The Remote Revision.

[GHG4589]

In this wiki

Stated that the game use the footage from TV series.

So, I think that Ben 10 show in this game is just like the imitate version of the main continunity of Ben 10, which have 26 higher-dimensions. And the Remote destroyed all cartoon network's show, including Ben 10 show.

I think the Remote should be 1-B, as he is destroyed everything in Ben 10 show, including higher-dimension.

 

[GHG4589]

bump.

 

[Antvasima]

I do not know if any higher dimensions were mentioned in conjunction, or if only the regular universe/setting was involved. Your reasoning seems to rely on too much speculation.

 

[The_2nd_Existential_Seed]

In conjunction if the crossover includes EVERYTHING in verse, it's somewhat possible, especially considering he views everything in-verse (Ben 10) as nothing more than a television show it can destroy. I believe he should scale to Ben's Ultimate Transformations though .

 

[Antvasima]

Well, it seems too hard to gauge properly. Perhaps unknown statistics would be best.

 

[The_2nd_Existential_Seed]

Makes sense. I'll watch a walk though of yte game to see for sure..

 

[NoMoreTalking]

Well, how about "Unknown. Likely 2-C possibly 1-B"?

Since we have no proof that this game's includes EVERYTHING in Ben 10 verse but, we also have no proof that this game does not includes EVERYTHING in verse either.

 

[Antvasima]

I suppose that suggestion should be fine.

 

[NoMoreTalking]

Okay who's gonna edit them?

 

[Antvasima]

You can do so if you wish.

 

[NoMoreTalking]

Okay, you can unlock the page.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Tell me here when you are done.

 

[NoMoreTalking]

Okay.

 

[NoMoreTalking]

All done. You can check the page and lock them now.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay.

 

[Antvasima]

I have fixed the edits. The page seems fine now. I will close this thread.

 

[ArbitraryNumbers]

I'd like to open this back up and point out that NoMoreTalking seems to be using the Burden of Proof fallacy.

The default belief is to not believe in something unless there is evidence to support it. "There's no proof that it doesn't" is logic that could be applied to anything. Unless there's anything suggesting that the remote controls all of the shows and everything that canonically resides within them, there's no reason to assume it can.

I think "Unknown, At least 2-C" is reasonable enough.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Should I open the page for you to edit?

 

[The_2nd_Existential_Seed]

I forgot about that fallacy. AN makes sense.

 

[ArbitraryNumbers]

Yes. I'll make the revision later.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Tell me here when you are done.

 

[NoMoreTalking]

I'm okay with "At least 2-C"

 

[ArbitraryNumbers]

I've made the revision.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Thanks. I will close this thread again then.