- 12,485
- 16,853
My apologies, but we need to follow our standards even for characters that we really like.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My apologies, but we need to follow our standards even for characters that we really like.![]()
Need this closed then?Y'all better not wait for me because after what Ant said, I immediately lost interest on this thread entirely, and I make Phoenks words mine.
Can someone get Super genius by scaling to someone who is?Look, as the full quote regarding our Supergenius requirements quite clearly shows, there should be a combination of reality-warping versatility and literally infinite power in order to qualify.
Goku is different from Celestials.. in the sense that The Celestials are Higher D and BDE in terms of existence and power, while Goku is only Low 1-C based on AP.For example, if an inventor's only claim to fame is to create a gun that can hurt the Low 1-C game version of Goku, that should not qualify.
Wouldn't this be sufficient enough to warrant Super genius?"And in-verse, the gap between him and Reed or Doom has always been treated as fairly small. And here, "Lord Thor" also says that his technology was nearly a match for Asgardian wizardry. Him singling out Iron Man when talking about massive threats to his reign, even when other characters like Scarlet Witch and Doctor Strange attacked him, feels significant."
Preferably not, especially given the enormous inconsistencies and conflicting writer biases or uninformed evaluations by them in Marvel Comics. We have our standards and they have theirs, and we scale from actual feats, versatility, and power output.Can someone get Super genius by scaling to someone who is?
Yes, but I used an example for that one trick pony attack potency scale alone is not remotely sufficient to qualify.Goku is different from Celestials.. in the sense that The Celestials are Higher D and BDE in terms of existence and power, while Goku is only Low 1-C based on AP.
No, those are just opinions, not proven feats of accomplishment.Wouldn't this be sufficient enough to warrant Super genius?
I guess that more or less discounts the Celestial Hulkbuster, since that was a hollowed out corpse that he stole from Knull. Same for the Phoenix buster since he had outside help (granted I don't remember that part of the story)I am seeing some confusion on the qualifiers here so Imma just leave this here and y'all can decide:
I put the key points being argued here in bold. From the looks of it, you do need to show versatility on top of sheer AP. Neutral for now.
Also I would like to know if Tony made those armors from scratch since that seems to be a requirement too.
Valid points.I guess that more or less discounts the Celestial Hulkbuster, since that was a hollowed out corpse that he stole from Knull. Same for the Phoenix buster since he had outside help (granted I don't remember that part of the story)
As for the eScape, what are our standards for virtual realities being considered real universes? Should they have a proper space-time continuum to count? Because otherwise the eScape is not a real universe but a rather complex VR.
I agree with this for now. Though I am skeptical that in all these years, Tony didn't accumulate enough scans for versatility.I think at best Tony's Tier 1 armors are good as supporting evidence for Supergenius, same with the Thor statement I provided. I am curious about the eScape though.
Right now, I think "At least Extraordinary Genius, likely Supergenius" would be best. The stories certainly imply that he is intended to be on almost the same level as Reed and Doom, but he hasn't shown enough direct stuff to warrant a solid rating based on this wiki's standards.
Thorbuster was made using a magical energy source given to him by Thor. Celestial Hulkbuster was reverse-engineered. Godkiller Mk2 and Phoenix Buster were made from scratch I think, but Phoenix Buster was collaborative with Hank Pym.I agree with this for now. Though I am skeptical that in all these years, Tony didn't accumulate enough scans for versatility.
About the tier 1 armors. Were they made from scratch? Or did Tony reverse engineer tier 1 equipment. Making them from scratch is clearly stated as a requirement.
So I guess Godkiller Mk2 is the best option since all the others had some sort of advantage. But it makes me curious, is Godkiller Mk2 a derivative of Godkiller Mk1? If so, was Godkiller Mk1 tier 1 and made from scratch?Thorbuster was made using a magical energy source given to him by Thor. Celestial Hulkbuster was reverse-engineered. Godkiller Mk2 and Phoenix Buster were made from scratch I think, but Phoenix Buster was collaborative with Hank Pym.
What I said here still applies.Look, as the full quote regarding our Supergenius requirements quite clearly shows, there should be a combination of reality-warping versatility and literally infinite power in order to qualify. For example, if an inventor's only claim to fame is to create a gun that can hurt the Low 1-C game version of Goku, that should not qualify.
Personal accusations, agitation, and hostility towards me are misdirected and unnecessary here. Currently I think that Tony qualifies for either "At least Extraordinary Genius, possibly Supergenius" or "At least Extraordinary Genius, likely Supergenius", but to achieve a certain Supergenius rating somebody needs to prove that he is extremely versatile in terms of his types of inventions, preferably by listing several good examples here. I am not unreasonable in that regard.![]()
You glaze consistency but the moment it goes against your agenda every writer who got that consistency going is now biased and hyperbolic?I think that the statements of Tony being close to Reed are biased hyperbolic nonsense from specific writers, much like the Moon Girl issue of forcibly suddenly declaring that she is the smartest character ever without remotely showing the feats to prove it as far as I am aware.
Between the fact Tony has made things capable of blasting apart tier 1s, reversed engineered a tier 1 body, HDE and all, and has repeated statesmates of being comparable(but inferior) to someone who is not low in Supergenius, I'd say it's fine to let Tony qualify. He'd be low-end SG to be sure though, because he does have one specialty, just so happens he's amazing at it.That is not my intention. I just believe that we should go by actual feats considerably more than random statements from writers who are usually not sufficiently informed in this area to make a proper call about it, especislly given that supergenius is such an extreme and specific statistic.![]()
Like... 90% of Fantastic's feats on his profile are engineering though? And the rest aren't even SG things? Like, having a PHD in every field imaginable is EG, and several of those feats are SI stuff.The problem is that he has demonstrated sufficient scale for supergenius, but not sufficient versatility/variation, so I think it would set a bad precedent to give him a straight supergenius rating, rather than "At least Extraordinary Genius, likely Supergenius".![]()
Reed makes a lot more diverse shit than Tony, but he's still just making shit and considered more intelligent than everyone else is.Isn't Reed Richards far more diverse and also more extreme in his feats throughout his long history than Tony Stark is? At least I strongly have that impression.![]()
Sure as shit ain't gonna be me, I got more verses to worry about than a project for a verse I don't even really consume content from, because trust me, that would turn into a full profile rework and I have much worse profiles than Reed's barebones self to worry about. Especially when I'd have to put a scrollbox on his damn AP section.Well, his feats section should preferably be greatly expanded in that case, given that we have partially ranked him as a supergenius due to remembering unmentioned feats.
Does the Marvel Comics wiki have any page that lists his various inventions?![]()
In lack of better options and seeing like the thread creator doesn't seem interested to keep pursuing this, should be fine.Thank you. Should we apply "At least Extraordinary Genius, likely Supergenius" then?![]()
Has this been applied yet?Thank you. Should we apply "At least Extraordinary Genius, likely Supergenius" then?![]()
I can do it. Can you unlock the profile?Has this been applied yet?![]()
Done.I have handled it. Tell me here when you are done.
![]()
Iron Man (Marvel Comics)
Iron Man, or Tony Stark, is the main hero of a comic by the same name. Stark: an inventive genius, industrialist, and multi-billionaire, went to Vietnam to oversee a field test for one of his transistorized weapons, that his company Stark Industries made. While there he accidentally stepped on a...vsbattles.fandom.com