- 68
- 9
Here's what I'm trying to explain:I don’t get your points here
Non servant characters just get assigned classes based on what fits them the most in FGO, pretty sure they’re called “Saint Graph Designations”
Even characters that don’t possess any saint graph at all like luminary Arcueid, and Arcueid herself have “classes” (I’m not talking about the mooncancer from FGO)
When Nasu answers questions about Shiki in an interview, what we clearly see in the scan you sent is that we can't understand which Shiki Nasu is talking about. Because as a fanbase and as we've seen in the novels, there are cases where we identify the Void Shiki as the root or []. And if we ignore the possibility that Nasu is a senile person who forgets his own writings, we have 2 situations regarding the refutations (half of which are false) reflected in the profile:
Case 1 is that the Shiki Nasu is referring to is Void, and we can't address this case because Nasu clearly states in the interview that he wants to maintain consistency between the two series. And if the Shiki was the Void, then the two series would contradict each other because the Void exists in a basically indescribable and nameless form, and Nasu refers to it as having a name. And the other contradiction is that the Shiki in that singularity being Void can be recorded on the heroic throne where the true selves of the heroic souls reside, and this is impossible because to record the Void Shiki on the throne would inherently disrupt the very structure of the throne itself, it would be akin to placing the Root on the Throne, and this is also impossible because of their metaphysical position and ontological differences.
Case 2 is that the Shiki in question is Saber, not Void, which is the most appropriate case that would not create contradictions between the series, as Nasu wanted. The Throne of Heroes keeps a physically better version of it, because if the Void is active, the Throne itself will be broken, as I mentioned in the first case, and in order not to break it, the Calyvorence style only activates Omniscience. And in Saber's profile it says that the parameters are invalid if [] is active, which would create a contradiction in case it's Void Shiki. So the Shiki mentioned in the interview must be referring to Saber and Assassin because Nasu stated that he was trying to be consistent. The Saber Shiki is just a record of the Void Shiki on the Throne of Heroes. I mentioned one of the examples of the Saint Graph for ORT in my articles above. It is completely wrong to say that an entity that is the root itself, even through the Saint Graph, can also be FGO, as if equating it to ORT or Arcueid.
Last edited: