• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Vs battles wiki pet peeves

Status
Not open for further replies.
Shmooply said:
This is, singlehandedly, the worst thing ever:
2FQALjg.png

dXxlv2D.png

sxDa66X.png
Click to expand...
Damn does Yuji use terrain to his advantage in combat? I can’t tell. Add a few more sentences mentioning it just to make sure
 
Dinozxd said:
The worst thing is though, I have to wait 6 months to post a CRT about the scaling chain and other things just for it to get stonewalled by people 🥴

The time and post requirement was a mistake lol.
Click to expand...
Well, I told you and Arnold how exactly "that" feat is gonna turn out and you both laughed it off, and it went exactly like I said.

Don't include the feats which I worked extensively on, and the ones I talked to you about offsite. We are already about to have Akkun/Kisaki comparable to Baji because of that certain thing.

It's better to wait for guys like Agnaa to listen to our reasonings.
 
Dragonstitch said:
don't you just love it when there is an ability that lets you make multiple attacks in the span of 1 but it does not count as you moving at a higher speed since it does not specifically stay it multiply stat by X.
Click to expand...
Absolutely despise it and i think the authors should clarify such speed differences
(the world doesn't deserve me)
 
SatellaTheWoE said:
Absolutely despise it and i think the authors should clarify such speed differences
(the world doesn't deserve me)
Click to expand...
Like when authors has the ability say your attacks a blur, that you do more than 1 attack, it is seen as happening simultaneously, each attack has to be rolled for individually, and has to be the same weapon for each attack. But somehow from this site's ass backwards moon logic all that means it does not boost your speed. What the hell does it mean then?
 
My pet peeve:
Users getting banned based off private discussions where they can't respond to or even see it, I know that some issues can be sensitive and not appropriate to discuss it publicly, but it's not remotely fair for the users being accused to not be able to even defend themselves.

The same goes for appeals.
 
I've always thought people considered HR to be unfair treatment of staff due to being private. I've never heard of a case where a user is not permitted to speak at least once on their own behalf. That said, the nature of this particular thread is meant to be more lighthearted, and is unsuitable for what you're trying to shift it to, if you catch my drift.
 
MorrisHatesYou said:
My pet peeve:
Users getting banned based off private discussions where they can't respond to or even see it, I know that some issues can be sensitive and not appropriate to discuss it publicly, but it's not remotely fair for the users being accused to not be able to even defend themselves.

The same goes for appeals.
Click to expand...
Depends on the content and context, but yeah. Sometimes it needs to be handled privately, and sometimes the user needs to at least be able to explain their side, if there is one. Some situations don't really need the other side of the story. It is what it is.
 
MorrisHatesYou said:
My pet peeve:
Users getting banned based off private discussions where they can't respond to or even see it, I know that some issues can be sensitive and not appropriate to discuss it publicly, but it's not remotely fair for the users being accused to not be able to even defend themselves.

The same goes for appeals.
Click to expand...
The problem is when those "private discussions" involve immoral or straight up criminal activity with seemly no regard for consequences due to "behind the screen" privilege (that many cyberbullies love to use) there's a reason Discord's reputation has plummeted into the abyss.
 
MorrisHatesYou said:
My pet peeve:
Users getting banned based off private discussions where they can't respond to or even see it, I know that some issues can be sensitive and not appropriate to discuss it publicly, but it's not remotely fair for the users being accused to not be able to even defend themselves.

The same goes for appeals.
Click to expand...
Yeah, but at a certain point, the "private discussions," are people literally just advocating for genocide unprovoked.
 
Those private windows are ultimately just a glimpse into what a person is actually like beyond the confines of having to adhere to this site's standards; When somebody is homophobic or racist on Discord, that's a far better way to gauge what kind of person they are than what they say and do here, so if we wouldn't allow that sort of behavior on-site, why would we allow it off-site?

That aside, it's remarkably easy to not be a fucking bigot in private conversations. I may be even more of a jackass on Discord than I am on here, but I'm still not casually throwing out slurs or anything (not the ones I can't reclaim, anyways).
 
SlendVeny said:
Yeah, but at a certain point, the "private discussions," are people literally just advocating for genocide unprovoked.
Click to expand...
Is that really relevant if the same behaviour isn't shown on the wiki ? I mean, in a few cases it is. But yeah.
 
MorrisHatesYou said:
My pet peeve:
Users getting banned based off private discussions where they can't respond to or even see it, I know that some issues can be sensitive and not appropriate to discuss it publicly, but it's not remotely fair for the users being accused to not be able to even defend themselves.

The same goes for appeals.
Click to expand...
Depends on the severity of it tbh. Take my recent report of Reio35 for example. Quite frankly, the fact that he was unable to defend himself is of no consequence to me because I’m not interested in seeing how someone defends bigotry or even calls for genocide
 
Vzearr said:
Is that really relevant if the same behaviour isn't shown on the wiki ? I mean, in a few cases it is. But yeah.
Click to expand...
As someone who is trans and used to be active a big reason for me not being on the site is because as of late a lot of bigoted behavior has kinda just been allowed to fester, as well as people who get away with said bigoted behavior simply because they were offsite and their buddies "vouch" for them going "ermmm it was a joke guys!".

I think if a person fundamentally believes in something harmful despite displaying this behavior off site, they still have the same views and are still harmful, thus they shouldn't be allowed in spaces like this which are supposed to be "safe". Simple as that.
 
SlendVeny said:
Yes. I feel like having people like that on the site makes us all look bad, and having someone who literally advocates to kill a not-insignificant portion of users is not good, actually.
Click to expand...
Looks bad to who? Some dude on discord and his friends? Alot of these messages are being tolerated in the servers they are being sent in, otherwise those people would be banned and have their messages deleted instantly, so if they're being tolerated in the servers they're being sent in, why would the people of that server give a hoot about a racist dudes background on vsbw. I can also assure you 99 percent of people aren't looking at a dudes wiki account to see if he got banned for what he said in a discord server.
CurrySenpai said:
I think if a person fundamentally believes in something harmful despite displaying this behavior off site, they still have the same views and are still harmful, thus they shouldn't be allowed in spaces like this which are supposed to be "safe". Simple as that.
Click to expand...
The thing is their harmful behaviour offsite doesn't actually effect things on-site so the site would still be a "safe" space, even though its far from it lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
  • Locked
Wiki Destabilization Discussion Thread
Replies
7
Views
1K
Sir_Ovens
Sir_Ovens
ThePrimalHunter
FC/OC vs Joke Battles Wiki Matches
Replies
1
Views
2K
H3110l12345I20
H3110l12345I20
Rikimarox2
Lightning is the Only Way General Discussion
Replies
31
Views
1K
Rikimarox2
Rikimarox2
HonestlyBored24
What is the most Powerscaling piece of fiction you’ve ever seen?
3 4 5
Replies
194
Views
20K
Mahek_The_Assassin_Silent_Killer
AKM sama
New Staff Promotions
2
Replies
70
Views
8K
DarkDragonMedeus
DarkDragonMedeus
Back
Top