Undertale verse is just 2-B, not 2-C

[The_King_of_Prudence]

Something increasing non-stop, endlessly, would still only be 2-B. Because no matter how many times it happens, since it starts as a finite number and increases at a finite rate, it will never be infinite. So, no, that's not evidence for 2-A at all.

But the code has no limits to how many you can make, and since doing so doesn't change anything gameplay-wise, the cosmology presumably has enough 5-space to accommodate for them.

 

[StrymULTRA]

But the code has no limits to how many you can make, and since doing so doesn't change anything gameplay-wise, the cosmology presumably has enough 5-space to accommodate for them.

This would be just Ad Infiniutum, and Undertale isn't the case

 

[The_King_of_Prudence]

Again I am saying, as it will definitely never stop, the cosmology is already that large, just mostly empty. Chara is implied to have destroyed the whole thing, which would include that empty space.

 

[DarkGrath]

Are you trying to say that literal empty space can be counted as it's own universe? And that it would take the physical force of a universe to destroy space which is not there?

I'll be blunt, we literally never evaluate cosmologies like that. A cosmology in tier 2 is defined by the amount of universes it is shown to contain. Nothing even remotely implies there being infinite universes, and even with the whole "empty space" thing, it would still need to actually physically demonstrate having infinite universes to be 2-A. Otherwise, every character who is scaled from "endlessly increasing universes with no end" would be 2-A, and it isn't. That's always, across all characters, considered 2-B.

 

[The_King_of_Prudence]

Not as a universe, but as a 5-D component of a multiverse. Actually, Altair (Re:Creators) was only low 2-C for it.

 

[StrymULTRA]

wut

 

[The_King_of_Prudence]

Fixed.

 

[Camper340]

Agree about this one FRA.