Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A lot of the GoW profiles need a complete overhaul. That CRT is just part 1 of the job. We've got 5 more minutes left before they kick into overdrive.Once the CRT concludes, Freya will have a oneshot worthy power advantage and that's not even getting into her skill and experience, versatility and the fact that her profile still needs an overhaul.
This is a stomp.
what makes Persephone inferior to Hermes or something.Youch. This is a visible stomp in favor of Valkyrie Freya. Way more hax, far more battle-hardened, stays higher up in the scaling chain, while Persephone is not even comparable to lower-rung Olympians even.
Basically because of the fact that they double-crossed her into staying in an eternal 6-month-stay period at Elysium after a certain... situation with her.what makes Persephone inferior to Hermes or something.
What if I changed it from Persephone to Gaia?Youch. This is a visible stomp in favor of Valkyrie Freya. Way more hax, far more battle-hardened, stays higher up in the scaling chain, while Persephone is not even comparable to lower-rung Olympians even.
That's even worseWhat if I changed it from Persephone to Gaia?
I just looked at her profile, man,Gaia scales below Poseidon. Like, I dunno how even you are with a dude that tears holes through you.
Ok then, I'll change it to Freya vs Thor (if they'd actually fought in the game that would have been cool).Fair, honestly. They're very close in power even if Freya edges ahead a bit.
She's a slight bit weaker but has a massive hax advantage and versatility advantage, and just being a better fighter overall.How is freya as strong as thor? I though thor was the strongest (AP) in gow ragnarok?
Kratos soundly defeats a bloodlusted Thor, albeit while putting most of his effort into it. Freya is about even with Kratos.How is freya as strong as thor? I though thor was the strongest (AP) in gow ragnarok?
Didn't thor fight kratos and was the toughest opponent he fought?She's a slight bit weaker but has a massive hax advantage and versatility advantage, and just being a better fighter overall.
Kratos only had the edge because his axe had missletoe and was able to land a crucial hit to thor at the start. Thor is supposed to be one of the strongest maybe the strongest foe in ragnarok. Freya is no where near bloodlusted kratosKratos soundly defeats a bloodlusted Thor, albeit while putting most of his effort into it. Freya is about even with Kratos.
LMAO what? Did you even read the notes on the profile?Didn't thor fight kratos and was the toughest opponent he fought?
LMFAO what cope is this. Kratos was soundly handing Thor's ass to him in the rematch and Mimir straight up told him not to lose control like he did with Heimdall.Kratos only had the edge because his axe had missletoe and was able to land a crucial hit to thor at the start. Thor is supposed to be one of the strongest maybe the strongest foe in ragnarok
No. There is literally a note on the profiles about this.Didn't thor fight kratos and was the toughest opponent he fought?
What are you on about? He held back, Thor says so himself. The second time they fight had both of them giving their all and Thor was mollywoped.Kratos only had the edge because his axe had missletoe and was able to land a crucial hit to thor at the start. Thor is supposed to be one of the strongest maybe the strongest foe in ragnarok. Freya is no where near bloodlusted kratos
Oh IdkNo. There is literally a note on the profiles about this.
He did hold back but thor was also weakned because kratos injured him at the start with the misletoe or whatever the thing that keeps gods fromm regenaratingWhat are you on about? He held back, Thor says so himself. The second time they fight had both of them giving their all
And what do you mean "mistletoe"?
NopeLMAO what? Did you even read the notes on the profile?
Thor literally send kratos flying several times and killed/knocked him out in their first fight. Kratos was holding back his strenght not his durability.LMFAO what cope is this. Kratos was soundly handing Thor's ass to him in the rematch and Mimir straight up told him not to lose control like he did with Heimdall.
I was talking about when he sliced thors belly with the misletoe (His axe was covered in the world serpents spit which is the reason thor was weaker)His Axe has Eitr, but it doesn't weaken Thor, the Axe on its own is completely useless if you're not strong enough to utilize it to begin with, and Kratos with the BoC was literally overpowering his Mjolnir.
I didn't even play the game I am not rich enough thanks for showing that off.I am legit starting to think peeps haven't played the same game as us.
Dude, no need to take things literally lol. Cool downI didn't even play the game I am not rich enough thanks for showing that off.
Its the truth the game is so expensive lol.Dude, no need to take things literally lol. Cool down
LMFAO whatOh Idk
He did hold back but thor was also weakned because kratos injured him at the start with the misletoe or whatever the thing that keeps gods fromm regenarating
Coolio, explain Kratos tanking that shit in the Rematch like a champ then. Or Spartan Rage Kratos literally causing Mjolnir to bounce off of him.Thor literally send kratos flying several times and killed/knocked him out in their first fight. Kratos was holding back his strenght not his durability.
Eitr, not mistletoe, they aren't the same. There is no evidence that either of them reduces stats, burden of proof is on you to show that.I was talking about when he sliced thors belly with the misletoe (His axe was covered in the world serpents spit which is the reason thor was weaker)
Oh I didn't know anyways I meant the spit or whateverLMFAO what
Mistletoe is Baldur, it negated the curse, it didn't weaken anyone.
Also that argument makes no goddamn sense because Thor's best feat is after he gets that belly gash and Kratos soundly whups his ass. You're literally just pulling headcanon out of thin air.
so kratos was somehow holding back his own durability which doesnt make any sense?Coolio, explain Kratos tanking that shit in the Rematch like a champ then.
They were holding back in the first fight massively so, Thor mocks Kratos and calls him a "lesser version" consistently here, he doesn't even have the BoC on him. That's kind of the reason why that fight's completely unusable for scaling, and when Kratos did give in, he rocked Thor's shit and knocked out his teeth, Thor literally got a taste and then he ****** off.
Not mistletoe but that doesnt change a injured person is gonna be weaker than a non injured person. Thats common senseEitr, not mistletoe, they aren't the same. There is no evidence that either of them reduces stats, burden of proof is on you to show that.
Except it does, Rage literally increases his dura a **** ton and hurls him closer to his true Godkiller self. Why else would Thor be mocking him for holding back?Oh I didn't know anyways I meant the spit or whatever
so kratos was somehow holding back his own durability which doesnt make any sense?
That's not how any of this works. If anything, it's the opposite here. Thor literally gives ****-all about having his organs blown out by Draupnir in the rematch and only gets further enraged.Not mistletoe but that doesnt change a injured person is gonna be weaker than a non injured person. Thats common sense
Which proves that Thor is stronger than a non raged kratos. Since kratos cannot lower his durability but can amp it with rage.Except it does, Rage literally increases his dura a **** ton and hurls him closer to his true Godkiller self. Why else would Thor be mocking him for holding back?
Still doesn't change the fact that he was fighting kratos with a giant cut on his belly.That's not how any of this works. If anything, it's the opposite here. Thor literally gives ****-all about having his organs blown out by Draupnir in the rematch and only gets further enraged.
It's never stated to do anything in the games.Oh I didn't know anyways I meant the spit or whatever
You do realize that while Kratos is stronger, it's not to the point of stonewalling everything Thor does right? You can be 3 times stronger than someone and they can still kill you if you fight carelessly or hold back and that's far larger gap than what exists between Thor and Kratos.so kratos was somehow holding back his own durability which doesnt make any sense?
Except Thor never implies that he's weakened by the poison. Nothing changes about his performance in the game nor is Eitr mentioned.Not mistletoe but that doesnt change a injured person is gonna be weaker than a non injured person. Thats common sense
Obviously its not but it is hinted and literally the game wouldnt make sense if it wasn't like that.It's never stated to do anything in the games.
When you are fighting someone you are 3 times stronger than and get your ass knocked out/killed thats a problemYou do realize that while Kratos is stronger, it's not to the point of stonewalling everything Thor does right? You can be 3 times stronger than someone and they can still kill you if you fight carelessly or hold back and that's far larger gap than what exists between Thor and Kratos.
He is literally cut. He is injured. Injured = Weaker. Thats itExcept Thor never implies that he's weakened by the poison. Nothing changes about his performance in the game nor is Eitr mentioned.
"Injure = Knocking someone out/Killing someone" Nice logicSeriously, this is so asinine.
"Alice is stronger than Bob to a degree."
"But how come Bob could injure Alice? Checkmate.:
He can do both when he slacks out or willingly tones down his usage of magic. His strength does not come from his body, but they're both honed by discipline, in his own words.Which proves that Thor is stronger than a non raged kratos. Since kratos cannot lower his durability but can amp it with rage.
And? Burden of proof is on you to show that it weakened him. He literally has Immortality Type 2 for a reason.Still doesn't change the fact that he was fighting kratos with a giant cut on his belly.
Immo 2 doesn't mean you don't get weaker when you are injured.And? Burden of proof is on you to show that it weakened him. He literally has Immortality Type 2 for a reason.
It's not.Obviously its not but it is hinted and literally the game wouldnt make sense if it wasn't like that.
Only when you ignore the goddamn context behind the fight.When you are fighting someone you are 3 times stronger than and get your ass knocked out/killed thats a problem
Nah bruh, that ain't it chief. That ain't how God of War works.He is literally cut. He is injured. Injured = Weaker. Thats it
Way to ignore the entire context of the fight I guess. Good thing we have the note on the profiles."Injure = Knocking someone out/Killing someone" Nice logic
In his case that's not true. Nothing compares to the Draupnir Assault or the Blades of Chaos being shoved into his abdomen, that axe blow with poison? That's nothing compared to having his organs blown the **** up.Immo 2 doesn't mean you don't get weaker when you are injured.
We don't give things abilities "cause hints". Prove it or move on. That simple.Obviously its not but it is hinted and literally the game wouldnt make sense if it wasn't like that.
If I hold back, no it isn't. And Kratos and Thor aren't that far apart at all.When you are fighting someone you are 3 times stronger than and get your ass knocked out/killed thats a problem
No, it isn't the case. There are many, many cases where it doesn't matter. Hades chief among them.He is literally cut. He is injured. Injured = Weaker. Thats it
....Yes, you can kill someone you're comparable to if they're weakened. Do you think this is Dragon Ball where having slightly higher power makes you invulnerable to weaker blows?"Injure = Knocking someone out/Killing someone" Nice logic