- 3
- 2
As you all know, at the apex of Tier High 1-A+ we find characters that embody the framework of every logically possible world, and, in a verse that follows classical logic, those characters are completely unsurpassable for anything that isn't Tier 0 by virtue of embodying everything, so every other character and power are just part of them, which makes sense. However, we all know that there are plenty of verses that aren't "restricted" to classical logic, so I have a few questions:
1) In non-logical cosmologies, a part of a structure can somehow have more power/control than the system as a whole, for example: In Marvel Comics the Infinity Gauntlet's power surpasses that of universal Eternity despite being a part of him. So, what's stopping something like this to happen to a High 1-A+ character in verses where classical logic isn't the ground of everything?
2)If a verse states that the sum of all possible worlds is just a tiny part of the cosmology, and also show characters that surpasses it, would those characters be tiered at High 1-A+ despite being beyond the very definition of what that tier represents? Or would the statement be invalidated despite the fact that classical logic isn't the ground of everything on that hypothetical verse?
1) In non-logical cosmologies, a part of a structure can somehow have more power/control than the system as a whole, for example: In Marvel Comics the Infinity Gauntlet's power surpasses that of universal Eternity despite being a part of him. So, what's stopping something like this to happen to a High 1-A+ character in verses where classical logic isn't the ground of everything?
2)If a verse states that the sum of all possible worlds is just a tiny part of the cosmology, and also show characters that surpasses it, would those characters be tiered at High 1-A+ despite being beyond the very definition of what that tier represents? Or would the statement be invalidated despite the fact that classical logic isn't the ground of everything on that hypothetical verse?
