Tier 10 Revisions

[BluudyManikin777]

This isn’t a revision of the the Tiers 10-C to 10-A (sometimes 9-C) themselves, but rather some of the characters who are rated as such

I feel like some of the characters put within this tier are there because of what they look like, or their statements regarding what they are. I don’t exactly know how to explain it, but here are some examples
A character being rated 10-C because she’s a little girl/boy
A character being rated 10-B because of them being depicted as average
A character being rated 10-A because they are athletes, or fairly trained fighters
A character being 9-C because they are extremely trained fighters, or depicted as the peak of humans that have been shown within said series

The reason I think these are unprofessional reasons to give straight forward ratings is because of averages being different throughout fiction. It’s entirely possible for an average person to be 9-B, 5-B, hell even Low 2-C if someone ever went that far. Ratings around 10-C to 9-C that are given to characters because of how they look, or statements regarding their skill, should be rated as likely/possibly instead of being given straight up ratings

 

[Da_Lunge_Fish]

An average person is average human unless specified otherwise, same with little children.

 

[BluudyManikin777]

An average person is average human unless specified otherwise, same with little children.

Isn’t that name fallacy though? There’s a joule range that comes with it. There are little children that are actually capable of producing 10-B amounts of force, and rarely 10-A amounts of force

 

[Da_Lunge_Fish]

Isn’t that name fallacy though? There’s a joule range that comes with it. There are little children that are actually capable of producing 10-B amounts of force, and rarely 10-A amounts of force

With full charge maybe, but we count just plain punches for tiers. With something like a body tackle an average human could produce street levels of energy

 

[BluudyManikin777]

With full charge maybe, but we count just plain punches for tiers. With something like a body tackle an average human could produce street levels of energy

Even so, there can be different averages throughout fiction. Average doesn’t generally mean 10-B. It is far safer to put them at a likely rating rather than a straight up rating

 

[Planck69]

If the work in question gives us no reason to assume they might be higher or lower then I don't know why we need to assume as such.

 

[Bernkastelll]

The reason I think these are unprofessional reasons to give straight forward ratings is because of averages being different throughout fiction. It’s entirely possible for an average person to be 9-B, 5-B, hell even Low 2-C if someone ever went that far. Ratings around 10-C to 9-C that are given to characters because of how they look, or statements regarding their skill, should be rated as likely/possibly instead of being given straight up ratings

but when this happen, we put them on their right tiers like 5-B or some crap, but if nothing was stated, there is no reason to assume that a little kid is higher than 10-C.

 

[BluudyManikin777]

Well, I just think the ratings for such reasons stated in the op’s examples are vague, and shouldn’t give said character a solid rating, but rather a likely rating

 

[Planck69]

Why? We know the AP range a human child, average adult or trained athlete would land in. If we're told they're one of those then we know what tier to put them in.

 

[BluudyManikin777]

Why? We know the AP range a human child, average adult or trained athlete would land in. If we're told they're one of those then we know what tier to put them in.

There are children out there who can produce 10-B amounts of power, and untrained adults that can produce 10-A amounts of power. There are characters that just because they destroy a building, they aren’t building level because of that. Things need to be accounted for such as distance from the structure, the size, where it was hit and so on

 

[Bernkastelll]

Well, I just think the ratings for such reasons stated in the op’s examples are vague, and shouldn’t give said character a solid rating, but rather a likely rating

why exactly ''likely''? there is no reason to assume that a little kid is higher than 10-C unless stated otherwise

Shiro (No Game No Life)

Shiro (白, Shiro) is an 11-year-old genius NEET (Not in Education, Employment, or Training), hikikomori (shut-in) gamer who, along with her brother, Sora, form 『　　』Kuuhaku. She is the main female protagonist of No Game No Life, and the calm and calculative half of the siblings. Tier: 10-C Name...

vsbattles.fandom.com

Maria Ushiromiya

The Witch of Origins, who will live for one thousand years in the future. She holds the motherly magical power to give birth to one (1) from the Sea of Zero. At a glance, this magical power is frail, but no matter how many times you multiply zero (0), it doesn't become anything but zero. It is...

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[Bernkastelll]

There are children out there who can produce 10-B amounts of power, and untrained adults that can produce 10-A amounts of power. There are characters that just because they destroy a building, they aren’t building level because of that. Things need to be accounted for such as distance from the structure, the size, where it was hit and so on

So, these kids are 10-B/10-A, they are, however, if its not stated. there is no reason to assume that a little kid is higher than 10-C

 

[Planck69]

There are children out there who can produce 10-B amounts of power, and untrained adults that can produce 10-A amounts of power. There are characters that just because they destroy a building, they aren’t building level because of that. Things need to be accounted for such as distance from the structure, the size, where it was hit and so on

Children can be 10-B, it depends on their age and an adult can simply be physically fit. Even assuming these are 7-9 year olds that can punch as hard as adults, they'd be exceptions, not the rule.

 

[BluudyManikin777]

Okay, I understand. This thread can be closed now

 

[Planck69]

I'll close the thread then.