantage for both sides before putting my thoughts down.I’m not asking people to debate here, just leave a comment that at least shows you glanced through the thread. Simply putting “I agree with [Insert users] reasons,” or just reiterating the points you agree with in like a sentence, is infinitely preferable to the FRA stuff we have currently.
If it's not fun, then stay out of it.I don't quite understand your question but it's not exactly fun interacting with someone who hates you for a part of yourself that you is harmless, makes up a lot of your identity and wants you dead because of it.
This is like... a very reductive way of looking at this, but alrightIf it's not fun, then stay out of it.
What????? I can’t control who’s on the site that’s the staffs duty, and even then I’m not TRYING to interact with those types of people, it’s just naturally what happens if they don’t get banned on the site meaning I’ll most likely run into them one way or another.If it's not fun, then stay out of it.
Not to sound rude but… why? It’s not like we’re being super hostile or anything and I think it’s certainly a good discussion to have. Feels a bit weird to stop the conversation now rather than when it was going on much earlier.Please stop this type of discussion about bigotry at once, thank you.
It is a rather controversial topic so I don't want any hostility sparking here. Though, if you're sure this won't go off rails then I'm gonna let this slide, however, everyone has to be civil.Not to sound rude but… why? It’s not like we’re being super hostile or anything and I think it’s certainly a good discussion to have. Feels a bit weird to stop the conversation now rather than when it was going on much earlier.
Because sensitive topics like this rather gets a rise out of people. And this thread really isn't the thread to be discussing about ongoing dramaNot to sound rude but… why? It’s not like we’re being super hostile or anything and I think it’s certainly a good discussion to have. Feels a bit weird to stop the conversation now rather than when it was going on much earlier.
Nah, I'll drop it tbh. I'd rather have an important discussion like this in a more serious thread, as Propellus saidIt is a rather controversial topic so I don't want any hostility sparking here. Though, if you're sure this won't go off rails then I'm gonna let this slide, however, everyone has to be civil.
The difference is that some drug dealers are actually helping(this only applies to if they're dealing insulin to people who can't afford it at the store or something, I am not endorsing heroin)This is the equivalent of seeing your drug dealer at a grocery store. First glance he isn't doing anything illegal but then again if you know you know