• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Versus Match-ups Addition Requests Thread 12

Status
Not open for further replies.
It can't even be in grace at 6-8 though. Not how that works.
 
Needs a 3 vote difference. Incon results without votes for incon almost never happens.
 
@Wok no it doesn't. If you reached 7 votes, and there's no 3 vote difference, it's deemed inconclusice.
 
Wok is right. That match would still be active, you need a vote or two to even it out.
 
For a verdict, there must be at least seven votes in favor of one character/team, with a minimum difference of three votes.

If both sides have equivalent posts with constructive arguments, the thread shall be deemed inconclusive.

I always took this to mean that when there isn't a three vote difference and the arguments are constructive, then it becomes inconclusive after a grace period.
 
I took that to mean that if a conclusion can't be reached in general. it seems to be shifting to one side, unless the thread has been dead for awhile I say wait a bit.
 
Wokistan said:
It can't even be in grace at 6-8 though. Not how that works.
Click to expand...
Yeah it kinda is how that works, it'll just go into inconclusive do to being conflicted. It only gets out of grace when it tips 3 votes over to one side over another
 
The only time I can think of that ever happening was goku vs vegeta, which ran out of space in the thread and ended up with like 20 something votes for each. Pretty sure it doesn't go into grace without the vote gap.
 
    • For a verdict, there must be at least seven votes in favor of one character/team, with a minimum difference of three votes. Some examples:
      • A final vote tally of 6-0 will be considered invalid.
      • A final vote tally of 7-0 will be considered valid.
      • A final vote tally of 7-4 will be considered valid.
      • A final vote tally of 7-5 will be considered invalid.
    • If both sides have equivalent posts with constructive arguments, the thread shall be deemed inconclusive.
That last part is the most important in this situation.
 
@Wok Ichigo vs Saitama ended in inconclusive back when he was still planet level. and that's only for the fact that there was no 3 vote gap. and both characters exceeded 7 votes.
 
"For a verdict, there must be at least seven votes in favor of one character/team, with a minimum difference of three votes."

It doesn't ever get to the verdict determining point without this. Incon without incon voting isn't really a thing that happens often.
 
Wokistan said:
"For a verdict, there must be at least seven votes in favor of one character/team, with a minimum difference of three votes."
It doesn't ever get to the verdict determining point without this. Incon without incon voting isn't really a thing that happens often.
Click to expand...
No, that means that if there isn't a three vote difference the battle will be deemed inconclusive
 
DMUA said:
Often.

Now, does 6-8 happen often?
Click to expand...
Far more than incon without a vote for that result. Threads like that generally just aren't considered finish.
 
The reasoning behind the Inconclusive votes was nullified by info that came up after.

Your vote was also an FRA, to a guy who later changed his vote to Chuck Norris. So yeah.
 
Not how it works. Mewtwo vs Doom (which should be removed because the latter stomps now) had me and Matt vote inconclusive after a long period of debating who wins between each other. Then a bunch of people voted Doom FRA for Matt's reasons. If the dude above thought the reasons were enough for incon, that's still gonna be a vote for incon.
 
ZacharyGrossman273 said:
Wait, so will bill vs chuck be added as inconclusive or chuck winning?
Click to expand...
It's gonna be added as Chuck winning in 24 hours

That said the thread should be re opened till time's up
 
MrKingOfNegativity said:
The reasoning behind the Inconclusive votes was nullified by info that came up after.

Your vote was also an FRA, to a guy who later changed his vote to Chuck Norris. So yeah.
Click to expand...
No it wasnt. I gave my own reason again
 
Luke Merod said:
Jason Voorhees beat Michael Myers 7-0
(Undead Jason Vs Thorn Michael and Speed was equalized)

https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2210940
Click to expand...
Added to both profiles. Also, if the profiles in question are unlocked, please add them yourself in the future. It does state in the OP to kindly do this, as it removes a bit of the bulk from the thread for adding profiles that could've been added by anyone. You should try to only request matches be added here if one or both of the profiles are locked, and add them yourself when you can.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

AThe1412
Can you restrict a character's Standard Equipment if it gives them a different tier?
Replies
2
Views
550
TheGreatJedi13
TheGreatJedi13
Keeweed
SBA change that should have happened forever ago (stopping the hyper active murder man)
Replies
8
Views
1K
Keeweed
Keeweed
Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
32 33 34
Replies
1K
Views
99K
Homie890
Planck69
  • Locked
Touhou Thread Rule Removal
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
Planck69
Planck69
ArachDusa
Versus matches for weapons?
Replies
5
Views
1K
XSOULOFCINDERX
XSOULOFCINDERX
Back
Top